• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Mizzou vigil goes horribly wrong after speaker makes it about race

Status
Not open for further replies.

deli2000

Member
I don't know what i'm more annoyed by, someone lecturing people in the middle of a fucking vigil, or the fact that people are going to use this video to take potshots at the progressive left until the end of time.
 

BriGuy

Member
Not sure what I find more tasteless. The person on stage politicizing the tragedy by using the vigial to criticize their local community for showing up here and not other local events or the people who are so immediately offended and visibly outraged at the mere suggestion that issues outside of the black and white dichotomy matter.

...

The heckling. And the storming off like children. That's more tasteless.

:e:

Hard to say definitely though. It's a video taken out of context and chopped to bits to make white people look like victims.
Yeah, those damn hecklers. Who do they think they are, reminding the speaker that they're there attending a vigil to mourn the loss of so many innocent lives? There's plenty of time for that after they hear about how horrible they are for being born white.
 

dalin80

Banned
Wow, that's a painfully awkward way to try and hijack the mourning of a tragedy for a separate cause.

Maybe next time they could get a NRA spokesman up there for maximum sensitivity.
 

Breads

Banned
Yeah, those damn hecklers. Who do they think they are, reminding the speaker that they're there attending a vigil to mourn the loss of so many innocent lives? There's plenty of time for that after they hear about how horrible they are for being born white.

They made it just as much about themselves as the speaker did.

The speaker gets points though because they are presumably involved with organizing it in the first place. Meanwhile the hecklers just indignantly stomped out of a vigil because their sensibilities were hurt.
 

Malvolio

Member
Not a good idea. With the emotions that have been stirred by the shooting though, I can understand people not thinking clearly. Now is the perfect time to display tolerance towards these missteps and regain focus on the problem at hand.
 

Strimei

Member
They made it just as much about themselves as the speaker did.

The speaker gets points though because they are presumably involved with organizing it in the first place. Meanwhile the hecklers just indignantly stomped out of a vigil because their sensibilities were hurt.

I don't know if the guys seen walking away in the video were them, but the report Cyan posted does mention that at least one of the people who walked away had lived in Orlando, had visited the nightclub, and knew regulars. (edit: said OP originally, realized I meant Cyan's post)

I think they had a right to be upset. They knew people who were there. They were at a vigil for those who were hurt and killed.

So yeah, maybe their feelings were hurt. I'd say they had a right to feel hurt.
 

FartOfWar

Banned
pretty brave of that speaker on stage to let that out. sad how the hecklers responded, but not surprising.

Pretty shitty of that speaker to suggest that people who appeared to show solidarity and mourn the lives lost in Orlando are somehow a threat to her due to her/their color. Give me a break. I thought "context matters."
 

BriGuy

Member
They made it just as much about themselves as the speaker did.

No, they didn't. If they had just randomly yelled out in the middle of the vigil, unprovoked, you would have a point. That's not what happened.

The speaker gets points though because they are presumably involved with organizing it in the first place. Meanwhile the hecklers just indignantly stomped out of a vigil because their sensibilities were hurt.
Her actions were offensive, probably doubly so to the two gay men who are feeling the fall out from this massacre the most. They're not obligated to stay there and put up with her shit.
 

Breads

Banned
I don't know if the guys seen walking away in the video were them, but the report Cyan posted does mention that at least one of the people who walked away had lived in Orlando, had visited the nightclub, and knew regulars. (edit: said OP originally, realized I meant Cyan's post)

I think they had a right to be upset. They knew people who were there. They were at a vigil for those who were hurt and killed.

So yeah, maybe their feelings were hurt. I'd say they had a right to feel hurt.

Not saying they didn't have a right to feel hurt, I'm just making a value judgement on what I found more tasteless. Tact aside how they all feel are rightfully justified. This is a tragedy afterall. And although I do think that interesectionality is an issue I don't think what either of them did is very productive other than raising visibility on how certain people feel.

