after the acquisition of Cod ...i heard from sony fans that Sony have at least 3 or 4 AAA competitive fps gaas in production
Someone please photoshop Todd Howard in a hot tubTrue, might have been a response to Bathesda though.
I mean Ms paid 70b for Activision. Clearly money isn't the problemthey can, don't fool yourself.
why do people think Sony is poor or something, Capcom and Square are not worth that much.
It's still a matter of whether a company wants to sell, you can't just buy them cause you want to.
When you rival spends $70 BillonWhen did we go wrong when we lol at 3b?
Its an old saying. He also wasnt saying it to hint at who if you watch the vid.That's interesting. I didn't knew they teased that outside of saying it'd make sense.
On topic, there's an achievement in RE5 called "It takes two to tango". Is Jeff hinting at Sony buying Capcom? That would be a great grab
It Takes Two to Tango achievement in Resident Evil 5
How to unlock the It Takes Two to Tango achievement in Resident Evil 5: Chain a 40-defeated combo in Team Slayers. This achievement is worth 15 Gamerscore.www.trueachievements.com
Seen how destiny gone i have my high doubt that Bungie of today is what it was 10 years ago. Best of the best lmao. That hyperboleLots of hand waiving about the developer who made Xbox what it is
Its called having the best of the best developers on board. Quite simple. Bungies next IP will be another GOTY calibre title which you can only enjoy on Playstation or PC a few years later
I didnt say Sony was poor. The problem is people don't realize that Microsft is one the richest companies in the world. They have more money then entire nations in various parts of the world.
Sony isn't poor but they have 10's of billions dollars to throw down at the drop of dime. Thye can't afford to take those kinds of risk. People need to stop jumping to extremes
What is the point of acquiring EA? Their cash cow is FIFA which is a licensed IP.
Yeah gotta laugh. They are one of an elite group of FPS devs alongside Respawn and 343i but the automatic raising of status overnight to best of the best is pretty funny. And I’m willing to bet money that I’ve put more time in to Bungie’s Halo games and Destiny 1 than 99% of people on here.Seen how destiny gone i have my high doubt that Bungie of today is what it was 10 years ago. Best of the best lmao. That hyperbole
If i remember it right...Sony said when the current fiscal year started that they were planning to spend at least 18b dollars in acquisitions.Before we talk about acquisitions how much money do Sony have left after the Bungie purchase?
Please fucking no.I’m more worried about Nintendo buying Capcom
Square OR Capcom probably .. EA, T2 or in that range are out of questionIt'd take them less than 2 years to make back the money on Square or Capcom.
They can afford it
for the entire company, therefore it also serves other divisions in case, and they planned to span it in 3 years (not that an acceleration cannot be accessed obviously) the total on hands capital (discovered by bank movements) m & a was 24b before the acquisitionIf i remember it right...Sony said when the current fiscal year started that they were planning to spend at least 18b dollars in acquisitions.
So, worst case scenario we can count on plenty more acquisitions. Not everything is worth over a 1b dollars.
Just a reminder that Bungie acquisition is the biggest Sony acquisition ever in videogames. So i'd say with the market changing so rapidly, those 18b could change for something else. It was also Sony's biggest acquisition this past 12 months. (even outside of their videogame division)
I still chuckle at posts like this.It was an attempt to counter Microsoft spending 7 billion on Zenimax and 79 billion on Activision, buy spending 3 billion on Bungie, not so sure this will help them, as it only highlights how mismatched they are in spending terms, I get they do need a replacement for COD, but not sure Bungie is the answer to this, but at least it's a response.
Rare to come across a bit logic in these types of threads.Come on OP…. grow up a bit, lad.
It was a business acquisition, designed to improve Sony’s content output, and thereby increase profits.
Sony are a company, not a kid in the playground, trying to stand up to the bully.
A lot of you seem obsessed with this idea that Sony and Microsoft operate on some confrontational level like they’re WWE wrestlers.
They’re both making business and financial decisions they feel will create the most income, and the competition between the two is purely based around that metric. They don’t make these acquisitions in order to get one over on the other guys.
