Not pressing charges is not the same thing as not suspecting him of shoplifting.
Correct. But parading him around the store in handcuffs over a suspicion? Seems extreme to me.
Not pressing charges is not the same thing as not suspecting him of shoplifting.
Correct. But parading him around the store in handcuffs over a suspicion? Seems extreme to me.
Sounds similar to how police will try to force admissions of guilt out of people.
If you know you didn't do anything wrong, you didn't do anything wrong. End of story. Trying to be helpful and saying "Well, could you be thinking of this?" just gives them ammo when they're convinced of your guilt.
Just curious, not that it's worse for you either way. Just shows the idiotic management practice, intimidating an employee until they can figure out a reason for you to fire them. Sorry you had to deal with that.
Shouldn't have killed himself. Can't speak for his mental state but I've been subject to worse. Painful but motivating.
I'm sorry but this policy seems really suspect. It would require the cooperation of the police to willing parade someone around in handcuffs.
It's either this store only or something else is up. I'm not buying it as a Target company wide policy.
If it is this store only, Target is still stuck with the blame though.
Target and law enforcement agencies are very buddy-buddy, I learned this from talking with out store's AP. You should look it up sometime, it's both very intriguing and frightening on some levels.
Shouldn't have killed himself. Can't speak for his mental state but I've been subject to worse. Painful but motivating.
False imprisonment is a serious crime. Target and these managers are going to be sued to oblivion. Knowing how these things go, the managers are probably going to end up blaming target, say they were just following orders, and they will end up suing target as well.
You can't handcuff someone anyway. Store employees or guards do not have the jurisdiction to handcuff someone. They also can't interrogate someone in a room against that person's wishes.
Shouldn't have killed himself. Can't speak for his mental state but I've been subject to worse. Painful but motivating.
Did Target know about his Aspergers ? If so, should they have treated him differently than all of the other employees that have been subjected to "The walk of shame" ? If they didn't know, can they possibly be found responsible for this young mans suicide?
I don't know much about Aspergers. Forgive my ignorance.
There was no false imprisonment here and the police handcuffed him not Target employees. They did so at the request of Target when they wanted to press charges for theft. I posted this a couple pages ago, but theft is one of the few crimes that police can make an arrest for without observing the crime or having an arrest warrant. They can make an arrest based on the accusation.
Handcuffing him is standard procedure when arresting someone. He was arrested, then taken back to the office most likely for a statement, then taken out the door and into a police car where he was then taken for further questioning.
Just because he wasn't charged really has no bearing to whether he did anything illegal or not. There's no way the police officer was in on the "shaming parade" as it's just normally how it's done. Chances are Target just understands police procedure and uses it to their advantage.
Target probably called the police station after they took him away and decided not to press charges after all. It would seem to fit their culture of making an example out of someone to keep other employees in line.
Her attorney claims the experience was intensified by the fact Graham had Aspergers, a high functioning form of autism.
"The nature of Aspergers he tended to hyper focus and so he was very hyper focused on this," McNicholas said. "He was hyper focused on his loss and it was a perfect storm which resulted in his death."
It doesn't matter if it was legal in a criminal sense or not.
It has no bearing on potential liability. And that's probably not how it went down. The complaint says there was friction with another coworker so it was probably based on heresay. Now we don't have proof of that right now but it's very possible seeing how some employees in the retail sector are treated. As you say, the cops don't care as they are not doing anything illegal. That doesn't get Target off the hook.
Any customer checking out would absolutely see it.Did they actually parade the person or just walk them to the office?
Either way it's fucked up.
And they just parade them around the store? Or did they only walk them away?Ive worked at Target and can personally vouch that this is indeed a common practice there. I worked at my local store for about a year and a half or so and probably witnessed at least 4-5 people who were handcuffed right in their department.
Several people have posted before, but I want to try explaining to people a bit about Aspergers.
The biggest problem with Aspergers (at least for me, obviously it varies from person to person) is extreme anxiety and uncertainty on how to behave in situations involving interacting with other people. I know that I'm bad at understanding and talking to people, so I have routines for how I do things. Things like starting conversations the same way, having "set responses" to various questions, these are the sort of things I do to help myself cope.
Due to the aforementioned anxiety and uncertainty, in unfamiliar or unstructured settings, I have a tendency to panic and become upset. For example, whenever I have to call my bank or something similar I spend half an hour or so psyching myself up and preparing. This also means that when things go wrong in a social situation, it is much more upsetting for me than it would be for a neurotypical person. I have spent days away from other people and feeling incredibly depressed over minor things that most people would barely even think twice about. Thus, such a public shaming would have a devastating effect on my mental health. While I may not have committed suicide had I been in the same situation, this experience would be hugely traumatic and scarring.
Basically, things like this are much harder to deal with for people with Aspergers.
