Drexon said:Actually teh funnies:
MrCheez said:Man, Bubsy... brings back memories.
Anyway, this comic wasn't that great =/ But, VGcats can be pretty damn funny and clever sometimes, so I forgive them.
FortNinety said:I hate VG Cats. I just don't "get it". Why the fuck are they furries? If it wasn't for this one thing, perhaps I'd give it a chance
FortNinety said:I hate VG Cats. I just don't "get it". Why the fuck are they furries? If it wasn't for this one thing, perhaps I'd give it a chance, but otherwise, it's just another melding of lame video game humor with yet another shitty web comic, my two favorite things.
But honestly, do you know what I think could make the comic 100% better? If they just made it shorter. I think that could help a TON.
AniHawk said:Just think of them as really hairy people. It's kinda disturbing you're so bothered by drawings of furries.
Who gives a shit about the fact that they're furries? At least it's not another grouping of generic cynical Gen-Xer white boys like 90% of all webcomics out there
FortNinety said:You're "disturbed" by my annoyance of furries? First off, I'm quite familiar with "furries" as they are recognized by today's standards. I have nothing against anthropomorphic animals in cartoon settings (hell, I still love classic Disney and Warner Bros characters). But I just find the whole furry scene fucking creepy when it's sexualized (and I've been to enough cons to know it is, and to a very high degree, so I don't want to hear anything that's the contrary) and even when it's not, it's just plain annoying. Seems like if a person furry fan, and if you put one in something, anything, this person will eat it up (I'm not saying that's why you like VG Cats for exmaple, i'm just stating the facts as I see them).
I also love how overly sensitive furry fans are. If you enjoy gawking at a raccoon with breasts, expect to get ridiculed.
Nikashi said:Okay, speaking of oversensitive, what does this have to do with you being bothered by completely unsexualized cartoon characters in a non sexual setting that really has nothing to do with the furry fandom? Sounds more like you're trying to make sure everyone knows how much you hate furries so they won't get on your case for (formerly?) going to furry cons (Which I have to wonder why you go to if you dislike furries so much).
FortNinety said:Whoever said I went to a furry con? They appear at other places mind you, like comic cons, sci-fi/fantasy cons, and anime cons (obviously).
As for my previous statement about furry fans being overly sensitive, well.... I think the responses speak for themselves.
Once again, if you like dressing up as a tiger in a business suit or whatever, by all means, knock yourself out. Just learn to take a little joke, that's all, and at least try to understand why some people might think it be a bit "weird." Hey I'm a bit of an oddball myself, but at least I can admit it.
Makura said:Did anybody see that CSI episode about furries?
SaitoH said:VGcats are furries? Does that mean Garfield is too?
>_>
Nikashi said:Once again, you dodge the issue of why YOU are upset about NON sexual anthropomorphic characters in a comic strip. Please, just tell me that, because I don't remember anything even remotely 'Furry' in that comic besides TWO of the characters being cats. Is that seriously enough to turn you away from the comic?
FortNinety said:..and even when it's not, it's just plain annoying. Seems like if a person furry fan, and if you put one in something, anything, this person will eat it up..
lol.FortNinety said:You must not be paying attention to what I've been saying...
SaitoH said:VGcats are furries? Does that mean Garfield is too?
>_>
A-fucking-men. At least when PA or most other comics suck, there's only three or four panels, not twelve-panel spreads. A few comics would've been slightly more entertaining if they were simply shorter.But honestly, do you know what I think could make the comic 100% better? If they just made it shorter. I think that could help a TON.
Belfast said:Ummm....the furry thing didn't come from Japan. It came from american cartoons produced by Warner Bros/Disney/etc. People (adults) were fans of these cartoons and it originally started out as just producing fan ary based upon them. Artists started to hold conventions and such and it was fairly innocent in the beginning (I think this was late 70s or early 80s?). Eventually, like at most fan conventions, people started dressing up. IIRC, some shady people started getting involved in the fandom and wanted to turn it into their own thing. This is where the horrible, perverted underground of being a furry started coming into play. I wish I could remember more details, but there was this huge post on Something Awful months ago that was a first-hand account from this guy who pretty much went through all of this. It was actually fairly interesing. But it has nothing to do with Japan.
Thaedolus said:what
Excuse my ignorance, but what the hell is going on here? I had no idea what a 'furry' was until I entered this thread, and no I'm curious as to why people are pissed of at VGCats for supposedly being furries?
belgurdo said:Yeah, like he said, the "sexual" side of it comes from deviates and people who just get off on being something they're not. Kind of like how anime has its normal side and its side filled with pedophile obsessives and costume fetishists. Doesn't mean the whole of foreign animation is sexual in nature.
Try not letting Something Awful and MTV tell you what to think all the time and see with your own eyes
Claus said:
FortNinety said:But honestly, do you know what I think could make the comic 100% better? If they just made it shorter. I think that could help a TON.
xsarien said:I've been preaching that for years, glad to see that I'm not alone.
Nikashi said:Actually, I notice that many of the comics play out more like the kind of humour you might see in a video game so I think it works in that respect. I'm kinda sick of 3 panels of talking heads as well, so the length is a welcome change.
xsarien said:Except that this isn't a video game. VG Cats needs to learn the simple art of getting to the point. Draw a joke on for too long, either just for the sake of it or to make sure EVERYONE gets it, and it kills everything.
It's why when PA is funny, it's very funny. The art of telling a good joke doesn't come pre-packaged with the art of drawing a (web)comic.
AeroGod said:Why do all web comics have to be the same? If you dont like the length, dont fucking read it.
AeroGod said:THe cats in VGCats are modeled after the writers own 2 pets. They arnt furries and they arnt sexualized, they're just cats.
FortNinety said:You're "disturbed" by my annoyance of furries? First off, I'm quite familiar with "furries" as they are recognized by today's standards. I have nothing against anthropomorphic animals in cartoon settings (hell, I still love classic Disney and Warner Bros characters). But I just find the whole furry scene fucking creepy when it's sexualized (and I've been to enough cons to know it is, and to a very high degree, so I don't want to hear anything that's the contrary) and even when it's not, it's just plain annoying. Seems like if a person furry fan, and if you put one in something, anything, this person will eat it up (I'm not saying that's why you like VG Cats for exmaple, i'm just stating the facts as I see them).
I also love how overly sensitive furry fans are. If you enjoy gawking at a raccoon with breasts, expect to get ridiculed.
Justin Bailey said:FortNinety. . .dude, they're just cats.
You're absolutely right, it doesn't seem to make sense so it's worthless. God forbid any comic that follows a strict regime of logic.FortNintety said:It happens to star two anthropomorphic characters for zero reason.