We need more "what if" scenarios.
These conditional allies don't give a shit about anything but their own comfort. They will never, ever step up for black people. BLM has been going on for years now. Where have they been? What has to be done for them before they'll do anything for anyone else?But aren't non-allies exactly the people you want to convert? To have sympathy for you, so that you can get them to be on your side? And make more of a change?
If this is creating more support for the movement/getting more people to be sympathetic to the cause, then yeah, I'd say this is a good move. But if this is generating more support from only the people who were already supporting it anyway, then it'd say it's a bad one.
Yep, so fucking true.of course you do when you do not have to worry about police brutality. You probably want people to protest in their designated protest zones so you continue to ignore the problems this country has.
We need more "what if" scenarios.
But aren't non-allies exactly the people you want to convert? To have sympathy for you, so that you can get them to be on your side? And make more of a change?
If this is creating more support for the movement/getting more people to be sympathetic to the cause, then yeah, I'd say this is a good move. But if this is generating more support from only the people who were already supporting it anyway, then it'd say it's a bad one.
But aren't non-allies exactly the people you want to convert? To have sympathy for you, so that you can get them to be on your side? And make more of a change?
If this is creating more support for the movement/getting more people to be sympathetic to the cause, then yeah, I'd say this is a good move. But if this is generating more support from only the people who were already supporting it anyway, then it'd say it's a bad one.
They should have continued driving.
Oh believe me, I have. And I get it. I just disagree with this doing anything to get people on their side.
And it's sad how some people jump my shit without attempting intelligent discourse. I'm on the protestors side. They don't need to win me over. But shit won't change without influencing a lot of people that aren't currently on their side. And I simply disagree that this particular technique is fruitful.
Mother fuck me all you want.
People are apathetic enough, so sometimes a little jolting to lives and thoughts of others is what's needed. You can ignore a protest off to the side, there's been plenty of those, but you can't ignore this, and if it turns people away from a very important and real issue to a lot of people, then so be it.
They should have continued driving.
Always a few, you should see how bad Reddit gets with these stories.
Got a 1 min segment on local news. Which is 2 minutes shorter than the segment on how bad the cold season is.
They should have continued driving.
Unrelated, but did John Q's son die? Anyone?
They should have continued driving.
Yeah it's generally a good idea to consider consequences of one's actions.
DON'T YOU SPOIL THAT NEARLY 20 YEAR OLD MOVIE FOR ME, GORDON
Probably looks at them like dogs..hates dogs..Yeah? That's your answer? Kill 'em all?
Nope, they'll move out the way.Yeah? That's your answer? Kill 'em all?
So, you do agree with the protestors?
You ain't rightUnrelated, but did John Q's son die? Anyone?
Yeah? That's your answer? Kill 'em all?
They should have continued driving.
Probably looks at them like dogs..hates dogs..
To be fair, they likely had that second one prepped and ready to go for a while. Those are easy.
Black Lives Matter less than being in traffic.
It's probably the exact opposite way to get (edit: those who aren't already sympathetic) white people to care
non American here, are BLM actually making any inroads with their protesting? I know you folks are in an election cycle so it's become a talking point for some candidates but do people think positive change is coming in regards to how black Americans are treated by the establishment?
no ulterior motive just interested in getting some insight
You don't get change by being obedient and getting everyone on your side, just take a look at MLK's approval rating in 1966, 32% positive and 63% negative.
non American here, are BLM actually making any inroads with their protesting? I know you folks are in an election cycle so it's become a talking point for some candidates but do people think positive change is coming in regards to how black Americans are treated by the establishment?
no ulterior motive just interested in getting some insight
Just an observation.
Another fan of ethos, it would seem.This is an appeal to Kant's Categorical Imperative, right?
non American here, are BLM actually making any inroads with their protesting? I know you folks are in an election cycle so it's become a talking point for some candidates but do people think positive change is coming in regards to how black Americans are treated by the establishment?
no ulterior motive just interested in getting some insight
Are they actually blocking emergency services or is that just a hypothetical? I would assume that there would be emergency services stationed on each side of the bridge, it would make no sense to go along something that long (eyeballing from Google Maps).
Nope. Just something constant said in these thread. That, and the hate bread by inconvenience..Are they actually blocking emergency services or is that just a hypothetical?
How dare you assume what the great doctor would think? You don't have your head on straight enough..MLK would be fucking demonized if he was around today
He wouldn't be asking why BLM is blocking the bridge, he would be asking why 60 years later they still have to block a bridge
"Yeah, yeah, yeah I'm for your struggle but don't fucking inconvenience me."