Ogbert
Member
I’ve been saying this for weeks!with all this CMA shouldn't have dropped the console concerns
The cloud isn’t the issue. It’s a basic competition issue.
I’ve been saying this for weeks!with all this CMA shouldn't have dropped the console concerns
This is who xbox fans respect?
Believe me, when Sony tries to pull a stunt like that (and I think they will with a Japanese publisher), I'll shit all over them too.Wow. Imagine badically admitting you bought Bethesda because Sony was in talks for a likely timed exclusive starfield.
Fucking hell.
Cloud will be in issue in 10+ years. I bet the CMA seen redacted info that shows the "end game" for MS and the like. Which will be a cloud only device or app for gaming and no more traditional native console boxes.I’ve been saying this for weeks!
The cloud isn’t the issue. It’s a basic competition issue.
Well, they could have chosen not to make it exclsuiveHe's complaining about Sony buying exclusive content like Deathloop and Ghostwire...
And he thinks the right call is to just buy publishers AND engage in the same strategy you are complaining about?
it's not about "Securing content" and keeping it on Xbox (while also allowing it on Playstation). It's about engaging in the SAME, if NOT WORSE, tactics than Sony by taking massive games off rival platforms.
This guy is such a snake oil salesman
How Sony became market leader has nothing to do with this case. As a consumer I did not choose to be unable to play Spiderman on my Xbox. I had to buy a PlayStation for that, cause Sony made it exclusive. When someone mandates they stop doing that, then they can mandate Microsoft to do the same... Making games exclusive to your platform is something all 3 players do. Whether you promoted 100 guys from your mail room to make that game, or bought 100 guys from a smaller studio and made them your own matters for nothing. There is nothing in this deal that threatens fair market competition.
Game Exclusivity, per Sony even, has nothing to do with this acquisition. Sony doesn't want the deal to go through cause they have their boots on MS's throat in the console space, and MS getting Activision might give Xbox a sliver of life. Everyone is pretending it's something else but it's not. Xbox is trying to be more competitive, Sony is trying to block them from getting more competitive, and everyone is acting like MS is the bad guy here.
Well, they could have chosen not to make it exclsuive
Phil owning this lawyer is not even a joke.
He's hearing the bizarro world version of the same audio as we areReally?
Then why Sony made them exclusive when they were announced with no exclusivity attached and were expected to be multiplatform as it was the standard for Zenimax since Oblivion?Right, they could have which is where you would trust their words. But their actions speak otherwise. If it's about ensuring it stays on Xbox, that doesn't mean you need to remove it from a platform it was already on
I could have sworn Matt Booty said his dog stepped on a WiiI think I’ll just look at this thing once it’s done. It’s like I’m watching Depp vs. Heard again except there’s no bee stepping, crazy psychologists and taking lots of drugs. Lots of ignoring the yes or no questions.
Then why Sony made them exclusive
Then why Sony made them exclusive when they were announced with no exclusivity attached and were expected to be multiplatform as it was the standard for Zenimax since Oblivion?
My man with the strategic answers.
I did not expect such a confession
My man with the strategic answers.
Another "good guy MS" narrative from the fanatics off the list whenever they bring up "but what about Minecraft."Oo damn. They were trying to make Minecraft Dungeons exclusive.
My man with the strategic answers.
Another "good guy MS" narrative from the fanatics off the list whenever they bring up "but what about Minecraft."
IIRC Only Modern Warfare 2 Remastered Campaign.Wait, was CoD ever released earlier on PS4?
Based on what they are talking about right now (regret) one title (= Minecraft) is because of the contract that forces them to release on PS / Nintendo. Phil regrets that.Another "good guy MS" narrative from the fanatics off the list whenever they bring up "but what about Minecraft."
Spider-Man is a licensed IP, Disney has to ok the exclusivity in a per game basis. Just like they did with Indiana Jones for Xbox.How Sony became market leader has nothing to do with this case. As a consumer I did not choose to be unable to play Spiderman on my Xbox. I had to buy a PlayStation for that, cause Sony made it exclusive. When someone mandates they stop doing that, then they can mandate Microsoft to do the same... Making games exclusive to your platform is something all 3 players do. Whether you promoted 100 guys from your mail room to make that game, or bought 100 guys from a smaller studio and made them your own matters for nothing. There is nothing in this deal that threatens fair market competition.
Game Exclusivity, per Sony even, has nothing to do with this acquisition. Sony doesn't want the deal to go through cause they have their boots on MS's throat in the console space, and MS getting Activision might give Xbox a sliver of life. Everyone is pretending it's something else but it's not. Xbox is trying to be more competitive, Sony is trying to block them from getting more competitive, and everyone is acting like MS is the bad guy here.
And they stated to regulators that Minecraft is where they were supposed to look at when thinking about CODPhil wanted Minecraft Dungeons to be exclusive.