Despite the flaws I'm still looking forward to this. ME1 wasn't perfect either and I still love that game. Sucks to hear about the story/writing, but as long as the combat and gameplay is still good, I think it'll be fine for me. I'm curious how the MP is
Reposting my reply to you because you cmae in hot:
But there's not role-playing. They removed that part. There's no narrative agency, except when it comes to silly sex scenes, it's apparenlty the only place your choices matter.
Reposting because I came in hot before the lock:
Oddly enough, while watching Jeff and Brad play (and shit on) this game for a hour I can´t help it - I´m getting hyped.
I´ll be commanding this ship soon and I´ll be flying through the galaxy to shoot up some aliens.
The setting alone will be enough for me to role-play the shit out of this.
And I´ll probably enjoy it while being disappointed that it is not better.
70-75 I'm guessing.
Where's Jim's review?
78 on PC Metacritic.
Hope rising
Reposting my reply to you because you cmae in hot:
But there's not role-playing. They removed that part. There's no narrative agency, except when it comes to silly sex scenes, it's apparenlty the only place your choices matter.
The awesome Bioware narrative agency that started with Baldur's Gate ha snow been officially relegated to a knocking boots simulator.
Gamespot said:Worse still, your agency in these conversations is limited. Sure, you can periodically select from up to four dialogue options, but these frequently boil down to "be optimistic" or "be realistic." On paper, this system improves over the rigid renegade/paragon dichotomy of the original series, but in practice, the various options felt only superficially different. And regardless of what I picked, my inputs only rarely impacted the outcome. Even when I tried to be rude, characters generally found a way to shrug it off. And after beating the campaign, I can only recall one major decision that had serious repercussions, and even that felt contrived. It also paled in comparison to the memorably gut-wrenching choices forced on me in the original games.
I feel like the difference between a 74 and a 75 is pretty big, I'd hope it doesn't tip lower.
What does Eurogamer's "no score" mean exactly? Do they usually not give out scores?
Omg. I hope all the GameStop clerks around the country at least TRY to warn people before they cash them out for this game.
Reposting my reply to you because you cmae in hot:
But there's not role-playing. They removed that part. There's no narrative agency, except when it comes to silly sex scenes, it's apparenlty the only place your choices matter.
The awesome Bioware narrative agency that started with Baldur's Gate ha snow been officially relegated to a knocking boots simulator.
They don't anymore.
I think they ditched review scores awhile back.
It's that good they cannot give it a silly number.
Eurogamer don't do numbers
They stopped giving scores 2 years ago
Yes? It means read the review like you should. The overly positive scores don't read like the score even suggest to me so instead of basing it purely off the arbitrary score, it's more effective to read them for positive and negative.
Thanks guys! I wasn't sure so I wanted some clarification. But thank you for answering!They do not. Which is one thing I like about them compared to most reviewers and their arbitrary scores that people care too much about. And I speak generally about that, not specifically in Andromeda's case.
The Witcher III released a lot longer than 4 months ago.Based on my brief reading of some blurbs, the game isn't perfect but really is suffering from releasing about 4 months too late. 2 titles have released recently that have changed expectations. The title also released 4 months too soon. There are some issues that need fixing.
Lol, that's because it excludes 18 reviews.
Quick question- can we control the ship directly this time?
Damn, son.
It seems like ultimately the "pillar" that got the most attention was the shootbang part of the gameplay, and frankly that was never why I was into Mass Effect.
Combining all previous entries, I've played the games from start to finish a combined 20+ times. I wish I was joking, but that's how much those games were part of my yearly game rotation. I explored every character arc, romance, class and difficulty I could, so from what I've seen and read I'm finding it hard to accept that people say "75 means its just for fans". I hardly care about scores, but that is not what I'm reading in the texts, using the above as an example.
What does Eurogamer's "no score" mean exactly? Do they usually not give out scores?
Yes? It means read the review like you should. The overly positive scores don't read like the score even suggest to me so instead of basing it purely off the arbitrary score, it's more effective to read them for positive and negative.
I've played through the intro twice. Once as FemRyder, trying to take it seriously, read everything, make a reasonable looking character, etc. I don't know what it is, but the voice acting just does not land for me this time. I vastly prefered FemShep, but it's the other way this time.
Last night, I started over, just fucked around in the CC and made a ridiculous looking dude, and I'm having way more fun with it. The voice acting reads far better with the male PC this time, IMO.
After playing the intro twice, I'm more into the story now and eager get into the meat of the game.
Busy with NieR.
What does Eurogamer's "no score" mean exactly? Do they usually not give out scores?
The Witcher III released a lot longer than 4 months ago.
Eurogamer don't do scores, but they have badges - "Essential", "Recommended" and "Avoid". To get no badge is the definition of mediocrity basically. (For a measurement: DAI got a recommended, Zelda got an Essential)
Oh I get it. Thanks! It makes more sense now.there's more to it than that
"no score" means the reviewer didn't consider it to be "essential" (like zelda) or "recommended" (like nier automata)
basically, means they think it's pretty mediocre
To those who said ''oh come on, a 7 is bad now?''
7 might be alright overall, but it is incredibly bad for a Mass Effect game.
Take a look at the series' track record:
Mass Effect - Best metascore 91 on Xbox 360
Mass Effect 2 - Best metascore 94 on Xbox 360
Mass Effect 3 - Best metasocre 93 on Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3
Mass Effect Anderomeda - Best metascore 78 on PC
You'd be crazy to say that fans shouldn't be angry or disappointed about this.
Can you imagine if The Last of Us 2 got an 80 on metacritic? Surely it's not a ''bad'' score but that's just disappointing.
Unless you can do this it's not a 'fun game'
![]()
![]()
excuse to post those GIFs as they always make me laugh
Sad to hear about femshep VA.
Nah, I know what you meant. Was just making a joke. I think everybody expected a lot more from BioWare after The Witcher III. At least most other big releases this year have lived up to or beyond expectations.I'm saying that the recent releases have scores that make the meta for this look even worse. Witcher definitely changed expectations for the genre. Should have been more clear about which expectations I meant