From the pewdiepie thread but relevant here:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230443715&postcount=810
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230443715&postcount=810
Only someone who has never experienced prejudice and hate in their life would call what he said empty or nonsensical.My morality (or lack thereof) has nothing to do with it, it's just an empty phrase devoid of any meaning that you think sounds good but is just nonsense
Are you fantasizing about a civil war?
This is not a healthy mentality at all.
Maher is not a liberal. lolIt's more than that. The last time Milo spoke at a college, a trans girl was harassed out of school. His plan for the Berkley speech was to out undocumented students (antifa stopped him).
When Milo talks in front of an audience, vulnerable people get hurt. There is a direct cause and effect at play.
How do liberals justify this? How is it ok to let a klansmen onstage when you know he's going to grab the mic and scream "kill all the n*****s!", and that people will do it?
You went full psycho huh
Maher is not a liberal. lol
He's a libertarian who holds liberal values.
Maher is not a liberal. lol
He's a libertarian who holds liberal values.
Only someone who has never experienced prejudice and hate in their life would call what he said empty or nonsensical.
Maher is not a liberal. lol
He's a libertarian who holds liberal values.
Bill Maher is as liberal as it gets, calling him a libertarian laughable
Bill Maher is as liberal as it gets, calling him a libertarian laughable
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of libertarians, yes. Libertarian doesn't (necessarily) mean Lassez-Faire free market crazy person.A libertarian would not want gun control, nor marijuana to be a regulated and taxed commodity, unless I have a fundamental misunderstanding of libertarian values.
As liberal as it gets?
Nah he's left but he's not as liberal as it gets lol.
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of libertarians, yes. Libertarian doesn't (necessarily) mean Lassez-Faire free market crazy person.
Legalizing and regulating illegal drugs is a classic libertarian position.
This is not a healthy mentality at all.
As liberal as it gets?
Nah he's left but he's not as liberal as it gets lol.
Why? Aren't you more interested in having reasoned debates with Nazis about why minorities should live?Ok here's another chestnut for you then:
"Give a racist some food and they will throw that food at you and your shirt will be dirty"
I should become a professional quote-maker
How do you think denazification happened? That the war stopped and everyone just accepted they were wrong?
Ok here's another chestnut for you then:
"Give a racist some food and they will throw that food at you and your shirt will be dirty"
I should become a professional quote-maker
Dude, you should make T-shirts lol
How much more liberal would Maher need to get?
False. Fascism/Nationalism was effectively swept under the rug and is rearing its ugly head again all over Europe.
Maher owns guns and believes in the second amendment, and he wants legal pot.A libertarian would not want gun control, nor marijuana to be a regulated and taxed commodity, unless I have a fundamental misunderstanding of libertarian values.
False. Fascism/Nationalism was effectively swept under the rug and is rearing its ugly head again all over Europe.
Why? Aren't you more interested in having reasoned debates with Nazis about why minorities should live?
Dude, you should make T-shirts lol
Bill Maher is as liberal as it gets, calling him a libertarian laughable
It's all very well saying that if you attack his arguments on TV people will see that it's all bullshit, but I think that's the gaf liberal bubble speaking again. It's ignoring the fact that a lot of people aren't all that bright and could be swayed, and a whole other bunch of people want to believe that shit and it will entrench their views. Remember when we all thought Hillary destroyed Trump in those debates? The general public disagreed.
Can you really call a guy that spouts offensive things specifically for money a 'Neo-Nazi'?
I don't buy for a second that he believes anything he espouses.
Can you really call a guy that spouts offensive things specifically for money a 'Neo-Nazi'?
I don't buy for a second that he believes anything he espouses.
It's more than that. The last time Milo spoke at a college, a trans girl was harassed out of school. His plan for the Berkley speech was to out undocumented students (antifa stopped him).
When Milo talks in front of an audience, vulnerable people get hurt. There is a direct cause and effect at play.
I hope Maher tears him a new one.
I'm having a hard time finding where the neo nazi label came from. From what I've seen this guy is not Spencer, and I think people group the two together via association
Any recent examples of far right guests that Maher ripped apart? I heard he had Ann Coulter on during the last season, how did that go?
Bill Maher is as liberal as it gets, calling him a libertarian laughable
I can't take anyone who calls this guy a nazi seriously.
He's an asshat in more ways than I can count, but he's not a nazi and calling him one does more harm than good. There are actual neo-nazis to worry about.
Calling him 'as liberal as it gets' is even more laughable than calling him libertarian.
Actually that is what helped Trump so much. Because everybody was already a Nazi and the word was used so inflationary, he pretty much got a pass. There was nothing left to up the game, because everybody on the internet making a stupid joke was already worse than Hitler. And all this Nazi talk does only helps Milo.
This internet hyperbole only helps extremists, because they can only hide behind people instead of beaning called out. If every stupid idiot is already a Nazi, people will ask themselves if the next Nazi is really one or did he just make some stupid jokes on the internet. If words lose their meaning or their impact people will not listen to them anymore.
All this Nazi talk only gives him importance he actually does not have. And as much of a turd he is, people like Michele Bachmann or Christine O'Donnell (the witch lady) probably did a lot worse things to the LGBTQ community than Milo. For example: remember this article. But they went to Maher or he ridiculed them nobody was that opposed.
Milo is a troll and like any troll he can actually not do that much, only if you give him more importance than he has. People like Michele Bachmann smile and create a environment where gay teens commit suicide because the their system is way more diabolical and also a lot more discrete.
Milo is a troll and like any troll he can actually not do that much, only if you give him more importance than he has.
Milo forced a trans student to quit school because he was given a public forum. So this statement is pretty much bullshit.
As bad that this is, people like Michele Bachmann create environments where gay teens commit suicide or just vanish because the rather do not come out. But they do it with a smile, so I guess Milo is a lot worse.
As bad that this is, people like Michele Bachmann create environments where gay teens commit suicide or just vanish because the rather do not come out. But they do it with a smile, so I guess Milo is a lot worse.
It's hard to define what that word even means anymore in the context of American politics, but he certainly is in the sense that he is a pretty solid Democrat.
But as an argument on the harmlessness of Milo, it makes no difference to compare bodycounts, Milo has used every chance given to him to harm people, badly. He's not simply a troll, he directs an army of psychopaths to ruin people.