seismologist
Banned
MrAngryFace said:im glad that second screen is there for a map or the game would suck.
That's uncommon for handheld games to have such a big map though.
MrAngryFace said:im glad that second screen is there for a map or the game would suck.
MrparisSM said:Having N-gage tech is ridiculous to me. regardless if it was 60fps or not(which I really doubt that it is, more like 30 fps I would guess). N-gage was a complete bomb, not just because of the ackward controll, but also because of the sub-par graphics. Hopefully Nintendo doesn't fall victem to the same mistakes.
seismologist said:I think the DS is fine at $150 I'm convinced when choosing a handheld people look at the games more than the graphics.
Well that's true if the driver completely learns the tracks, but it could be a pretty decent benefit during urban sprawls with many twists and turns. Or like a checkpoint race (in GTA, etc) where a new checkpoint only appears after you cross the last one. It could be pretty useful in those situations.thorns said:Maps in racing games are almost totally useless. No decent driver uses the map while driving. It can't be that hard to learn the track can it? At least it 's useful for seeing where the opponents are.
Second screen = useless for most games IMHO.
jecclr2003 said:Sorry the PSP doesnt have to be worried about being "slowed down". The $200 price point more than handles that. Along with no big name launch titles. (we dont know if the GT4 port wll be done or not)
Your average consumer wont drop $250 on a handheld and game when they could just as easily buy an Xbox or Ps2 and 2 games.
Nintendo has something many people forget about in the handheld genre, longevity. They are the Nike of handheld gaming, they're name is synonymous with portable handheld gaming. I think the first few shipments of the DS will sell out, gimmic second screen or not.
Face the facts, we're an extremely small sect of the game buying public. The casual gamer will take the DS over the PSP, $50 is $50.
If anything battery life will be the death knell for the PSP upon launch, maybe the heat problem if they havent got that fixed either.
If this forum were the general game buying public, sports games or the yearly GTA wouldnt be the top selling games every year, it'd be obscure Japanese-flavored RPGs that bore most people to tears.
MadOdorMachine said:As far as the two screens go, I think we'll see some better uses down the road. A cool idea for the two screens in a racer would be to have one screen in first person and the second in third person. Or what if the bottom screen was looking ahead and the top screen was a constant rear view mirror. There's ll kind of ideas they could use, give it some time to see what they can do.
Shogmaster said:That's such BS. Think about the public at large and not just the people on this wacky forum. $150 for DS ain't looking kosher against $200 PSP and even $80 GBA SP.
Nintendo should wake up and think long term. PSP has to be slowed way the fuck down, if they want to preserve their handheld supremacy for the long haul. They have to sacrifice DS and price it @ $100 to slow down the adoption of PSP till reinforcements arrive.
seismologist said:Talk about overreacting? PSP needs to be slowed down, huh? The system already has enough obstacles in terms of bettery life and reliability.
The DS will do fine.
I expect the GBA will be phased out over the next year since DS will be getting all the attention.
$200 is way too much for a handheld anyway.
Mrbob said:When people start seeing the capability differences between the DS and PSP I don't think a stylus is gonna hold them back from shelling out 50 more bucks for a vastly more capable portable system.
Suerte said:But aren't they kind of limited in that only one screen can do 3D at a time, right?
That could go both ways though. Is it really fair to say there's a $50 dollar price difference between the two? When all is said and done, you'll have to buy a memory card and a game to get started on PSP which will bring the price to around $300. For NDS all you'll need is a game, which will bring it to around $200. If PSP games $40 - $50 and NDS games are $30 that's an issue as well. That's not even getting into PSP's battery life. I don't see why they didn't just put in two batteries for PSP. It's really all about the games though and so far I think the DS has a better library. Nintendo should really think about dropping the price though. If they drop the price from $150 to $100 when PSP launches, it will make the DS look bad. The exact same thing happened to GC. When they dropped the price everyones reaction was, "They dropped the price because it wasn't selling well."Mrbob said:When people start seeing the capability differences between the DS and PSP I don't think a stylus is gonna hold them back from shelling out 50 more bucks for a vastly more capable portable system.
Mrbob said:When people start seeing the capability differences between the DS and PSP I don't think a stylus is gonna hold them back from shelling out 50 more bucks for a vastly more capable portable system.
Vark said:The graphics had nothing to do with the N-Gage not selling.
krypt0nian said:I love how some are trying to take the rules from the console biz and apply them to the handheld side of things.
The handheld buyer has never cared about graphics superiority. Please leave your graphic whore xbox-me too attitude at the door until you can show me where I'm wrong in my first statement.
krypt0nian said:I love how some are trying to take the rules from the console biz and apply them to the handheld side of things.
The handheld buyer has never cared about graphics superiority. Please leave your graphic whore xbox-me too attitude at the door until you can show me where I'm wrong in my first statement.
Bullshit. I guess console gamers don't, either, because Atari Jaguar was outsold by both Genesis and Super NES.krypt0nian said:I love how some are trying to take the rules from the console biz and apply them to the handheld side of things.
The handheld buyer has never cared about graphics superiority.
Well there never has been so clearly superior device in the market as PSP is. And it helps its from Sony. Technically PSP and DS are from different generations and even an average consumer can see that.krypt0nian said:The handheld buyer has never cared about graphics superiority. Please leave your graphic whore xbox-me too attitude at the door until you can show me where I'm wrong in my first statement.
krypt0nian said:I love how some are trying to take the rules from the console biz and apply them to the handheld side of things.
The handheld buyer has never cared about graphics superiority. Please leave your graphic whore xbox-me too attitude at the door until you can show me where I'm wrong in my first statement.
krypt0nian said:I love how some are trying to take the rules from the console biz and apply them to the handheld side of things.
The handheld buyer has never cared about graphics superiority. Please leave your graphic whore xbox-me too attitude at the door until you can show me where I'm wrong in my first statement.
No NDS can put 3D on both screens at the same time.
i think $250 would be way too much for a handheld for most people, considering this is a closer match with the $150 DS and the pack-in MP Hunters demo, but the $200 PSP price is what's going up against the $150 DS, and even the $80 SP, which i doubt Nintendo will be dropping any time soon.seismologist said:Talk about overreacting? PSP needs to be slowed down, huh? The system already has enough obstacles in terms of bettery life and reliability.
The DS will do fine. I expect the GBA will be phased out over the next year since DS will be getting all the attention.
$200 is way too much for a handheld anyway.
Correct me if i'm wrong, but those videos are for kids. Adult gamers aren't going to be jumping on Sonic X, Pokemon, or Spongebob. There's been little information on video releases for PSP, which makes me think they're still having trouble getting studios to adopt the format. Doesn't matter early on in the game though. People aren't buying it for video.Mrbob said:Also, don't forget about the movie and music capabilities of the portable as well. I am one who wrote off the movie ability as something I thought people would want. However the spectacular sales of the GBA video series by Majesco is making me rethink this stance.
Mrbob said:^^^
This is a good point. Everyone is just ASSuming PSP will be priced $199 in the states. What if PSP gets launched at $149? I'd love to see the Nintendo fanboys spin that.
huzkee said:Underestimating the competition is Nintendo's weakness. To say that Nintendo knows the handheld market and could not possibly be overthrowned reeks of ignorance.
explodet said:But $185 just isn't a psychologically pleasing price point. When has a console or handheld ever been MSRP $185?
Correct me if i'm wrong, but those videos are for kids. Adult gamers aren't going to be jumping on Sonic X, Pokemon, or Spongebob. There's been little information on video releases for PSP, which makes me think they're still having trouble getting studios to adopt the format. Doesn't matter early on in the game though. People aren't buying it for video.
Mrbob said:^^^
This is a good point. Everyone is just ASSuming PSP will be priced $199 in the states. What if PSP gets launched at $149? I'd love to see the Nintendo fanboys spin that.
The novelty appeal of DS is going to go over well since nobody's ever played games like this before.
Tell that to 'Joe Casual' who mainly judge games based on graphics.seismologist said:I think the DS is fine at $150 I'm convinced when choosing a handheld people look at the games more than the graphics.
Along with what everyone else has already stated I'd only like to add one thing not mentioned (I think): Every publisher is going to fully support the PSP. That's the first time EVER that a non-Nintendo handheld has been able to say that. Make no mistake, PSP's going to cause some serious damage to the world of portables.krypt0nian said:I love how some are trying to take the rules from the console biz and apply them to the handheld side of things.
The handheld buyer has never cared about graphics superiority. Please leave your graphic whore xbox-me too attitude at the door until you can show me where I'm wrong in my first statement.
No, the Japanese price is 19800 Yen. You won't see stores in the US charging that.Insertia said:That's the Japanese price and it's pretty psychologically pleasing to me.
If they do go lower - and please remember I'm not saying they will or they won't - I'm still leaning towards $179.Insertia said:If PSP follows the same trend as Sony's consoles (lower price in the US compared to the rest of the world) I expect PSP to be priced at $169.