...you put a DSLR on a video tripod. most video tripods are designed to fit something like this, not a DSLR.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
NeoGAF Camera Equipment Thread | MK II
- Thread starter MRORANGE
- Start date
...you put a DSLR on a video tripod. most video tripods are designed to fit something like this, not a DSLR.
VisceralBowl
Member
Video-specific cameras. Not DSLRs.
...you put a DSLR on a video tripod. most video tripods are designed to fit something like this, not a DSLR.
Mmm, ok. DSLRs are such an standard tool for shooting video I would never for a moment have thought a tripod would not be compatible. *shrug*
No need to get irritated either my man. Im just learning this stuff too.
I'm happy for people to make their items look worse, keeps the prices lower.
JadedWriter
Member
Ok, fine, but they should at least accurately mark how fucked the thing is. Earlier I saw a posting for a lens that was EX+++ mint and I look at the pics and it's scuffed to fuck, the back part looks like shit, I think the connector piece looked cracked in an area, chip in the barrel and god knows what else. I was like no, that's not mint.
Quick question.
Just got a new lens for my Canon 70D. After connecting it I get the message "Ensure a lens is attached. Press START/STOP button to activate movie shooting"
I contacted Adorama and they basically were like "OK, you can return it and we'll send you another one." I ask "So this means it defective?" she says "Well, it could be"
Any ideas?
Just got a new lens for my Canon 70D. After connecting it I get the message "Ensure a lens is attached. Press START/STOP button to activate movie shooting"
I contacted Adorama and they basically were like "OK, you can return it and we'll send you another one." I ask "So this means it defective?" she says "Well, it could be"
Any ideas?
Is it a canon lens?
Also, all fluid dampened tripod heads are going to be narrow to accept video cameras. You need to work a little to get it to accept a DSLR.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0170B8CS8/?tag=neogaf0e-20
That is normal there is no chip in there to tell the camera what the lens is.
Good to know. Thanks!
jongkookie
Member
Welp... was out on a shoot today and while walking around with my N8008, the strap slipped off and dropped lens facing first to the ground, killing my Tokina AT-X 28-85mm in the process. 
The focal length ring gets stuck at around 50mm and it takes a crapton of force to send it on either direction but everything else seems to work, I don't see any cracks in the glass or any image issues.
The lens itself cost me $40-ish when I got it a few months back, I kinda wonder how much it would cost to get it fixed or if I should just buy a replacement.
The N8008 is fine I think... hopefully. I'm gonna be sending the roll of film out tomorrow and see if it didn't get damaged.
The focal length ring gets stuck at around 50mm and it takes a crapton of force to send it on either direction but everything else seems to work, I don't see any cracks in the glass or any image issues.
The lens itself cost me $40-ish when I got it a few months back, I kinda wonder how much it would cost to get it fixed or if I should just buy a replacement.
The N8008 is fine I think... hopefully. I'm gonna be sending the roll of film out tomorrow and see if it didn't get damaged.
JadedWriter
Member
Ouch....what kind of strap were you using? I usually still hold my camera by the grip if it's on my neck strap. If the lens is that cheap you might as well just get a spare.Welp... was out on a shoot today and while walking around with my N8008, the strap slipped off and dropped lens facing first to the ground, killing my Tokina AT-X 28-85mm in the process.
The focal length ring gets stuck at around 50mm and it takes a crapton of force to send it on either direction but everything else seems to work, I don't see any cracks in the glass or any image issues.
The lens itself cost me $40-ish when I got it a few months back, I kinda wonder how much it would cost to get it fixed or if I should just buy a replacement.
The N8008 is fine I think... hopefully. I'm gonna be sending the roll of film out tomorrow and see if it didn't get damaged.
VisceralBowl
Member
Noticed this today:
Not sure if bug or feature lol.
look at the aperture ring and the aperture at the bottom of the screen
f/16-2 are slightly offset.
jongkookie
Member
The stock Nikon strap that came with my D3200.
I was using 2 cameras at once actually, my D3200 on a sling and the N8008 on the strap. You know how you have to wrap the strap and secure it using that black plastic thing? I'm guessing that when I was letting go of my N8008, that plastic was already out of place and the thing just dropped to the ground.
I'm still searching or another copy or maybe something else that has the same focal length but thinking about it, I have primes in 28, 50 and 85 so I'm not even sure if a replacement is necessary for the time being. That said, if I find something good, I'll probably pick it up.
JadedWriter
Member
You really can't rush secure that strap. If it's the same one that came with my 7100 you have to loop it in a certain way, but it's pretty secure on my camera, granted I've never taken the damn thing off just so I wouldn't have to put it back on again. I had the same thing happen to me almost with my cheaper camera. Strap came undone and luckily I was just holding the camera in my hand. I think if I had to have both cameras on me I'd probably just use two black rapid straps.
So I got some great advice for my camera shopping (In the 400 USD range)
I was looking at the compact point and shoot cameras, but I think I might want a DSLR.
I've been doing my research and I was looking at the Pentax K50.
I see that it's a recommended camera. Should I just go for this one or are there any disadvantages for someone who's noob level?
I was looking at the compact point and shoot cameras, but I think I might want a DSLR.
I've been doing my research and I was looking at the Pentax K50.
I see that it's a recommended camera. Should I just go for this one or are there any disadvantages for someone who's noob level?
It is actually a really good camera for a beginner as it has a bunch more features and controls than most entry level DSLR cameras. It is generally harder to find pentax gear in local shops I would say is the only real downside, but if you order all your gear online then it is of no real consequence.
Do you have a general idea of what you want to take photos of though? A point and shoot or a mirrorless camera may be better suited to what you want to do.
jongkookie
Member
Yeah, not sure how exactly how I secured that strap but needless to say, I'm not using it at all anymore.
Anyway, I've already found a replacement lens for it.
The Vivitar "Stovepipe" lol.
Should be here next week.
Noticed this today:
look at the aperture ring and the aperture at the bottom of the screenNot sure if bug or feature lol.f/16-2 are slightly offset.
maybe update the firmware on the lens.
JadedWriter
Member
The name of that lens sounds hilarious. What are the specs on it?
Don't know completely yet. As of now I'm just trying to take nicer pictures of dead animals I see when I'm out riding my bike.
I was looking for a camera that I could learn and grow with and see where I want to go with photography. I do want to learn how to use camera gear though.
jongkookie
Member
It's a Vivitar Series 1 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
It's called the "stovepipe" coz of this:
The zoom is a push/pull mechanism then combine that with the wide opening, the lens looks like a stovepipe once fully extended lol.
The more awesome thing is that this one of the few legendary Series 1 lenses from Vivitar so I had to snap it up almost immediately.
JadedWriter
Member
Man, you get some really interesting lenses. Given the crop factor that's like a 42 - 135mm, wow.
theepicoftyler
Member
I love the notation on the barrels of these old lenses. They have so much character.
It will take you a long time to outgrow K50's capabilities plus it's weather sealed which may be useful from dusty environment when it's paired with lenses that are also weather sealed. You might also consider spend a little more for K-S2 if Wifi and tilt screen can come in handy.
I don't know other manufacture with consumer grade/kit (i.e. pocket friendly) weather sealed lenses. As mentioned, it's difficult to find Pentax products in the stores, so order from a place that have good return policy in case you get a dud or just simply don't like it. Also another downside to Pentax is having less 3rd party support but that's changing a little bit.
VisceralBowl
Member
Already up to date. I fixed it somehow and then caused it again so it might be a camera setting I messed with.
For example you can control the shutter speed with the top shutter dial and the grip dial at the same time. Will see later.
---
On another note, what's a good reflector? My last 5-in-1 collapsible started rubbing off and got silver glitter-like stuff EVERYWHERE. It doesn't have to be 5-in-1, just silver.
---
Aiustis,
The K-50 is a great camera. Grab a weather resistant lens with it if you decide to go with it.
Maximus.
Member
Just picked up a Sony a6000 with 50mm and 55-210mm lenses. Was heavily debating originally to get the Canon Rebel t6i, but Sony beats that. Now I am somewhat considering what if I got the Canon EOS 70D instead (yes I know the 80D was just announced). Thoughts on Sony a6000 vs Canon EOS 70D?
I came from using Canon, but almost everything I have seen and read about the a6000 has been positive. Mainly picked up the camera to capture moments with my dog at first, but will expand from there. Tons to learn about the settings and stuff, but excited to explore.
I came from using Canon, but almost everything I have seen and read about the a6000 has been positive. Mainly picked up the camera to capture moments with my dog at first, but will expand from there. Tons to learn about the settings and stuff, but excited to explore.
CrudeDiatribe
Member
I've got the Series 1 70-210 f/2.8-4 macro. Pretty decent, if heavy. The backwards focus ring (from the Nikon norm) always throws me.
New line of NIkon /P&S 1 inch cameras called Nikon DL
Either Nikon's forgetton about the 1 series or there going after the RX100.
Either Nikon's forgetton about the 1 series or there going after the RX100.
the better twin
Member
Going to be a bit tight with your widest at 50mm no?
Maximus.
Member
To capture my dog? I guess it depends if I am shooting him randomly or if I am planning my shots. He has been trained in agility, so I have the option of setting up shots, rather than in the moment only. We will see though, going to test it out today and tomorrow to see how it goes.
Sounds like it's a Rokinon lens or something that isn't chipped so the camera isn't able to communicate with it.
It's fine.
(Edit)
I'm late on that
jongkookie
Member
Heh, it's mostly luck and a good amount of research that leads me to interesting lenses.
My 50mm Nikon Series E has had an excellent reputation for being a fantastic lens for the money, but people avoid it because its a "consumer grade" lens because of the Series E name.
The 85mm Opteka was pure dumb luck, if my friend didn't give me hers, I wouldn't have one at all.
The Promaster 19-35mm was a blind purchase, I just wanted a proper 28-42mm lens lol. But I don't even really use it anymore, it's just sitting on my desk now. Same thing goes for my Sigma 75-250mm... I'd love to use it, but it's sooo fncking heavy it's almost a core to use lol.
I honestly wouldn't have picked up this Vivitar since I've got primes I could use to cover the focal length, not to mention that I have feet lol, but after doing my research, the price and condition was such a bargain, it would've been a crime to not pick it up, especially once you knew how great it was.
The Sigma I'm talking about above has the same notation on the barrel and honestly, I don't know how to read them lol. I see the focal length, but those curvy lines? Yeah, idk what they mean haha.
Nice, reading the chart I'm assuming yours is a Komine?
I'm actually glad I did some extensive research on them, as I'm gonna start looking for other Series 1 lenses from them lol.
CrudeDiatribe
Member
Yes, the Komine.
I only looked the Vivitar up after I got it-- it was in a lot with two other AI-S lenses that I was really interested in-- the Nikkor 105mm f/2.5 and the (still-produced!!) 28mm f/2.8.
jongkookie
Member
Awesome. The first 28-90mm I found on eBay was actually a Kiron that was priced above $100, I ran the search again and found a Komine copy for less than $80 lol.
I'm super tempted to pick up the 70-210 but I've already got that Sigma... but that f/2.8 sounds so super tempting... I need to stay away from eBay this weekend haha.
New to this thread and photography in general. Was inspired by a trip to Big Bear last weekend and have been reading and researching all week.
I'm currently leaning towards the Fuji X series for my first non-iPhone camera. Fuji appeals to me based on what I've heard but should I consider Sony? For Fuji it seems like the X-T10 might be my best option to start out with. I feel like I will want weather proofing down the line (or even right away) but don't know if it's worth the extra cost as a total beginner and if I don't have a true plan yet. From what I've seen I think I want to try to get into landscape photography the most but if they release the X-T2 next year that might be the best time to upgrade to weatherproofing.
Really I'm hoping this camera will be my excuse to go on an epic road trip and possibly even live abroad for a year or something.
I'm currently leaning towards the Fuji X series for my first non-iPhone camera. Fuji appeals to me based on what I've heard but should I consider Sony? For Fuji it seems like the X-T10 might be my best option to start out with. I feel like I will want weather proofing down the line (or even right away) but don't know if it's worth the extra cost as a total beginner and if I don't have a true plan yet. From what I've seen I think I want to try to get into landscape photography the most but if they release the X-T2 next year that might be the best time to upgrade to weatherproofing.
Really I'm hoping this camera will be my excuse to go on an epic road trip and possibly even live abroad for a year or something.
Joel Was Right
Member
Weather proofing isn't necessary at all. The XT-10 is a fantastic, capable camera.
Weather proofing is a nice bonus but not really worth it if you are buying lenses that aren't weatherproofed. The majority of the lenses in Fuji's line-up aren't. The X-T10 is a great camera but if you can afford the extra money go for the X-T1 to future proof yourself for that feature.
Yeah the one thing is that even With the X-T10 I feel like I might end up with mostly WR lenses but that is still somewhat useful I suppose. The tough decision now is which lenses to get. I know the 18-55 is supposed to be really solid but I am considering just a 16 1.4 WR and 35 F2 WR combo to start. The 10-24 might be a better choice than the 16 since I'm interested in landscape but the 16 looks to be the best for astrophotography which I wanna try. Too many choices
Joel Was Right
Member
23mm 1.4. There isn't a Fuji lens that can match its image quality.
JadedWriter
Member
If life doesn't fuck me over I'm getting the Sigma 18-35 1.8 Art lens with my tax return. It's either that or the 1.4 50mm Art lens.
Maximus.
Member
So finally tested out the a6000 with the 50mm and 55-210mm lenses. Love the thing for photography, definitely have to practice more. For videos, I was disappointed with quick moving objects. I was filming my dog running and jumping over things, but when I checked out my video on my computer, it was jittery and out of focus (dog not being focus subject). I was moving the camera with him and panning, but I remained stationary. Just wondering if there are specific settings I should be looking out for, for this type of video? Am I assuming too much from the camera? If the camera is still and shooting stationary, it seems fine. Also disappointed with the 50mm manual focus. Takes so many turns to get it to change compared to what I accustom to on the canon lens I used to use.
JadedWriter
Member
Mirrorless auto focus isn't great with quickly moving subjects. Oh yeah kit lenses are rarely great with how they handle. They come with the camera for a reason.
Except for the A7R2.
JadedWriter
Member
Well that makes sense. Have you seen the price tag on that thing. The auto focus is just a complaint I've seen associated with mirrorless cameras.
Astral/H3X
Member
On mobile so too lazy to cut everything out.
Those curvy lines show what would be in focus at what focal length. So as you extend it, it isn't going to be able to focus as closely, and the curves are there to compensate for that so that the focus markers "stay" accurate. Manual lenses gave a lot of tricks like these -- for example, a lot of times you'll see a pattern like:
. /
16 8 4 1.8 4 8 16
Just below the focus distance marker-- that's saying that at f4, all of the distances whose markers fall in between the 4's will be in focus. Also macro lenses will print what reproduction ratio a given focus will give you. Lots o neat little tricks.
And this info is for anyone, not just you.
jongkookie
Member
Ahhh.
I figured as much. I assumed that's what it meant but are the numbers even correct for an APS-C camera?
Thanks for the info though, I'm sure somebody else will find it useful too.
Okay. Did more research last night and am definitely going with the 23mm F1.4. I'm also planning to get a Rokinon 12mm F2 for my landscape and astro needs. The only question now is if 35mm is needed as well. I almost feel like I should get the 35 2 WR since bundled with the camera it's only $300 but I'm not sure how often I would use it compared to the 23.