chromhound
Member
Disney doesn't like to kill their characters thoJane does in the comic run this is based on.
Disney doesn't like to kill their characters thoJane does in the comic run this is based on.
Yeh I'm cool with them not doing too much to cover him up. Plastering him in CGI, makeup or prosthetics would limit his range.If I had Christian Bale being the main vilain in my movie, I wouldnt put tons of CGI and make up on him, for sure
It's fine. He could be bulkier tho, and the guy is known for being a chameleon, so he could have hit the gym if he wanted to, but eh
Cery excited to see Bale on the MCU
Missed Endgame didn’t you.Disney doesn't like to kill their characters tho
This is why Rogue One was good. Excellent script, decent actors, and everyone pissed off after the one-off.Missed Endgame didn’t you.
Or Rogue One where the entire cast dies.
The poster looks like a rubbish AI generated one and someone used the keywords Star Wars, Flash Gordon and Thor.
Thor looking trentastic
Disney doesn't like to kill their characters tho
Disney doesn't like to kill their characters tho
Oh man, the Youtube reviewers will have a field day with this.
Let me get the talking points:
- strong female character who doesn't seem to earn her power for any meaningful reason
- established male character is weaker and less apt because female character will not be allowed to ever seem worse than male character
- established male character is used to show how wonderful the new strong female character is and will be a buffoon Loki-style
- there will be no challenge for female character and no character development
I mean Marvel doesn't do itself any favors in this one. It will be a fun movie - I'm sure of it, but I hope Jane is not just another Captain Marvel in this.
?The first point is a great one, female super heroes always have to "earn" their power, even though most male super heroes don't earn their powers either.
The first point is a great one, female super heroes always have to "earn" their power, even though most male super heroes don't earn their powers either.
I want to clarify this because you make a reasonable point and I wasn't clear.The first point is a great one, female super heroes always have to "earn" their power, even though most male super heroes don't earn their powers either.
I want Hemsworth to hit me hard with his cockGoddamn Hemsworth makes me want to hit the gym hard
I want Hemsworth to hit me hard with his cock
Rey is the ultimate example of women just being tossed power in cinema with zero effort to earn it. Only time she ever lost was when she fought Kylo in the third movie because she was fueled by anger and he, for the first time ever, wasn't and attempted to stop the engagement.I want to clarify this because you make a reasonable point and I wasn't clear.
Gaining power is not character development. In fact gaining power is mostly a plot point so it doesn't really matter whether one actually becomes more powerful or not in context of character development. However power gain is a good tool to enhance the meaning of character development.
Case in point - Thor already had Mjornir in the first movie from the first scene. His quest is at first to simply restore his power. However the interesting part of the first movie is not him getting power back - it's his character growth - learning humility and being a good ruler. (not that Thor is very deep as a movie but it's something). Gaining power back as a reward for going through trials and being willing to sacrifice himself at the end accentuates actual growth. It's especially important for main characters and these simple arcs were normal for Marvel movies.
What I call fake is when in Moon Knight Layla takes up a lot of space, has several potentially interesting arcs which all end nowhere and don't affect her character at all. Then at the end Layle just gets superpowers for no reason and that lack of correlation between power gain and lack of character is just bad writing. Don't even get me started on how awful America Chavez's arc is in the new Dr Strange...
That's the problem with most recent Disney characters and it doesn't help that they are also dominantly diverse and female which really shouldn't matter but it seems like it shackles the writers somewhat because of perceived backlashes. They will probably tell us in the movie how come Jane is Thor now, but being "worthy" should be rare and has to be earned. Otherwise we just casually made her as noble as Captain America while the existing character was just a scientist lady.
Rey is the ultimate example of women just being tossed power in cinema with zero effort to earn it. Only time she ever lost was when she fought Kylo in the third movie because she was fueled by anger and he, for the first time ever, wasn't and attempted to stop the engagement.
But she didn't lose her hand or get beat the hell up like Luke did in the original trilogy, or get all messed up like Anakin (or even Obi-Wan really) in the prequels.
Still attainable for the Everyman though
?
Thor spent the first whole movie proving he was worthy of Mjolnir.
Stark had to do endless upgrades on his suit in the first movie, as well as personally facing the consequences of his actions as a weapons manufacturer.
Captain America started as a pencil neck wuss who got teased and berated his whole life before finally proving himself in the Army.
Etc.
I can't tell if your post is sarcastic or I'm misinterpreting it.
I want to clarify this because you make a reasonable point and I wasn't clear.
Gaining power is not character development. In fact gaining power is mostly a plot point so it doesn't really matter whether one actually becomes more powerful or not in context of character development. However power gain is a good tool to enhance the meaning of character development.
Case in point - Thor already had Mjornir in the first movie from the first scene. His quest is at first to simply restore his power. However the interesting part of the first movie is not him getting power back - it's his character growth - learning humility and being a good ruler. (not that Thor is very deep as a movie but it's something). Gaining power back as a reward for going through trials and being willing to sacrifice himself at the end accentuates actual growth. It's especially important for main characters and these simple arcs were normal for Marvel movies.
What I call fake is when in Moon Knight Layla takes up a lot of space, has several potentially interesting arcs which all end nowhere and don't affect her character at all. Then at the end Layle just gets superpowers for no reason and that lack of correlation between power gain and lack of character is just bad writing. Don't even get me started on how awful America Chavez's arc is in the new Dr Strange...
That's the problem with most recent Disney characters and it doesn't help that they are also dominantly diverse and female which really shouldn't matter but it seems like it shackles the writers somewhat because of perceived backlashes. They will probably tell us in the movie how come Jane is Thor now, but being "worthy" should be rare and has to be earned. Otherwise we just casually made her as noble as Captain America while the existing character was just a scientist lady.
This is the first marvel set that isn’t leading to nowhere the past were all thanos these new ones nothing?
YesWhen you say set, do you mean phase 4?
This is the first marvel set that isn’t leading to nowhere the past were all thanos these new ones nothing?
From who? WHO CONFIRMED IT!Got confirmation that it faithfullyfollows the full Jane cancer storyline to the end.
So no she’s not replacing Hemsworth.
People have seen the movie already. It’s out in two weeks and some early screenings have started.From who? WHO CONFIRMED IT!
Got confirmation that it faithfullyfollows the full Jane cancer storyline to the end.
So no she’s not replacing Hemsworth.