Before we talk about acquisitions how much money do Sony have left after the Bungie purchase?
So it was 18bn over three years across all of entertainment. They had spent 1.5bn on an Indian cable network or something (Zee entertainment) . Obviously got the 3.6bn in the Bungie deal. I think the other deals are also included in this FY but not 100% sure.If i remember it right...Sony said when the current fiscal year started that they were planning to spend at least 18b dollars in acquisitions.
So, worst case scenario we can count on plenty more acquisitions. Not everything is worth over a 1b dollars.
Take Two just spent 12b dollars in a single acquisition a few weeks ago. That company is much smaller than Sony. If Sony feels like spending more than that will work for their strategy, they can.Square OR Capcom probably .. EA, T2 or in that range are out of question
for the entire company, therefore it also serves other divisions in case, and they planned to span it in 3 years (not that an acceleration cannot be accessed obviously) the total on hands capital (discovered by bank movements) m & a was 24b before the acquisition
Square OR Capcom probably .. EA, T2 or in that range are out of question
for the entire company, therefore it also serves other divisions in case, and they planned to span it in 3 years (not that an acceleration cannot be accessed obviously) the total on hands capital (discovered by bank movements) m & a was 24b before the acquisition
Square + Enix
But then Sony forgets to put their grasses on and everything goes wong.
Then Square leaves Sony and becomes SquareSoft again. Enix does the same.
Both become based again and return to making games for glorious nippon only.
They literally excluded every Sony fan of Bethesda games, including some of the biggest rpg franchises out there.A lot of people seem to think these acquisitions are bad and will lead to more and more exclusives. I think the exact opposite. Both Sony and MS will have made large investments they need to make back, and they just cut off a large part of the fanbase. They both need the user base that's on the other console considering how expensive games are to develop now. So I think it's inevitable that in one way or another, people will get access to both Sony and MS games regardless of which console they own. Of course, it would have to be a collaborative effort but I see both as having more to win than to lose, especially when the PC gets all the games by default. It won't happen soon, maybe not even this decade. But we'll get there.
m & a was 24b before the acquisition
How do you guys manage to fit your identity politics into every thread?If I could direct Sony or Microsoft's acquisitions funds, I'd spend a couple of billions to prospect studios in Poland, China, maybe Japan, or any place where the main concern is still creativity and not promoting diversity & inclusion. American studios may still have valuable IP, but most are at a dead end in terms of creativity and suffering an exodus of talent.
Poor no money Sony isn't done...and sounds like something is happening soon apparently.
This industry is giving me a heart attack this year. If i vanish, you know why.
edit: The article where that comes from:
Source
Kadokawa fits with Sonys broader Anime growthThey own FromSoft like the whole company they also own alot of anime stuff and a few other studios and pachinko if anyone wants to buy FromSoft they would have to buy up the whole company. To keep it short they arent selling
"But this has changed very recently. Again, using the excellent Macrotrends website, we can see that Sony deposited around $24B this summer. Some people seem to believe that this is because a large acquisition is in motion, this isn’t true. This is essentially Sony taking from their “Cash on Hand” to essentially create their first M&A Focused budget.Where are you getting this budget from?
"
But this has changed very recently. Again, using the excellent Macrotrends website, we can see that Sony deposited around $24B this summer. Some people seem to believe that this is because a large acquisition is in motion, this isn’t true. This is essentially Sony taking from their “Cash on Hand” to essentially create their first M&A Focused budget.
Data were taken from Macrotrends.net
In other words, instead of them going on a case-by-case basis for acquisitions, each segment now has a dedicated budget for M&A. This is kinda alluded at by Sony Pictures President, Tony Vinciquerra, in which he said the following..."
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/26/sony-strategic-investments-gaming-entertainment-subscriptions.htmlIt's not probably. It would take them 1 year, maybe more, to make that money
Obviously, I'm not talking about EA or T2. They can make a $50B acquisition though if that's what they felt they needed to do