• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Marvel Cinematic Universe |OT2| Discussion on released and future projects (spoilers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Personally I feel there should be limitations, nothing against your threads Neoxon but I'd rather see some variety than just one person monopolizing all the OTs for a series of films. Or at least more of a community input since everyone here is buddy-buddy. But that's a discussion for another thread.
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
Personally I feel there should be limitations, nothing against your threads Neoxon but I'd rather see some variety than just one person monopolizing all the OTs for a series of films. Or at least more of a community input since everyone here is buddy-buddy. But that's a discussion for another thread.
Fair enough, maybe we can coordinate 2017 here so we'll be ready once reservations for 2017 open up.

I was planning on covering GotG2 with Quick as per usual (if he's cool with it), while Droid has Ragnarök. If anyone wants Black Panther, go ahead & speak up (of course, I'll take responsibility if nobody wants to).
 
I think all of MCU GAF should give input in all the OTs, like info, images, style and photoshopping. We can also have a fair system where whoever hasn't posted one before and wants to do one can do so. So, if Pai Pai or GAMEPROFF want to post an OT, go ahead. It'll be fun!
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
I think all of MCU GAF should give input in all the OTs, like info, images, style and photoshopping. We can also have a fair system where whoever hasn't posted one before and wants to do one can do so. So, if Pai Pai or GAMEPROFF want to post an OT, go ahead. It'll be fun!
You mean like make it a collaborative effort between all of MCU-GAF? I'm usually the one who gathers information, in which Quick executes them with a fancy-looking graphic.
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
Alright, we can try to set this reform for 2017 onwards. So far we have...

2017
- GotG2 - Neoxon & Quick
- Thor: Ragnarök - Droid
- Black Panther: ?

2018
- Avengers: Infinity War (Both Parts) - Neoxon & Quick (extends to 2019)
- Captain Marvel - ?
- Inhumans - ?
 

duckroll

Member
There's no need to force participation. I think that those who want to contribute already do. I just wanted to clear up that we don't want to be like judges for a foot race. This is stuff the community should work together on for fun and everyone is happy.
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
There's no need to force participation. I think that those who want to contribute already do. I just wanted to clear up that we don't want to be like judges for a foot race. This is stuff the community should work together on for fun and everyone is happy.
Fair enough, so the likes of myself, Quick, & Droid already contribute enough?
 
There's no need to force participation. I think that those who want to contribute already do. I just wanted to clear up that we don't want to be like judges for a foot race. This is stuff the community should work together on for fun and everyone is happy.
Of course, no force (hey, a rhyme!). Anyone who wants to contribute in any way should he able to do so, that is what I was trying to get at :p

Also: I think that having certain users locked for a film isn't a good idea. Since there's years before this stuff gets posted, we can just have whoever wants to contribute do their bit along the way.

OTs really are srs bsns, haha.
 

duckroll

Member
Fair enough, so the likes of myself, Quick, & Droid already contribute enough?

I don't think there's anything wrong with the current structure. Other than people constantly making fun of you for making 9000000000000 Marvel threads anyway. :)

There's been a lot of collaboration, no one in MCU-GAF is really seriously upset or being left out. I just wanted to clarify our position because I really dislike it when people start arguing about racing to make threads "first". That sort of attitude is really bad in general, because I think everyone benefits from having better threads rather than faster threads.
 
"Basically you're gonna get Avengers 2.5"

I'm getting a bit worried about just how much stuff they're trying to fit in this movie.

Actually, as someone who's more worried about how much AoU is trying to cram into itself (the twins and possible inhumans stuff about them, wakanda, hydra, ultron, possible asgard business), I'm sort of relieved to have Civil War function as a bit of a pressure valve on AoU. If anything, I expect to Civil War to be the more focused of the two while maintaining a fairly serious ensemble cast.
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
Actually, as someone who's more worried about how much AoU is trying to cram into itself (the twins and possible inhumans stuff about them, wakanda, hydra, ultron, possible asgard business), I'm sort of relieved to have Civil War function as a bit of a pressure valve on AoU. If anything, I expect to Civil War to be the more focused of the two while maintaining a fairly serious ensemble cast.
I thought Feige said about a million times that the Twins won't be Inhumans.
 

Quick

Banned
Alright, we can try to set this reform for 2017 onwards. So far we have...

2017
- GotG2 - Neoxon & Quick
- Thor: Ragnarök - Droid
- Black Panther: ?

2018
- Avengers: Infinity War (Both Parts) - Neoxon & Quick (extends to 2019)
- Captain Marvel - ?
- Inhumans - ?

I'll do all the OTs. Marvel baby!
 

IntelliHeath

As in "Heathcliff"
I don't think there's anything wrong with the current structure. Other than people constantly making fun of you for making 9000000000000 Marvel threads anyway. :)

There's been a lot of collaboration, no one in MCU-GAF is really seriously upset or being left out. I just wanted to clarify our position because I really dislike it when people start arguing about racing to make threads "first". That sort of attitude is really bad in general, because I think everyone benefits from having better threads rather than faster threads.

Yep, It was funny that some people gave him hard time about it because he actually make a fast thread without any contents so he can be first to make thread for Avengers Age of Ultron Trailer.
 
So Clark Gregg is saying that the Inhumans in SHIELD are basically mutants. Perhaps these Inhumans don't fit with either Attilan or Human society.

Yeah I saw this yesterday.

All along S.H.I.E.L.D. has kind of been about protecting people from what they don't know about, which often means people who are on the index -- people who have powers because they've been kind of mutated or given powers by technology or Hydra or various alien artifacts. Inhumans represents a different chapter.

At least in the comics, the Inhumans, they're a race of people who've been transformed. They're mutants, more or less. I've always loved that part of the comics.

I believe he's just trying to convey what Inhumans are and not necessarily commenting on story direction.

Unless your referring to the where the mid season break ends with
What seems to be a "cabal" of bad(?) Inhumans( the no eyes guy/whoevere he was on the phone to)
than I believe they will be separate to The Inhumans movie and be entirely dealt with on the show, Maybe getting a passing reference if anything.
That said, If It were to have any impact on the movie i believe that It would be through Sky (very unlikely) and only then in the sense of her character development.
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
Just decided to go Tumblr surfing, & I found what most of Tumblr is touting as their favorite potential Richard Rider actor.

Troy Baker
 

Gartooth

Member
Nova would be one of the easiest heroes to get in the MCU since a lot of the threads are already there. All that is necessary is coming up with an explanation of the Nova force since it wasn't really in GotG. (maybe a suit based on the technology in their ships?) From there come up with a reason why Rhomann Dey is at Earth and there we go. I don't think any of the Phase 3 movies are going to bother introducing him, and Guardians would be the best fit anyway since he has a connection with a lot of the team but it won't happen.

On another note, does anyone hope that post Phase 3 MCU has multiple Avengers teams? Right now that particular franchise is being treated as the "comic book event" of the MCU. I think it would be interesting to see a movie starring the smaller characters that don't hold their own franchise as a way to develop them outside of main Avengers films. That seems to be a common complaint anyway with Hawkeye being the biggest example.
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
Nova would be one of the easiest heroes to get in the MCU since a lot of the threads are already there. All that is necessary is coming up with an explanation of the Nova force since it wasn't really in GotG. (maybe a suit based on the technology in their ships?) From there come up with a reason why Rhomann Dey is at Earth and there we go. I don't think any of the Phase 3 movies are going to bother introducing him, and Guardians would be the best fit anyway since he has a connection with a lot of the team but it won't happen.
Or they could try to reenforce their ships' energy with the energy of the Power Stone to engineer the Nova Force.
 

Gartooth

Member
Or they could try to reenforce their ships' energy with the energy of the Power Stone to engineer the Nova Force.

I thought that too. However, we have no idea what will become of the Power Stone post-Infinity War and having Nova's power linked to the stone might throw a wrench in having him around since he would be entirely dependent on it. Also there is the visual difference of the Nova force being orange and Power being the purple Infinity Stone. (minor, but I feel that the colors are important elements of both things)
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
I thought that too. However, we have no idea what will become of the Power Stone post-Infinity War and having Nova's power linked to the stone might throw a wrench in having him around since he would be entirely dependent on it. Also there is the visual difference of the Nova force being orange and Power being the purple Infinity Stone. (minor, but I feel that the colors are important elements of both things)
The Nova Force has also been depicted as blue. But yeah, it's more commonly orange.
 
On another note, does anyone hope that post Phase 3 MCU has multiple Avengers teams? Right now that particular franchise is being treated as the "comic book event" of the MCU. I think it would be interesting to see a movie starring the smaller characters that don't hold their own franchise as a way to develop them outside of main Avengers films. That seems to be a common complaint anyway with Hawkeye being the biggest example.
I wonder about things such as this, clearly they can sign teams of heroes and it does work. Hopefully this is what will happen and perhaps the films are merely named after that team's leader (Black Panther, for instance).
 

