Bobby Roberts
Banned
What was the last movie that did that? Just sorta surprised everyone and went against perceptions/projections? TMNT? World War Z?
Days of Future Past
What was the last movie that did that? Just sorta surprised everyone and went against perceptions/projections? TMNT? World War Z?
Days of Future Past
No Marvel won that case (and kept making Mutant X) and later settled with Fox.
Fox has confirmed recently that they are in negotiations with Marvel:
http://www.newsarama.com/23337-report-fox-in-negotiations-with-marvel-for-x-men-tv-series.html
Nope. People were convinced it was going to splat-pack on the pavement like a balloon filled with shit from 30 stories up.
Nope. People were convinced it was going to splat-pack on the pavement like a balloon filled with shit from 30 stories up.
Even issue #1 of The Fnatastic Four barely devotes any time to their backstory. It has a flashback that lasts two or three pages with the FF going into space and getting powers and then jumps right into them on some adventure. Hell, nothing is ever really explained, they just live in a decked out Baxter building and have the Fantasti-car and whatnot within the first three issues without there ever being an explanation as to how they got everything.
Superhero films could learn something from this method of storytelling. If the people want a superhero story, then give them a superhero story and don't waste a whole act explaining how they got powers and then take the entire film to establish all of the lore surrounding the characters. Start with them being a superhero and you don't need to explain how they got all the gadgets and cars and buildings, the audience can just assume it happened some time in the past.
That show sucked so bad.
I never understood what was going on
I'm,like wtf this ain't xmen.
Not to mention those crotch posters...Come to think ofit... remembered First Class also had an uphill battle
It was like cast and filmed in like under a year, and we all thought was gonna bea disaster
Does fox get any merchandise money from f4?
Only if it's based on the movie. Doesn't matter anyway since Marvel isn't making anything for the F4.Does fox get any merchandise money from f4?
What was the last movie that did that? Just sorta surprised everyone and went against perceptions/projections? TMNT? World War Z?
Wasn't this at $50 million a few days ago?
It was, & that fact was noted in the article.Wasn't this at $50 million a few days ago?
The article states the estimate has been downgraded from 50 to 46 million.
If you ask me, I think that the film's box office numbers will depend solely on the film's quality.
Guardians, though I was one of its biggest supporters.What was the last movie that did that? Just sorta surprised everyone and went against perceptions/projections? TMNT? World War Z?
There were lots of people that thought Fury Road wasn't going to be very good. It only did moderately well in the box office but I don't think anyone predicted the kind of critical reception it got.
I'm not sure if that's the best comparison.There were lots of people that thought Fury Road wasn't going to be very good. It only did moderately well in the box office but I don't think anyone predicted the kind of critical reception it got.
What was the last movie that did that? Just sorta surprised everyone and went against perceptions/projections? TMNT? World War Z?
Nope. People were convinced it was going to splat-pack on the pavement like a balloon filled with shit from 30 stories up.
Nope. People were convinced it was going to splat-pack on the pavement like a balloon filled with shit from 30 stories up.
To be fair, what was the last superhero movie that didn't do well at the box office? They're easy to watch, not polarizing, very mainstream. If your group has to decide between a bunch of different movies or genres, it's an easy choice.
Wouldn't be surprised if F4 did well even if it's shit.
Both TMNT and WWZ ended up sucking though. Unless you're saying that people expected them to suck even more than they already did. In that case, yeah I guess.
Both TMNT and WWZ ended up sucking though. Unless you're saying that people expected them to suck even more than they already did. In that case, yeah I guess.
I do wonder just how much they're spending on marketing. Seems like it's been about the last 2 and some change months that I've seen commercials for the movie at minimum once any hour I'm watching..but about 3 an hour randomly.fantastic four has cheaper budget though. with around $120 million budget (according to wiki), how much do they need to at least break even? $250 million? that didn't seem much nowadays especially for action pop corn flick. this movie will have Marvel logo as well whether Marvel like it or not.
I think this movie will probably make profit even if the reviews are bad.
compared to the original TMNT film that was probably financed by bookies and loan sharks the latest film was an abject failure considering how popular the TMNT brand is worldwide. The original made like 135 mil domestic ...in 1990...thats like 4- 8 dollar tickets man. Adjust for inflation and one has to wonder ...who snorted a whole lunch room table length of coke and said lets spend a ton of money on a movie we could do for 50 million dollars? bunch of martial artists, suits beat asses, how is this hard?
Just proof you dont wan't the money, NO take this foul currency from my SIGHT i cast thee OUT!
wwz wasn't bad it just suffered from a not great third act and completely ignored its source material
To be fair, what was the last superhero movie that didn't do well at the box office? They're easy to watch, not polarizing, very mainstream. If your group has to decide between a bunch of different movies or genres, it's an easy choice.
Wouldn't be surprised if F4 did well even if it's shit.
compared to the original TMNT film that was probably financed by bookies and loan sharks the latest film was an abject failure considering how popular the TMNT brand is worldwide. The original made like 135 mil domestic ...in 1990...thats like 4- 8 dollar tickets man. Adjust for inflation and one has to wonder ...who snorted a whole lunch room table length of coke and said lets spend a ton of money on a movie we could do for 50 million dollars? bunch of martial artists, suits beat asses, how is this hard?
Just proof you dont wan't the money, NO take this foul currency from my SIGHT i cast thee OUT!
compared to the original TMNT film that was probably financed by bookies and loan sharks the latest film was an abject failure considering how popular the TMNT brand is worldwide. The original made like 135 mil domestic ...in 1990...thats like 4- 8 dollar tickets man. Adjust for inflation and one has to wonder ...who snorted a whole lunch room table length of coke and said lets spend a ton of money on a movie we could do for 50 million dollars? bunch of martial artists, suits beat asses, how is this hard?
Just proof you dont wan't the money, NO take this foul currency from my SIGHT i cast thee OUT!
I mean Green Lantern was the last real bomb wasn't it? Or Ghost Rider 2. Even the Amazing Spider-Man movies made money, didn't they?
Both TMNT and WWZ ended up sucking though. Unless you're saying that people expected them to suck even more than they already did. In that case, yeah I guess.
According to Sony's leaked emails, ASM2 probably just broke even. The list of most profitable movies of 2014 has it at just over $70 million in profit after $709 million in ticket sales (http://deadline.com/2015/03/most-profitable-movies-of-2014-box-office-1201390489/).
They somehow lost money on MiB3, which cost $40 million less to produce and grossed just $80 million less WW. If you make and market a movie with the idea that it's going to gross a billion, you can lose your damn shirt if you make "only" 700 million. Minions cost like $75 million to produce + $600 million in marketing, it'd be a complete bomb if it only made $700 million.
FF probably has to make in the range of $400 million to make a sequel with the same cast a sure thing.