Yup. I think it's finally slowing down. Archive-worthy thread.Since this will eventually die down, just wanted to say you guys are amazing. It was an honor to have served you lol.
Yup. I think it's finally slowing down. Archive-worthy thread.Since this will eventually die down, just wanted to say you guys are amazing. It was an honor to have served you lol.
I was posting on GameFAQs and Gamespot back then. It was pretty terrible at those places.
This thread has been one hell of a ride.Since this will eventually die down, just wanted to say you guys are amazing. It was an honor to have served you lol.
Since this will eventually die down, just wanted to say you guys are amazing. It was an honor to have served you lol.
This is just an E3 pre-show warmup.
Since this will eventually die down, just wanted to say you guys are amazing. It was an honor to have served you lol.
I don't think you are defending the policy, I think you like arguing (I get this bug a lot too so I understand it). In my original post I was arguing that reminding people that something is a rumor only seems worthwhile to remind them that it may not happen, not that rumor = impossible. It's more about intent than definition.you know.... I just typed up a nice reply to this and the original post I took issue with, mercilessly tearing it to shreds, but then I realized... fuck it. Life's too short. You're right, I'm getting hung up on semantics. This is a giant waste of both of our collective times. I don't really give a shit.
Just know that I ain't defending this shitty policy, that's for sure.
Imagine...
Since this will eventually die down, just wanted to say you guys are amazing. It was an honor to have served you lol.
was this posted? Response from Major Nelson
http://majornelson.com/2013/04/05/official-statement-on-what-was-said-yesterday/
SO how big has this story gotten now?
SO how big has this story gotten now?
Oh it's just getting started.
This is just an E3 pre-show warmup.
And a damn fine one.
E3 is the real fiesta.
Since this will eventually die down, just wanted to say you guys are amazing. It was an honor to have served you lol.
Oh this is just hilarious. Looks like the Big 3 are going to lose one of their numbers.
This will be my first E3 on GAF
I will charge head first into the battle. Sword in one hand, Flame Shield in the other
It's been a fun thread, but nobody seriously believes this will have any real impact on MS right?
The unveiling is in a month+ from now and nobody outside of Gaf will remember this.
I'm in the camp of always online <> DRM. SimCity and Diablo III clearly show we are not ready for that and would open them up to a ton of liability
Microsoft's E3 Conference sure will be interesting.
He wasn't talking to his friend at first. So no it's not.So everyone knows that Orth and Manveeir Heir are friends right? I know it's a public conversation and that Orth should have remember that, but I think the context changes a bit considering it's two friends giving each other shit.
I am completely against an always-online console, but is anyone here thinking this has been a complete overreaction to the guy's comments?
So everyone knows that Orth and Manveeir Heir are friends right? I know it's a public conversation and that Orth should have remember that, but I think the context changes a bit considering it's two friends giving each other shit.
I am completely against an always-online console, but is anyone here thinking this has been a complete overreaction to the guy's comments?
pure gold
my favourite is
So anyone think there's still a chance Microsoft might change their mind on this?
WhatWas this posted?
Playing the game without the disc in the drive. If the amount of whining we see every time a 2 or more disc game gets released is any indication, this is a _huge_ benefit. Heck, as I recall, there was months of whining because you couldn't eject the disc tray remotely.
But let's get serious here for a second. They don't need always-online for DRM. The Steam model uses online activation, and doesn't require always online. So let's get it straight: always-online is not a DRM thing. You can lock down piracy perfectly well with one-time codes and online activation, which only requires a connection the first time you start a game. In fact, that would even work for not requiring the disc in the drive.
Always online is a feature that developers can rely on being there, something they cannot do with a current console, or even PC. Like the hard drive in the PS3, or analog triggers on the controller. Requiring always-online is telling the developer: "Don't be afraid to incorporate features that rely on an internet connection, we will guarantee it is there". Things like a RTS game that uses google maps as it's terrain engine, or persistent online worlds, or integrating an ARG into the gameplay. Consider Ubisoft's Watch_Dogs with a modification of the game phoning your actual phone and interacting with you as if you're in the game world.
It's the next logical step in gaming. We can quibble about whether now is too soon, but it's going to happen regardless, if not this coming generation, the next one.
I think it's very good explained.
