Rumblebones
Banned
If there's one thing I can think of right now that I think should be reviewed in terms of scoring it's cage dominance, or more specifically centre control. Historically, judges favour fighters that command the centre of the octagon, but should it really weigh that much when they're not imposing their dominance by taking control if it's a case where the other fighter doesn't want to fight in the centre?
Some fighters are well aware their best odds are fighting at distance or by creating more space. If they're not battling for control of the centre, should judges actually take that into consideration? Woodley and Overeem are good examples of this. Woodley likes the space to blitz and creates that space by backing up to the cage. It has served him well on many occasions so can it really be held against him? Overeem likes to circle around his opponents and reset often because he knows his chin ain't what it used to be, and he's had a lot of success doing it.
I dunno if centre control should really matter at all if it's not a battle of control.
Some fighters are well aware their best odds are fighting at distance or by creating more space. If they're not battling for control of the centre, should judges actually take that into consideration? Woodley and Overeem are good examples of this. Woodley likes the space to blitz and creates that space by backing up to the cage. It has served him well on many occasions so can it really be held against him? Overeem likes to circle around his opponents and reset often because he knows his chin ain't what it used to be, and he's had a lot of success doing it.
I dunno if centre control should really matter at all if it's not a battle of control.