New Batman V Superman Stills From EW

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are they fighting over who gets the right to make snoo snoo with Batman?

death_by_snu_snu_by_nebezial-d6x9ipc.jpg

pretty sure i saw this in the thread already
 
Her "military experience" is from conscription that pretty much everyone (with exemptions) is required to do in Israel. Outside of whatever basic training she was given her required two years were spent as a sports trainer, she wasn't a part of their combat forces.

Still... She was in military forces. That right there is "military experience". I was a cook in the army of my country when I graduate from high school and I do have military expirience.

I wonder how many do that "basic traing." outside Israel.
 
Batfleck is looking amazing to me.

But not feeling Gadot as WW, though.

Jamie Alexander is also petite but I think she has the face of a female superhero I don't know. She has the beauty. Gadot is of course beautiful but she doesn't have much charisma I think.
 
Antje Traue sold Faora but if you're going to use her as an example it should probably be accompanied by an image from the time they were filming. Nothing from Gadot has sold her as pulling off Wonder Woman to a lot of people. Maybe we'll get some footage at Comic Con that will change that.

I didn't say he was skinny. I said he wasn't an HGH-fueled man-beast. I mean, you quoted the post.

No, you were agreeing with the post you quoted that said he "shouldn't be jacked" and "logically a character like that would be pretty thin" and added that it was why you partially think Reeve was still the "go-to" and posted an image with a depiction that's contradictory to how Reeve was built. Reeve didn't look like an "HGH fueled man-beast" because that wasn't a thing back then outside body builders (though in the late 70s that's be steroids) that wasn't a thing at the time but he was pretty jacked. Christopher Reeve is the standard because of obviously the movies at the time but because of how he looked.

When signed, Reeve was 6'4", 188 pounds and looked, he admits, "like Jimmy Stewart standing sideways. I had to get to a state where I could believe I was Superman." To that end, the producer hired body builder David Prowse (who played Darth Vader in Star Wars). After the first workout, Reeve confesses, "I went into the locker room and heaved." But in 10 weeks of weight lifting and a four-meal-a-day high-protein diet, he gained 33 pounds and added two inches to his chest. As for strength, he raised his initial bench-pressing record of a pathetic 40 pounds to 320. "By the time my body took shape I was able to loosen up," he says. The gawky flip side of the role was never a problem. "I'm much more like Clark Kent," says Reeve. "Joe College. I have one thing in common with Superman, which is that I'm clean. I'm not a drug addict." On the set he refers to his red-caped character fondly as "Supie."
http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20072681,00.html


If a 27 year old Christopher Reeve was playing Clark/Superman today he'd be just as jacked if not more so and over all bigger than Cavill.


As for the comics, they do go over board sometimes with how big they make Superman but it fits with the character, him being skinny wouldn't be fitting despite the "logic" behind it, build wise Superman should look physically imposing and contradictory to his nature.
 
No, you were agreeing with the post you quoted that said he "shouldn't be jacked" and "logically a character like that would be pretty thin"

Sounds like you wanted to respond to someone else's post then, not mine.

I mean - you understood what I was getting at, right? Clearly? It seems like you did. So I don't get this.
 
Still... She was in military forces. That right there is "military experience". I was a cook in the army of my country when I graduate from high school and I do have military expirience.

I wonder how many do that "basic traing." outside Israel.

You have military experience but as a cook in the military you wouldn't go around selling that experience as to why you would be believable in an action role would you?

Sounds like you wanted to respond to someone else's post then, not mine.

I mean - you understood what I was getting at, right? Clearly? It seems like you did. So I don't get this.

I probably should've quoted the other post as well. But yes, I do agree that in comics he gets drawn with ridiculous proportions sometimes that match to a character who is supposed to be 6'3" or 4 and 235-245 pounds.
 
I probably should've quoted the other post as well. But yes, I do agree that in comics he gets drawn with ridiculous proportions sometimes that match to a character who is supposed to be 6'3" or 4 and 235-245 pounds.

Cool. Thanks man.

Also, last time the whole "Gadot's body" discussion came up, I believe it was established her military experience wasn't just basic training - she was a physical fitness instructor for the military, wasn't she? Something like that.
 
Wonder Woman hasn't always been and still sometimes isn't portrayed as physically imposing, and she doesn't have to be. Gal Gadot looks fine.

