Musky_Cheese
Banned
Haha. I thought the same thing.I saw 31 new alerts and first thought that I must have said something really dumb to get that many alerts, lol.
Haha. I thought the same thing.I saw 31 new alerts and first thought that I must have said something really dumb to get that many alerts, lol.
Hope anyone with connections to old members shouts them out to come back also!
This is exactly what happened to me. I tried the new place. I've realized it is all of the extremists stuff I left gaf because of. I said to myself "I wonder if what's left on gaf is the good part of gaf.". Seems I was rightI have a feeling it'll happen over time organically.
"I wonder what that place is like"
"Oh, it's much better than I remember"
Other places being or not being tire fires may influence things from time to time.. but the people who stay and are valued posters will get here on their own I think.
I'll "let go" when the rest of the ban reviews are complete, since they're not complete. I'm invigorated recently, as you'll notice if you read the rest of the OP, because of recent findings that a "friend" was actively suppressing moderate voices last October under false pretenses after specifically volunteering to help during the crisis situation. That was far worse and far more malicious than anything Bish did post-election. I forgive Bish. I've known Bish since I was 14 years old. He had his reasons and made mistakes and harmed the site, but I believe the motives he described to me when I confronted him with the truth. It is what it is and we had to part ways. This is not about fomenting a witch hunt against him. It's about cleaning up.
You're interrupting. You're attempting to psychoanalyze someone and you are not up for the task. Stop interrupting and let's get back to business. Thanks.
That might have been a custom macro. He could have just as easily posted his avatar picture as a reason for banning."No handwaving today. "
That one must have been at the top of his copy/paste text file.
I was banned for victim blaming
Certainly, but atleast the best that can come out of this is that reasonable posters return for a re-run. I am well aware that moderation on OldGAF was... tricky, to put it lightly. From copy-paste reasoning to staff actively holding tabs on who they want to ban (And others getting more bans/unbans than others), its exactly why it is so obvious to spot in the way some of The Names on ERA are heading towards to.I agree, but I also strongly disagree if that makes sense. People like Bish absolutely need to embrace self reflection and have a mirror placed squarely in front of them. People like him/her have pushed away voters like me, who voted for Obama.
It's never good to keep bringing up past events, certainly not ones that may have affected one directly, but the insane polarization that has unfolded in the left, where it has become extreme, needs to have light shed on it. I've always considered myself a moderate Democrat, or moderate Republican. Sitting in the center isle taking what I believe is the best from both parties.
Do note that it was not only Bish. But yeah, it goes to show what one does when you are presented with far-reaching moderation powers and you only have to adhere to one man (Evilore) who can't always be around for GAF (Due to business/travel/gaming/everything else). It is, in a way, a contract of trust.Asking questions in an attempt to understand or learn should be rewarded with civil, and educated discussion, not a ban. This type of attitude spills over into every day life with speakers at university's around the nation getting shouted down.
This thread is a great way for rational people to get an inside look into the mind of someone who purely wants to silence those who have a different outlook/opinion. This is what an unchecked echo chamber can, and will create.
I know. When Bish would enter a thread, the whole tone of said thread would change. People would post trilling water in glass.gif or cinematic shot of walking feet with hammer.mp4 to warn users. If you think about it, it is laughable. Complete user groups being scared online of a staff member. That's when you know that you arent moderating in style and in a neutral fashion, but that one moderates based on feelings, emotions, hottakes.He was famous for bans. Had his own animated gifs and everything.
I saw 31 new alerts and first thought that I must have said something really dumb to get that many alerts, lol.
This so much.Nice to see the old member making comebacks. Hopefully this lead to more interesting discussion.
Thanks for the account merge, EvilLore.
I caught a permaban in like 2015 for suggesting that maybe both sides contributed to the ongoing drama of GG, which is true of literally any ongoing drama.
(Formerly AranS)
My old account was Arkage. I was banned during the gamergate hysteria because I said that the Leigh Alexander article was overly inflammatory and likely to do more damage dividing people, and I said members asking questions in the GG threads are probably legitimate rather than intentional trolls. If I could get my old account back (and merge this one into that one) that'd be cool, as I liked that username better. Though I don't remember the password on it anymore, and it probably has a no longer functioning email address attached to it for password reseting.
And as I just went through a pretty similar banning situation on Resetera, I think I'm going to take up this forum again as the mods here are legit.
This thread just keep getting better.
Certainly, but atleast the best that can come out of this is that reasonable posters return for a re-run. I am well aware that moderation on OldGAF was... tricky, to put it lightly. From copy-paste reasoning to staff actively holding tabs on who they want to ban (And others getting more bans/unbans than others), its exactly why it is so obvious to spot in the way some of The Names on ERA are heading towards to.
Its literally the same sort of tactic that is employed. Shunning discussion in favor of a singular opinion. You gotta adhere to that, or else. It more and more becomes strange that not more ERA members are raising a stink because of it.
Not so sure what the American politics has to do with it thoughWell, probably they dislike it aswell (the majority atleast) but since every transparent discussion on this gets squashed by those same Names, it does not take much to believe that transparency as ERA sees it as little to do with actual transparency.
Do note that it was not only Bish. But yeah, it goes to show what one does when you are presented with far-reaching moderation powers and you only have to adhere to one man (Evilore) who can't always be around for GAF (Due to business/travel/gaming/everything else). It is, in a way, a contract of trust.
Trust that Bish clearly broke, and a contract that also exists on ERA with some of The Names. I reckon that Cerium is totally not up to snuff with how his forum is run on a day by day basis, and i reckon he will be in for a big surprise when the place implodes. Which i find geniunely saddening as i reckon Cerium is doing a ton behind the scenes to make ERA a modern website. To have ruined by a small group of staff running ablaze... in that sense Evilore's view is certainly not a unhealthy one (especially when you know the guy who did this to you since age 14.)
I propose Evilore writes a book on this matter: In this Gaming Age: How an Echo Chamber is Created, Manifested, and Cultivated, Beyond Your Control.
I would buy that in a heartbeat, a standard work on forum powers and what not.
I know. When Bish would enter a thread, the whole tone of said thread would change. People would post trilling water in glass.gif or cinematic shot of walking feet with hammer.mp4 to warn users. If you think about it, it is laughable. Complete user groups being scared online of a staff member. That's when you know that you arent moderating in style and in a neutral fashion, but that one moderates based on feelings, emotions, hottakes.
Similar things are happening on ERA, whenever SweetNicole posts a mod warning or Morrigan comes along, you better tread lightly. It is a ridicoulous statement to make, but that is the culture on ERA in some of the more sensitive topics.
I disagree on Bish. He was popular. Like, a GAF celebrity. He was celebrated.
PPL don't make .gifs of someone who is loathed.
When SweetNicole and her posse shows up, discussion ends, and unless you post one way, the bans begin.
But we already have a thread on Era. Let's keep it contained there.
Mods editing posts entirely might as well delete the post if it triggers them that much. For the most part mods aren't needed imo, as long as nobody posts anything too extreme posts should not be edited by others.
He was popular to the people who mobilized him to ban who they wanted. They took that to a level of almost odd worship, with Gifs and constant praise when he would come save them from posters who offended them or had an opinion they didn’t like.
He was not popular to people who wanted to have a real conversation. It was obvious when a topic was about to be purged of the “wrong” people and turned into an echo chamber.
That’s...not what I said at all.I've never met anyone who was glad to be banned.
You mean NeoGAF keeps getting better.
Just got your mail response Tyler, thanks for lifting the ban on my other account (Mousnis). Could you merge it with this one and keep nkarafo as my only account? I also replied on the email about this.