I'm so happy with this 😁
Weakest in general or because they're far removed from the source material?Re: purists wanting the movies to stick close to the original material.
My biggest concern with GDT's films is not that they strayed far from Mignola's work, but that everything new that he incorporated (besides the lore and the visuals) was vastly inferior and hardly in tone. Hellboy was more of a dumb brute than a composed detective with a brutish facade, while Liz... don't get me started with Liz. Del Toro ruined her character.
The films were not that great back in the day and they can hardly survive a rewatch. They are some GDT's weakest work by far.
It's not Hellboy without Del Toro and Perlman.
Weakest in general or because they're far removed from the source material?
I have no idea what the source material is as I have never viewed it (and have no interest either) but I liked the films. Not great, but enjoyable.
He's most excellent in Stranger ThingsFunky Papa's posts have sold me on this. The only thing I'm really down about is no Ron Perlman. I'm not familiar with David Harbour so I don't have an opinion on him.
FTFY
We've had a string of great directors getting paired with perfect projects. Fuller and American Gods. Eggers and Nosferatu. Villeneuve and Blade Runner/Dune. Marshall seems really suited for thisUh, you should count your blessings.
Neil Marshall is a fantastic director that can make a small independent film look like a blockbuster, has a great eye for fantasy and is a fan of the original material. Dog Soldiers managed to be both hilarious and scary at the same time, The Descent is one of the scariest, most claustrophobic films of the 00's and the much maligned, greatly misunderstood Doomsday was a veritable love letter to all things nerdy. His Game of Thrones episodes always rank along the very best of TV and he also directed Hannibal's The Great Red Dragon. He has proven his chops and we know he's not afraid of violence. At all. He's a fantastic pick for Hellboy.
Let's get real here: Del Toro's Hellboy was gorgeous but not very close to the books and it's not like the films made a ton of money. Plus, Perlman is getting old. Marshall and David Harbour are not only great talent, but way above the very best Hellboy fans could ever wish for given the circumstances.
Since this is a Neil Marshall gig, it'll be made on time, it'll be made on budget and it'll be every bit as gritty (and funny) as the comics. But well above everything else, it'll be made.
Honestly, people who don't know the source material going "no del Toro no buy" are like people thinking Raimi's Spiderman was perfect and further adaptations would be unnecessary. And that is such a weird prospect.
He's most excellent in Stranger Things
In general.
Del Toro did an immense work with the visuals and he captured the crazy world of Hellboy better than I could ever imagine, but character development was lame as hell.
Hellboy was a dumb brute.
Liz was botched beyond salvation.
Abe fared better, but he wasn't very memorable.
Kraus was a flat line.
Kroenen was done dirty. He's so much more interesting in the comics than the whole nazi clockwork ninja (and despite this, he was probably the best character of the films by far).
And so on...
I cannot commend GDT enough for the monumental work he did with the aesthetics and the visual design and it's going to be extremely hard for Marshall to get close to that bar, but pretty much everything else about the original films was so forgetable.
I really, really wanted to bring myself to love the films, but I couldn't. Not because I just plain love the original books, but because they happen to tell better stories.
With that said, they weren't bad movies per se. They were just poor adaptations of a superior product.
I do like the posters in this thread who seem to think that Millennium Films are going to give them the definitive and faithful adaptation of Hellboy that they've been waiting for.
Go and have a look at Millennium Films output and see what you're potentially letting yourselves in for.
But who knows, it might be good.
Uh, you should count your blessings.
Neil Marshall is a fantastic director that can make a small independent film look like a blockbuster, has a great eye for fantasy and is a fan of the original material. Dog Soldiers managed to be both hilarious and scary at the same time, The Descent is one of the scariest, most claustrophobic films of the 00's and the much maligned, greatly misunderstood Doomsday was a veritable love letter to all things nerdy. His Game of Thrones episodes always rank along the very best of TV and he also directed Hannibal's The Great Red Dragon. He has proven his chops and we know he's not afraid of violence. At all. He's a fantastic pick for Hellboy.
Let's get real here: Del Toro's Hellboy was gorgeous but not very close to the books and it's not like the films made a ton of money. Plus, Perlman is getting old. Marshall and David Harbour are not only great talent, but way above the very best Hellboy fans could ever wish for given the circumstances.
Since this is a Neil Marshall gig, it'll be made on time, it'll be made on budget and it'll be every bit as gritty (and funny) as the comics. But well above everything else, it'll be made.
"But it's not Del Toro!"
Bitches, Dog Soldiers is the best B.P.R.D. story that Mike Mignola never wrote. Go watch it and report back.
Edit: Go in blind and skip the trailer. It's hideously early 00's and spoilerific.
I do like the posters in this thread who seem to think that Millennium Films are going to give them the definitive and faithful adaptation of Hellboy that they've been waiting for.
Go and have a look at Millennium Films output and see what you're potentially letting yourselves in for.
But who knows, it might be good.
No Del Toro? fuck that.
Marshall, Harbour and Mignola are involved. Millennium Films may suck, but this is probably a prestige project for them, maybe a way to dip their toes into the superhero craze. You don't hire people like Marshall and Mignola if you are not planning to let them do their thing.
This.
No Del Toro and Pearlman, might as well not exist.
I'd be surprised, given how the previous two films flopped, if this project has anything near an event film budget. Can one do a Hellboy film for under $50m?
Nobody is saying that. We just are hoping for a more faithful adaptation than del Toro's, which is not far fetched at all.I do like the posters in this thread who seem to think that Millennium Films are going to give them the definitive and faithful adaptation of Hellboy that they've been waiting for.
Honestly, people who don't know the source material going "no del Toro no buy" are like people thinking Raimi's Spiderman was perfect and further adaptations would be unnecessary. And that is such a weird prospect.
No Kojima.
I will give the reboot a chance and judge it on its own terms but this isn't what I want and is the equivalent of getting nothing.
Re: purists wanting the movies to stick close to the original material.
My biggest concern with GDT's films is not that they strayed far from Mignola's work, but that everything new that he incorporated (besides the lore and the visuals) was vastly inferior and hardly in tone. Hellboy was more of a dumb brute than a composed detective with a brutish facade, while Liz... don't get me started with Liz. Del Toro ruined her character. So for me it's not as much about trying to stick close to the comics than it is about keeping what it works and improving from there.
The films were not that great back in the day and they can hardly survive a rewatch. They are some GDT's weakest work by far.
It's not Hellboy without Del Toro and Perlman.