Movies You've Seen Recently: Return of the Revenge of the Curse of the...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Magnolia.

Such an odd film. Not sure why. There's a lot going on but I enjoyed it. I also loved how
none of the main characters died
. Overall it was definitely worth the watch.
 
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:
Tbh, that relationship between a men and women, seems to be a costan in Kim KiDuk's films.
Think about Bad Guy, Seom(it's inverted here), The Bow, and so on.
I haven't seen Autumn, Winter.. i'm going by your description, but it seems like a recurring element.
 
Giard said:
Why, then, does
Mark Ruffalo's character call him "Teddy" before he's being carried out at the end? And Leo seems to realize he's going to be lobotomized, something he shouldn't remember if he relapsed to his imaginary reality.
He only calls him Teddy after determining that the treatment didn't work. For the second part of your query...

big ander said:
Nope, the ending was intentionally ambiguous and there isn't supposed to be a definite conclusion. I feel like there was even an interview on it.

I agree it's an ambiguous ending, but in the sense that
we don't know if Edward actually relapsed or if Teddy simply faked the breakthrough. I'm more inclined to believe the latter only because of the lengths we've already seen him go through to try and find the imaginary Edward and expose the truth of the facility, including the injury of several staff members and destroying a car, and that he knows about the lobotomy procedure, but to what end on his part?

EDIT: Out of curiosity, how does the book end? Is it more definitive or was it ambiguous?
 
Eyes Wide Shut. It was the first Kubrick film I saw which disappointed me. Maybe he was too old to make a film like he used to. Specifically, I didn't like the fact that there was no actual climax in the film and that many parts seemed unconnected. I didn't like the surrealness of this one and it seemed to be like a badly done David Lynch movie.

I had the same opinion while watching Barry Lyndon but it redeemed itself with the duel near the end. That one actually had some type of climax.

In this movie you can't consider the orgy scene the climax (no pun intended) because A. Immediately after a climax some change must have occurred and the rest needs to be a falling action. B. Climaxes don't occur only 40% of the way through the film.

idk. Can someone redeem this movie for me? Perhaps an analysis of it? It just seems like a very well done porno to me.

Ranking of Kubrick Films:

1. A Clockwork Orange
1 (tied). 2001
2. Dr. Strangelove
3. Full Metal Jacket
4. The Shining
5. Barry Lyndon
6. Eyes Wide Shut

Haven't seen Lolita or the earlier ones.
 
i thought eyes wide shut was phenomenal though the last hour didn't quite live up to everything that preceeded it. of all of kubrick's films i've seen so far, i'd put it on top. and i've been meaning to watch barry lyndon for a while now, but its running time is daunting.
 
He sure have some personal problems in that department, but i don't have a problem with it.
I found them interesting, actually.
Troubled or obsessed people are not necessarily bonded to produce bad or insincere art.
(that is, until they keep their problems and obsessions in the realm of legality)

Again, not talking about that film in particular which can be bad on its own right, i'm talking in general, infact, i like Seom and Bad Guy a lot, and both exhibit a more than questionable moral undertone.
-
Also, The fact that he's ignored in South Korea.. i don't know how much that really matter, since from what i've read about South Korea, it seems like a pretty misogynistic culture (but i'm Italian, so not talking from an high horse here :P).
 
CaptYamato said:
Kim Ki-Duk hate

+1
Don't know.

Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter... and Spring left me cold, but I loved Bin-Jip (3-iron) and Samaritan Girl.
Really liked Breath (Soom) as well as Bad Guy.
 
Not gonna lie, I really loved Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter...And Spring and 3-Iron, but nothing Snowman has said really rings false. Sometimes, I think I watch something and it just hits a note even when looking at something in retrospect that might cause me to think lesser of the art. And I suppose I could remedy this by watching the film again, but I'm always trying to watch something new, so it probably won't happen any time soon.

GhostRidah said:
Anyone else using http://mubi.com/ to score/track films? Really like the design of it and its faster than imdb

http://mubi.com/users/1017177
 
Misanthropy said:
Ranking of Kubrick Films:

1. A Clockwork Orange
1 (tied). 2001
2. Dr. Strangelove
3. Full Metal Jacket
4. The Shining
5. Barry Lyndon
6. Eyes Wide Shut

Haven't seen Lolita or the earlier ones.
Paths of Glory could be his best film, put that on your to-do list ASAP!
 
Misanthropy said:
Eyes Wide Shut. It was the first Kubrick film I saw which disappointed me. Maybe he was too old to make a film like he used to. Specifically, I didn't like the fact that there was no actual climax in the film and that many parts seemed unconnected. I didn't like the surrealness of this one and it seemed to be like a badly done David Lynch movie.

I had the same opinion while watching Barry Lyndon but it redeemed itself with the duel near the end. That one actually had some type of climax.

In this movie you can't consider the orgy scene the climax (no pun intended) because A. Immediately after a climax some change must have occurred and the rest needs to be a falling action. B. Climaxes don't occur only 40% of the way through the film.

idk. Can someone redeem this movie for me? Perhaps an analysis of it? It just seems like a very well done porno to me.

Ranking of Kubrick Films:

1. A Clockwork Orange
1 (tied). 2001
2. Dr. Strangelove
3. Full Metal Jacket
4. The Shining
5. Barry Lyndon
6. Eyes Wide Shut

Haven't seen Lolita or the earlier ones.

I'm not sure I understand your critique. I don't think a film has to have a climax. I always viewed Alice's revelation that she would have given up everything to fuck a naval officer to be the climax because it sends Dr. Bill on his odyssey.
 
Eyes Wide Shut is not really a film with a strong climax. Kidman's speech about the naval officer is really the inciting action more than anything, and if there IS a climactic moment, it's either the revelation by Pollack's character that he was at the orgy or Cruise's discovery of the mask lying on the pillow, prompting his own emotional breakdown and the revelation of his odyssey to Kidman (I'd say quite probably the latter, since it happens so near the end and is probably the thing that creates the greatest lasting change for either character).

Edit: Watch Paths of Glory, mang; it's one of the all-time great war films, and Dax is one of the greatest hero characters in all of cinema.
 
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:
Eyes Wide Shut is not really a film with a strong climax. Kidman's speech about the naval officer is really the inciting action more than anything, and if there IS a climactic moment, it's either the revelation by Pollack's character that he was at the orgy or Cruise's discovery of the mask lying on the pillow, prompting his own emotional breakdown and the revelation of his odyssey to Kidman (I'd say quite probably the latter, since it happens so near the end and is probably the thing that creates the greatest lasting change for either character).

Edit: Watch Paths of Glory, mang; it's one of the all-time great war films, and Dax is one of the greatest hero characters in all of cinema.

You're likely right because that's when he breaks down and says, "I'll tell you everything."

I tend to agree with the other poster that thinks that the marriage is irretrievably broken in EWS. I love the film because of all of its ambiguity.
 
I just finished watching this one:

xFvW0l.jpg


Man... =/

The only thing I was expecting was the story to keep going for just a little more, just at the final part happen.
 
icarus-daedelus said:
Welp, Red Desert was amazing.

2nd Antonioni film I've seen after Blow-Up, a long time ago.

Blow-Up is one of the first ones on my list after I finish the 250 (only 22 to go!); of the three Antonioni films that I've seen, Red Desert and L'Eclisse were both amazing, while L'avventura was mediocre after the first hour or so.

Edit: Also, the original Manchurian Candidate is fantastic; Angela Lansbury simply kills it in that movie.
 
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:
Blow-Up is one of the first ones on my list after I finish the 250 (only 22 to go!); of the three Antonioni films that I've seen, Red Desert and L'Eclisse were both amazing, while L'avventura was mediocre after the first hour or so.

Edit: Also, the original Manchurian Candidate is fantastic; Angela Lansbury simply kills it in that movie.

You just say fuck off 250 and watch Blow-Up.
 
Giard said:
Just watched Shutter Island.
I think I would've appreciated the movie 10 times more if I hadn't seen the trailer. :/
Still enjoyed it though.

What are GAF's impressions on the ending?
Crazy from the start, or made crazy?

Of course
he is crazy. I don't see how it can even be ambiguous in any way
.

Giard said:
Why, then, does
Mark Ruffalo's character call him "Teddy" before he's being carried out at the end? And Leo seems to realize he's going to be lobotomized, something he shouldn't remember if he relapsed to his imaginary reality.

He hasn't relapsed YET at that point, but he is acting like he did, because he is giving up. He doesn't want to accept reality, so he decides to become an imaginary victim of the plot he had imagined, because he doesn't want to live on as someone who killed his wife.

big ander said:
Nope, the ending was intentionally ambiguous and there isn't supposed to be a definite conclusion. I feel like there was even an interview on it.

No, it's actually the flaw of the movie. It ISN'T ambiguous at all.
 
Cars 2, thanks to the late summer kids program at our local theater.

Cars is my most disliked Pixar film. Cars 2 lands near the bottom as well, though above the first a touch. The narrative is really quite a mess. Comment on the 3rd race:
they had so much trouble juggling the plot threads the film just completely ditches the race entirely after a few minutes, including the outcome and fallout.

I really hope Cars 3 doesn't happen. I'm really sick of these characters.
 
I looked at your ICM profile to see what you have left. If you haven't seen Good Will Hunting, let me know what you think of it when you get to it. It's come up on another board that I post on, and they all think it's great, and I'm just kind of surprised. I like the movie, but it's nothing incredible.
 
Meliorism said:
I looked at your ICM profile to see what you have left. If you haven't seen Good Will Hunting, let me know what you think of it when you get to it. It's come up on another board that I post on, and they all think it's great, and I'm just kind of surprised. I like the movie, but it's nothing incredible.
Good Will Hunting gets better with the passage of time. I thought it was pretty good when it came out but wasn't over the moon about it. And every time I've seen it since then my estimation of it grows. I realize what a great script is there, I appreciate Williams', Damon's and Skarsgard's performances even more, and the film hits me more emotionally than it did when I first saw it. Good mix of humor to go with the heavy stuff, great supporting cast (Minnie Driver = *swoon*), all this stuff combines to make it a great film.

I don't like to rate movies. But when I do, I subscribe to the icarus-daedelus 6 point scale. /Dos Equis Guy

Good Will Hunting is a solid 5 out of 6
 
icarus-daedelus said:
The cinematography in Red Desert is seriously some of the best I've ever seen; the way the color and focus (and lack of each, as well) of the world are shaped by Giuliana's perception of it might be one of the cleverer ways I've seen of engaging audience empathy and building character purely through visual style (among other means.) It is somewhat "on and off," in that we may see more or less from her point of view in a given scene, but that just makes the technique more striking and effective imo. (The character herself sort of struck me as similar to a saner, rounder variation of the main character in Repulsion.) And, well, it is just plain beautiful to look at. The lovely bedtime story near the end being exemplary and a wonderful scene besides.

I don't think I could make it through the IMDB top 250 list, honestly. Every fiber of my being tells me I'd probably hate Life is Beautiful.

That's coming up for me, man. Not looking forward to it. BUT I must persevere, as clearly it is important to have seen every film from a list compiled by the internet.
 
The_Host_film_poster.jpg

The Host
A korean monster movie. Overall I enjoyed it. Decent effects, good acting, some funny moments, some thrilling. A nice blend of comedy/drama/monster-movie.
 
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:
Capt: I'm so close, I'm not gonna eff the 250 now! After I finish it's back to "watch what I want, when I want."

I have 31 left but some are movies I watched along time ago, but I don't want to check them off because I don't remember it.
 
icarus-daedelus said:
Every fiber of my being tells me I'd probably hate Life is Beautiful.
Snowman Prophet of Doom said:
That's coming up for me, man. Not looking forward to it. BUT I must persevere, as clearly it is important to have seen every film from a list compiled by the internet.
LOL, something tells me you're gonna hate that with a passion, but i might be wrong.
It's always amusing though, to witness Benigni's obsession for is wife.
I usually hate Benigni's recent cinema (i liked his comical stuff, like Johnny Stecchino or Il Mostro) i should rewatch Life is Beautiful again though, i watched it last time years ago, when it came out in the theaters.

Anyway.

4:30
.
Cute idea, but didn't do anything for me, really.
The characters were not fleshed out enough and the directing was very confusing.

Bedevilled
.
Awesome revenge movie, though
the ending moments dragged on a bit too much and lost some power (especially the final part in the police station)
.
Also the male characters were a bit flat, but hey.

Human Centipede.
Masterpiece, i'm in awe, just 2 questions:
1)
How fucking dumb must you be, to leave the scalpel in the doc's leg and bite him, instead of simply cutting his throat with the damn thing?
2)
Is Dr. Hainer to be considered a scientist or an artist?
 
Watched There Will Be Blood for the first time. Roger Ebert pretty much sums up my feelings, but I will elaborate:

"There Will Be Blood is the kind of film that is easily called great. I am not sure of its greatness. It was filmed in the same area of Texas used by No Country for Old Men, and that is a great film, and a perfect one. But There Will Be Blood is not perfect, and in its imperfections (its unbending characters, its lack of women or any reflection of ordinary society, its ending, its relentlessness) we may see its reach exceeding its grasp. Which is not a dishonorable thing."

I'm a bit torn on Day Lewis' performance, on one hand it's a textbook example of an actor slipping into a role and completely disappearing. On the other hand, I've always been of the mind that the best performances are the ones where you don't feel like the actor is putting on a performance or really "notice" they're acting, but here you could be forgiven for thinking Day Lewis felt like he was on a stage the whole time. The guy never takes a moment to breathe, he looked like he was ready to snap at any moment.
and the ending was...well, bleh :P

But, there were moments when I was watching film where I said literally to myself, "Man, Day Lewis is acting the shit out of this movie." I would actually draw comparisons to Christian Bale in American Psycho. The film is solely about this character and their universe, and you only get fleeting glimpses of the outside world or a scene where the protagonist isn't in the frame.

Much like American Psycho, there was never a moment where I was bored or uninterested; I never had any idea what the main character would do next. Definitely a solid film, but very bizarre.
 
I don't think I could make it through the IMDB top 250 list, honestly. Every fiber of my being tells me I'd probably hate Life is Beautiful.
Man that's the ONE film I've considered watching (only because it's on the top 250 IMDB) but I've held it off for years, if only because it sounds like something I'd hate 100%, and for what it's worth, my dad has actually seen it, and he hated it, in addition all his complaints seem to be exactly what i expect from a film with that premise.
He sure have some personal problems in that department, but i don't have a problem with it.
I found them interesting, actually.
Troubled or obsessed people are not necessarily bonded to produce bad or insincere art.
(that is, until they keep their problems and obsessions in the realm of legality)
His own misogyny seems to hold back the execution of his art tho, especially when he tries to portray male-on-female relationships in the number of films I've seen by him, and it just comes off as awkward and very poorly done. I also feel like a lot of his spiritual buddhist films (i heard his earlier films have a different tone from that) come off as manufactured in terms of tone and the overall message, especially since i recall reading that he identifies himself as a christian, and doesn't really give a shit about buddhism.
 
HiResDes said:
There Will Be Blood > No Country For Old Men
P2nVt.gif


This was one year where the Academy nailed it. The direction in NCfOM was better than TWBB, the picture as a whole was better, but Daniel Day-Lewis's performance was indeed better than any single performance in NCfOM. Ebert was right. TWBB is called great too easily. It is good, but not good enough as a whole to be considered great.
 
No Country For Old Men is kind of rudimentary in theme, whereas I found There Will Be Blood to be a much more complex piece of work...Not that that makes it necessarily makes it better, but in this particular case I think There Will Be Blood is the more rewarding of the two.
 
Lafiel said:
His own misogyny seems to hold back the execution of his art tho, especially when he tries to portray male-on-female relationships in the number of films I've seen by him, and it just comes off as awkward and very poorly done. I also feel like a lot of his spiritual buddhist films (i heard his earlier films have a different tone from that) come off as manufactured in terms of tone and the overall message, especially since i recall reading that he identifies himself as a christian, and doesn't really give a shit about buddhism.
I think he fails when he tries to go more down to earth, with realism and realistic characters.
That's why i like 3 Iron, Bad Guy and Seom, because i found him to be less worried in trying to tell a tradiotional story between two people, and more about telling one on a single character with the other as an element to highlight his/her personality.
Maybe that's something only i saw in there, totally misreading them, but for example: In 3-Iron i interpret the young male as imaginary, as a part of the girl's character-- ofcourse he's physical storywise, but metaphorically, the scene at the end i see it as a delusional desire for a gentle quiet love, that she has not the power or the will to live, so she sticks with the abusive asshole husband, while having an affair with a ghost (basically).

Similar thing in Bad Guy and Seom.
 
HiResDes said:
No Country For Old Men is kind of rudimentary in theme, whereas I found There Will Be Blood to be a much more complex piece of work...Not that that makes it necessarily makes it better, but in this particular case I think There Will Be Blood is the more rewarding of the two.
See I found the opposite to be true. I thought TWBB was rather simplistic in its themes. There were peripheral things like capitalism, revenge, and an anemic commentary on religion/Godhood, but all of those were very lightly touched upon under the main theme which was the greed of man.

NCfOM explored greed, corruption of man, the nature of evil, nihilism, and man's struggle to adapt to a world which rapidly changes around him. Nothing rudimentary about any of that as far as I can tell, at least not as explored in NCfOM.

I do think that TWBB's cinematography blows NCfOM's out of the water. TWBB is astonishing to look at.
 
Sure, but I was responding to your claim that NCfOM's themes were rudimentary while TWBB's were complex. If that is how you saw it I can dig it, I just thought TWBB tread very shallow water in the theme department whereas NCfOM dealt with much heavier shit.
 
UrbanRats said:
Bedevilled.
Awesome revenge movie, though
the ending moments dragged on a bit too much and lost some power (especially the final part in the police station)
.
Also the male characters were a bit flat, but hey.

Just finished the movie. damn. I loved it.
 
Just watched Get Low tonight with the wife, and I loved it. Its a slow drama, but a damned good one and I needed a film like this. Thoughts?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom