Come on, this is a hyperbole fallacy.So if I posted an image (do paintings count) of Louis XVI mid-guillotine would it be punishable under this law?
So if I posted an image (do paintings count) of Louis XVI mid-guillotine would it be punishable under this law?
The fact that US politics are a hyperbole circus full of lies where fallacy and treason makes you win doesn't mean that it's the same everywhere.would a leftist member of the EU parliament lose their immunity for retweeting graphic holocaust photos?
She would be banned on this forum the first day, the EU Parliament will not protect a Nazi from prosecution.Fuck free speech, I hope we start enforcing the Communist Control Act again.
Wouldn't this empower her and her deranged followers thinking the establishment is out to get her? It is almost election time, not a good move by the EU Parliament.
Wouldn't this empower her and her deranged followers thinking the establishment is out to get her? It is almost election time, not a good move by the EU Parliament.
WOULD THEY?
LaPen is garbage but that's a shitty reason and terrible law.
Looks like they're just trying to find something.
MEP immunity is waived consistently.
Parliamentary immunity exists to protect against politically motivated prosecution, not for anything else.
It will be voted on as well: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?reference=2017/2021(IMM)&l=en (not much info)Unfortunatly it's only for this case, she still has her immuty for other cases like the alleged fictional job contract for aide.
I'm sorry, are you suggesting immigrant and refugee groups belong to ISIS?
So some groups are or were? Explain that again.Some are or were, yes, absolutely.
Disseminating the recording of such images is punishable by five years' imprisonment and a fine of 75,000 euros.
Jesus. And people are trying to make free speech look stupid.
Jesus. And people are trying to make free speech look stupid.
They're being used as an excuse to support bigotry against ISIS. There may or may not be some overlap between the two groups.
they could see it like that surely, but she broke the law. There is no arguing about it and she now gets prosecuted.
3 years sounds crazy but that would probably be more linked to having fabricated the images oneself.
Still, the schafenfreude in this made my day. Fuck her.
Btw, what was it that some of her aides were under investigation that she's not going to testify before the elections?
just so i understand, you're not allowed to post violent images on twitter.....and going against that means the EU can prosectute? isn't that completely against freedom of speech?
Any of you going to explain why or nah?This.
It's more like a safeguard to deter countries from unduly meddling with MEPs, and thus, by extension, the European Parliament.However how does this immunity thing work then if it can be revoked ? Like what's the point ?
I posted a Google link on the last page that links to these things. They explain in detail how it works. But basically it is to ensure that nobody can be sued for what they have as political opinions.If this has been done before as seems to be the case acc to posters including for things like speeding tickets I'm fine . If this were a complete one off I may have had more questions.
However how does this immunity thing work then if it can be revoked ? Like what's the point ? Isn't immunity supposed to be like immunity ? Or is this revoked under very special conditions (eg request by judges / eu vote as in this case ?) obviously the second part is more rethorical/ a technical point but I'm wording if immunity can be revoked easily why offer it ? Or I guess maybe rename it conditional immunity ? Eu political types can maybe shed some light on how this works in most cases ? Or is the law to protect persecution in the persons non native eu country eg french mep being immune to prosecution in Germany ?
Some people are really surprised that in some countries snuff media is not covered by freedom of speech, huh?
Thank you for posting this. Makes far more sense now.