And BriGuy you know how I feel and I know how you feel. I don't see how discussing it further is productive here. I disagree - as is my right in regards to my ranking in the taste-o-meter.
 

devilhawk

Member
This is MU, we should remember. I'm half surprised that the speaker didn't call out "Can I get some muscle over here" and forcibly remove any white vigil attendees.

I don't know what i'm more annoyed by, someone lecturing people in the middle of a fucking vigil, or the fact that people are going to use this video to take potshots at the progressive left until the end of time.
There's nothing progressive about what the speaker did.
 

Piecake

Member
Not saying they didn't have a right to feel hurt, I'm just making a value judgement on what I found more tasteless. Tact aside how they all feel are rightfully justified. This is a tragedy afterall. And although I do think that interesectionality is an issue I don't think what either of them did is very productive other than raising visibility on how certain people feel.

She told her audience what they were feeling and thinking though. She said her audience were all a bunch of racists who were only here to morn for the white victims. Who wouldn't feel upset about that? Denying that out load and straight up leaving such an event is a natural reaction.

Vigils come with expected conventions and norms. It is a place where people can come together and mourn as a community for the victims. She completely shattered that by telling her audience that they are a bunch of racists. Right there, the whole purpose of the vigil was ruined for some/many of the people there - that togetherness of expressing grief and mourning as a community. The people who left likely felt that they could mourn and grieve for the victims someplace else or alone, and at a time and place where they werent told that they were piees of shit and implied that they were not wanted.
 
Not surprised by the response.

I think POC LGBTs are in serious need of support, and in many cases, that goes by deaf ears from white LGBTs and straight POCs alike, nevermind everyone else.


Nobody wants to hear that at a vigil, but frankly, they clearly never wanted to hear it if she had to bring it up right then and there.

Hard to make the crowd's feelings take priority when people like you are dying like this.


I would have chosen a later time, a different place, but one thing is for damn sure: she would have been ignored doing just that. Per usual.
 
Not surprised by the response.

I think POC LGBTs are in serious need of support, and in many cases, that goes by deaf ears from white LGBTs and straight POCs alike, nevermind everyone else.


Nobody wants to hear that at a vigil, but frankly, they clearly never wanted to hear it if she had to bring it up right then and there.

Hard to make the crowd's feelings take priority when people like you are dying like this.


I would have chosen a later time, a different place, but one thing is for damn sure: she would have been ignored doing just that. Per usual.
It was a vigil to mourn and celebrate the lives of QPOC. It wasn't a white pride rally.
 
All 49 victims have been mourned, not just the white ones. The fact that most were Latino has not been emphasized in the media because, out of political correctness, they don't want to unveil that ISIS sympathizers are not only homophobic but also racist as fuck. This lowkey deflection from her is very suspect
 

watershed

Banned
Race is an important issue in the gay community as it is in all communities, but she chose a divisive approach when clearly the moment called for a uniting approach.
 

Dennis

Banned
Why are people saying this was her one chance to have a captive audience?

The moment the words came out her mouth was the moment people stopped listening to her and stopped respecting her.

Not all events can be about all things. And making the death of 50 people all about you is dumb.
 

commedieu

Banned
i condone what she did because i watched the video and felt sorry for her.

the logic about waiting for the right time is just a lesson learned from experience that it's never the right time to talk about certain topics.

+1. Tact has delivered the world we are currently in. All the guidelines of "how to do things by my standards from the couch," have been followed. Yet. Still the same identical outcome.

It would be the same dismissal if she had an event specifically for her message. As we've seen. Never a good time.

This country gives no shits about the lgbt community. As we see with bathroom bans and everyone trying their best to squirm out of acknowledging same sex marriage. A lot of frustration out there as many have followed the official guidelines. And yet.. little progress. Always a finger wag.

It's never the right time.
 

norm9

Member
+1. Tact has delivered the world we are currently in. All the guidelines of "how to do things by my standards from the couch," have been followed. Yet. Still the same identical outcome.

It would be the same dismissal if she had an event specifically for her message. As we've seen. Never a good time.

This country gives no shits about the lgbt community. As we see with bathroom bans. A lot of frustration out there as many have followed the official guidelines. And yet.. little progress. Always a finger wag.

She should go down to Orlando and deliver her message at some of the funerals. An even bigger audience down there.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
i condone what she did because i watched the video and felt sorry for her.

the logic about waiting for the right time is just a lesson learned from experience that it's never the right time to talk about certain topics.

I think there's a philosophical median where you're absolutely right, but in practical terms, she goofed. Her words were poorly chosen, her point badly made and the giant blowback and negativity she's brought on herself and the event, have NOT made people have any kind of meaningful conversation. Here's what's objectively happening on social media:

1. Racists and homophobes are using this as proof that the Gays (tm) and the Coloreds (tm) are all unreasonable to the point of churlishness and cannot be taken seriously.
2. Progressives and average people think she's an asshat.
3. LGBT folks are incensed at her insensitivity.
4. Even a bunch of BLM folks are irritated at her goalpost centralization.


In short, she objectively did harm to the very point she was trying to make because she made a shitty egotistical and tactically askew decision.

And her mode of presentation made it not about any kind of philosophical point or movement and absolutely about her radical cred.
 

entremet

Member
Her message was a bludgeon to the head. Needs polish for more effectiveness.

You can talk about race in this context, but that also requires tact.

For those condoning her actions, how persuasive was she?
 

commedieu

Banned
She should go down to Orlando and deliver her message at some of the funerals. An even bigger audience down there.

The issues she's discussing won't be realistically vetted by the american public no matter what she, or anyone else does. Some issues are always dismissed. It has been via eloquent speakers, or evidence of issues. It's a non issue for a significant % of america. Has been for quite a while. More people will complain about this, than participate in a reversal of institutional problems here. I mean I get it. No dog in the fight for a lot of folks. This is one of those issues that shouldn't need victims to grab attention of others. Yet, here we are.

Her message was a bludgeon to the head. Needs polish for more effectiveness.

You can talk about race in this context, but that also requires tact.

For those condoning her actions, how persuasive was she?

No one has been persuasive. As this message shouldn't have to be "sold" to america. It's been packaged in all different ways. Identical outcome from all messengers. Various angles and approaches all end in the same way. It's been a few 100 years of messaging in every way imaginable. The only response is a parental one. Every time.


Remember. We live in a post racial society. Things get to a stupid point, which this is. But there are issues constantly ignored that grow frustration in individuals exhausted of trying.

The country has failed already if people still need to be persuaded of the problems here. I can see issues from over seas and know they are wrong. It just doesn't happen here. People have to be 'sold' on messaging of racism.

Yes this method doesn't work. Neither does any other method for this specific message. So how do you convince a nation crippled by racism and has a current candidate running on racism, that it's a problem?
 

Rayis

Member
I can't watch this, far too cringeworthy, race is important to talk about but don't be antagonistic or people will not be receptive.
 

ThisGuy

Member
Who displayed racism?
I'm gonna go out on a limb and believe some people feel that way because her reasoning was due to skin color.


Or maybe the posters upset people are just now showing up for Latino causes?

I dunno, could go either way?
 
The issues she's discussing won't be realistically vetted by the american public no matter what she, or anyone else does. Some issues are always dismissed. It has been via eloquent speakers, or evidence of issues. It's a non issue for a significant % of america. Has been for quite a while. More people will complain about this, than participate in a reversal of institutional problems here. I mean I get it. No dog in the fight for a lot of folks. This is one of those issues that shouldn't need victims to grab attention of others. Yet, here we are.

No one has been persuasive. As this message shouldn't have to be "sold" to america. It's been packaged in all different ways. Identical outcome from all messengers. Various angles and approaches all end in the same way. It's been a few 100 years of messaging in every way imaginable. The only response is a parental one. Every time.


