MGS3 doesn't retcon's MGS2's mystery about the Patriots, but it does retcon other established facts from previous games. The series kept retconning itself as it went on. https://metalgear.fandom.com/wiki/RetconCorrect me if I'm wrong, but MGS2 ended with the twist that all of the Patriots listed had been dead for over 100 years, therefore leaving the mystery of the Patriots' identities open. So when MGS3 tells its story, what is it directly rewriting? To my memory, nothing.
A retcon is retroactive continuity, i.e. changing established fact. But MGS2 didn't establish anything for MGS3 to change, they just found a list of names - the Philosophers. Intentional misdirection by a top secret group. 3 fills in gaps, not changes things.
Again, I'm happy to be corrected if I'm wrong
MGS1/2 on GOG have fan patches, but I don't think they're perfect by any means as with many from that era.Its great, it doesnt have the best story in the franchise or the best cinematics or the best gameplay, but it does have the best overall package which is important too.
I guess if they remake MGS1 i will like it better, but for now its probably the best MGS game, i'd rate it and MGS1 the same though, its just that MGS1 aged worse than MGS3.
I dont think its the pinnacle of stealth gaming though, i prefer Hitman, Chaos Theory and Thief over it, but it does have a very "Solid" overall package and very memorable cast of characters which makes it stand out in the genre.
I played it long time ago on the Playstation, im thinking if there's a good version on PC nowadays but it looks there's none except the emulation and i dont know how it performs there, which is unfortunate, this series is buried and could use some reviving, a good remaster and port to Steam will breath a new life inside it. Or an actual remake like Resident Evil series.
All the great 00s games are getting remakes, this better be on the table, or at least a freaking remaster. Can Kojima do something or its all Konami now?
He has a name. Fatman.MGS2 had a fat dude on roller skates…
Oh I know. I'm just describing the fact that MGS has always been weird and it didn't start with 3.He has a name. Fatman.
He has a name. Fatman.
Wow. My brain completely blocked this from existence. I forgot all about it.We don't talk about survive though.
If memory serves me correctly... (warning spoilers to anyone who doesn't want to know... but seriously it's been 20 years lol)Correct me if I'm wrong, but MGS2 ended with the twist that all of the Patriots listed had been dead for over 100 years, therefore leaving the mystery of the Patriots' identities open. So when MGS3 tells its story, what is it directly rewriting? To my memory, nothing.
A retcon is retroactive continuity, i.e. changing established fact. But MGS2 didn't establish anything for MGS3 to change, they just found a list of names - the Philosophers. Intentional misdirection by a top secret group. 3 fills in gaps, not changes things.
Again, I'm happy to be corrected if I'm wrong
To me that sounds like Otacon's great find actually being a red herring, then the mystery remaining a mystery until it's no longer a mystery in the next chronological game where the answer is revealed for the first time. If nothing is changed, then where's the retcon?If memory serves me correctly... (warning spoilers to anyone who doesn't want to know... but seriously it's been 20 years lol)
So as you say at the end of mgs2 it's revealed the patriots are already dead 100 years. When mgs 3 rolled around it wasn't the patriots but the philsophers and they weren't dead several decades. Volgin is after the philsophers legacy, they are split blah blah.
Come mgs4 , we learn that the patriots we first heard about in mgs2 actually consisted of your support team in mgs3 - they form after the events of mgs3 - Never is the fact they were supposedly dead 100 years ever mentioned again after mgs2 ending.
Sadly Kojima did retcon.
I like that list, but I have issues with it. If an alleged retcon ever mentions things like "Presumed dead", it's not a goddamn motherfucking retcon. What's the rule about dead people in fiction? If you didn't see a body, they aren't officially dead. If you see a body and the next game says what you saw didn't actually happen, that's a retcon. If a game says "I dunno he's probably dead lol" then he shows up in the next game, that's a continuation of a character's story.MGS3 doesn't retcon's MGS2's mystery about the Patriots, but it does retcon other established facts from previous games. The series kept retconning itself as it went on. https://metalgear.fandom.com/wiki/Retcon
I understand, I was leaning into it by pointing out the obscurity that the fat guy is literally named "Fatman".Oh I know. I'm just describing the fact that MGS has always been weird and it didn't start with 3.
