MITT - Netflix Documentary on Romney's election campaign (Streaming now on Netflix)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I saw Mitt Romney on Meet the Press a few weeks back. What was most amazing is that Romney was acting like the election never ended. David Gregory was asking about health care and Romney had a unique perspective to offer since he passed the template for the ACA in his home state, and Romney still acted like he could gain in the polls. He was just in pure out attack mode.

Usually after the election is over candidates can drop the message discipline and give some unguarded, meaningful remarks. You know, act human. He couldn't do it.
 
I saw Mitt Romney on Meet the Press a few weeks back. What was most amazing is that Romney was acting like the election never ended. David Gregory was asking about health care and Romney had a unique perspective to offer since he passed the template for the ACA in his home state, and Romney still acted like he could gain in the polls. He was just in pure out attack mode.

Usually after the election is over candidates can drop the message discipline and give some unguarded, meaningful remarks. You know, act human. He couldn't do it.
Does he plan to run again?
 
I saw Mitt Romney on Meet the Press a few weeks back. What was most amazing is that Romney was acting like the election never ended. David Gregory was asking about health care and Romney had a unique perspective to offer since he passed the template for the ACA in his home state, and Romney still acted like he could gain in the polls. He was just in pure out attack mode.

Usually after the election is over candidates can drop the message discipline and give some unguarded, meaningful remarks. You know, act human. He couldn't do it.

Romney is salty. Their campaign thought Romney was going to win easily. Skewed polling.

I mean they waited even after all the networks had called the race because they couldn't believe they could have lost. Romney probably still can't believe that Obama is still President.
 
It's interesting that Netflix would push a doc like this. The last few political docs that got pushed heavily all slanted to the left. Does Netflix think this gives them a unique voice?

Insurance companies that tried to fuck over their consumers by not providing essential healthcare benefits that all civilized countries provide, decided to drop them instead. You should be angry at the insurance companies for failing to provide additional healthcare.
Like maternity care to single men

Those plans were killed for bullshit reasons
 
It's interesting that Netflix would push a doc like this. The last few political docs that got pushed heavily all slanted to the left. Does Netflix think this gives them a unique voice?

It doesn't appear to me to be an entirely right-wing documentary. I'm definitely going to watch it because it's interesting. It doesn't seem to be about promoting an idea, but showing the story of a man trying to become the president when we know he is going to lose.
 
It's interesting that Netflix would push a doc like this. The last few political docs that got pushed heavily all slanted to the left. Does Netflix think this gives them a unique voice?

Like maternity care to single men

Those plans were killed for bullshit reasons

The vast majority of cars have to include installations for car seats, even if they're sold to a single person. The cost is shared between everybody so that installation for a car seat isn't an extra $2,000 dollars.

It's the same thing with maternity care. So women don't have to pay a lot more for care, the costs is shared between everyone. In addition, health insurance now has to include preventative care, including for example, tests to check for various heart issues for smokers, even if you haven't smoked.
 
I will be interested to see this.

I refuse to believe that the Romney campaign couldn't see their loss coming. Even if they weren't Nate Silver true believers, they were clearly behind in almost every battleground state. I hope at some point in the 2-3 weeks prior to election, the filmmakers asked Romney to comment on all those Ohio/Michigan polls that showed them losing.
 
I know enough about both parties that I don't judge a candidate based on their party. Mitt is just a businessman that has the skills to turn around our economy. He's not a politician and that's why I liked him.

He was a fucking governor. He's most definitely a polition.
 
Mitt's more of a man than Barrack ever was. I'm glad this is coming out.

6A2ToxZ.gif


Seriously, cooler than cool.

Taken like a man, too.

Some salt echoes through eternity.
 
I feel for anyone who works that hard and that long, but still loses. Every now and then someone like George Bush the second slips by, but normally presidential candidates have been working decades and sometimes their adult life with the goal of becoming president. I cant imagine how bad it would feel on election night giving the concession speech after you failed. Then I remember how rich almost every one of the candidates are and how much fun it would be to go on crazy vacation for months after losing.
 
Mitt attended to the Sundance premiere friday:

PARK CITY, Utah (AP) — Mitt Romney surprised filmgoers when he came to the Salt Lake City premiere of "MITT", the documentary that tracks his run for the presidency. But he declined to share what he thought about the movie afterward, even with the filmmaker behind it.