Remember. We live in a post racial society. Things get to a stupid point, which this is. But there are issues constantly ignored that grow frustration in individuals exhausted of trying.
What is your argument? "People won't listen regardless, so may as well bring it up in a really shitty way that will only hurt your message"

If you're giving a vigil I feel like you could fairly easily discuss "hate" as a whole and try to make a larger point about it. Even something like "hey, we appreciate your support but hate extends beyond the issues of LGBT. There are others who need your support as well"

Instead they decided to insult the attendees and turn it into a condescending "gotcha!"

I sympathize with the notion that "there's never a right time", but this isn't just social disruption. It's ignorant.
 

commedieu

Banned
What is your argument? "People won't listen regardless, so may as well bring it up in a really shitty way that will only hurt your message"

If you're giving a vigil I feel like you could fairly easily discuss "hate" as a whole and try to make a larger point about it. Even something like "hey, we appreciate your support but hate extends beyond the issues of LGBT. There are others who need your support as well"

Instead they decided to insult the attendees and turn it into a condescending "gotcha!"

I sympathize with the notion that "there's never a right time", but this isn't just social disruption. It's ignorant.
I agree. But it's never 'the right time.'it doesn't help the situation. But neither has anything else. So it's no loss to me.
Bad form surely. But good form isn't received either.
It's not an argument. It's the reality in the usa. It all stems from the same root issues here that are flatly ignored. I think that has to be taken into consideration. I'm not an idiot. This is a shitty situation. And she will more than likely regret it.

Nothing 'hurts' messaging that isn't being listened to full stop. No matter the messenger. One can't go negative marginalized.
 

kirblar

Member
We have 50 people, mostly gay men, massacred as a direct result of internalized male homophobia.

And she, someone who is neither gay, nor male, takes it upon herself to declare that the real issue is something else entirely. In the span of two minutes, she makes it absolutely clear that she has no actual interest in the issues facing gay men, and that she only seeks to use this as a springboard for things that she's personally invested/interested in.

This shit isn't ok when it's white people going #alllivesmatter and try to change the subject, and it's not ok here.
 
She's preaching to a LGTB vigil crowd that are probably progressive or moderate on social issues just because they're white? That's extremely stupid and sounds like someone judging others for their skin color. How does she know those people haven't focused on racial issues?
 
We have 50 people, mostly gay men, massacred as a direct result of internalized male homophobia.

And she, someone who is neither gay, nor male, takes it upon herself to declare that the real issue is something else entirely. In the span of two minutes, she makes it absolutely clear that she has no actual interest in the issues facing gay men, and that she only seeks to use this as a springboard for things that she's personally invested/interested in.

This shit isn't ok when it's white people going #alllivesmatter and try to change the subject, and it's not ok here.

Not only that, she didn't bring up any specific race issue in the LGBT community that preoccupies her. She was just rambling about "muh co-opting" and "muh allies". Just there to virtue signal and zero meaning to her words. I'm not one for tact, people can speak up at the most inappropriate moment for all i care, but I am one for coherence, and this waste had neither.
 
Why are people saying this was her one chance to have a captive audience?

The moment the words came out her mouth was the moment people stopped listening to her and stopped respecting her.

Not all events can be about all things. And making the death of 50 people all about you is dumb.

anyone who stopped listening then never respected her in the first place.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
Who displayed racism?

Well she blanket accused all white people of being clueless about [and it gets fuzzy here, because her actual point was egotistical and incoherent] matters of racial something.

If you said that all black people could not understand [insert anything here] then it would be racist. Now I'm fully aware that it's a historically asymmetrical politic, but her thundering lack of nuance actually did make it racist.
 

FartOfWar

Banned
She's preaching to a LGTB vigil crowd that are probably progressive or moderate on social issues just because they're white? That's extremely stupid and sounds like someone judging others for their skin color. How does she know those people haven't focused on racial issues?

It's also entirely possible that, having been gay in the 70s, 80s, and 90s, the older men in the video endured more oppression than she's faced in her 19 years on the planet -- more than half of those being in an era where the majority of Americans express support for gay rights and marriage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom