• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Mormon/Ex-Mormon Thread of 3 hour blocks and salvation flowcharts

B

Barrett2

Member
Anyone have any resources for calculating the approximate number of active, adult LDS people in the world, or number of LDS people with a current temple recommend.

I would assume the number of people with a current temple recommend couldn't be much higher than 500,000 - 900,000... maybe lower?
 
R

ronito

Member
lawblob said:
Anyone have any resources for calculating the approximate number of active, adult LDS people in the world, or number of LDS people with a current temple recommend.

I would assume the number of people with a current temple recommend couldn't be much higher than 500,000 - 900,000... maybe lower?
Click to expand...
There's no real way to know. The church boasts 14 million members. But that number's grossly inflated. I mean if you were ever a mormon and you don't specifically fill out the paperwork to be removed from the church records they'll count you as a member until you're 110 (even if you're dead). So there's no way in hell 14 million is anywhere close to the actual number of mormons let alone temple recommend holders.

But you can sorta work backwards. According to this:
http://lds.org/general-conference/2...t-2010?lang=eng&query=membership+numbers+2010

There were 28,660 wards and branches. A ward can be anywhere between 200-500 members while a branch is less than 200 members. Let's be generous and assume 300 per each of those.

That comes to 8,598,000. Total (that includes inactive members within the church)

According to FARMs (a mormon apologist org) in the 90s the church saw about 40-50% activity in the US/Canada/Pacific, 35% in EMEA, and 25% in Asia/Latin countries.

Let's be generous and say 40% activity is the norm throughout the world. HIGHLY unlikely, but whatevs. That means 3,493,200 active mormons.

Of course of that 3 million not all are temple recommend holders, many too young and a even more are unworthy. Now this is just purely anecdotal evidence but in talking to bishoprics and friends that work in the LDS office building I've heard that only 25% of active members actually have a temple recommend and that's been fairly consistent even when I've moved states. But let's assume that's too low and double it. So even if you do double it to say that a whopping 50% of active mormons regardless of age have temple recommends you're looking at 1,719,600 temple recommend holders. That is the absolute highest number giving the church every benefit of the doubt. If anything I'd think the number to be half that (~850,000) at most.

Out of curiosity why do you ask?
 
A

alejob

Member
I just got visited by missionaries a couple of hours ago, I had to inform them(once again) that I'm not interested. I like hearing about this stuff, their rituals, secret stuff, magic underwear, etc. LOL! I live in Utah and it's true that the people are some of the nicest people there is.

I do get annoyed though by a few things, they make you feel that they are better than everyone else. Probably unintentionally but it feels that way. What they believe in is TRUE!! I guess if you repeat it it makes it truer?

If I were a mormon girl I would revolt and leave the church. My grandmother is LDS, but my grandfather is not. Same situation with my parents. Guess my mom and grandma won't be going to heaven or whatever they called that place.

Also it's happened to me before, go on one date and they want you to go to church with them.

Any who, I like most mormons. I do think the church intrudes to much into peoples lives though. How come everything has to be church related?
 
N

NICKNACC

Banned
i am a member going to Brigham Young University ......in idaho. its the retarted stepchild of BYU provo utah. Church has done nothing but bless me. I strongly believe in its doctrine and teachings since i have read the book of mormon and believe it is the word of god thus verifying the church today.


i served my mission in New Jersey for two years speaking spanish. It was amazing and i dont know who i would be without it. I also got to bless lots of people.

.....yep
 
S

speculawyer

Member
Huntsman has said in the media and intimated elsewhere that he's not really a practicing mormon.
Click to expand...
ronito said:
Romney for sure.
chances are Romney is wearing his garments right now, you couldn't say that at all with Huntsman.
Click to expand...
Interesting. I did not know that. Well Huntsman must have been into it at one point . . . doesn't he have 7 kids?

I also got the feeling that Romney wasn't really into it either . . . but perhaps he has been downplaying it (for obvious reasons).
 
E

elrechazado

Banned
speculawyer said:
Interesting. I did not know that. Well Huntsman must have been into it at one point . . . doesn't he have 7 kids?

I also got the feeling that Romney wasn't really into it either . . . but perhaps he has been downplaying it (for obvious reasons).
Click to expand...
From everything I've read, romney has been a lifer, whereas Huntsman was raised with it, but kind of stopped being invested in the last decade or so. Huntsman Sr. is a major bigwig in the church though.
 
A

Atramental

Banned
Keep on seeing two Mormon missionaries riding around on their bicycles near where I live.

I couldn't imagine myself biking from home to home, wearing a dress shirt and tie in the summer heat, while trying to spread another version of Christianity to people who are firm Protestants. I think I would go AWOL.
 
E

Eight Diagram Bat Fighter

Banned
speculawyer said:
Interesting. I did not know that. Well Huntsman must have been into it at one point . . . doesn't he have 7 kids?

I also got the feeling that Romney wasn't really into it either . . . but perhaps he has been downplaying it (for obvious reasons).
Click to expand...

I know lots of non-mormon familes with 7+ kids also. What's your point?
 
R

ronito

Member
NICKNACC said:
i am a member going to Brigham Young University ......in idaho. its the retarted stepchild of BYU provo utah. Church has done nothing but bless me. I strongly believe in its doctrine and teachings since i have read the book of mormon and believe it is the word of god thus verifying the church today.


i served my mission in New Jersey for two years speaking spanish. It was amazing and i dont know who i would be without it. I also got to bless lots of people.

.....yep
Click to expand...
Welcome!
I remember those days.
Btw, misspelling retarded. Good way to sum up BYU Idaho.
speculawyer said:
Well Huntsman must have been into it at one point . . . doesn't he have 7 kids?
Click to expand...
What do you mean "You people?"!!!
 
S

s7evn

Member
NICKNACC said:
i am a member going to Brigham Young University ......in idaho. its the retarted stepchild of BYU provo utah. Church has done nothing but bless me. I strongly believe in its doctrine and teachings since i have read the book of mormon and believe it is the word of god thus verifying the church today.


i served my mission in New Jersey for two years speaking spanish. It was amazing and i dont know who i would be without it. I also got to bless lots of people.

.....yep
Click to expand...

Aw, Rexburg. I grew up in Boise and know a bunch of people going to school there now.
 
B

Barrett2

Member
I remember visiting some old mission buddies who were attending Ricks (aka: BYU Idaho). Most depressing shit I've ever seen.
 
R

ronito

Member
http://universe.byu.edu/index.php/2011/07/19/22-percent-of-americans-would-not-vote-for-a-mormon/

Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman have some extra hurdles to jump in the race for the White House: convincing voters they won’t force Americans into polygamy, restore prohibition or integrate other Mormon stereotypes into the Oval Office.

A recent Gallop Poll shows 22 percent of Americans would not vote for a Mormon. Stereotypes and sentiments surrounding Mormons frequently make their mark on LDS candidates running for office, and often, these stereotypes are inaccurate or wrong.

Negative images influencing almost a quarter of voters can break a campaign when many elections are decided by a difference of only one or two percent. Mormon stereotypes were among the strongest indicators of the various results shown in the Gallup Poll. The only groups scoring worse than Mormons were homosexuals (32 percent) and atheists (49 percent). The same poll showed 5 percent of voters would not vote for an African-American president, 6 percent would not vote for a woman and 9 percent won’t vote for a Jewish person.

As 2012 presidential election media coverage heats up, and speculation abounds in the cable news networks, one trend seems to dominate conversation about Huntsman and Romney — anti-LDS sentiment. However, high anti-LDS sentiment across the nation has motivated many volunteers into restoring and building a better LDS image.

Jim Dabakis, is a Utah state Democratic chair hopeful.

“I’m really disturbed in America that we have that kind of prejudice and bias,” he said in a news release. “In this day and age, there is no room in America — especially in our political system — for religious bias. Misunderstandings and ignorant presumptions on what it means to be LDS need to be confronted on a massive scale.”

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has requested that candidates running for office not imply that their candidacy or platforms are endorsed by the Church.

“The Church does encourage its members to play a role as responsible citizens in their communities, including becoming informed about issues and voting in elections,” said the official political neutrality statement released by the Church.
Click to expand...

This always struck me as strange. Really to an outside observer Mormonism, while admittedly stranger than most Christian religions, they aren't all that much more so.
Sorta like the people that laughed at the rapture guy but still believe in the rapture, all they disagreed with was the date, not the concept.
 
B

Barrett2

Member
ronito said:
http://universe.byu.edu/index.php/2011/07/19/22-percent-of-americans-would-not-vote-for-a-mormon/



This always struck me as strange. Really to an outside observer Mormonism, while admittedly stranger than most Christian religions, they aren't all that much more so.
Sorta like the people that laughed at the rapture guy but still believe in the rapture, all they disagreed with was the date, not the concept.
Click to expand...

Mormon intolerance is a strange thing. Growing up in Houston, it was infuriating how so many evangelicals had such poor opinions on Mormons. It's amazing how the Church's nutty history continues to stick around and haunt it, long after the actually nutty stuff has any day to day relevance for LDS people.
 
H

heyf00L

Member
OK, I have some questions. I'll just put out one for now.

I had some Mormon missionaries come talk to me once. We got stuck on this:

God created Adam and Eve and gave them two commands:
1) Be fruitful and multiply (ie have babies).
2) Don't eat the forbidden fruit.

But apparently Mormon theology holds that it was only after they ate the forbidden fruit that they gained physical bodies and the ability to have children.

So, that would mean that God gave two commands that where mutually exclusive of each other. They would only be able to keep one by breaking the other. I can't understand that.

Follow up questions: Is this the only time that God has done this? Are there other commands today that we ought to break in order to keep others and/or receive the benefits from?

The Fall of Adam and Eve (lds.org)
Moses 5:11
 
B

bluemax

Banned
lawblob said:
Mormon intolerance is a strange thing. Growing up in Houston, it was infuriating how so many evangelicals had such poor opinions on Mormons. It's amazing how the Church's nutty history continues to stick around and haunt it, long after the actually nutty stuff has any day to day relevance for LDS people.
Click to expand...

I don't think its really that strange that the Church's history continues to plague it. One of the first fundamental things the LDS church asks anyone to do is accept that Joseph Smith was a modern day prophet who saw God and Jesus. If you can't accept that, then you can't accept pretty much anything else about the LDS church as being true.

When you hear all the stories about Joseph Smith being a pervert, a treasure hunter, a serial liar etc it makes it harder to accept the LDS church as the one true faith.
 
R

ronito

Member
heyf00L said:
OK, I have some questions. I'll just put out one for now.

I had some Mormon missionaries come talk to me once. We got stuck on this:

God created Adam and Eve and gave them two commands:
1) Be fruitful and multiply (ie have babies).
2) Don't eat the forbidden fruit.

But apparently Mormon theology holds that it was only after they ate the forbidden fruit that they gained physical bodies and the ability to have children.

So, that would mean that God gave two commands that where mutually exclusive of each other. They would only be able to keep one by breaking the other. I can't understand that.

Follow up questions: Is this the only time that God has done this? Are there other commands today that we ought to break in order to keep others and/or receive the benefits from?

The Fall of Adam and Eve (lds.org)
Moses 5:11
Click to expand...
I'd be very interested in what the missionaries had to say. I'd be interested in what active mormons have to say. I have heard/have been taught that the timeline was just misinterpreted (which always sounded like an apologist's argument to me). And I've also heard that there might've been a way from Adam and Eve to eventually pro-create if they had stayed in the garden without eating the fruit (again another apologists's argument). I could never get my head around this like the whole "The natural man is an enemy to God." teaching (well, who created the natural man?). I'd be very interested to hear what others have to say.
 
H

heyf00L

Member
They never said anything convincing. They kept saying why the Fall was a good thing, but even if you believe that it does nothing to explain the paradoxical commands. They eventually said it's just a matter of faith and urged me to pray for the Holy Spirit to reveal the truth to me.

You can't make a confused timeline argument because even the retellings of the story in the Smith-produced scriptures give the same timeline and emphasize it (Moses 5:1 for example).

While looking through Smith's stuff there I can't get over how often God reveals the full details of Jesus (called the Only Begotten or the Son) to Adam, the patriarchs, Moses, etc. Even there in Moses 5:8 an angel tells Adam to call on the name of the Son forever. Yet somehow none of this made it into any of the Hebrew scriptures and was completely unknown to the Israelites or Jews. Is there some explanation for why these important details (on how to worship God) were intentionally withheld and instead put into secret books that would only be discovered over 3000 years later in America well after teachings about the Son of God are well known?
 
B

Barrett2

Member
heyf00L said:
OK, I have some questions. I'll just put out one for now.

I had some Mormon missionaries come talk to me once. We got stuck on this:

God created Adam and Eve and gave them two commands:
1) Be fruitful and multiply (ie have babies).
2) Don't eat the forbidden fruit.

But apparently Mormon theology holds that it was only after they ate the forbidden fruit that they gained physical bodies and the ability to have children.

So, that would mean that God gave two commands that where mutually exclusive of each other. They would only be able to keep one by breaking the other. I can't understand that.

Follow up questions: Is this the only time that God has done this? Are there other commands today that we ought to break in order to keep others and/or receive the benefits from?

The Fall of Adam and Eve (lds.org)
Moses 5:11
Click to expand...

Without going into detail, (mostly because im' too lazy to dig out books I haven't read in a decade), I think this question generally falls within the broader context of the logical problems with Judeo-Christian theodicy.

Roughly speaking, the LDS Church holds to the theodicy that God is both (i) all knowing, and (ii) all powerful. Problem is, to hold both of those beliefs, you simultaneously have to accept that there are many elements of the LDS theodicy which don't make logical sense, holding both of those premises as true. For example: (i) God's plan could only work if a certain % of his kids rejected him from the beginning, (ii) Adam and Eve could only leave the garden by disobeying his commandments, (iii) for God's plan to work, there must be a "Satan" to oppose him, which either means God is not all powerful, because his plan could only work if he created certain children which had to oppose him, or God is not all knowing, or even all good, because if he knew this going into it, he either was ok with the idea of creating children spirits who would ultimately be doomed to "outer darkness," or he didn't care (not all good), etc....

If you really want to go down the rabbit hole of LDS theology and where it falls apart; consider that Mormons believe that Jesus is the savior not just of this Earth, but of all the planets god has created. So what does that mean? Does that mean us on Earth won the lottery and just happen to live on the one planet Jesus visited to perform the atonement, and that every other planet in the universe created by God and populated with people worships some space alien? Or does it mean Jesus goes from planet to planet, living and dying on each one? Or does it mean there is a different Jesus for each planet God made? Of course, all three of these sound ludicrous, but the logical extension of LDS theology is that one of them must be correct.

Whether it be the paradox of the "universal atonement," the Garden of Eden, or the litany of contradictions between the Book of Mormon and D&C, id' say the real answer is that LDS theology actually isn't all that well developed. Actual LDS theology is surprisingly loose and fluid when compared with other protestant or Catholic beliefs.
 
R

ronito

Member
heyf00L said:
They never said anything convincing. They kept saying why the Fall was a good thing, but even if you believe that it does nothing to explain the paradoxical commands. They eventually said it's just a matter of faith and urged me to pray for the Holy Spirit to reveal the truth to me.

You can't make a confused timeline argument because even the retellings of the story in the Smith-produced scriptures give the same timeline and emphasize it (Moses 5:1 for example).

While looking through Smith's stuff there I can't get over how often God reveals the full details of Jesus (called the Only Begotten or the Son) to Adam, the patriarchs, Moses, etc. Even there in Moses 5:8 an angel tells Adam to call on the name of the Son forever. Yet somehow none of this made it into any of the Hebrew scriptures and was completely unknown to the Israelites or Jews. Is there some explanation for why these important details (on how to worship God) were intentionally withheld and instead put into secret books that would only be discovered over 3000 years later in America well after teachings about the Son of God are well known?
Click to expand...
Again, you're getting your stuff here from people that WERE mormon and the church changes rather quickly.

There used to be a teaching that the reason that the "fullness of the gospel" was withheld until Joseph Smith was because the world wasn't ready/worthy for it. There certainly was talk about how people were chosen to live in this day and age because they had earned it by being valiant in heaven and that the later people were born the more "choice" they were. Now when I started getting ready to leave the church they were retreating really quickly from this kind of teaching. It'd be good to hear what a currently believing mormon has to say on the matter.
 
H

heyf00L

Member
lawblob said:
Without going into detail, (mostly because im' too lazy to dig out books I haven't read in a decade), I think this question generally falls within the broader context of the logical problems with Judeo-Christian theodicy.
Click to expand...
The whole "God cannot be both all-powerful and all-good and still allow sin to exist" thing hasn't been a logical problem for a long time now. Of course that doesn't stop people from thinking it is a problem. But anyway, I don't think that God giving two logically inconstant commands would fall into that category.


ronito said:
Again, you're getting your stuff here from people that WERE mormon and the church changes rather quickly.
Click to expand...
OK, I'll keep that in mind. I was just Googling a bit, and I found this posted on some Mormon's blog talking about neoorthodox Mormon views on the Fall which attempt to conform more closely with traditional Protestant views without abandoning key Mormon doctrines. However, I don't see anything that would solve the paradox.

So maybe that's the direction they're headed.

I also have asked Mormon missionaries about the controversy around the Book of Abraham facsimiles, but none has ever known what I was talking about.
 
R

ronito

Member
heyf00L said:
I also have asked Mormon missionaries about the controversy around the Book of Abraham facsimiles, but none has ever known what I was talking about.
Click to expand...
Most mormons don't know about it. And those that do explain it away with a small line that one of the founders (I believe it was Oliver Cowdery) had written in a journal or something that said the ring around the facsimile was red. The one shown was blue.

Even the most prominent mormon apologists use this to cast doubt on the whole thing. Doesn't change that ring color aside it all doesn't mean what they say it does, or that the prophet at the time had given the approval for the facsimile to be shown. I even emailed one apologist Jeff Lindsay on this one with "Surely there must be more to your argument than the ring color." He answered the other questions in the email but never that one.
 
M

mik

mik is unbeatable
lawblob said:
Anyone have any resources for calculating the approximate number of active, adult LDS people in the world, or number of LDS people with a current temple recommend.

I would assume the number of people with a current temple recommend couldn't be much higher than 500,000 - 900,000... maybe lower?
Click to expand...
I'll ask my brother--if anyone would know the answe rto this, he would. He publishes a lot of papers regarding statistical analysis of church membership and retention rates over time. A lot of it has been focused on international numbers, like this one:

http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/10/21/review-phillips-rethinking-expansion/

but I'll bet he has access to overall numbers, too.

This one little encapsulated quote might be enough to make the estimation though:

"[Rick] Phillips uses recent census data from Australia, Austria, Canada, Chile, Mexico, and New Zealand to attempt an answer to this question. According to the data, the number of self-professed Mormons is between 23-58 percent of the number claimed by the church. (Australia 47.5%, Austria 57.1%, Canada 58.4% (lower outside Alberta), Chile 27.3%, Mexico 23.2%.
Click to expand...
 
B

Barrett2

Member
mik said:
I'll ask my brother--if anyone would know the answe rto this, he would. He publishes a lot of papers regarding statistical analysis of church membership and retention rates over time. A lot of it has been focused on international numbers, like this one:

http://bycommonconsent.com/2006/10/21/review-phillips-rethinking-expansion/

but I'll bet he has access to overall numbers, too.

This one little encapsulated quote might be enough to make the estimation though:
Click to expand...

Interesting. I remember a few years ago reading that in the Brazilian census, some tiny number of people self-identified as LDS, compared to what the Church had listed as the number of LDS people in Brazil.

For the obscene amount of money and resources spent on missionary work, the LDS Church seems to get pretty bad results. Back when I was in the Church, the answer to this problem was that it was the Church's strict rules that make it hard to bring in new members. But what about Islam? That's a very strict religion, and they bring in plenty of new converts. Not to mention that I knew plenty of evangelicals in the South who didn't drink alcohol, etc., and lived essentially LDS lifestyles, and they were constantly building more and more enormous mega churches. IMO, the forced enculturation into a very midwestern-waspy-Leave it to Beaver lifestyle is what kills a lot of missionary work, at least in the US.

I also have a hunch, purely speculative, that the internet is basically killing Mormon missionary work. In short, you can no longer feed people the same BS, whitewashed answers about polygamy, seer stones, the occult, and all the other bizarre stuff in LDS Church history, and they have no way to verify it.
 
D

DigitalDevil

Member
I worked for a company (in an industry) that employed lots of Mormons. The owner would travel to BYU every spring and recruit young men who had finished their mission to come and sell pest control door to door. I got to meet, work with, and manage a lot of really interesting people during that time.

A couple things I know about Mormons:

1. Despite the stigma surrounding polygamy, every Mormon I have ever met (hundreds) and the vast majority of all Mormons are disgusted by the practice.

2. Mormons have something figured out. Say what you will about their beliefs, their faith, their practices, but they are some of the (genuinely) happiest and most "at peace" people I have ever known.

3. If you are ever hiring for a sales position, hire a young Mormon who has finished their mission. Believe me, if you can sell god door to door, you can sell anything.

including alarm systems, satellite television, and pest control
 
R

ronito

Member
blob I wouldn't consider that the investment people and church makes on missions wasted because converting is admittedly getting more difficult. I always thought of missions as killing a bird with two stones. Returned missionaries are much less likely to leave the church after two years of virtual monkhood in the mission field, and it takes men out at their height of hormones and teaches many how to live in strict church boundaries. Converting people is an added bonus on top of that.
 
B

Barrett2

Member
ronito said:
blob I wouldn't consider that the investment people and church makes on missions wasted because converting is admittedly getting more difficult. I always thought of missions as killing a bird with two stones. Returned missionaries are much less likely to leave the church after two years of virtual monkhood in the mission field, and it takes men out at their height of hormones and teaches many how to live in strict church boundaries. Converting people is an added bonus on top of that.
Click to expand...

Good point.

Raises another interesting question. How many LDS men would stay in the church into adulthood if it weren't for the mission program indoctrinating them to be active LDS men throughout their lives? Makes you wonder if the LDS church would basically collapse without the missionary program, based on sheer attrition of active members?
 
M

mik

mik is unbeatable
DigitalDevil said:
2. Mormons have something figured out. Say what you will about their beliefs, their faith, their practices, but they are some of the (genuinely) happiest and most "at peace" people I have ever known.
Click to expand...
Prozac will certainly help you present that face to the public.
 
D

Deleted member 1159

Unconfirmed Member
Oh haayyy guys, how did I miss this thread for so long?

DigitalDevil said:
2. Mormons have something figured out. Say what you will about their beliefs, their faith, their practices, but they are some of the (genuinely) happiest and most "at peace" people I have ever known.
Click to expand...

Maybe on the outside, but from what I've experienced Mormons are just as dysfunctional as any other group, and instead are experts at putting up a happy, self-assured front. I know I was a pro at it, which is why everyone shat bricks when I finally said enough and washed my hands of the LDS church.
 
E

Eight Diagram Bat Fighter

Banned
heyf00L said:
OK, I have some questions. I'll just put out one for now.

I had some Mormon missionaries come talk to me once. We got stuck on this:

God created Adam and Eve and gave them two commands:
1) Be fruitful and multiply (ie have babies).
2) Don't eat the forbidden fruit.

But apparently Mormon theology holds that it was only after they ate the forbidden fruit that they gained physical bodies and the ability to have children.

So, that would mean that God gave two commands that where mutually exclusive of each other. They would only be able to keep one by breaking the other. I can't understand that.

Follow up questions: Is this the only time that God has done this? Are there other commands today that we ought to break in order to keep others and/or receive the benefits from?

The Fall of Adam and Eve (lds.org)
Moses 5:11
Click to expand...

Adam and Eve at that time were immortal, quickened by the spirit and could not die. But without bodies of flesh and blood, they could not multiply the earth. They knew they had to break one commandment to follow another, but this wasn't an ordinary commandment, it was more of a warning. He was saying that "In the day thou eatest thereof, thou shalt surely die". So, they could stay and live in the garden forever if they wanted, not knowing happiness, joy, sorrow- anything that would increase their spiritual, emotional and mental development.

Or if they were to eat it, they would lose their immortal state and become mortal and die BUT they would be able to know sorrow, joy, pain, happiness and more. They would in some small part know the emotions that God feels. What they did was transgress the law, but was not a sin against God.


(SHORT & TO THE POINT VERSION)
Basically God told them not to eat it because there were some bad consequences if they did. It wasn't a choice between evil or good, but an option between a good outcome or a negative consequence for their actions. Kinda like "don't touch the flame, you might get burned." So no, not a sin on either commandments.
 
R

ronito

Member
http://universe2.byu.edu/node/953
It is no secret that Cafe Rio is one of the more popular restaurants among BYU students. It is for this reason I felt compelled to write this letter to expose something I found both shocking and saddening. I noticed Cafe Rio uses real Coca-Cola in its recipe for pork barbacoa. That means many of us have disobeyed the commandments of our prophets without even knowing it!

I am appalled Cafe Rio would perpetuate this subterfuge in Provo. Surely the owners must realize how many of us are striving to uphold the Word of Wisdom. How can we do that when they are secretly giving us real Coke? Now that this despicable deception has been brought to light, I think the only solution that we, as students of the Lord’s university, can embrace is to immediately stop patronizing Cafe Rio until it uses caffeine-free Coke in its pork barbacoa recipe.

Until then, let us eat on campus — BYU Dining would never serve real Coke. Further, I call on the Honor Code Office to consider whether students who continue to order pork barbacoa should have a place at this university. Surely we cannot have students attending BYU who don’t think it’s important to follow the prophets. If students insist on eating pork barbacoa at Cafe Rio, they should cede their spot at this university to someone who is willing to be obedient, even when it doesn’t suit their carnal tastes.

Scott Gale
Beaverton, Ore.
Click to expand...
Not sure if troll, or just one of "those" BYU students. Pretty sure it's a troll but still have met plenty of people like this when I was at BYU.
 
D

diehard

Fleer
ronito said:
http://universe2.byu.edu/node/953

Not sure if troll, or just one of "those" BYU students. Pretty sure it's a troll but still have met plenty of people like this when I was at BYU.
Click to expand...
Troll, i have honestly never met another mormon who thought Coke was against the word of wisdom. Or they are just retarded, either way.. not worth paying attention to.
 
B

bluemax

Banned
DigitalDevil said:
I worked for a company (in an industry) that employed lots of Mormons. The owner would travel to BYU every spring and recruit young men who had finished their mission to come and sell pest control door to door. I got to meet, work with, and manage a lot of really interesting people during that time.

A couple things I know about Mormons:

1. Despite the stigma surrounding polygamy, every Mormon I have ever met (hundreds) and the vast majority of all Mormons are disgusted by the practice.

2. Mormons have something figured out. Say what you will about their beliefs, their faith, their practices, but they are some of the (genuinely) happiest and most "at peace" people I have ever known.

3. If you are ever hiring for a sales position, hire a young Mormon who has finished their mission. Believe me, if you can sell god door to door, you can sell anything.

including alarm systems, satellite television, and pest control
Click to expand...

Ehh, I think #2 is a falsehood. Their are a lot of massively unhappy LDS people who just put on happy faces for keeping up appearances. The church has really high rates of depression and suicide, ESPECIALLY among female members.

lawblob said:
Good point.

Raises another interesting question. How many LDS men would stay in the church into adulthood if it weren't for the mission program indoctrinating them to be active LDS men throughout their lives? Makes you wonder if the LDS church would basically collapse without the missionary program, based on sheer attrition of active members?
Click to expand...

Ehh, I think like any Church there are a lot of people who stay in solely for the sense of community being in a religious group provides.
 
D

Deleted member 1159

Unconfirmed Member
ronito said:
http://universe2.byu.edu/node/953

Not sure if troll, or just one of "those" BYU students. Pretty sure it's a troll but still have met plenty of people like this when I was at BYU.
Click to expand...

As much as I want it to be real, this has to be a troll. It's too well-written for a real tard to write.
 
H

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
bluemax said:
Ehh, I think #2 is a falsehood. Their are a lot of massively unhappy LDS people who just put on happy faces for keeping up appearances. The church has really high rates of depression and suicide, ESPECIALLY among female members.
Click to expand...
Not sure if it's still true today, but Utah led the nation in prozac use.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

The Virtues of Ancient Rome
45
2K
Liljagare replied
  • Poll
Alan Wake 2 | Review + Prediction Thread
Analysis Review 7 8 9 10 11
524
43K
Ev1L AuRoN replied
  • Locked
Help a NeoGAF member become a better NeoGAF member...
10
1K
Kev Kev replied
What actually happened to Warren Ellis?
14
2K
CGNoire replied
  • Locked
  • Poll
FF XVI IGN Interview Triggers ResetERA Into MADNESS (Diversity/Representation)
Opinion Drama Cringe 2 3
130
11K
TheInfamousKira replied
Top Bottom