I still don't like replies like these though. I don't know what your scum game is like, but I've seen your town game and it felt very different. I don't know the scum plays of anyone here except Splinter.What's with the long term narrative being formed here? There's a common trend of suspicion on Sky/Melon, people saying they're suspicious to me of varying degrees, and an extremely odd analysis of my playing pattern despite none of these people ever having seen me play scum ever in GAFia history.
You are still evading the question.Yea and I think that's true from the push we've seen today. I just haven't broken it down in any real detail.
Tbh I read you guys as scumbros so I don't particularly care which of you go.
You are still evading the question.
Thos should be an easy question to answer, so why do you keep squirreling around it? You just double down on me and Ty4on being a scum team, but you are being really quiet on the details.
Vote: Ty4on
My vote on Sophia is past its expiration date, she's not that high on my priority list and I've made my point on her seeming somewhat suspicious. Placing my vote on Ty4on for now since that will make the vote list the most similar to my actual scum reads with Sky, Terra and Ty on the lead. I'm not sure how I feel about lynching Terra with such low activity today though, I don't want to do the mods job >_>
I still don't like replies like these though. I don't know what your scum game is like, but I've seen your town game and it felt very different. I don't know the scum plays of anyone here except Splinter.
Because I'm at work and don't really feel like taking an hour to go back and reread.
It's not an easy question to answer because it involves going back and re reading the thread with a different point of view than I did on the previous pass, mainly you being town.
If it comes to pass I'll do it this evening after work. I've put forth the work and research I did last night, sorry I can't be assed to do another second dip so that you can have a satisfactory answer. No reason beyond "I think your scum" is actually ever really needed for a vote btw. You say you wouldn't have been stupid enough to try to save hyper yesterday but I think it was a legit mistake any scum could have made on reading the situation.
You are still evading the question.
Thos should be an easy question to answer, so why do you keep squirreling around it? You just double down on me and Ty4on being a scum team, but you are being really quiet on the details.
Oh, as I said, I messed up and got the order of events of who said what confused.Why were you so confident in Hyper yesterday when the two of you barely ever spoke?
SkyOdin voted against a scum lynch right before it became unavoidable. He was under my radar all day, but I don't need Cabot to point out a vote trap that I set up. He's been almost unanimously scumread today, described as "almost too obvious" by Ty (bad comment btw) and "not worth a mega post" by Kawl.Actually Splinter... where DID your read of SkyOdin come from? You just suddenly jumped on the SkyOdin train after cabot presented his evidence...
And there's been very little attempt to try and debate and argue with him from from you. These are the only two I can find...
Is cabot's evidence that strong that you suddenly jumped on the train but waited so long to actually vote for him? I know I did something similar in D1, which is why I'm asking you.
Oh, as I said, I messed up and got the order of events of who said what confused.
Normally, I actually take detailed notes when playing Mafia. However, the short phases and high activity of this game mean that I don't have the time to take notes. So, I was still getting a feel for who everyone even was on Day 1. In short, some of the things you said and some of the things Hyper said got jumbled in my brain.
I think I have a better grasp of who everyone is and where they stand today, though.
Because when reading large numbers of posts in a row it is easy for some of it to blur together in my memory?How did you confuse who said what?
Did you find Hyper's posts suspicious in D1 despite not quite realizing he had written them?
I don't understand the comment about the search function. Shouldn't those posts quite clearly be Hyper's? Main difference being the lack of context (but you get that by scrolling).Because when reading large numbers of posts in a row it is easy for some of it to blur together in my memory?
Now, I am ashamed to admit that Hyper didn't register as scum to me for most of Day 1, so When the accusations against Hyper happened, I had to use the search feature to reread his previous posts. However, that meant that I read those posts slightly divorced from the context of the rest of the thread. I was also under a time crunch, since we had less than half an hour until day's end at that point, while the thread was moving fast. As such, my mind mistakenly placed some of the posts Hyper made to where some of the posts you made in the thread were placed. My memory isn't very good, I admit. That's why I need to retead the thread in detail everytime I make an argument.
It was only after I retead the thread in detail during the night phase that I fully understood why Kawl and everyone else saw Hyper as scummy.
I probably won't make mistakes like that as much once I have played more games with everyone and gotten your avatars more straight. Though it doesn't help that everyone is always changing avatars.
No worries I understand be pain of mobile. Would greatly appreciate it if you could before day's end though.
SkyOdin voted against a scum lynch right before it became unavoidable. He was under my radar all day, but I don't need Cabot to point out a vote trap that I set up. He's been almost unanimously scumread today, described as "almost too obvious" by Ty (bad comment btw) and "not worth a mega post" by Kawl.
Voting for him is almost a formality at this point. When Kawl asked for votes I was actually surprised to see so many votes going elsewhere.
Of course the posts were clearly labeled as Hyper's. It is just that the content of the posts struck me as "I've read this before". However, my brain made a bad association between the content of Hyper's post and when and where I had read it before.I don't understand the comment about the search function. Shouldn't those posts quite clearly be Hyper's? Main difference being the lack of context (but you get that by scrolling).
Did you read Kawl's mega post and what did you think of it back then?
lolGuess I'll see how things play out. I don't see a reason to move my vote off Sky at the moment, but I'm getting the slight impression of dead air.
So it does,Ah, Terra, the game specific rules are pretty clear on what your supposed to do in this situation.
And it's very much not make a post like that :/
Where did the confidence in your town read of Hyper come from then?Of course the posts were clearly labeled as Hyper's. It is just that the content of the posts struck me as "I've read this before". However, my brain made a bad association between the content of Hyper's post and when and where I had read it before.
Also, I will admit that I kinda skimmed Kawl's mega-post the first time. I don't have a good excuse for that. Sorry.
Who do you think are the two remaning scum? I have Sky, but I'm not sure who the third is.Yeah I'd be more concerned with DADV if we had drifted onto some middle of the road candidate. It's pretty hard to argue against a Sky lynch without deferring to a gut read.
We also haven't stopped looking at other people.
So... yeah
Who do you think is the third one when I flip town?Only way we have two scum is the scenario I painted of it being a SK who killed LP and mafia hitting the 1 shot bp SK.
As far as I'm concerned this is essentially tossed out.
Where did the confidence in your town read of Hyper come from then?
Could you make a timeline maybe of your thoughts and actions that day end?
You or Sophia currently most likely. Could also be someone who hasn't really been in the spotlight yet - Stan or Fireblend would be my "shot in the dark" guesses.Where did the confidence in your town read of Hyper come from then?
Could you make a timeline maybe of your thoughts and actions that day end?
Who do you think are the two remaning scum? I have Sky, but I'm not sure who the third is.
I know we could have just two scum, but three is much more likely.
CAN I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION PLEASE
Sorian WILL BE REPLACING Terrabyte20xx EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
THE PLAYER ROSTER WILL BE UPDATED IN ABOUT AN HOUR
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE OF VOTE COUNTS ETC. [/b]
CAN I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION PLEASE
Sorian WILL BE REPLACING Terrabyte20xx EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
THE PLAYER ROSTER WILL BE UPDATED IN ABOUT AN HOUR
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE OF VOTE COUNTS ETC. [/b]
Oh right, forgot about Terra.
Hi Sorian, are you scum?
Just to warn you, we only have two hours left in this day phase, so read fast.Haven't read much of this game aside from the day 1 end so I'm going to do that before posting anything substantial. I'm busy for like another hour or so and then I'll get right into that.
Oh youAnd yes, the answer is always yes.
Speaking of vote counts...CAN I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION PLEASE
Sorian WILL BE REPLACING Terrabyte20xx EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
THE PLAYER ROSTER WILL BE UPDATED IN ABOUT AN HOUR
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE OF VOTE COUNTS ETC. [/b]
Never thought I'd say this on a day 2, but with things looking this inevitable I'm all for a turbo.
(lol)
I can't justify keeping my vote on Terrabyte after he is leaving the game of course. The main basis of my scum reading of him has been his low activity and lack of commitment to scum-hunting. However, if he is being replaced because of lack of enthusiasm for the game, then I can't very well stick to my guns on that argument.
So, there is someone else I have been suspicious of since Day 1.
Vote: melonrabbit
I still think that melonrabbit has been making an effort to say as little as possible and stay out of the limelight. She sticks to short, one or two sentence posts as much as possible, and makes a lot of fluff posts when she actually posts. I don't think I have yet to see her actually go after someone aggressively yet, either.
We can't turbo ya ninny.
Even if all but one vote someone day doesn't end prematurely.
Ah. Guessing we have a vigilante and a doctor
If we choose to toss aside Occam's razor, seeing as this is gafia after all, we could have a doctor and a SK, or less likely, a doctor and a vig.
Hmm, with the kill choice I was assuming doctor/vig, but I hadn't considered the probability of a doctor/cop/vig combo
This is a set of speculation I saw from the start of this day phase. I have meant to go back to it, but I've been busy with other topics. Why does everyone immediately discard the simplest explanation (that scum NKed LP), and instead jump to the conclusion that it was a vigilante or serial killer responsible? It isn't at all unusual for scum to target someone less likely to be protected by a doctor. Normally, I would be very surprised if we had a doctor block a NK on Night 1. Thus, if we had two killers, the only way we would have gotten one kill would be via one of two methods:L_P could be a vigi, considering the no vote and heat but no traction.
You'd think a vigi would kill the other person in a tight lynch result though.
I've thought about Stan. Nothing worrying from his posts that I've seen though.You or Sophia currently most likely. Could also be someone who hasn't really been in the spotlight yet - Stan or Fireblend would be my "shot in the dark" guesses.
Who do you think is the third one when I flip town?
Vote: SkyOdin
Work is chaos right now and I keep getting interrupted. Will try and make it back for deadlime. I will emphasize that I get good vibes from Stan and believe him to your opposite, 1911.
Well that was a good night kill choice.
I only moved from L_P to break the tie. When I switched back it was clear Hyper was going to be lynched without my help so I went back to where my gut feeling was. I was obviously wrong, but I generally think having all players on a single player at day end is less useful than having the votes be a bit more scattered.
Okay, I come back to a pile of accusations and votes on my head. To be honest I am not surprised after how Hyper flipped and the way I justified my vote. However, because of how many people are quoting me and asking me questions, please allow me to address the accusations in a general sense rather than one by one. It would turn into a mess if I tried to quote it all.
Now, on the first order of business: I was wrong. That's the key thrust of my defense; I misread Hyper and L_P.
In large part, I simply got overwhelmed by the speed of the thread in the last two hours of the day. Most of the main drive against Hyper happened in those two hours, and those two hours made up half of the posts from Day 1. I simply lost track of who had said what when. When it was coming down to the wire and I had to make my vote, I was desperately using the search function to find posts made by the four people who were tied towards the end there. I ended up rereading Hyper's posts, but I read them in a vacuum divorced from a lot of the context of the rest of the thread. I think I mentally mixed up Hyperactivity and Ty4on a little bit. So, I made a mistake. I am sorry.
When I reread the thread in detail during the Night phase, I could see a lot more clearly where Kawl was coming from. Reading the thread at a more leisurely pace helped me get my thoughts much more in order.
However, I have to dispute the narrative that I was "throwing shade at Kawl's plan". I was initially confused about the plan, but I would consider myself one of its biggest proponents in the thread. Hell, I helped resolve and address other people's concerns about the peek plan. For example, i helped solve Stanley's worries about the plan. I did have some reservations about the plan, but I figured that if we were going to do it, we might as well do it well. Hell, I had two minutes to post when the game started before i ahd to rush out the door, and I made sure to follow through on the plan as we agreed, even though Kawl had apparently decided it was pointless. Obviously it is not pointless, since we still might have a cop! We might even have two more! No need to give up hope on that front just yet.
On that note, I find it suspicious that there has been such a dedicated push being made for me when I said up front that I couldn't post for a few hours. That was a good time to put pressure on people who could actually respond and provide answers, but instead it feels like someone has been trying to snowball a case against me when I couldn't properly defend myself.
I had been reading cabot and Sophia as mostly town after my reread last night, but I did have a few reservations about their alignment because I thought there were some oddities in their focus and read-lists. Now I am getting more suspicious that one or the other is scum.
In any event, I rescind any previous comment about melon being anything less than scummy. After some review, melon has definitely been acting scummy. I think splinter is also on my current top scum list.
On the other hand, i can't imagine a scenario where a scum is the most active player in the game, puts forward an unfamiliar but solid town defense plan, and aggressively busses a fellow scum all on day one. That would be a BOLD scum gambit. So I think I will discard some of my initial reservations about Kawl and accept him as our town overlord. At least until MYLO.
Kawl is town until we get better evidence of a serial killer. Anyone trying to suggest otherwise is scummy as fuck.