Batman is still looking great. Getting hyped for this but trying not to let my expectations get too great.
 
Cool. Thanks man.

Also, last time the whole "Gadot's body" discussion came up, I believe it was established her military experience wasn't just basic training - she was a physical fitness instructor for the military, wasn't she? Something like that.

Physical fitness specialist.
 
I probably should've quoted the other post as well. But yes, I do agree that in comics he gets drawn with ridiculous proportions sometimes that match to a character who is supposed to be 6'3" or 4 and 235-245 pounds.

DC's not even consistent with it. Some variations of Supergirl are as strong (or at least have the capacity to be as strong) as Superman. Superboy Prime was clearly stronger than Superman despite being built like a typical comic book teenager. The sun building muscle mass that correlates with his strength doesn't really match up with the other characters. Future supermen who had been in the sun decades or centuries longer weren't all that much bigger either.

I understand why the character was designed to look like a strong man originally (and how that got exaggerated in the 80s/90s when you had Arnold setting the standard for action heroes). That's what we associate with physical power. However, if Kara shows that muscle mass is not needed for Kryptonian super strength, and superman can't break a sweat benching anything less massive than a moon, he shouldn't look like he's about to compete in Mr. Universe.

Hickman and his artists in the recent Avengers run did a good job turning that particular trope on its head with Starbrand. You have a skinny 19 year old who doesn't look at all intimidating, but he's stronger than the Hulk and Thor due to the Starbrand power source.
 
You have military experience but as a cook in the military you wouldn't go around selling that experience as to why you would be believable in an action role would you?


ehhh... like all the military forces in the world. You could be the cook or the I.T guy, you have a military training like other forces. Because you know... There is alway the posibility that you have to go to combat? So yes.. I have experience as a cook plus combat training, survival traing, etc... I know that you know how the army works, right?
 
Charlize's frame is not the same as Gadot. Not even close.

Tiny, willowy, petite frames capable of immense physical strength is ridiculous. You cannot convince me otherwise. There are more petite strong superheroines than skinny strong dude superheroes by miles, it's a fucking fetish thing.

Making Wonder Woman have another super slim supermodel build is bad for women. Why is it not ok for women to looks strong and be strong physically? It's garbage for the 90's ideal to be put back up on the pedestal with Wonder Woman as the model.
Having a bunch of guys like you judge an actress based on how much muscle tone she has to have to suit your image of what Wonder Woman should look like is bad for women.

You have to adapt casting, because if you cast the most extreme end of the spectrum away from muscular it looks silly.

Sif did not look threatening, and she has Asgardian strength. When she hit people it looked comical.

If you cast someone that looks threatening and fights it out and knocks people around, it looks much more believable. Like Faora. Even though she's wearing a suit, she did the training. She has the frame to look like she could punch the shit out of superman and vice versa and not have it look fucking absurd.
So Gal Gadot is now the "most extreme end of the spectrum away from muscular"?

Did Uma Thurman look silly fighting 88 yakuza with a slight frame in Kill Bill? How could Black Widow possibly fight against mechanical alien enemies that are bigger than her and also armored, she has no bulk at all! A good director can sell any action scene, petite girl fighting someone stronger-looking than her or not.

The perpetual complaining about Gadot's 'frame' or 'bodytype' is really just a disguise for how Gal Gadot isn't the Wonder Woman you envisioned. It's all excuses to complain about how, physically, she isn't your comic book fantasy. She isn't wearing full armor to fight against Superman, but you're not persistently complaining about how unrealistic that is. Instead, here are a bunch of comics nerds defending a Wonder Woman costume design with a battle skirt and very little armor. "Oh, historical reference!" "Oh, this is her classic look!" "Oh, this bullshit and that bullshit!" And on the side they're complaining about how unrealistic the actress's body is. Right.
 
Cool. Thanks man.

Also, last time the whole "Gadot's body" discussion came up, I believe it was established her military experience wasn't just basic training - she was a physical fitness instructor for the military, wasn't she? Something like that.

Her title was "sports trainer" from when I remember when I looked it up back when she was cast and people would throw out her being in the military as a selling point for her being able to portray an "amazon warrior".

DC's not even consistent with it. Some variations of Supergirl are as strong (or at least have the capacity to be as strong) as Superman. Superboy Prime was clearly stronger than Superman despite being built like a typical comic book teenager. The sun building muscle mass that correlates with his strength doesn't really match up with the other characters. Future supermen who had been in the sun decades or centuries longer weren't all that much bigger either.

I understand why the character was designed to look like a strong man originally (and how that got exaggerated in the 80s/90s when you had Arnold setting the standard for action heroes). That's what we associate with physical power. However, if Kara shows that muscle mass is not needed for Kryptonian super strength, and superman can't break a sweat benching anything less massive than a moon, he shouldn't look like he's about to compete in Mr. Universe.

Hickman and his artists in the recent Avengers run did a good job turning that particular trope on its head with Starbrand. You have a skinny 19 year old who doesn't look at all intimidating, but he's stronger than the Hulk and Thor due to the Starbrand power source.

Yeah, it's inconsistent, especially with female characters and they retconned the more recent example of Supergirl being stronger (before I think it was supposed to be because she was in space for so long absorbing heavier doses of solar radiation wasn't it?) than Superman with Clark always holding back or whatever, IIRC the sun playing its part obtaining a physical peak was the explanation and more so maybe affecting him since he'd been on Earth since he was an infant?

As for New 52 era Superman I can't really comment on it since I stopped reading around a year after it launched.
 
Well this thread sure went places overnight. Some of you motherfuckers need to understand that it is what it is; Gal Gadot is Wonder Woman. It's done, it's over. There's no need to shit up every BvS thread yelling she looks too skinny and they should cast someone else, you're not doing anyone any favors.
 
It's funny that people believe they're gonna walk out of the theater thinking Wonder Woman was too skinny. Have they ever seen a Zack Snyder film? Do they know how movies work?
 
ehhh... like all the military forces in the world. You could be the cook or the I.T guy, you have a military training like other forces. Because you know... There is alway the posibility that you have to go to combat? So yes.. I have experience as a cook plus combat training, survival traing, etc... I know that you know how the army works, right?

Sure but the point I was trying to make is regarding what level of expertise is achieved in those areas beyond the basic.
 
Why didn't anyone make one of these for Man of Steel.
My god. There was a new thread about that movie every few weeks. It was the same shit every thread...going around in circles.

I think MoS was one of the first film threads to usher in the new news new thread theme. New threads popped up with any new news.
 
People seem to get really heated by this conversation. I think Gadot looks lame and lacks the presence of her co-stars, but I don't really care as far as the movie goes nor care how much that bothers people. I don't think anyone is being unfair, this thread's subject is showing off the cast, so what do you expect?
 
The sad thing is, presuming her acting doesn't end up being atrocious, how Gadot is received as Wonder Woman is going to be mostly out of her control. If the fight choreography, editing, and cinematography depicts her as powerful and imposing, she'll be thought of as powerful and imposing. Check out this skinny WW and how much she kicks ass

uk9SA9h.gif


edhh7Sz.gif
 
Guys it's cool and all that you prefer a certain bodytype for WW, but nothing's going to happen at this point apart from you venting, you know?
If the internet complains enough they'll recast her that's how it works.
 
I think MoS was one of the first film threads to usher in the new news new thread theme. New threads popped up with any new news.

No. I'm talking about LTTP threads. This is after MoS had been released and we had an OT for it. With every new thread the OP either liked it or hated and the arguments were pretty much cyclical. It has been the most polarizing movie.

I'm afraid BvS will continue that trend.
 
Having a bunch of guys like you judge an actress based on how much muscle tone she has to have to suit your image of what Wonder Woman should look like is bad for women.

I agree with you, absolutely. That's the state that we're at with battling beauty standards and body acceptance... However to be fair to the other side, if you had a rail thin actor playing Batman, they'd likely get an equal amount of scrutiny leveled toward them. That's the nature of dealing with fans and their expectations.
 
I agree with you, absolutely. That's the state that we're at with battling beauty standards and body acceptance... However to be fair to the other side, if you had a rail thin actor playing Batman, they'd likely get an equal amount of scrutiny leveled toward them. That's the nature of dealing with fans and their expectations.

Yeah, because that theoretical actor would fall well outside of Batman's general body type.

Gadot fits Diana. With room to spare depending on which source you are looking at.
 
Reservations aside, Snyder has never made a bad movie (don't even try to convince me otherwise, you won't) so there's no way this doesn't rule.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom