ЯAW;115155145 said:Yes it is.
It's definitely a bit of a grey area, but generally:
Science Fiction is about the reaches of our technology on Earth. It's an extension of what we currently have, directly, on this planet. That doesn't mean it needs to be set on Earth or anything, just that it should draw from, extend and build on technologies that currently exist, or technological problems the human race may face in the future. It serves as commentary on how we should be directing our technologies from here into the future.
Star Wars doesn't really fit this definition. It works, most certainly, because it relates to humanity but using more universal themes that don't actually relate to technology or the future of our race at all. The futuristic setting is used as a fictional backdrop to exaggerate elements (like the fictional world of Westeros treats its females far worse than in the real world, allowing the show to highlight through exaggeration the problems females face in real life) and more creatively tell story. In this way, the setting is being used in the exact same way that something like Lord of the Rings uses it. Just because there are elements that we would arbitrarily define as "futuristic" doesn't really make it SciFi.
So, in short, a SciFi story's themes will directly tie into the problems with technology or the future of humanity, which Star Wars most definitely doesn't deal with. A fantasy story uses an abstracted setting to more creatively tell story, and can exaggerate elements for more impact. That's my takeaway anyway.
Edit: Have I too made a mistake for raising this further?