MS is gonna go cry to US Congress again, aren't they?
Let me see if I got this shit correct...5-10 Min a day to get that game pass membership for free. I find it very worth it. Part of my morning routine.
Just doing some catching up.
Can someone tell me wtf is a Boosteroid
That's because Sony follows a strict policy of ABAP.If Game Pass ever started to offer anything per-minute, they would lose everyone over to PS Plus and vice versa in an instant. It would be the biggest shitstorm in video game history.
And Microsoft's other subscription services don't hint at anything like this.
And Xbox is not going the Netflix route of closed ecosystems, they are open to publish on other platforms.
If anything, right now it's Playstation's position as the premium console manufacturer that is creating an environment with absurdly priced hardware and VR devices because of the lack of competition in that space.
Sad Brad Smith
and sheer, fucking, will!And commitment.
and about the Fosspatent delusional theoryRight - y'all made me dig out my login for the first time in three years so you better all appreciate this.
First up, I have a professional background related to this issue.
Second, There are at least 4 major errors of fact or understanding which are running endemic in the thread:
Also, please stop bringing up Brexit. In fact, as a fun bonus, EU competition policy is exactly what most people in this thread seem to not want - a heavily political process. EU decisions are made by the Commission - a body heavily subject to political influence. UK decisions are made by a politically independent body. To be explicitly clear: if you prefer the EU process, you prefer a political process.
- That the CMA is in any way subject to government intervention/"just take them to court". The appeal process goes to a tribunal, which can only intervene if their action was illegal, had incorrect process or was irrational. There is no other route to appeal to the courts and the UK Government cannot intervene even if they want to. The CMA is not run or controlled by the Government - attacking the CMA means you are attacking an independent organisation, not the UK Government or the Conservative Party.
- That irrational carries a colloquial meaning. Just because you think a conclusion is wrong does not make it irrational. Irrational, in this context means that it is so unreasonable that no rational person could reasonably have reached this conclusion.
- That the probability of the appeal succeeding is anything other than very low. Success rate at the CAT is not high, and a success would just mean that the CMA has to remake the decision having fixed whatever the issue in their process was.
- That the CMA is a political body, "overpaid", "idiots", or any other ad-hominem attack. The CMA is an independent body, staffed by people with deep and extensive knowledge and experience of competition law and issues, who are paid less than they could earn in the private sector (even quite senior staff are generally paid less than £100k). From professional experience, I can confidently say that the quality of the CMA's work and people is highly-regarded by professionals in the field.
I have worked on a number of situations related to the UK's national security laws. The idea that they apply here is one of the most absurd legal suggestions I have ever seen in my life.
Ok so you want much shitter games and less reason to play them.This is not a controversial take. The problems around expenses and time management of big modern triple-A games are not unusual topics. Buddy. You don't think Sony finds it problematic that God of War takes 5-6 years to produce?
I have to say, is probably the darkest day in our four decades in Britain,” the company’s president, Brad Smith, told BBC Radio 4. “It does more than shake our confidence in the future of the opportunity to grow a technology business in Britain than we’ve ever confronted before.”
“Basically, this is Microsoft and Brad Smith throwing their toys out of the pram after they didn’t get the decision they wanted after all the lobbying they did,” said Max von Thun, director of the Europe office of the Open Markets Institute, a proponent of stronger antitrust enforcement.
I am replying to what you said about an Xbox monopoly leading to server-based charging.
It's game pass ultimate which is worth $15 so I'm getting atleast $2.75 an hour for the work. Maybe even $3.Let me see if I got this shit correct...
Let's take those 10 mins a day x 30 days... that's 300 minutes... divide by 60, that's a grand total of 5 hours.
Gamepass is around 10$ a month, so that means you got the equivalent of 10$ for 5h of work... Split that shit by 5 and you're working for a trillion dollar company at the going rate of $2 per hour...
My guy, i have a massive lawn in my property, i'll double that fee and you come and mow it for me once a month, how's that for a deal?
Will you shill for me in gaming forums at that rate?
MS trying to keep all revenue for their games streamed by other cloud services.
It's game pass ultimate which is worth $15 so I'm getting atleast $2.75 an hour for the work. Maybe even $3.
Every time I see his face, I have to laugh. But the events and reactions today, surpassed everythingThis is it. I feel like I'm in BlueBox 2.0, and I'm loving every second.
MS trying to keep all revenue for their games streamed by other cloud services.
The EC is setting themself up to be incompetent or corrupt.... possibly both. Worst part is nintendo and nvidia agreed to this?If that's the deal that the European commission are gonna potentially approve on, good grief.
Seems like Timdog is menstruating
Exactly the sort of answer I expected.Ok so you want much shitter games and less reason to play them.
Are you even a Gamer bro.
No, this is not a problem anyone had but CMA, because they overrate the possibility of Microsoft staying ahead in tin-foil hat scenarios. If we were talking about cloud infrastructure and expenses right now it would be one thing, but the idea that they would consolidate to the point where everyone would become a non-factor over time is nonsensical. Even now, PS Plus can match them. Offering cloud services is gonna be a gigantic business and Microsoft will never be able to shut the competition down to the extent where it will "harm gamers".Exactly. Meaning if you had read the CMA's decision then you wouldn't be pointing to Sony and Nintendo as prime examples of being capable of preventing them from effectively monopolising that space. It's a lot more complex than that owing to the fact that infrastructure is required.
Activision's probably not open to making these kind of deals like MS is. It they were, don't you think it would already be a thing?
Let me see if I got this shit correct...
Let's take those 10 mins a day x 30 days... that's 300 minutes... divide by 60, that's a grand total of 5 hours.
Gamepass is around 10$ a month, so that means you got the equivalent of 10$ for 5h of work... Split that shit by 5 and you're working for a trillion dollar company at the going rate of $2 per hour...
My guy, i have a massive lawn in my property, i'll double that fee and you come and mow it for me once a month, how's that for a deal?
Will you shill for me in gaming forums at that rate?
If that's the deal that the European commission are gonna potentially approve on, good grief.
You know the answerHow many Microsoft games are there currently on other cloud providers?
Thank you, I thought I was being gaslighted for a moment thereIt’s hilarious how little self awareness some people have. Get on a trillion dollar thread mill like a little rat for 2$ an hour, hell on earth.
It’s hilarious how little self awareness some people have. Get on a trillion dollar thread mill like a little green rat for 2$ an hour, hell on earth.
I honestly didn't but as it took a while for a reply I've done my research and...there wasn't any, only that offer to please EU regulators. Well, if they're so committed, they should put their games anyway. Is it only worth putting on GeForce NOW if they close the deal?You know the answer
It's Romanian for Hemorrhoids or is it Ukrainian word for it?Just doing some catching up.
Can someone tell me wtf is a Boosteroid
MS trying to keep all revenue for their games streamed by other cloud services.
Wait, why is spending a few hours getting free shit bad? Realistically, do you truly spend all your spare time doing something actually productive? Pulling yourself doesn't count, that's only beneficial to the tissues mositure soaking capabilities.It’s hilarious how little self awareness some people have. Get on a trillion dollar thread mill like a little rat for 2$ an hour, hell on earth.
Welp that's it. No shot this goes through now. Michael Pachter has spoken.
Like Jim Ryan said "inadequate"
So Microsoft in those 10-year agreements with those cloud providers were going to get 100% of the in-game purchases? WTH!!!??
What is it with these journalists shilling for Microsoft. It’s embarrassing
Well, if they're so committed, they should put their games anyway. Is it only worth putting on GeForce NOW if they close the deal?
this means microsoft wanted to keep 100% of in game transactions instead of 30%
why did companies accept this 10 year contract ?
Welp that's it. No shot this goes through now. Michael Pachter has spoken.
Like Jim Ryan said "inadequate"
Seems like Timdog is menstruating
Nintendo knew that Microsoft couldn't get a native version running on the Switch. Signing the deal was the only was for Nintendo to get Brad Smith to fuck off.You are very smart, my boy....
It was a scam to make the deal pass.
I don't even know why Nintendo and Nvidia signed that useless 10-year deal. Maybe they did to gain something in case the deal passed...
If Sony had to give 100% of streaming revenue to ms for abk titles then i can't blame Sony for calling MS out and screaming at the top of their lungs to regulators. Geforce, Nintendo and nvidia was ok with this say a lot about them. Finally, ABK, after working so closely with Sony for so long made a frigg ton of money together and bobby still could not go to MS and say hey we have to offer sony a fair trade on COD?
No, this is not a problem anyone had but CMA, because they overrate the possibility of Microsoft staying ahead in tin-foil hat scenarios.
If we were talking about cloud infrastructure and expenses right now it would be one thing, but the idea that they would consolidate to the point where everyone would become a non-factor over time is nonsensical. Even now, PS Plus can match them.
Offering cloud services is gonna be a gigantic business and Microsoft will never be able to shut the competition down to the extent where it will "harm gamers".