So publically humiliated but no charges against the guy?
No wonder retail managers are worried about people going postal. If that is how you treat people maybe you should be scared.
Thank you for this insightful post.Several people have posted before, but I want to try explaining to people a bit about Aspergers.
The biggest problem with Aspergers (at least for me, obviously it varies from person to person) is extreme anxiety and uncertainty on how to behave in situations involving interacting with other people. I know that I'm bad at understanding and talking to people, so I have routines for how I do things. Things like starting conversations the same way, having "set responses" to various questions, these are the sort of things I do to help myself cope.
Due to the aforementioned anxiety and uncertainty, in unfamiliar or unstructured settings, I have a tendency to panic and become upset. For example, whenever I have to call my bank or something similar I spend half an hour or so psyching myself up and preparing. This also means that when things go wrong in a social situation, it is much more upsetting for me than it would be for a neurotypical person. I have spent days away from other people and feeling incredibly depressed over minor things that most people would barely even think twice about. Thus, such a public shaming would have a devastating effect on my mental health. While I may not have committed suicide had I been in the same situation, this experience would be hugely traumatic and scarring.
Basically, things like this are much harder to deal with for people with Aspergers.
Oh absolutely, Target is still liable and will most likely lose this suit. Even if it's not an official policy, commom and past practice is enough to hang them out to dry.
I was only pointing out the misconception that poster had about being handcuffed and the false imprisonment post they made.
Corporate America and Big Retail in a nutshell.
Did it say anywhere that he did not steal anything?
Only that they did not press charges.
Just because the kid had aspergers everyone will run to the defense and battle the tyrants.
But being walked out, with security and making a very public scene of it is nothing new.
They could have made an agreement not to press charges if he did not come back to the store, or many other things could have been in play.
This is all true.There was no false imprisonment here and the police handcuffed him not Target employees. They did so at the request of Target when they wanted to press charges for theft. I posted this a couple pages ago, but theft is one of the few crimes that police can make an arrest for without observing the crime or having an arrest warrant. They can make an arrest based on the accusation.
Handcuffing him is standard procedure when arresting someone. He was arrested, then taken back to the office most likely for a statement, then taken out the door and into a police car where he was then taken for further questioning.
Just because he wasn't charged really has no bearing to whether he did anything illegal or not. There's no way the police officer was in on the "shaming parade" as it's just normally how it's done. Chances are Target just understands police procedure and uses it to their advantage.
Target probably called the police station after they took him away and decided not to press charges after all. It would seem to fit their culture of making an example out of someone to keep other employees in line.
Several people have posted before, but I want to try explaining to people a bit about Aspergers.
The biggest problem with Aspergers (at least for me, obviously it varies from person to person) is extreme anxiety and uncertainty on how to behave in situations involving interacting with other people. I know that I'm bad at understanding and talking to people, so I have routines for how I do things. Things like starting conversations the same way, having "set responses" to various questions, these are the sort of things I do to help myself cope.
Due to the aforementioned anxiety and uncertainty, in unfamiliar or unstructured settings, I have a tendency to panic and become upset. For example, whenever I have to call my bank or something similar I spend half an hour or so psyching myself up and preparing. This also means that when things go wrong in a social situation, it is much more upsetting for me than it would be for a neurotypical person. I have spent days away from other people and feeling incredibly depressed over minor things that most people would barely even think twice about. Thus, such a public shaming would have a devastating effect on my mental health. While I may not have committed suicide had I been in the same situation, this experience would be hugely traumatic and scarring.
Basically, things like this are much harder to deal with for people with Aspergers.
Did you even read this fucking thread?
I have Aspergers too, something I've never shared on the internet or GAF. This is the realest shit ever wrote on the subject.
Fuck, ironically I read this story right before an appointment with my psychologist. We talked about it in length, and I wasn't sure whether I'd have jumped off that ledge, or not.
I'm positive that my pride is the only thing keeping me alive right now. Stripped of that, I don't know....
Fucked up story and I hope Target burns to the ground over this shit.
I worked at Target for over a year, I never saw any shit like this.
And they just parade them around the store? Or did they only walk them away?
I'm sorry but this policy seems really suspect. It would require the cooperation of the police to willing parade someone around in handcuffs.
It's either this store only or something else is up. I'm not buying it as a Target company wide policy.
If it is this store only, Target is still stuck with the blame though.
"Parading" is a choice of words. If I said they were moving him from one part of the store to another in handcuffs it doesn't seem as nefarious.
How do you conclude that there was no cause? The article only states that he wasn't charged.
That's because it's probably a local thing.
There is no way if this was standard protocol for the company this wouldn't be known. Local management are probably morons who think they can treat subordinates however they want.
Amazed it's not Wal Mart.
But they'd probably beat you and burn your house down too.