"Where we diverged with the CMA was on remedies. We accepted a 10-year free license to consumers to allow them to stream all Activision games for which they have a license via any cloud service. And why did we do this instead of blocking the merger? Well, to us, this solution fully addressed our concerns. And on top of that, it had significant procompetitive effects.![]()
EVP Vestager keynote speech at the International Forum of the Studienvereinigung Kartellrecht:
Good morning, Thank you to the Studienvereinigung Kartellrecht for bringing this event to Brussels. You asked me to open today's event with remarks on “current issues in European competition policy”.ec.europa.eu
Interesting vestegar says this![]()
EVP Vestager keynote speech at the International Forum of the Studienvereinigung Kartellrecht:
Good morning, Thank you to the Studienvereinigung Kartellrecht for bringing this event to Brussels. You asked me to open today's event with remarks on “current issues in European competition policy”.ec.europa.eu
Where we did have concerns was in cloud gaming - still a nascent market but one we expect to grow, because it offers many advantages for gamers. For one, it enables gamers to untie games from specific devices - that means more accessibility and lower cost. So cloud gaming deserved an in-depth assessment. This was a common concern because, like us, the CMA focused on this market.
It's you guys that need to wake up.They realise the benefits to everyone, CMA need to wake up.
Have the EU released a final report yet where they document their decision process in full, like the CMA did in their 420 page document?
Yeah, this ‘trust me bro’ shit doesn’t wash with me at all. But the EU don’t believe in transparency so not surprised.If it's anything similar to the Qatar situation then here's the report:
![]()
Yeah, this ‘trust me bro’ shit doesn’t wash with me at all. But the EU don’t believe in transparency so not surprised.
they confirmed to their journalist tom warren that they appealedSo I guess nothing yet from ms directly about the appeal? Thought they'd be shouting it from rooftops by now.
Yeah, although i was expecting something directly from mad brad. Maybe we get it today.they confirmed to their journalist tom warren that they appealed
This quote isn't really anything special. It gives CMA more ammo, EU did what they though was good for their market."Where we diverged with the CMA was on remedies. We accepted a 10-year free license to consumers to allow them to stream all Activision games for which they have a license via any cloud service. And why did we do this instead of blocking the merger? Well, to us, this solution fully addressed our concerns. And on top of that, it had significant procompetitive effects.
Consider the pre-merger situation, where Activision does not license its games to cloud services. So, in this case, the remedy opens the door for smaller cloud services in the EU to offer big games on their platforms, widening choice for gamers. The merits of this remedy was recognised across the spectrum - by developers, by cloud gaming providers, by distributors and of course also by consumer groups. And that is because it unlocked the potential of the cloud market."
They realise the benefits to everyone, CMA need to wake up.
... that's literally their job?This quote isn't really anything special. It gives CMA more ammo, EU did what they though was good for their market.
I know. But a lot of folks are hoping MS use the EC decision to help them appeal to CAT.... that's literally their job?
EC loves getting the money with fines laterSo the EC has the same conclusion as the CMA but they embrace policing the market and the potential fines.
![]()
Microsoft’s appeal requires them to demonstrate that the CMA acted illogically. The EU having the same conclusions but differing on the remedies is useful to Microsoft in this regard, however, it’s no silver bullet - it could be that the EU acted illogically. It’s up to the CAT to decide.I know. But a lot of folks are hoping MS use the EC decision to help them appeal to CAT.
When both regulators will do what they consider is best for their market.
it's not useful, CAT doesn't care about remedies that's CMA decisionMicrosoft’s appeal requires them to demonstrate that the CMA acted illogically. The EU having the same conclusions but differing on the remedies is useful to Microsoft in this regard, however, it’s no silver bullet - it could be that the EU acted illogically. It’s up to the CAT to decide.
Rejection of the remedies was their reason to block. Now CAT has to decide if the CMA was acting illogically when it came to this decision.it's not useful, CAT doesn't care about remedies that's CMA decision
wrong, CMA did give microsoft remedies but microsoft declined and keept doing the 10 years PR dealsRejection of the remedies was their reason to block. Now CAT has to decide if the CMA was acting illogically when it came to this decision.
