Modern Warfare 2 Will Render at 600p
- Thread starter lionelhutz
- Start date
mcmonkeyplc
Neo Member
Fersis said:Here you have it buddy: The 'missing' 1024 x 120 pixels, have fun. T__T
Cool, got one for the missing pixels in Halo 3?
BattleMonkey
Member
Talamius said:If this console generation really does last 10 years, it'll be the best thing to ever happen to PC gaming
Happens every gen though. New consoles come out and everyone OoooOoos and ahhhhs, then the PC's trump it and drags the graphic whores until the next console gen comes out and is all shiny.
When half of the people who played Gears of War 2 played it on a non-HD television, I find hard to understand what is the problem with a game not being rendered at those kinds of resolutions.
Most people still don't have a HD television believe it or not, fuck I don't have a HD television and I am fine with it.
Most people still don't have a HD television believe it or not, fuck I don't have a HD television and I am fine with it.
How can anyone even tell at this point what the game's native resolution really is? All we have is some videos released by IW, and I'm no expert at the subject, but I'm pretty sure that's not enough to tell the game's resolution.
In fact, unless my memory fails me, I remember the guys at Beyond3D guessing the resolution of MGS4 based on its videos, just like they are doing now with MW2, and they also said that it was 600p, when the actual game had a higher resolution than that (even though it wasn't 720p either).
In fact, unless my memory fails me, I remember the guys at Beyond3D guessing the resolution of MGS4 based on its videos, just like they are doing now with MW2, and they also said that it was 600p, when the actual game had a higher resolution than that (even though it wasn't 720p either).
dammitmattt
Banned
I hate GAF sometimes.
:lolWollan said:
'Gamers' take all the fun out of games.
By the way the game im working on has a frame buffer of 2560x720 :lol
I wouldnt say 'hate it' but i surely dont understand 'hardcore gamers' sometimes.dammitmattt said:
test_account
XP-39C²
Why dont you want it, is it because that the game is running at 600p? If yes, what if the game still looks pretty good and still plays good?lionelhutz said:
Or the PC version will probably be a better choice to get the highest resolution and the best graphics though as many has already said in this thread Felix Lighter
Member
If the previous game was running at 720p, I'd understand the outrage but the last game didn't seem to be horribly effected by the lower resolution. It's kind of hard for me to get upset about the situation.
I AM JOHN!
Banned
The game still looks and runs fantastically and is going to be AFW. What more do you people want?
Bumblebeetuna
Member
Are there any other 360/PS3 FPS games that run at 60 frames per second?
DeaconKnowledge
Member
*Bookmarks this thread for future Wii discussions*
*Snickers at the irony*
*looks fondly over at Radeon HD 4890*
*Snickers at the irony*
*looks fondly over at Radeon HD 4890*
Apocryphon
Member
antiloop said:
Bingo.
Felix Lighter
Member
kamorra said:
For the most part your right. I fell into the knee jerk reaction trap because of an image in the op.
I'm ashamed of myself.
Baron Doggystyle von Woof
Member
Mr. Pointy said:
QFMT!
600p matters shit when your playing 30 peeps online.
Cat in the Hat
Member
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/multiplayer-debut-modern-warfare/53382?type=wmv
Yep looks fine to me.
Yep looks fine to me.
Bumblebeetuna
Member
Shurs said:
UT3 right? What else?
COD4 and 5 where both 600p and trust me they looked almighty fine. MW2 also does. I don't care, as long as it runs at 60FPs. Current consoles do not have the equipment of newer PCs of course.... but the people I know play on Xbox, so I will be buying that version. See? Simple... no need for stupid PC/Console wars. Use your time in something more productive!
test_account
XP-39C²
Maybe someone in this thread have already mentioned this, but the Xbox 360 and the PS3 version of Call of Duty 4 and 5 was also running at 60 frames per second if i am not mistaken. At least Call of Duty 4 were running at 60 frames per second.Bumblebeetuna said:
EDIT: Or maybe you mean other first person games than the Call of Duty games?
AgentOtaku
Member
Xater said:
This is honestly my reaction as well. Shit MGS4 was 1024x768 and still looked fantastic ...it's more about the fidelity of the image, not just the resolution.
The only reason this is making the news is because of the poo-fest that was the PS3 sku of Ghostbusters as noted.
I AM JOHN!
Banned
That many?Roxas said:
TheExecutive
Member
meh, dont care too much but they couldnt optimize the engine with the cash flow they received from the first game and the 2 years they had? They better have a bunch of awesome new MP gameplay additions and maps or they are and will come off as lazy.
Cat in the Hat
Member
WaWBumblebeetuna said:
Every games beside Crysis and ARMA2 on my PC
D
Deleted member 30609
Unconfirmed Member
I donn't give a shit ~
clap
give a shit ~ yeah!
clap
give a shit! ~ hey!
oh, IIIIII donnnn't give aaaa sssshit! ~ y-y-ea-yeah!
clap
give a shit ~ yeah!
clap
give a shit! ~ hey!
oh, IIIIII donnnn't give aaaa sssshit! ~ y-y-ea-yeah!
I AM JOHN!
Banned
War never changes.Raide said: