Thirty7ven
Banned
How is it pro competitive if competition won’t be able to make any revenue from those games? Absolutely idiotic.
The perspective that most of what the 97% of gaming (smartphones, jigsaw on PC, Tetris, etc) has no bearing on the dangers and anti-competitive shenanigans of the acquisition of ATVIs high-end console gaming catalogue of games being bought by Microsoft.
Confidently ignorant is a bad look. All streaming boils down to "remote desktop applications optimized for latency". I've played COD streaming over parsec from both my home and AWS. Your accusation should be satisfied.
Next 2 years more likely, it'll be slow & painfulSo MS is now going to spin their wheels for the next year in courts trying to get this deal to pass?
It's not about today, you know this. It's about in 10 years.
Especially when today owns 70% of cloud infrastructure in the word.
The bottom line is that the UK is the only one not approving the deal. When everyone but you have the same opinion, something must be off.
It truly is a script.Making a decision now based on a hypothetical 10 years later
The bottom line is that the UK is the only one not approving the deal. When everyone but you have the same opinion, something must be off.
Nah, it will go through.The FTC is fighting this deal as well.
It is completely out of context when all the opposition and concern against the deal is from a segment effected that is less than 20% of all gaming revenue in the gaming market. 1-3% versus 15-20% isn't quite as insignificant and small, especially when devices like potato PC and Switch are in that market share too., so emerging Cloud in relative terms is maybe as much as 5-10% already compared to high-end console gaming.That may be a point of discussion but EU's main concern was cloud and CMA blocked for the reason of cloud, the '1 to 3 %' market is the focal point here.
They didn’t block the deal. Requesting concessions it completely different than outright blocking the deal.EC didn’t approve without remedies which is what other regulators did. Are they off too or are you just being selective because you know.
Nah, it will go through.
They didn’t block the deal. Requesting concessions it completely different than outright blocking the deal.
Yeah, why concern yourself with what is actually happening? Let's just pretend that the FTC isn't suing to block the deal as wellNah, it will go through.
FTC: Am I a joke to you?The bottom line is that the UK is the only one not approving the deal. When everyone but you have the same opinion, something must be off.
The only accusation I've made here is that your experience is anecdotal. Not sure what you think I'm "confidently ignorant" about. I didn't say you were wrong in what you experienced, now did I?
It truly is a script.
![]()
If they only have to look at the market as it is today, what are they regulating? (in the market, as it is today, MS does not own Activision btw).Making a decision now based on a hypothetical 10 years later, when we don't know what state the gaming industry will be in, is kind of dumb. Look at Stadia, all that promise and what happened.
Additionally, the CMA can use the same justification about "they have cloud monopoly" to deny any future acquisitions even if they're a smaller studio while OK-ing acquisitions from other platform holders because they might not have a similar cloud infrastructure.
I'm glad at least one more major regulator outright dismissed it so there's more conversation on the subject.
Is "it's a script" the new "everything I don't like is woke" ?
![]()
Exactly. Intellectually dishonest and being purposely obtuse repeating the scripted lines ala Sage and Mage, wayment.... Sage... Mage.... hmmmmIf they only have to look at the market as it is today, what are they regulating? (in the market, as it is today, MS does not own Activision btw). lol
Why should the impact of the acquisition from now to 10 years later not matter?
If they only have to look at the market as it is today, what are they regulating? (in the market, as it is today, MS does not own Activision btw).
Why should the impact of the acquisition from now to 10 years later not matter?
From what I have understood so far, EC didn't disagree with what the CMA said about the cloud concern; they just went with the proposed remedies, which the CMA didn't go for.You have different regulatory bodies coming to different outcomes about the perceived impact of the acquisition in 10 years so it's not like it's a unanimous or cut-and-dry outlook either.
I'm not saying it was, I'm saying that the impact in cloud of the ATVI catalogue is against the same high-end console market context. not the 85% of people playing Freecell, Minesweeper, angry birds etc on their smartphone, and the 1-3% figure shows her lack of knowledge to contextualise the issue in a meaninful way for the consumers most impacted by the proposed acquisition - which is supposed to be the job she is doing.The regulators already concluded that the catalog was not a concern for the high-end console market. The CMA objected based on the cloud market which is a different product offering.
They did not come to a different outcome on that, like at all. Just different decisions/remedies. They both literally agreed with one another on the state of the market in 10 years, just one chose the block path, the other chose the potential fine path, something the EU has been notorious for over the years. Free money at the expense of the consumers and markets.You have different regulatory bodies coming to different outcomes about the perceived impact of the acquisition in 10 years so it's not like it's a unanimous or cut-and-dry outlook either.
They did not come to a different outcome on that, like at all. Just different decisions/remedies. They both literally agreed with one another on the state of the market in 10 years, just one chose the block path, the other chose the potential fine path, something the EU has been notorious for over the years. Free money at the expense of the consumers and markets.
Ok.Different outcome as in one was satisfied with the proposed remedies and one wasn't. (for now)
Have you tried to play any FPS on GeForce Now, Stadia, moonlight, or parsec? Or is your opinion purely hypothetical? GeForce now has a free tier in most regions. Why don't you fire up a game in competitive mode (in glorious 720p) and see the impact of input lag for yourself? The tech isn't suited for games like COD.
I didn't express an opinion, hypothetical or otherwise. But yes, I've played Halo Infinite on xCloud and found it lacking. That is also anecdotal.
I could explain the physics of it to you but you would probably call my math anecdotal. I'll stick with confidently ignorant and let you be on your way.
I will end the physics debate.I could explain the physics of it to you but you would probably call my math anecdotal. I'll stick with confidently ignorant and let you be on your way.
I will end the physics debate.
You can't solve the speed of light / distance to datacenters.
The end.
Anecdotal.
That may be a point of discussion but EU's main concern was cloud and CMA blocked for the reason of cloud, the '1 to 3 %' market is the focal point here.
-
Pachter was right, what a time to be alive.
I will end the physics debate.
You can't solve the speed of light / distance to datacenters.
The end.
I will end the physics debate.
You can't solve the speed of light / distance to datacenters.
The end.
No chance, CMA already blocked it.Nah, it will go through.
The FTC is fighting this deal as well.
Anecdotal.
Good dog. Possibly anecdotal. Need to see peer reviewed research before petting.
And this is why I read this thread..To sum things up?
![]()
Good dog. Possibly anecdotal. Need to see peer reviewed research before petting.
You don't need VPN. On Xbox consoles or Windows you'd just change your region to access games from other countries on Xbox Game Pass.The VPN market is about to explode in the UK lol
China isn't part of the MS ABK deal. It needs all the UK, EU and US to pass.