If memory serves me correctly... (warning spoilers to anyone who doesn't want to know... but seriously it's been 20 years lol)
So as you say at the end of mgs2 it's revealed the patriots are already dead 100 years. When mgs 3 rolled around it wasn't the patriots but the philsophers and they weren't dead several decades. Volgin is after the philsophers legacy, they are split blah blah.
Come mgs4 , we learn that the patriots we first heard about in mgs2 actually consisted of your support team in mgs3 - they form after the events of mgs3 - Never is the fact they were supposedly dead 100 years ever mentioned again after mgs2 ending.
Sadly Kojima did retcon.
If memory serves me correctly... (warning spoilers to anyone who doesn't want to know... but seriously it's been 20 years lol)
So as you say at the end of mgs2 it's revealed the patriots are already dead 100 years. When mgs 3 rolled around it wasn't the patriots but the philsophers and they weren't dead several decades. Volgin is after the philsophers legacy, they are split blah blah.
Come mgs4 , we learn that the patriots we first heard about in mgs2 actually consisted of your support team in mgs3 - they form after the events of mgs3 - Never is the fact they were supposedly dead 100 years ever mentioned again after mgs2 ending.
Sadly Kojima did retcon.
It's fine to think it wasn't retconned. It's just opinion.To me that sounds like Otacon's great find actually being a red herring, then the mystery remaining a mystery until it's no longer a mystery in the next chronological game where the answer is revealed for the first time. If nothing is changed, then where's the retcon?
MGS2 itself tells us the information acquired isn't accurate in the game it's introduced in, so the list of names was always intended to be a dud. That's the twist ending, and twist endings aren't retcons. People may not like how the story plays out, but quality has no say in the matter.
I remember playing through MGS2 and being blown away by it, this was before MGS4 came out. I was like "no way MGS3 can beat that".. and it was like, the same level of quality. Two 10/10 games right in a row and I can't say which is better.MGS2 slaps harder....
I don't have an issue with you so I hope you don't take it as such, but it if a word has a definition there's no opinion to be had. The name itself is short retroactive continuity, i.e. changing the past. If there's no difference between "It was planned to be this way" and "There probably a plan that changed", then it's not a retcon because there's not anything that was set in stone then changed.It's fine to think it wasn't retconned. It's just opinion.
My opinion is it was. That Kojima had a direction with the patriots in mgs2 but changed that direction in mgs3 and 4.
I would be interested to know what exactly Kojima thought of way in advance because to me it feels like he pivoted alot and tried to match things.
You're probably right, it's been a while since I've played them too. Either way, my point is narratively the story took a huge turn with regards to how I thought then Patriots was going to play out and I thought it sucked and was lazy.Its been awhile since I've played through the series but pretty sure it was MGS4 that retconned Paramedic and Signit, not MGS3
Best boss fights of any game ever. Among my top ten video games I have ever played. The more I played through it, the more it blossomed. From beginning to end it never fell flat, only got better. A gaming masterpiece.Best in the series, by far.
Peak PS2 game in fact. The boss fights were amazing.
MGS4 is when the series lost me. Trying to explain too much, too concerned with deep lore and wrapping up every story line.Its all stupid, for example, Para Medic was retconned into a woman, she ends up being Dr. Clark. But MG from 8-bit era was ofcourse never written with continuity in mind.
About the Patriots, in fact, the list of names were of the original founders of the Philosophers (these were high ranking officials from China, Russia and US formed after the Great War). These can be seen as the original Patriots as its their legacy thats being acquired by Big Boss and with it the MGS3 crew starts up the Patriots.
The mistake Hideo made is actually explaining the patriots to such lengths in MGS4. They could leave it at MGS3, with the philosophers being the original, and leave it open from there.
Personally I can't really say I was blown away by MGS2...and it was a bit of a drag to complete it...and it wouldn't be a title I would go back to either...where as MGS 3 when I was watching the video walkthroughs prior to their HD release I thought this game looks cool, subsequently I did end up getting it ...but why MGS-1 and 4 have never been part of ANY collection is surprising..
Konami straight up fumbling easy money. All they gotta do is remaster or remake their games.It's sacrilege that all 5 games aren't in some super collection for all 3 platforms.
Konami dumb