Tbh, that relationship between a men and women, seems to be a costan in Kim KiDuk's films.Snowman Prophet of Doom said:
Giard said:Why, then, doesMark Ruffalo's character call him "Teddy" before he's being carried out at the end? And Leo seems to realize he's going to be lobotomized, something he shouldn't remember if he relapsed to his imaginary reality.
big ander said:Nope, the ending was intentionally ambiguous and there isn't supposed to be a definite conclusion. I feel like there was even an interview on it.
Don't know.CaptYamato said:Kim Ki-Duk hate
+1
GhostRidah said:Anyone else using http://mubi.com/ to score/track films? Really like the design of it and its faster than imdb
Paths of Glory could be his best film, put that on your to-do list ASAP!Misanthropy said:Ranking of Kubrick Films:
1. A Clockwork Orange
1 (tied). 2001
2. Dr. Strangelove
3. Full Metal Jacket
4. The Shining
5. Barry Lyndon
6. Eyes Wide Shut
Haven't seen Lolita or the earlier ones.
Misanthropy said:Eyes Wide Shut. It was the first Kubrick film I saw which disappointed me. Maybe he was too old to make a film like he used to. Specifically, I didn't like the fact that there was no actual climax in the film and that many parts seemed unconnected. I didn't like the surrealness of this one and it seemed to be like a badly done David Lynch movie.
I had the same opinion while watching Barry Lyndon but it redeemed itself with the duel near the end. That one actually had some type of climax.
In this movie you can't consider the orgy scene the climax (no pun intended) because A. Immediately after a climax some change must have occurred and the rest needs to be a falling action. B. Climaxes don't occur only 40% of the way through the film.
idk. Can someone redeem this movie for me? Perhaps an analysis of it? It just seems like a very well done porno to me.
Ranking of Kubrick Films:
1. A Clockwork Orange
1 (tied). 2001
2. Dr. Strangelove
3. Full Metal Jacket
4. The Shining
5. Barry Lyndon
6. Eyes Wide Shut
Haven't seen Lolita or the earlier ones.
FollowedMeliorism said:
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:Eyes Wide Shut is not really a film with a strong climax. Kidman's speech about the naval officer is really the inciting action more than anything, and if there IS a climactic moment, it's either the revelation by Pollack's character that he was at the orgy or Cruise's discovery of the mask lying on the pillow, prompting his own emotional breakdown and the revelation of his odyssey to Kidman (I'd say quite probably the latter, since it happens so near the end and is probably the thing that creates the greatest lasting change for either character).
Edit: Watch Paths of Glory, mang; it's one of the all-time great war films, and Dax is one of the greatest hero characters in all of cinema.
icarus-daedelus said:Welp, Red Desert was amazing.
2nd Antonioni film I've seen after Blow-Up, a long time ago.
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:Blow-Up is one of the first ones on my list after I finish the 250 (only 22 to go!); of the three Antonioni films that I've seen, Red Desert and L'Eclisse were both amazing, while L'avventura was mediocre after the first hour or so.
Edit: Also, the original Manchurian Candidate is fantastic; Angela Lansbury simply kills it in that movie.
Giard said:Just watched Shutter Island.
I think I would've appreciated the movie 10 times more if I hadn't seen the trailer. :/
Still enjoyed it though.
What are GAF's impressions on the ending?Crazy from the start, or made crazy?
Giard said:Why, then, doesMark Ruffalo's character call him "Teddy" before he's being carried out at the end? And Leo seems to realize he's going to be lobotomized, something he shouldn't remember if he relapsed to his imaginary reality.
big ander said:Nope, the ending was intentionally ambiguous and there isn't supposed to be a definite conclusion. I feel like there was even an interview on it.
Ether_Snake said:Of course.he is crazy. I don't see how it can even be ambiguous in any way
Blader5489 said:Sarcasm?He's obviously sane and chooses to get lobotomized.
Good Will Hunting gets better with the passage of time. I thought it was pretty good when it came out but wasn't over the moon about it. And every time I've seen it since then my estimation of it grows. I realize what a great script is there, I appreciate Williams', Damon's and Skarsgard's performances even more, and the film hits me more emotionally than it did when I first saw it. Good mix of humor to go with the heavy stuff, great supporting cast (Minnie Driver = *swoon*), all this stuff combines to make it a great film.Meliorism said:I looked at your ICM profile to see what you have left. If you haven't seen Good Will Hunting, let me know what you think of it when you get to it. It's come up on another board that I post on, and they all think it's great, and I'm just kind of surprised. I like the movie, but it's nothing incredible.
icarus-daedelus said:The cinematography in Red Desert is seriously some of the best I've ever seen; the way the color and focus (and lack of each, as well) of the world are shaped by Giuliana's perception of it might be one of the cleverer ways I've seen of engaging audience empathy and building character purely through visual style (among other means.) It is somewhat "on and off," in that we may see more or less from her point of view in a given scene, but that just makes the technique more striking and effective imo. (The character herself sort of struck me as similar to a saner, rounder variation of the main character in Repulsion.) And, well, it is just plain beautiful to look at. The lovely bedtime story near the end being exemplary and a wonderful scene besides.
I don't think I could make it through the IMDB top 250 list, honestly. Every fiber of my being tells me I'd probably hate Life is Beautiful.
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:Capt: I'm so close, I'm not gonna eff the 250 now! After I finish it's back to "watch what I want, when I want."
icarus-daedelus said:Every fiber of my being tells me I'd probably hate Life is Beautiful.
LOL, something tells me you're gonna hate that with a passion, but i might be wrong.Snowman Prophet of Doom said:That's coming up for me, man. Not looking forward to it. BUT I must persevere, as clearly it is important to have seen every film from a list compiled by the internet.
"There Will Be Blood is the kind of film that is easily called great. I am not sure of its greatness. It was filmed in the same area of Texas used by No Country for Old Men, and that is a great film, and a perfect one. But There Will Be Blood is not perfect, and in its imperfections (its unbending characters, its lack of women or any reflection of ordinary society, its ending, its relentlessness) we may see its reach exceeding its grasp. Which is not a dishonorable thing."
Man that's the ONE film I've considered watching (only because it's on the top 250 IMDB) but I've held it off for years, if only because it sounds like something I'd hate 100%, and for what it's worth, my dad has actually seen it, and he hated it, in addition all his complaints seem to be exactly what i expect from a film with that premise.I don't think I could make it through the IMDB top 250 list, honestly. Every fiber of my being tells me I'd probably hate Life is Beautiful.
His own misogyny seems to hold back the execution of his art tho, especially when he tries to portray male-on-female relationships in the number of films I've seen by him, and it just comes off as awkward and very poorly done. I also feel like a lot of his spiritual buddhist films (i heard his earlier films have a different tone from that) come off as manufactured in terms of tone and the overall message, especially since i recall reading that he identifies himself as a christian, and doesn't really give a shit about buddhism.He sure have some personal problems in that department, but i don't have a problem with it.
I found them interesting, actually.
Troubled or obsessed people are not necessarily bonded to produce bad or insincere art.
(that is, until they keep their problems and obsessions in the realm of legality)
HiResDes said:There Will Be Blood > No Country For Old Men
I think he fails when he tries to go more down to earth, with realism and realistic characters.Lafiel said:His own misogyny seems to hold back the execution of his art tho, especially when he tries to portray male-on-female relationships in the number of films I've seen by him, and it just comes off as awkward and very poorly done. I also feel like a lot of his spiritual buddhist films (i heard his earlier films have a different tone from that) come off as manufactured in terms of tone and the overall message, especially since i recall reading that he identifies himself as a christian, and doesn't really give a shit about buddhism.
See I found the opposite to be true. I thought TWBB was rather simplistic in its themes. There were peripheral things like capitalism, revenge, and an anemic commentary on religion/Godhood, but all of those were very lightly touched upon under the main theme which was the greed of man.HiResDes said:No Country For Old Men is kind of rudimentary in theme, whereas I found There Will Be Blood to be a much more complex piece of work...Not that that makes it necessarily makes it better, but in this particular case I think There Will Be Blood is the more rewarding of the two.
UrbanRats said:Bedevilled.
Awesome revenge movie, though.the ending moments dragged on a bit too much and lost some power (especially the final part in the police station)
Also the male characters were a bit flat, but hey.