"If he hated it, I don't know if he's going to tell me," director Greg Whiteley said. "He's nice and he and (his wife) Ann are gracious. I wonder what they really think."

Whiteley followed the Romney family for six years, from the Massachusetts governor's first attempt for the Republican nomination in 2006 to his run against now-President Barack Obama in 2012. Whiteley said the Sundance Film Festival premiere Friday was the Romneys' first look at the film, which will debut on Netflix on Jan. 24.

Romney and his wife are also expected to attend Saturday night's premiere of the film in Park City, Utah.

Whiteley said he long admired the Romneys because, as a Mormon, he'd heard of George Romney while growing up.

"What Hank Greenberg and Sandy Koufax is to young Jewish kids probably is what George Romney was to me," Whiteley said. "When I heard that Mitt Romney was running for president, I had just finished my second film and occurred to me that might make a great movie."


Through a meeting with Romney's eldest son, Tagg Romney, Whiteley pitched the documentary idea and he "thought it was great."

Romney's campaign, however, not so much. Whiteley had unfettered access to the Romney family, which made campaign officials nervous, but the family went along with it anyway.

Part of any campaign strategy, Whiteley said, is to "present the most polished, most veneered, most presidential image as you can."

"What we forget is we need to connect with these people," Whiteley said. "They're human beings, and that gets lost in all of this."

The portrait of Romney in "MITT" is very human. He's shown playing in the snow with his grandkids, eating pasta from a plastic takeout container and brainstorming with his family about what to say in a concession speech. He discusses the pros and cons of his presidential run with his wife, children and siblings. Intimate footage shows his moments of confidence and doubt and the emotional toll the campaign took on his family.

Romney comes off as warm and likable, but the director said that wasn't the goal of the film.

"I had no agenda in trying to make him look good," Whiteley said. "I had no agenda in trying to convince people to vote for him."

He describes the film as "very apolitical."

"I really saw my job as to just shut up, film everything I can, and when I'm editing this footage, just try and find a balance between just being as honest and authentic and as entertaining as I possibly can."

http://news.yahoo.com/romney-attends-sundance-premiere-39-mitt-39-194814542.html?soc_src=copy

I have some doubt about the objectivity of this documentary, but it still interesting to have glimpse at the campaign of a US presidential candidate.
 
It still sounds fascinating. I can't imagine the filmmaker trying to make some political point against romney because it could come off as insulting I think since he had so much access to them

The best I can personally hope for is a neutral sort of view but I'm sure they're including and leaving things out that help the narrative, whatever it may be
 
I served an LDS mission with one of Mitt's sons, Craig. We still keep up on things, and I'm interested to see his presence in this. We never really talked about the documentary, and he never talked about on Facebook or Instagram at all. It should be fun to tease him about later if the camera catches him doing anything dumb.

I hope that this does expose people to what he's really like. Mitt is a good guy, and he's a fantastic father and grandfather.
 
Saw excerpts, one reviewer said, if the Romney in MITT was the MITT the candidate, he would win in a landslide
I always thought of Romney as a bit of a good-hearted doofus. He clearly did a lot of good in MA regarding public education and health care. However, between his own gaffes and what I suspect to be pressure from the Republicans to appeal to the far right, he ended up becoming someone to laugh at or scorn. Whatever version of Romney that was presented to us definitely deserved to lose. I'm wondering what the Romney under that was like.
 
I always thought of Romney as a bit of a good-hearted doofus. He clearly did a lot of good in MA regarding public education and health care. However, between his own gaffes and what I suspect to be pressure from the Republicans to appeal to the far right, he ended up becoming someone to laugh at or scorn. Whatever version of Romney that was presented to us definitely deserved to lose. I'm wondering what the Romney under that was like.

He was definitely strong-armed into adopting some policy and opinion that he would otherwise not have. The party was nervous with him as it was, and they shoved him more right on the spectrum than he really sits. It's kind of like working for an employer, I guess. Sometimes you don't get to do things your way to stay employed.
 
He was definitely strong-armed into adopting some policy and opinion that he would otherwise not have. The party was nervous with him as it was, and they shoved him more right on the spectrum than he really sits. It's kind of like working for an employer, I guess. Sometimes you don't get to do things your way to stay employed.
Yeah, watching him talk always seemed like he wasn't comfortable in his own skin. Can't wait to dig into this documentary and see behind that layer. Hope it doesn't purposely lean towards his good side, because I have a feeling he doesn't really need that.

