PdotMichael
Banned
Man, I grew up not knowing any of these and just knowing that she was a living saint kind of person.
How did she earn a nobel prize with all these controversies?
Nobel Peace Prizes are a joke.
Man, I grew up not knowing any of these and just knowing that she was a living saint kind of person.
How did she earn a nobel prize with all these controversies?
No. The very nature of Protestantism is a refutation of Catholicism. There is no "group A" here.
Man, I grew up not knowing any of these and just knowing that she was a living saint kind of person.
How did she earn a nobel prize with all these controversies?
No. The very nature of Protestantism is a refutation of Catholicism. There is no "group A" here.
She tortured poor people with sub par treatment, because she believed that suffering was the path to god. She was a career saint. Her declared mission wasn't to make people better to live on their own, she was a shepherd that tried to push as many the lambs into the barn as she could. It's a crime that she is remembered so positively in the minds of the public coincidence. Mother Teresa is the saint of the slowly decaying.
I don't even understand this post.
Like what does you sending your non-catholic kids to a school simply named after her have anything to do with anything?
This.
What other evidence? Are you talking about allegations from medical personnel who complained about the standard of care at her hospitals or the allegations that she tried to convert people to catholicism on their death bed (totally plausible given the catholic faith). If society was so ready to help the needy then why are there so few organizations that are in fact helping the poor in third world countries. Complaining about the standard of care in places where little or no care was previously being provided to the needey seems a bit like not seeing the forrest for the trees.
lol Giving sainthood to evil people.
Wow, what a piece of shit. I like the current pope but this is way too much.Saw this on redit
Copying this message from /u/be_my_plaything:
What evil? This evil....
She ran hospitals (If an institution with a 40% mortality rate is actually classifiable as a hospital) like prisons, particularly cruel and unhygienic prisons at that. Children in her care were tied to their beds to prevent them misbehaving. She let the terminally ill (and even those with illnesses that would have been curable if her 'hospitals' were run better) die without pain relief because suffering bought them closer to Jesus
Most of the money donated to her causes was filtered back into the (already exceedingly rich) Catholic Church, or used to expand her 'charities' to new regions, rather than actually helping those in her care, many of whom were starving and lacking basic medical care... Basically she didn't love the poor and hungry, she loved poverty and hunger, she saw suffering as a grace and despite being lauded as a humanitarian given the fame and donations she had at her disposal did relatively little practical good.
She befriended and defended a genocidal dictator, Jean-Claude 'Baby Doc' Duvalier, and accepted donations from him of money extorted from the very poor she was supposedly helping as well as drug dealing and body part trafficking.
She accepted and refused to return profits of criminal activity. Including one and a quarter million US dollars in cash and use of a private jet from convicted racketeer and fraudster Charles Keating who stole over $3 Billion from US taxpayers in the 80's and 90's... Upon his conviction not only did Mother Teresa and The Catholic Church refuse to return the money they had received from him, Mother Teresa actually tried to use her influence to have him let off or at least sentenced leniently.
She publicly defended known pedophiles from within the clergy, including trying to use her influence to have leniency shown in sentencing of convicted child rapist Donald McGuire and campaigning to have him reinstated to the priesthood and allowing him to continue his work... even though this work would inevitably bring him into regular contact with children.
Because so much of the money she raised went to the church not the poor she hated waste in her hospitals, insisting staff reused needles until they were too blunt to continue using... even in known HIV high risk areas.
She directed a mere 7% of the monies her charities raised directly those she was supposedly helping... With much of the rest ending up in secret bank accounts and as yet still unaccounted for.
She routinely baptised those dying under her care regardless of their own wishes or religious beliefs.
She opposed both abortion and contraception, even in cases of incest, abuse and rape.
She praised and supported Ireland's anti-divorce laws... even in cases where spousal abuse was apparent, forcing countless women to live out lives of slavery and torture.
Basically pretty much everything about her was evil, but the churches PR machine didn't have a hard job spinning a kindly looking old women stood amongst some of the poorest people in the world to look lie a saint, and once that side of the story was cemented in the press it became all most people saw of her.
Possible sources:
1.
http://www.nouvelles.umontreal.ca/udem-news/news/20130301-mother-teresa-anything-but-a-saint.html
2.
Les côtés ténébreux de Mère Teresa
3.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...many-critics-mother-teresa-is-still-no-saint/
4.
Christopher Hitchens - Mother Teresa: Hell's Angel
5.
http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/i-dont-think-she-deserved-the-nobel/284270
6.
http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/on-the-same-page/284274
7.
http://newamericamedia.org/2013/03/city-of-doubts-kolkatas-uneasy-love-for-mother-teresa.php
8.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Mother_Teresa
9.
http://www.salon.com/2016/01/03/the..._had_little_impact_on_her_glowing_reputation/
10.
http://www.forbes.com/2010/08/10/forbes-india-mother-teresa-charity-critical-public-review.html
11.
More sources in this comment by /u/BlunderLikeARicochet
Saw this on redit
Copying this message from /u/be_my_plaything:
What evil? This evil....
She ran hospitals (If an institution with a 40% mortality rate is actually classifiable as a hospital) like prisons, particularly cruel and unhygienic prisons at that. Children in her care were tied to their beds to prevent them misbehaving. She let the terminally ill (and even those with illnesses that would have been curable if her 'hospitals' were run better) die without pain relief because suffering bought them closer to Jesus
Most of the money donated to her causes was filtered back into the (already exceedingly rich) Catholic Church, or used to expand her 'charities' to new regions, rather than actually helping those in her care, many of whom were starving and lacking basic medical care... Basically she didn't love the poor and hungry, she loved poverty and hunger, she saw suffering as a grace and despite being lauded as a humanitarian given the fame and donations she had at her disposal did relatively little practical good.
She befriended and defended a genocidal dictator, Jean-Claude 'Baby Doc' Duvalier, and accepted donations from him of money extorted from the very poor she was supposedly helping as well as drug dealing and body part trafficking.
She accepted and refused to return profits of criminal activity. Including one and a quarter million US dollars in cash and use of a private jet from convicted racketeer and fraudster Charles Keating who stole over $3 Billion from US taxpayers in the 80's and 90's... Upon his conviction not only did Mother Teresa and The Catholic Church refuse to return the money they had received from him, Mother Teresa actually tried to use her influence to have him let off or at least sentenced leniently.
She publicly defended known pedophiles from within the clergy, including trying to use her influence to have leniency shown in sentencing of convicted child rapist Donald McGuire and campaigning to have him reinstated to the priesthood and allowing him to continue his work... even though this work would inevitably bring him into regular contact with children.
Because so much of the money she raised went to the church not the poor she hated waste in her hospitals, insisting staff reused needles until they were too blunt to continue using... even in known HIV high risk areas.
She directed a mere 7% of the monies her charities raised directly those she was supposedly helping... With much of the rest ending up in secret bank accounts and as yet still unaccounted for.
She routinely baptised those dying under her care regardless of their own wishes or religious beliefs.
She opposed both abortion and contraception, even in cases of incest, abuse and rape.
She praised and supported Ireland's anti-divorce laws... even in cases where spousal abuse was apparent, forcing countless women to live out lives of slavery and torture.
Basically pretty much everything about her was evil, but the churches PR machine didn't have a hard job spinning a kindly looking old women stood amongst some of the poorest people in the world to look lie a saint, and once that side of the story was cemented in the press it became all most people saw of her.
Possible sources:
1.
http://www.nouvelles.umontreal.ca/udem-news/news/20130301-mother-teresa-anything-but-a-saint.html
2.
Les côtés ténébreux de Mère Teresa
3.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...many-critics-mother-teresa-is-still-no-saint/
4.
Christopher Hitchens - Mother Teresa: Hell's Angel
5.
http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/i-dont-think-she-deserved-the-nobel/284270
6.
http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/on-the-same-page/284274
7.
http://newamericamedia.org/2013/03/city-of-doubts-kolkatas-uneasy-love-for-mother-teresa.php
8.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Mother_Teresa
9.
http://www.salon.com/2016/01/03/the..._had_little_impact_on_her_glowing_reputation/
10.
http://www.forbes.com/2010/08/10/forbes-india-mother-teresa-charity-critical-public-review.html
11.
More sources in this comment by /u/BlunderLikeARicochet
I could be upset over this.
Instead I'll just take it as a friendly reminder what a shitstain the catholic church is to humanity.
My understanding is that she used donation money that was supposed to be used to help locals in one side of the world to build churches of suffering on another.
Not really. Protestantism is based on the Catholics books. The King James version, for example, is not just full of mistranslation, it's written by people who didn't know Hebrew.
Group A is Christianity itself.
this is what i've settled on
The point is that Mother Teresa is a household name like Martin Luther King.
I just browsed through the Time special on her. There's not one line of negative material in there.
The point is that Catholics are not the ones refuting evolution in the classrooms.
Catholics values compares very well to any other religion.
Technically, all faithful Christians who are deceased are saints. Some just get additional recognition.
Really?! She did some horrific stuff though.
I consider myself agnostic, but every thread with religious topics is full of hatred and "it's the current year!!."
Like, calm down. Let people believe whatever they want to believe.
No not coolCool.
Chariot even figured out her boss name already.Mother Teresa is the saint of the slowly decaying.
So all it takes to become a saint is some good PR?
Not really. Protestantism is based on the Catholics books. The King James version, for example, is not just full of mistranslation, it's written by people who didn't know Hebrew.
Chariot even figured out her boss name already.
I could be upset over this.
Instead I'll just take it as a friendly reminder what a shitstain the catholic church is to humanity.
Its a massive red flag that the most evidence submitted in this thread derives from a reddit post, which dishonestly failed to provide the prominent counter articles accompanying its sources from the Washington Post, Outlook India (both cited above) or the Huffington Post. This anti-intellectualism exposes the new-atheism for what it genuinely is: another fundamentalist delusion, fueling intolerance for other backgrounds by deception, and not at all concerned with critical thinking.
So to all the Mother Teresa haters: if you dont like her, thats your right and I respect it. But please, do not waste all this time writing studies or articles on her that have no other value than being controversial enough to be published. Pick your battles. Surely there are a lot worse people than her in this world who deserve your energy! And if Mother Teresa did such a bad job helping others, why not save that time spent criticizing her to instead try to make a difference in this world?
Yes, Mother Teresa was adamant and very vocal about this. Although I usually scream loud and clear when I hear any politician questioning what I consider two fundamental rights, I do not hold it against Mother Teresa. In fact, I understand her and see it as a necessary price to pay for all the good she has done to this world.
No. The very nature of Protestantism is a refutation of Catholicism. There is no "group A" here.
Group A is Christianity itself.
Protestantism literally rejects the whole worshipping of saints and canonization thing. So no, a piece of shit like Teresa being declared a saint by the Catholics doesn't reflect poorly on Protestants. In fact it proves them right.
.
Catholics don't worship saints, and some Protestant sects do have saints.
Thats true, im surprised people are arguing otherwiseWorship might be a subjective term, but I'd say Catholics certainly worship saints. They erect sanctuaries in their honor, name churches after them, do pilgrimages in their name, pray to them, have statues and loads of other iconography around among many, many other things.
.
Catholics don't worship saints, and some Protestant sects do have saints.
Yeah! it's not like religious beliefs have any effect on the world! Beliefs are just completely segmented off in peoples minds and do not effect politics, health, etc!I consider myself agnostic, but every thread with religious topics is full of hatred and "it's the current year!!."
Like, calm down. Let people believe whatever they want to believe.
Worship might be a subjective term, but I'd say that in practice, Catholics certainly worship saints. They erect sanctuaries in their honor, name churches after them, do pilgrimages in their name, pray to them, have statues and loads of other iconography around among many, many other things.
As someone that lives in a country with a 99% Catholic population, Catholics absolutely worship not only saints, but also statues, murals, paintings and other imagery.
I mean the theological response is that Catholics don't pray, which is what most people are getting at when they say worship, to saints so much as instead asking for intercession.
The historical response is that the implication of the accusation that Catholics worship saints is that they worship them as lesser Gods. This is fairly clearly wrong in practice, but more importantly has been used as justification for the othering of Catholics in addition to some pretty nasty acts over the last 5 centuries or so.
It's a fairly odd definition of worship that leads to the accusation and it has a clear incentive. Additionally in my experience, today the charge is mostly leveled by the more regressive protestant sects.
Also some Protestant sects, including one of the most reformed ones in the Scottish Kirk, name things after saints so I'm not really sure what you are getting at with that.
I mean, I don't know what to tell you. I know for a fact that people in my family actively pray to saints. They literally use that word when they want to "ask" a particular saint for something. You say this is intercession, but I say tomato tomahto. I'm certainly not trying to "other" my family, but this is definitely my experience.
When I was in Catholic school they justified it with semantic mumbojumbo, saying how saints were "revered" and not worshiped, when in effect it's the same thing. They might not actually consider them "lesser gods", but in actuality that's what they're doing to be honest. I'm not even gonna get into the whole "revering" of murals, statues and Marian apparitions.
I don't know much about Protestants, so I can't speak to that, and I jumped in late into this whole argument anyways.
Pretty ironic coming from someone who just posted little more than a slew of gish gallop. I doubt you're fooling anyone, though, so nice try.This anti-intellectualism exposes the new-atheism for what it genuinely is: another fundamentalist delusion, fueling intolerance for other backgrounds by deception, and not at all concerned with critical thinking.