yeah i don't think we will look back at Jones beating a 41 year old Henderson who just lost to Jake Shields at 185 as a big win for him. Context matters. You can't sit here and pretend that every win off the same guy is equal.
"Just" lost to Jake Shields? You mean 5 fights ago?
Hendo doesn't need excuses, since leaving PRIDE he's beaten Shogun, Fedor, Franklin, and Bisping.
The point is, he's getitng it done and has adapted his game over time and become a dangerous striker with dynamite in his right hand.
Maybe people should start looking at the effect of fighters not adapting their game over time instead of blaming it on fighters not "being in their prime anymore" at whatever age they're at.
For example, Tito's ground and pound shit was extinct because the game evolved with guys who got better than him. His stone age MMA shit didn't work anymore when guys got as good as him. Same with Liddell, he rode the iron chin until it wasn't iron anymore until the end. Thats on him and his flaws though that he couldn't adapt his game to face the inevitable, that he couldn't do that forever. Similar to Wanderlei.
It's total bullshit after someone loses the fanboys of the fighters jump out and say NUH UH IT DOESN'T COUNT! WHO CARES HE WAS 30 AGE DOESN'T MATTER HE STILL WASN'T IN HIS PRIME!
Fuck you could do that with fucking anything and everybody. This is part of the game though, longetivity is part of the sport, and if you don't adapt to minimize what you've lost over time or the flaws you could compensate with, that counts against you and you can't use it as an excuse that "you're not yourself anymore."