Gartooth

Member
I wonder about things such as this, clearly they can sign teams of heroes and it does work. Hopefully this is what will happen and perhaps the films are merely named after that team's leader (Black Panther, for instance).

They're kind of doing that with Cap 3 I imagine. Although they could start dabbling into names such as West Coast Avengers, New Avengers, Secret Avengers, etc.
 
They're kind of doing that with Cap 3 I imagine. Although they could start dabbling into names such as West Coast Avengers, New Avengers, Secret Avengers, etc.
That may be too confusing for a general audience, I fear. Though maybe that could be seen as patronizing, the naming hardly matters as it's clear that your average cinema-goer knows that these films are already heavily connected.

Do you think that if they were named Secret/New/West Coast it could contribute to franchise fatigue? Maybe give the impression that the movies don't have new and/or interesting features to them which is almost undoubtedly why people were so drawn to Guardians.
 
That may be too confusing for a general audience, I fear. Though maybe that could be seen as patronizing, the naming hardly matters as it's clear that your average cinema-goer knows that these films are already heavily connected.

Do you think that if they were named Secret/New/West Coast it could contribute to franchise fatigue? Maybe give the impression that the movies don't have new and/or interesting features to them which is almost undoubtedly why people were so drawn to Guardians.

Yes. I think that's exactly why we have GotG and why there are plans for The Defenders. Teams or rather groups of heroes that are functionally similar to The Avengers while skirting brand fatigue.
 

Gartooth

Member
That may be too confusing for a general audience, I fear. Though maybe that could be seen as patronizing, the naming hardly matters as it's clear that your average cinema-goer knows that these films are already heavily connected.

Do you think that if they were named Secret/New/West Coast it could contribute to franchise fatigue? Maybe give the impression that the movies don't have new and/or interesting features to them which is almost undoubtedly why people were so drawn to Guardians.

Probably the biggest draw to these movies is seeing the superheroes themselves, so I think that if they keep the characters fresh by changing rosters and adding new blood, audiences wouldn't really be fatigued by the "Avengers" name on its own. (more likely too many superhero movies in general) If however we did see a huge influx of Avengers films, I wouldn't be surprised if the titles for the events shifted to naming conventions for comic book events. (Ex: Avengers: Age of Ultron would become just Age of Ultron, or Avengers: Infinity War would just become Marvel's Infinity War)
 
Yes. I think that's exactly why we have GotG and why there are plans for The Defenders. Teams or rather groups of heroes that are functionally similar to The Avengers while skirting brand fatigue.
I guess this could be part of the idea behind The Inhumans then anyone who is a... mutated human? Can be whacked in there and, like The Avengers, the name outlives individual team members.

Probably the biggest draw to these movies is seeing the superheroes themselves, so I think that if they keep the characters fresh by changing rosters and adding new blood, audiences wouldn't really be fatigued by the "Avengers" name on its own. (more likely too many superhero movies in general) If however we did see a huge influx of Avengers films, I wouldn't be surprised if the titles for the events shifted to naming conventions for comic book events. (Ex: Avengers: Age of Ultron would become just Age of Ultron, or Avengers: Infinity War would just become Marvel's Infinity War)
That's a very good point, hadn't thought of naming them after the events.
 

bengraven

Member
Finally watched Guardians.

Despite the huge amount of hype and love that movie gets...I still loved it to death. Re-watched it twice already. Goddamn I love me some fun space opera. Star Wars, Guardians, Riddick, Mass Effect, Deep Space 9, Battlestar remake...I wish we could get more fun space opera out there. I like having pink skinned girls from one night stands wearing old band t-shirts or hanging out in a space station that's really a giant celestial head.

We need novels like this - most sci-fi novels are so obessed with getting their sci right that they miss out on the fun.

I don't care if connects to the outside universe (though they kind of have to since SHIELD and the Guardians share a kind of mission in finding and securing the infinity gems), I would love a trilogy by James Gunn with these fuckers.

PS: okay, the Tesseract instead of Cosmic Cube, I get that, but what's the issue with using the world "gem" instead of "stone"? Really? Does some other studio own the rights to "infinity gems", like Sony or Fox, or is like the Cube in that you're worried people won't take it seriously with a name like "Gem"? The whole thing is truly outrageous.
 

Neoxon

Junior Member
xtctJqn.png


Captain America vs. Star-Lord
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom