My friends wife is having a baby soon. She is fully vaccinated since she got her shots awhile ago. The hospital requires a negative covid test before birth still. After the negative test she has to wear a mask through the entire childbirth.
Why?
My friends wife is having a baby soon. She is fully vaccinated since she got her shots awhile ago. The hospital requires a negative covid test before birth still. After the negative test she has to wear a mask through the entire childbirth.
Why?
Every hospital has their own policy, but at ours patients are generally only required to wear a mask when leaving their room.My friends wife is having a baby soon. She is fully vaccinated since she got her shots awhile ago. The hospital requires a negative covid test before birth still. After the negative test she has to wear a mask through the entire childbirth.
Why?
Edited
Such illnesses depend on many parameters, from air pollution, to eating habits.From this study (https://n.neurology.org/content/95/16/e2200) the numbers are more like 20 per million and was noted to be rising in the US.
Just seems hard to conclude anything when it is still within the normal range of another region, especially when this year many people's diet/habits may have changed due to lockdowns, e.g. more takeaway fast-food / less exercise / mental stress / less people take medical checks etc.Such illnesses depend on many parameters, from air pollution, to eating habits.
That's why one takes into account country specific figures.
It is just 2 per million in Germany.
But why on earth would you compare it to figures of other regions?Just seems hard to conclude anything when it is still within the normal range of another region, especially when this year many people's diet/habits may have changed due to lockdowns, e.g. more takeaway fast-food / less exercise / mental stress / less people take medical checks etc.
As a reference to what a natural rate of occurrence could be like, thereby acknowledging that there is a higher chance of making type1 errors given other factors have differed.But why on earth would you compare it to figures of other regions?
What I'd do instead, would be comparing it to the reactions to other vaccines.As a reference to what a natural rate of occurrence could be like, thereby acknowledging that there is a higher chance of making type1 errors given other factors have differed.
The world is having (what is likely) our last spring wave before it dies off to become endemic so they're actually savoring every day of Q2 loving it. Q3 and Q4 of this year they'll be having a hard time for sure though.Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine continues to be effective up to 6 months later, company says
Pfizer says its vaccine continues to be effective against COVID-19 up to six months later. Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, announced updated results Thursday from their ongoing late-stage …ktla.com
The lockdown crowd isn't going to be having a good year.
Updates from Germany on brain thrombosis cases.
2.6m doses administered (I don't know, how many were second doses).
31 cases of rare brain thrombosis. (normally happens 1-2 times a year per 1 million people)
9 dead. (Germany alone, was only 2 dead when AZ jabs were suspended for the first time)
Seems to mostly harm women under 50.
The question here is, how come UK has administered more than 20 million of AZ jabs, but hasn't detected the effect. (no, it's not happening only in Germany, out of 15 brain thrombosis deaths detected when AZ vaccination was first suspended, only 2 cases were German)
The great thing about lockdown is that it can continue on a voluntary basis indefinitely.Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine continues to be effective up to 6 months later, company says
Pfizer says its vaccine continues to be effective against COVID-19 up to six months later. Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, announced updated results Thursday from their ongoing late-stage …ktla.com
The lockdown crowd isn't going to be having a good year.
I cannot find any particular study/statistic on the German number of the thrombosis. What I found though was that 2-5 per million was actually quite common across the globe, a decade or so ago. However, more recent studies in Australia, Netherlands, US have all noted significant increase in the number of cases. I don't think Germany would be a lone exception in the west.What I'd do instead, would be comparing it to the reactions to other vaccines.
Which, by the way, are administered in higher numbers, only small fraction (thanks to AZ failing to deliver to any place, but UK) of vaccines are AZ vaccines, Germany has much higher number of people vaccinated with Pfizer-Biontech jab (and around a million of Modernas), if that was caused by lockdowns, all groups would be affected.
So now we need to dive into "it's happening with other vaccines, but is not reported" conspiracy.
This is basically being dismissive of PEI.However, more recent studies in Australia, Netherlands, US have all noted significant increase in the number of cases. I don't think Germany would be a lone exception in the west.
I'm actually quite clear about there being a notable discrepancy.Well, you are hinting on a UK conspiracy in the first place.
Thanks.
Well, bitching aside, the main part I've got out was the official UK figures for the said thrombosis.
And on bitching part:
1) There were good enough (at least for me) reasons for all the "under this age... no after that age", namely, barely any figures were available for efficacy for the respective groups in the beginning
2) Canada following suit on banning the use on the young, shows that if it is some sort of conspiracy, not only EU, but also Canada is somehow part of it
3) There is no explanation of thrombosis happening 25 times more often in Germany. I'd resort to "but more young women were vaccinated" except I doubt that is the case.
The "not enough data" is... largely about trust.
I have zero reasons not to be believe PEI.
And on his other bitching on Sputnik V (which I personally wouldn't take either, the same for J&J at this point):
EU is not pushing any of its members to do or not do something with vaccines. Each country can decide whatever the heck they want to do. I know, it contradicts what brexiters were saying, but uh oh, that's the way things are.
It feels crazy, to be honest, being some sort of jealous about freaking vaccines... Yet that's what it looks like.
This is basically being dismissive of PEI.
It also contradicts UK's stats, cough, think about that.
Nor does it explain how that doesn't happen with Pfizer (which has been administered in times higher numbers than AZ)
I'm actually quite clear about there being a notable discrepancy.
And the "UK is underreporting" vs "Germany is faking deaths" is a no-brainer choice to me.
At the same time, I do not see that as the only possible explanation.
Because people are fucked up and love controlling behavior even if it makes no sense. It’s like having that MD after your name is like some kind of police badge.My friends wife is having a baby soon. She is fully vaccinated since she got her shots awhile ago. The hospital requires a negative covid test before birth still. After the negative test she has to wear a mask through the entire childbirth.
Why?
Spoken like someone who doesn’t know any old people or would never go to a nursing home because it “smells funny”.This is going to be ruled on in France in the coming days - should vaccinated people be subject to restrictions in place to protect the population at large.
My take: fuck yes, the country burns for 12 months now to protect old and people that fucked up their health and now they are the ones to benefit from it? Talk about moral hazard.
Also, childcare closes for 3 weeks starting Monday, it’s going to be fun times working.
School vans will be used to transport the dead in São Paulo. The morgues can't keep up with the amount of people dying.
Seriously. I can't.
I was in FL for a week. Most of the tourists were from Michigan, NJ, and NY and were dying for some normal life. Blame Whitmer and Cuomo.I'm mad boys. This spike we're seeing. Driven by the younger demographics/spring break partiers. Being college age myself I know many who KNOW it is wrong and will drive spread. Who KNOW it is selfish and stupid. And STILL went to Florida anyway and I have to see snap stories of packed bars of them partying. It's a stunning level of moral bankruptcy that honestly just depresses me more than anything. We need to get vaccines out for all 18-29 year olds ASAP.
Old people already had the whole world bend over to save them, they can sit tight for a few more months. Likewise, they never took care to protect themselves more, limit contact etc. And that’s because many old people are insufferable shits much more egoistic than even the youth.Spoken like someone who doesn’t know any old people or would never go to a nursing home because it “smells funny”.
A suspected reason of the increase cited by the studies I looked up (humans probably didn't suddenly get more susceptible to cvt) is that the condition is not easily diagnosed and advanced neuroimaging analysis are needed in order to ascertain the occurrence. So there is inherently some form of survival bias on the issue.This is basically being dismissive of PEI.
It also contradicts UK's stats, cough, think about that.
Nor does it explain how that doesn't happen with Pfizer (which has been administered in times higher numbers than AZ)
I'm actually quite clear about there being a notable discrepancy.
And the "UK is underreporting" vs "Germany is faking deaths" is a no-brainer choice to me.
At the same time, I do not see that as the only possible explanation.
So the guy I work with might have got it. He got tested today, he will know the results tomorrow at the earliest.
If I've I got it from him I will start feeling sick by tomorrow at the earliest.
Lets nuke China next time, OK?
Ahhh fuck you, you ageist.Old people already had the whole world bend over to save them, they can sit tight for a few more months. Likewise, they never took care to protect themselves more, limit contact etc. And that’s because many old people are insufferable shits much more egoistic than even the youth.
I could imagine non-fatal case of such thrombosis to go undetected.A suspected reason of the increase cited by the studies I looked up (humans probably didn't suddenly get more susceptible to cvt) is that the condition is not easily diagnosed and advanced neuroimaging analysis are needed in order to ascertain the occurrence. So there is inherently some form of survival bias on the issue.
Did you have one or 2 jabs? (it's not a 100% protection for a reason though)Hmm, so I have Covid despite getting Pfizer few months back. Not sure how that happened.
Yeah 2 jabs, but I am immunity deficient and as far as I know, that could lower the effectiveness to 60%. But I should have just a mild symptoms, I can live with that.Did you have one or 2 jabs? (it's not a 100% protection for a reason though)
First dose is said to give about 80% protection, second brings it to 94% (at about 2 weeks after the vaccination)
It also supposedly softens the virus impact, in case it still gets through.
None of the vaccines are 100% preventitive to getting the virus. Most of their effect is to combat it to stop it becoming serious enough to suffer severe illness.Hmm, so I have Covid despite getting Pfizer few months back. Not sure how that happened.
I just have fever, nothing else. I monitor my oxygen saturation and I am calm, honestly so far the vaccination was way bigger shit for me.
Hmm, so I have Covid despite getting Pfizer few months back. Not sure how that happened.
I wrote as such in my next post after that : )The vaccines do not protect against getting the virus. They help protect against getting very seriously ill from the virus.
You might still get a very mild case of it. That is why it is still important to keep on with social distancing even after having gotten the vaccine, because if you are infected you could infect others with no protection.
They didn't meant undetected, by rather misdiagnosed as something else. The condition is (among the ones that got it) rather common in young woman anyway since contraceptive pills increase the rate of occurrence to something like 1,000 per million iirc.I could imagine non-fatal case of such thrombosis to go undetected.
Yet we are talking about young women dying.
That is not something that ever goes undetected.
I dont get it, do you have to see for yourself when they actualy die?is there any proof the coronavirus is dangerous outside the mass media outlets? I havent seen anyone die of it