Edit: And yeah, then's there's stuff like that ^ and the 47% stuff that really bother me. Wonder if the film hits on those points.
 
I always thought of Romney as a bit of a good-hearted doofus. He clearly did a lot of good in MA regarding public education and health care. However, between his own gaffes and what I suspect to be pressure from the Republicans to appeal to the far right, he ended up becoming someone to laugh at or scorn. Whatever version of Romney that was presented to us definitely deserved to lose. I'm wondering what the Romney under that was like.

Yeah . . . Romney had a chance to win the election but the GOP did not. Romney was forced to disavow his biggest political accomplishment (the Massachusetts healthcare law) and had to toe the line on a lot of hard-right GOP positions that I don't know if he really believes in. That made him look hypocritical or fake depending on how you looked at it.
 
I hope that this does expose people to what he's really like. Mitt is a good guy, and he's a fantastic father and grandfather.

He might be good to his family and nice to his neighbors or whoever, but that doesn't really change anything about his policies or his approach (or lack thereof) to certain issues - which I think/hope is what more people are concerned with.
 
I can sympathize for Mitt under the grounds that he was a good governor, he was intelligent, and really believed he had the win.

But the party line has just become so far to the right that that Mitt didn't really stand a chance. He's pretty much obligated to tow that line and the GOP platform is not becoming a party of governance, but rather a platform of ideology, anti-science, and undisguised cronyism.
 
If Mitt had won, I wonder why sort of congressional bills we would be seeing.

A lot of horrible ones, I'm sure. But also, we would probably see a lot of the basic, commonsense bills we pass every year that we just simply didn't get through due to the political gridlock.
 
He might be good to his family and nice to his neighbors or whoever, but that doesn't really change anything about his policies or his approach (or lack thereof) to certain issues - which I think/hope is what more people are concerned with.

What do the political issues matter for anymore? He's not running for president anymore. I don't think he's looking forward to much besides retirement and possibly a speaking engagement once in a while. This is probably one of the final blips on the radar you'll see from him before he just quietly retreats into a more private life.
 
I really doubt that. I'm under no illusions things would be much different with Romney as president right now.
Yeah, the grass could certainly appear to look greener with how abysmal Obama has been this term, but I'm still convinced things would be even worse if Romney had won.

Still, I'm very much looking forward to watching this. I followed the election like a hawk, and this will probably be a super fascinating watch.
 
Romney himself may be a good guy, but his politics are not my cup of tea, and never will be. I'm unconcerned about this documentary changing my opinion of him on a personal level, because I'd still be very much against his presidency regardless.

I have no doubt that he wanted to win and help the United States.
 
Thanks for the reminder guys. I'm guessing everyone who sees this will wish that Mitt was now our President. I'll be watching with a box of Kleenex.

Ahahaha, Bulbo's posts are some of the funniest on Gaf.

Yeah, the grass could certainly appear to look greener with how abysmal Obama has been this term, but I'm still convinced things would be even worse if Romney had won.

Do you think things are worse now than during the first term? All of Obama's scandals have been the uncovering of programs begun years before the 2012 election. His drone policy certainly deserves criticism, but drone strikes are not something that he just started doing.
 
Cannot fucking wait for this. This is so intimate that even though it's about Mitt it has a real chance as to illuminating us as to the process.
 
Mitt seemed like a nice, personable and even funny guy to be around. His entire persona and stature changed when in campaign mode. It was almost unrecognisable. I remember seeing a leaked recording of me talking to Hannity off-camera before an interview when I first noticed just how different he is when he isn't speaking to an audience.

It's a shame. He seems like a decent guy
 
Mitt seemed like a nice, personable and even funny guy to be around. His entire persona and stature changed when in campaign mode. It was almost unrecognisable. I remember seeing a leaked recording of me talking to Hannity off-camera before an interview when I first noticed just how different he is when he isn't speaking to an audience.

It's a shame. He seems like a decent guy

Even though he seems like a decent guy - and I'm even inclined to agree when they show how nice he seems with his family - I personally would never vote for someone who changed positions on literally every policy he has ever spoke out on. It's too much mist.
 
No candidate will ever admit to having a concession speech.

They all have at least four.

Otherwise it's the wrath, from high atop the... the thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom