Now that I'm calm (and sober) what a game last night.
As a Duke fan, it was way too close and way too stressful. As much as I bemoan Virginia playing no fun basketball, I don't necessarily want defense to cease to exist either. Let them score so you can turn up the floor and run is Roy's MO but I know K would be mad as fire had they lost that game letting them score at will like that. He's probably still mad as fire and they won. And most of that's on the post players. Jah, even before the injury, was letting Meeks eat (no irony intended). Amile was useless. Even on the few times their first shot defense was OK, no one could get a rebound so UNC ate with second chance points. At least Cook put the clamps on Paige.
Offensively they scored well, but I expected that because UNC can't stop a fly with one wing. They were still too cavalier with the ball (not the first game this year where they had a bunch of unforced turnovers).
I wasn't in a position to comment on too strongly on the refs other than they were college bad as usual. Hess was probably chilling at the crib laughing at some of the calls made in that one. On both sides.
But it's yet another game where they managed to pull victory from the jaws of defeat. Huck notwithstanding (and what was with him being chummy with Cook after Meeks threw the ball out of bounds on the inbound? If I were a Carolina fan that would have me feeling a type of way), Carolina should have won that game. But Tyus and Quinn rescued Duke yet again.
As a fan of basketball, I have roll the mental rolodex back a ways to find a Duke-UNC game that good. Everyone jumps to RIVERS, but I remember that game being more just a complete collapse on UNC's part than a great game. Maybe 2011 Cameron where Seth Curry and Nolan Smith brought Duke back from the brink? Maybe as far back as 2005 Dean Dome with Sean May, Marvin Williams, McCants, and all them?
Of course, defense is completely separate from holding the ball at the top of the key for the first 10 seconds of every possession(which is actually something that UK also does way too much of, especially in games where we have a lead, and it almost always leads right into letting the other team back into the game). You can have defense and an exciting play style.
Pace is not the only (or even primary) problem with college basketball though, it is more of a symptom or the main problem, that college basketball is way way too physical, inside and out. This may seem odd as a lot of the hard fouling and outright fighting of the 80s and 90s has been taken out of the game, but in exchange refs will allow you to bump ball handlers completely out of their path, you can just about use judo takedowns to secure rebounds, you can just jump on top of someone for a held ball tie up (This one I really want to know when it started, guy falls down with the ball, just football pile on top of him and get rewarded, that shit ain't hustle it's assault).
Lots of things need to be updated, I'd start with a defensive 3 second rule and a wider key, along with the 30 second shot clock that is almost inevitable at this point. I'm thinking a longer 3 point line would be good for college spacing as well, I don't really buy the idea that another foot or two is too much for college shooters to handle, sure 3p% would drop slightly, but it would make it much more difficult to double the post from the wing without giving up the open shot.
I would say they need to start calling the bumping and handchecking, but first we would need competent refs, which are seriously lacking in all of college basketball it seems(which is understandable of course, reffing such a fast paced game is extremely difficult and there are probably only a couple dozen people on the planet that are actually good at it and most of them are probably working for the NBA).
The defensive three second call would help with the handchecking and bumping on the perimeter a bit, because it is harder to put on pressure like that if you don't have a big man just sitting in the paint waiting if the guy beats you off the dribble.
Lots of things I'm convinced will never get fixed, like the block charge call(which is even somewhat of a problem in the NBA), because it seems no one involved actually even understands the rule. If I hear one more announcer talking about how it's not a block because the guys feet were set of vice versa...
It is way too easy for a secondary defender to draw a charge by dangerously jumping into the path of a driving player who is already committed to his motion, and it is way too difficult for a primary defender to draw a charge when his man just drops his shoulder and bulls him out of the way.
The 'feet set' misunderstanding that even refs have is bad for the game in other ways then just getting the call wrong though, as it encourages the defensive player to just stand there and get run over without making any play on the ball at all, because they won't get the charge call if they attempt a block. Which is wrong, if you are in legal guarding position you can jump if you want, it should still be a charge if the offensive player runs into you. You can sidestep to maintain LGP(ie if your opponent tries to eurostep, if you are quick enough to stay in front of him, that should be a charge not a block). A rules interpretation that encourages a defensive player to rely on the whistle and put his hands down and just stand there is not good for the game. The defender should be encouraged to challenge the shot.