holyax
Banned
wont believe it till I see it. all see is crowds of people with dog masks when i go outsideI dont get it, do you have to see for yourself when they actualy die?
What kind of proof are you looking for?
wont believe it till I see it. all see is crowds of people with dog masks when i go outsideI dont get it, do you have to see for yourself when they actualy die?
What kind of proof are you looking for?
Correlation doesn’t equal causation. I’m not against old people because of their age, but because people having no respect for social norms and thinking they deserve things just happen to be old. Guess what, if the whole world cuddles you like you do with old people it makes you think the whole world owes you.Ahhh fuck you, you ageist.
They were told to stfu and sit tight for 15 months. You try doing that. Try not seeing your family and going to do the things you love for 15 months. It’s fucking prison and you know it. These aren’t radical anti maskers. These are people that understand the risks. And they have common sense. They know there can be ways to safely let people in and out. But just like most nursing homes, the workers are too lazy to figure it out.Correlation doesn’t equal causation. I’m not against old people because of their age, but because people having no respect for social norms and thinking they deserve things just happen to be old. Guess what, if the whole world cuddles you like you do with old people it makes you think the whole world owes you.
Fortunately in the case I mentioned yesterday the Conseil d’Etat told vaccinated old people to stfu and sit tight with the rest of the population.
Do you believe WWII took place?wont believe it till I see it.
i do, because i had relatives who were in it.Do you believe WWII took place?
When I get Covid I get fever for 2 days and that’s it. When grandma gets Covid she ends in ICU and because there are too many old people there my kids cannot go to childcare for 3 weeks. How TF is this fair? You are putting my kids at risk, my job at risk to protect old fart that had a full life and will die within the next 5-10 years anyway?It boils down to worldview. Mine is built on giving people a choice and letting old people live out their lives they way they want. Quality of end of life verses quantity.
Dont you have any relatives working in a hospital then?i do, because i had relatives who were in it.
I just can’t compete with the amount of bigotry you got going on here. I’m done.When I get Covid I get fever for 2 days and that’s it. When grandma gets Covid she ends in ICU and because there are too many old people there my kids cannot go to childcare for 3 weeks. How TF is this fair? You are putting my kids at risk, my job at risk to protect old fart that had a full life and will die within the next 5-10 years anyway?
Agreed, let’s talk when you get kids and get off your high horse.I just can’t compete with the amount of bigotry you got going on here. I’m done.
Here is a suggestion - Go* to any general hospital and ask the staff if you are allowed to see terminally ill covid-19 patients fighting for their lives and losing it because of the collapse of the lungs. There is your proof.is there any proof the coronavirus is dangerous outside the mass media outlets? I havent seen anyone die of it
You know the world is bigger than just the plain view outside, right? You don't go to the hospital, because there is nothing wrong with you, or with your relatives.wont believe it till I see it. all see is crowds of people with dog masks when i go outside
So it takes a relative for you before you start believing that the virus is a thing and exists.i do, because i had relatives who were in it.
Agreed, let’s talk when you get kids and get off your high horse.
How do you know they aren't lying?i do, because i had relatives who were in it.
is there any proof the coronavirus is dangerous outside the mass media outlets? I havent seen anyone die of it
This shit is like Russian roulette. One friend, who is obese and has asthma had just a mild flu. Another friend, in his early thirties, with no comorbidities that I know of, is in the ICU.
“Reasonable lockdowns” is an oxymoron.This has nothing at all to do with Russian roulette, but with the fact that the real state of health of a person is not always the one that is known.
The main reason why the death rate increases with age is exactly the same reason why hardly any younger people die. Studies and statistics are very clear about this. If you are under 40 and really healthy (neither overweight nor coronary disease), you will not die. This is statistically and factually almost impossible.
Despite all this, I am in favor of reasonable lockdowns. People who are surprised about low numbers and lockdowns do not understand that the numbers are so low because of such restrictions. This is not about me at all, but about the people who actually have a higher risk for severe courses or death.
As far as human rights etc. are concerned, I still see lockdowns critically, but I think they are justified because the virus is still too new for humanity and therefore it is often not really dealt with effectively.
However, the topic reflects well the world view of many people. As in politics, there are always only two sides and nothing in between.
If it were about a virus with a 50% death rate, certainly not. But it seems like some people here are only concerned with the wording. At the core, it's about rules and restrictions. Way too many people get way too attached to the word "lockdown".“Reasonable lockdowns” is an oxymoron.
In the UK we don't normally get a lot of coverage about Brazil in general, but I have seen several articles about the escalating case load in the country (along with Bolsonaro firing/losing his military chiefs, risks of impeachment etc.) And with the coverage of the third wave in Europe, I don't see how anyone could reach the conclusion that COVID is "over".CNN
MSNBC
BBC
Huffington Post
USA Today
Fox News
Al Jazeera
Slate
Reason
Out of all of those news networks, there are about a dozen articles combined this weekend reporting on COVID numbers, vaccines, or lockdowns. And more importantly, only about half of those are unique to that paper. Seriously, go look. There's almost nothing about police in the UK going into churches on Good Friday, the protests happening in Belgium. There isn't even anything about the rise of cases in Brazil. It's almost like COVID is over with.
Any thoughts on this?
In the UK we don't normally get a lot of coverage about Brazil in general, but I have seen several articles about the escalating case load in the country (along with Bolsonaro firing/losing his military chiefs, risks of impeachment etc.) And with the coverage of the third wave in Europe, I don't see how anyone could reach the conclusion that COVID is "over".
Vitamin D, and genetics will be the things that fill in the gaps of our understanding of Covid randomness. Vitamin D deficiency is a pandemic of its own right now.This shit is like Russian roulette. One friend, who is obese and has asthma had just a mild flu. Another friend, in his early thirties, with no comorbidities that I know of, is in the ICU.
i wish him the best, hope he pulls throughI have not so great news about my father tho, he went just now to the hospital. Shit. Sadly there isn't same level of meds ready for him as for me....
i wish him the best, hope he pulls through
This has nothing at all to do with Russian roulette, but with the fact that the real state of health of a person is not always the one that is known.
The main reason why the death rate increases with age is exactly the same reason why hardly any younger people die. Studies and statistics are very clear about this. If you are under 40 and really healthy (neither overweight nor coronary disease), you will not die. This is statistically and factually almost impossible.
Despite all this, I am in favor of reasonable lockdowns. People who are surprised about low numbers and lockdowns do not understand that the numbers are so low because of such restrictions. This is not about me at all, but about the people who actually have a higher risk for severe courses or death.
As far as human rights etc. are concerned, I still see lockdowns critically, but I think they are justified because the virus is still too new for humanity and therefore it is often not really dealt with effectively.
However, the topic reflects well the world view of many people. As in politics, there are always only two sides and nothing in between.
I see lockdown extremely critically since it has enormous negative consequences. Many like to tell lockdown critics, "you care more about the economy than lives" while ignoring that poverty is one of the biggest factors in deaths worldwide. Yes, government can cushion the blow temporarily with stimulus payments.(In wealthier countries). However, if a bunch of businesses shut down permanently, then of course government loses tax revenue. It's not sustainable for an extended period of time.
The more important aspect is the mental and physical impact of lockdown. In the United States,deaths from opioid abuse increased in 2020. Not surprisingly, depression, anxiety, drug and alcohol abuse increase during lockdown. Humans are social creatures. It makes sense that isolating people in their homes with strict regulations has a negative impact.
Obesity is second only to age in terms of risk factor for the virus. Yet last year, a majority of people reported that they gained between 10 and 30 pounds. Some much higher. The United States already has an obesity problem, and gaining even more weight during this pandemic where obesity is a major risk factor seems counterproductive. Perhaps shutting down gyms was a bad idea?
Finally, you have the negative aspect to children. They went months in many places with no in person school, no playing with friends, and no sports/clubs. Child psychiatrists have been warning about the immense negative consequences this has on children. Keep in mind, the virus is very little threat to that age group.
In the end it somewhat becomes an ethical dilemma. Many who are dying from the increased opioid deaths are far younger than the average age of Covid-19 deaths. Other serious diseases/conditions including cancer get fewer or delayed treatments and surgeries because of the Covid-19 focus. Which will ultimately result in more cancer deaths not far down the road. Perhaps many of them preventable if they had been diagnosed and treated earlier.
If Covid-19 were deadly to children and young adults like smallpox, polio, and Spanish flu were, then I would be in complete support of lockdown. It isn't though, and therefore I'm not convinced the pros outweigh the cons.
We were able to brush off China's success with "oh, but figures were suppressed" and "oh, but it's a dictatorship", yet there it is, the insane difference of Wulhan Virus impact on South Korea/Japan and the West.Influenza season in Japan ends with under 1/500th the number of physician visits compared to the already low previous year. Unit in the graph below are in 10,000s.
インフルエンザ、現行調査で初の流行なし 今季は例年の約1000分の1に - ライブドアニュース
例年のインフルエンザの感染者数は、国内で推定約1000万人といわれている。今季は約1000分の1で、患者報告数が流行の目安水準未満でシーズン終了に。流行入りせずシーズンを終えるのは、現行調査開始以降で初めてだというnews.livedoor.com
COVID numbers throughout the pandemic have also been relatively low in the country.
EU heel turn complete.
euronewsThe UK's medicines regulator is urging people to continue taking the AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine, despite revealing that seven people in the country have died from rare blood clots after getting the shot
We were able to brush off China's success with "oh, but figures were suppressed" and "oh, but it's a dictatorship", yet there it is, the insane difference of Wulhan Virus impact on South Korea/Japan and the West.
Why was it so different needs to be investigated and lessons need to be learned.
Good morning:
A country that exported zero dozes, while having enough jabs to cover half of its population is about to get "generous" with evil EU, that has exported half of jabs produced, while barely having enough jabs to cover 10% of the population.
It is amazing what "ex girlfriend syndrome" does to humans.
COVID Derangement Syndrome is the Double Mutant version of Trump Derangement Syndrome for the media. They know their fear porn will burn out with vaccinations so they have to scare people as much as they can in the weeks they have left.These people have no concept of what constitutes a wave. We haven't even had a third wave yet (just a prolonged 2nd wave) and these clowns are worrying about a fourth one?
And Texas cases? Things are still low after the lifting of the mask mandate.
Open Vaccinations. About 1/3 of all Texans have had at least one jab.....Its just about over in the Lone Star State. Suck it fear mongers.
With coronavirus cases continuing to decline in California as vaccinations increase, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Tuesday that the state’s economy could fully open up again as early as June 15.
The full reopening is contingent on two criteria: that California’s COVID-19 vaccine supply is sufficient for all adults who wish to receive the shot; and that hospitalization rates remain stable and low.
If those two conditions are met, in two months the state — as a whole — will be able to move into a new phase beyond the state four-tiered, color-coded system that’s been guiding reopenings for more than six months.
Once that happens, the “Blueprint for a Safer Economy” plan will essentially be scrapped. Then, every single sector listed in the system will be allowed to resume normal operations, provided they keep public health policies in place to prevent the spread of the virus. The state’s testing and contract tracing efforts will also continue.
Even conventions and other large-scale indoor events will be permitted with the requirement of testing or vaccination verification.
One measure that will remain in effect for the foreseeable future is the state’s mask mandate, which Newsom called “the most powerful and important non-pharmaceutical intervention” to curb the virus’ spread.
“We are committed to extinguishing this disease and we don’t have any short term goals as it relates to lifting the mask mandate,” he said.