• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Monthly or weekly wages?

Which frequency is better?

  • Monthly

    Votes: 22 50.0%
  • Weekly

    Votes: 22 50.0%

  • Total voters
    44

IDKFA

I am Become Bilbo Baggins
Help me settle a debate.

I know somebody who has been offered a job that pays more than what they're on now, but it will mean going from monthly to weekly pay. Besides that, there isn't much of a difference. It's still full time and permanent. However, as they're currently on monthly pay, they're not sure if weekly pay is right for them.

I get it. I wouldn't be sure about taking a weekly pay role, but to help with the decision, I thought I'd ask the GAF hive mind.

Which is better?

What are the pros and cons or each?

Would you switch jobs to one that paid weekly if it paid a higher salary?
 

MaestroMike

Gold Member
Weekly is extremely better than monthly. Daily pay would be freaking awesome. The time value of money decreases as time passes by or whatever according to economics/accounting classes I took a long time ago my memory is fuzzy but I know money now is way better now than the future since inflation slowly and sometimes more rapidly increases. Money a year ago would’ve bought you more than it does today.
 

feynoob

Banned
I get paid on the 5th and 20th.

I don't think it matters too much tbh.
It matters, in a sense that weekly and monthly don't teach you that much, about managing your funds.

Weekly, you don't have to worry about your spending.

Monthly, you know you are getting big fund at the end of every month.

Bi-weekly, you are getting half of monthly, and double of weekly. It allows you to strategically plan on how you spend your money.

1 paycheck would be for the rent and other stuff, while the other paycheck is for savings, and your entertainment. That is how mine is setup. So i don't overspend my money too much.
 

G-Bus

Banned
Get paid every Thursday and I love it and that's coming from a bi weekly pay system before my current job.

I would not like monthly. Feel like it would require a lot more budgeting.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Woudnt getting paid faster and higher be better?

I dont see what the issue is unless the people have severe budgeting problems and blow their wad, so they're broke when it comes to paying rent or mortgage.

The standard here once every two weeks. Twice a year, we get paid three times in a month due to how the weeks go.
 
It matters, in a sense that weekly and monthly don't teach you that much, about managing your funds.

Weekly, you don't have to worry about your spending.

Monthly, you know you are getting big fund at the end of every month.

Bi-weekly, you are getting half of monthly, and double of weekly. It allows you to strategically plan on how you spend your money.

1 paycheck would be for the rent and other stuff, while the other paycheck is for savings, and your entertainment. That is how mine is setup. So i don't overspend my money too much.

Almost everyone overspends. If you like to go to bars, you don’t spend half the month not going to bars just because your first check is considered as, and is mostly consumed by rent.

People rely on making enough to satisfy their habits and lifestyle. They make their habits fit their money so to speak. So it doesn’t matter if you get paid weekly, bi weekly, or monthly.
 

Evolved1

make sure the pudding isn't too soggy but that just ruins everything
The longer you wait, the higher your pay, the more chance of getting raked harder by taxes.
 

Mr Reasonable

Completely Unreasonable
Doesn't matter, take the extra money, set up a second account. Have his pay go into the new account and set up a standing order to pay what he would have got paid monthly into his normal account.

For bonus points, set it to pay what he used to earn rather than what he's now earning and he gets to make a rainy day fund for no effort at all.
 
Last edited:

Garibaldi

Member
I've only ever been monthly. Other payment schemes don't seem as popular in the UK.

25th of each month. Budget that for the next month with a little float to spread around the flux categories in case of a overspend need. Job done for the month.
 
Last edited:

Sub_Level

wants to fuck an Asian grill.
I do not have the discipline for weekly pay. Monthly is much safer for me and easier to wrap my budget around.
 
What kind of question is that dude? Weekly of course. If some shit went down and you didn't have enough saved for a rainy day then you'll have to sell your ass on the streets.
 

Kaachan

Member
I would honestly love daily pay, but realistically weekly pay is much more satifisying than monthly pay
 

Evolved1

make sure the pudding isn't too soggy but that just ruins everything
Surely tax is based on annual, not monthly or weekly thresholds? If avoiding tax was as easy as getting a small but regular pay cheque, scumbag CEOs of the world would be instructing their payroll departments to pay them hourly.
Guess it depends on where you are. I'm paid biweekly... usually taxed around 30%. But when we get backpay or get paid out for various types of time, when it's lumped into normal pay, the rate has been almost 50% at times. Recently had some backpay come through and on a 10K paycheck, I paid nearly 5K in taxes. Not quite 5 but pretty close iirc.
 

Lasha

Member
Guess it depends on where you are. I'm paid biweekly... usually taxed around 30%. But when we get backpay or get paid out for various types of time, when it's lumped into normal pay, the rate has been almost 50% at times. Recently had some backpay come through and on a 10K paycheck, I paid nearly 5K in taxes. Not quite 5 but pretty close iirc.

Paid or withheld? You might have had more withheld because the amount pushed you into a different tax bracket. Taxes are always paid on an annual cadence.
 

NinjaBoiX

Member
There is zero downside to being paid weekly rather than monthly, unless you don’t trust yourself to budget correctly.

Shit, hide your bank card until the end of the month if you’ve got so little self control, but it’s MUCH better to be paid weekly, there’s no sensible argument to be had otherwise.

I get paid every Wednesday and it suits me perfectly.

(Obviously it works out cheaper for payroll for THEM to do it monthly, but that’s their downside not yours.)
 
Last edited:

Mr Reasonable

Completely Unreasonable
Guess it depends on where you are. I'm paid biweekly... usually taxed around 30%. But when we get backpay or get paid out for various types of time, when it's lumped into normal pay, the rate has been almost 50% at times. Recently had some backpay come through and on a 10K paycheck, I paid nearly 5K in taxes. Not quite 5 but pretty close iirc.
Yeah, the way tax bands work can be confusing but the gist is that as you earn more money, you pay a higher rate of tax on the earnings over a set of thresholds.

People sometimes assume that if they go into a higher tax bracket that all their earnings are taxed more harshly. But that is not the case.

For the sake of argument you are taxed 10% of your first $10k and 20% above that. If you earn $10k you would pay $1k tax.

If you earn $11k you would pay $1k tax on the first $10k and then $200 on the rest(20% of $1k). That percentage increases as you earn more, Google and you'll find the exact brackets and percentages very easily.

In your case, receiving a big paycheck and losing what you say is a disproportionate amount of it almost certainly means that your payroll department's software has calculated your tax on the basis that you'll be paid that amount every week (or whatever their normal pay schedule is) rather than this being a payment for a longer period than usual.

This means that if you only worked one month a year, earning exactly $10k, the payroll department would assume you were going to earn that amount every month (unless informed of your specific work schedule) and as a result will deduct the amount of tax that you'd pay if you earn $120k annually, not the amount that you'd pay if you were to earn $10k annually.

The payroll system should be sophisticated enough to see that occasional larger payments aren't your normal pay and try to balance the amount of tax on other months to take that into account. That may not be possible as the thing that a payroll department will try to do is ensure that you are not undertaxed so that you don't have to pay an unexpected tax bill at the end of the financial year.

At the end of the financial year you'll be able to see your total pre tax earning and how much tax you paid. If you paid more tax than was necessary, you'll be due a rebate, so if you do have unpredictable or variable pay it might be in your interest to keep your pay slips so you can check that all the numbers add up.

You will be able to Google a tax calculator where you'll be able to type in your total pre tax earnings and check that your tax is not disproportionate.

That's how it works here in the UK, so there may be some vagaries in the US, but Google suggests it's basically the same.

Either way, everyone who earns the same amount of money as you should pay the same amount of tax over a year, wether you earn it over a year or in a day. If you are paying more, or think you are, then it's worth checking.
 
Last edited:
I get paid every two weeks but my job offers daily pay through an app for free so it’s nice to have that money at the ready if need be. I couldn’t imagine being paid monthly.
 

Cyberpunkd

Member
Weekly is extremely better than monthly. Daily pay would be freaking awesome. The time value of money decreases as time passes by or whatever according to economics/accounting classes I took a long time ago my memory is fuzzy but I know money now is way better now than the future since inflation slowly and sometimes more rapidly increases. Money a year ago would’ve bought you more than it does today.
This. Monthly pay is a standard in Europe and doesn’t make fucking sense. If it adds to the same amount it gives you more frequent influx of capital and allows you to plan your expenses much better instead of constant thinking about end of the month / beginning of the month charges.
 

Cyberpunkd

Member
People sometimes assume that if they go into a higher tax bracket that all their earnings are taxed more harshly. But that is not the case.
This drives me insane. My wife who is extremely intelligent will sometimes slip into this and say BS like “if I earn just a bit more I take home less money”. No, you don’t.
 

Mr Reasonable

Completely Unreasonable
This drives me insane. My wife who is extremely intelligent will sometimes slip into this and say BS like “if I earn just a bit more I take home less money”. No, you don’t.

I'm pretty sure it's regularly presented misleadingly so top earners can present as paying more tax and taking less home. But yeah, I remember the first time I heard someone say "I can't afford to get a pay rise!"

I wonder if it keeps some people on the cusp of the next tax bracket content where they are rather than asking for more.
 
Top Bottom