These initial comments:So everyone knows that Orth and Manveeir Heir are friends right? I know it's a public conversation and that Orth should have remember that, but I think the context changes a bit considering it's two friends giving each other shit.
I am completely against an always-online console, but is anyone here thinking this has been a complete overreaction to the guy's comments?
What would be the benefit of this over download/install exactly? Especially if both of them launch without requiring the process to be completed? It takes away the decision of whether or not to buy discs (since discs won't work at all on the former)?Was this posted?
Playing the game without the disc in the drive. If the amount of whining we see every time a 2 or more disc game gets released is any indication, this is a _huge_ benefit. Heck, as I recall, there was months of whining because you couldn't eject the disc tray remotely.
But always-online games already exist on platforms that aren't required to be online.Requiring always-online is telling the developer: "Don't be afraid to incorporate features that rely on an internet connection, we will guarantee it is there". Things like a RTS game that uses google maps as it's terrain engine, or persistent online worlds, or integrating an ARG into the gameplay. Consider Ubisoft's Watch_Dogs with a modification of the game phoning your actual phone and interacting with you as if you're in the game world.
He wasn't talking to his friend at first. So no it's not.
These initial comments:
Weren't directed at anyone though.
The masses will not care. As long as it has flashy features, it will probably sell fine. No dice for me, though.
It's been a fun thread, but nobody seriously believes this will have any real impact on MS right?
The unveiling is in a month+ from now and nobody outside of Gaf will remember this.
I'm in the camp of always online <> DRM. SimCity and Diablo III clearly show we are not ready for that and would open them up to a ton of liability
He was obviously joking about the geography. But his sentiment (which was directed at no one but his followers and in response to the Kotaku article) is genuine. He is and was defending an anti-consumer philosophy. If he is a bit sweaty and unsettled... good. We need more of that backlash from people like you and I.So everyone knows that Orth and Manveeir Heir are friends right? I know it's a public conversation and that Orth should have remember that, but I think the context changes a bit considering it's two friends giving each other shit.
I am completely against an always-online console, but is anyone here thinking this has been a complete overreaction to the guy's comments?
He wasn't talking to his friend at first. So no it's not.
This:
-snip-
Reminded me of this:
-snip-
Arrogant assholes on Twitter apparently like this pose/look.
Someone needs to re-create that long-ass post someone made on the FFXIII on 360 thread and replace Sony with Microsoft (along with some other things).
A game that used live-google earth data could just run off the old data until you go online again. Sure, maybe you're not getting the truest live data, but you are getting real data.Was this posted?
bkilian BD3
Playing the game without the disc in the drive. If the amount of whining we see every time a 2 or more disc game gets released is any indication, this is a _huge_ benefit. Heck, as I recall, there was months of whining because you couldn't eject the disc tray remotely.
But let's get serious here for a second. They don't need always-online for DRM. The Steam model uses online activation, and doesn't require always online. So let's get it straight: always-online is not a DRM thing. You can lock down piracy perfectly well with one-time codes and online activation, which only requires a connection the first time you start a game. In fact, that would even work for not requiring the disc in the drive.
Always online is a feature that developers can rely on being there, something they cannot do with a current console, or even PC. Like the hard drive in the PS3, or analog triggers on the controller. Requiring always-online is telling the developer: "Don't be afraid to incorporate features that rely on an internet connection, we will guarantee it is there". Things like a RTS game that uses google maps as it's terrain engine, or persistent online worlds, or integrating an ARG into the gameplay. Consider Ubisoft's Watch_Dogs with a modification of the game phoning your actual phone and interacting with you as if you're in the game world.
It's the next logical step in gaming. We can quibble about whether now is too soon, but it's going to happen regardless, if not this coming generation, the next one.
I think it's very good explained.
He was obviously joking about the geography. But his sentiment (which was directed at no one but his followers and in response to the Kotaku article) is genuine. He is and was defending an anti-consumer philosophy. If he is a bit sweaty and unsettled... good. We need more of that backlash from people like you and I.
Edit: libregkd
eh I dunno. I swipe at people's views all the time on Twitter without actually tweeting at them. Not saying he was or wasn't aiming it at his friend, but... 140 characters. Don't wanna ruin the punchline, and all that. as someone who also probably thinks they're far wittier than they actually are, I empathize with his plight.