Anything that shifts the marketshare closer to a more even split will give 3rd party developers more of a pause when it comes to making exclusive games, and it will be more expensive for Sony to lock down 3rd party deals. Meaning less 3rd party exclusives than there are currently.It's you guys that need to wake up.
If this deal gets approved, Xbox will lose of games, due to Sony retaliation.
There is nothing good about this deal, other than MS pocket.
If Sony buys Capcom, I don't know how MS can recover from that. That is a gameover.Anything that shifts the marketshare closer to a more even split will give 3rd party developers more of a pause when it comes to making exclusive games, and it will be more expensive for Sony to lock down 3rd party deals. Meaning less 3rd party exclusives than there are currently.
Besides, Sony already sees the writing on the wall, Microsoft wants to acquire developers/publishers. Sony isnt going to wait for the ABK deal to close to enact their own strategy of acquisitions and exclusive content deals.
If Sony buys Capcom, I don't know how MS can recover from that. That is a gameover.
We reached insanity level now.
We reached insanity level now.
There's no bias all all. I don't see a problem /s
In the real world this would be class as conflicting interest.
A solution like that only works in theory. It would be nearly impossible to implement because of red tape between all cloud providers, not to mention probable technical incompatibilities between the tech used by each provider."Where we diverged with the CMA was on remedies. We accepted a 10-year free license to consumers to allow them to stream all Activision games for which they have a license via any cloud service. And why did we do this instead of blocking the merger? Well, to us, this solution fully addressed our concerns. And on top of that, it had significant procompetitive effects.
Consider the pre-merger situation, where Activision does not license its games to cloud services. So, in this case, the remedy opens the door for smaller cloud services in the EU to offer big games on their platforms, widening choice for gamers. The merits of this remedy was recognised across the spectrum - by developers, by cloud gaming providers, by distributors and of course also by consumer groups. And that is because it unlocked the potential of the cloud market."
They realise the benefits to everyone, CMA need to wake up.
The guy also wasn’t involved in the MS/ABK case iirc.The guy hasn't worked for that law firm in 10 years. You are reaching. And why are you blindly believing anything a known shill has to say?
The guy also wasn’t involved in the MS/ABK case iirc.
I've been saying that since the decision. That is the EU way. Their dollar is plummeting, they lost their 4th largest GDP, and they stay afloat by levying future fines at the expense of the consumers and markets..So the EC has the same conclusion as the CMA but they embrace policing the market and the potential fines.
![]()
Is he arguing that someone who is being paid, or has previously been paid, by a company can’t be trusted…Yeah, this guy is just promoting fiction at this point. Am not surprised that the idiots on twitter are gobbling this nonsense up.
We PRO-competitive, baby.
saying "that is our Call of Duty."
Is he arguing that someone who is being paid, or has previously been paid, by a company can’t be trusted…
Whilst at the same time admitting he is being paid by Microsoft?
We PRO-competitive, baby.
The hopium crossover
The hopium crossover
Jim Ryan wants to rule live service games, and won't stop until he does it.Seen how MS cant manage their studios for shit .. and sony now wants to be a gaas multiplayer gen z rainbow publisher.. leave the fucking third party publishers and studios alone as they are.
Jim Ryan wants to rule live service games, and won't stop until he does it.
It's clear that shareholders wants money now.Good luck with that ... I maybe wrong..but dont know if the premium console public is quite there yet ... they are chasing the right market at the wrong place. But what the fuck do I know ...
Good luck with that ... I maybe wrong..but dont know if the premium console public is quite there yet ... they are chasing the right market at the wrong place. But what the fuck do I know ...
Look at hell spawn that is mobile games.Moblie gaming continues to be the worst thing that ever happened to this industry.
Look at hell spawn that is mobile games.
![]()
![]()
In-App Purchases Guide for Mobile Game Monetization | Udonis
What are in-app purchases in mobile games? What are the types? How do top-grossing games implement them? We got it all covered.www.blog.udonis.co
every week I try a new mobile game, and this is the type of shit that I see.I'm desensitised to this shit. Looks like your average modern day GAAS or Ubisoft game.