PS5 roughly around (in 1 game test) a 2080 or 2080 Super / 3060 Ti, which are just graphics cards that cost as much or more alone than the entire console. Good job Sony, not bad.PS5 = Bang for buck.
It better NOT be a Zen 3 equivalent CPU, the PCMR community's devastation would be overbearing and non-stop.I am really impress than the console settings are basically hight-ultra but I really don't understand why
Alex have the necessity to screw in some moment his videos, like when he start again "This impressive this
behave better than another GPU with X flops".
I mean is not impressive for that reason for God sake when this guys of DF will afront the fact they were
wrong in repeat to the nauseum marketing campaign of flops, the flops are not all, also not is not because
is bad port is what is.
Everytime I read or heard that DF for some reason cannot make mistakes I remember that all DF guys
said multiple times "have more TF so should perform better" and they really have contacts so they know that
the delta was not so big or even in favor of XSX as the marketing said but even then they didn't care because
is not like DF doesn't love to ask this kind of things to their contacts.
Finally Alex should mention which CPU is using if he is using a 3800x/5800x or better that is important.
I almost sure Alex is using a Zen 3 if this is true he "forget" to mention because now that is not important, a CPU of thatIt better NOT be a Zen 3 equivalent CPU, the PCMR community's devastation would be overbearing and non-stop.
I sent him the video and now he's saying:Well I wasn't lying, when I told you, that 1000USD PC of your friend cannot beat new consoles at all : )
Well I guess you cannot expect "gaming console" to do office work, same argument as always from the PC crowd. Since basically PS2 era, when PC gaming started to getting same level experiences.I sent him the video and now he's saying:
"Ps5 is still limited in all other specs.
Everything else but gaming
And pcs can be upgraded every year with new parts.
For now
GPUs get cheaper year by year. Ps5 wont be the best for the full run
Its really good for now strictly gaming wise since it can pack more for cheaper. The PC Gpus have a bunch of stuff on it for other things like overall performance"
Me: "It will be a while until you can get a pc build for the price of the ps5 so"
Him: "
Thats gonna be easily 2-3 years
PC has more to offer title wise imo for multiplayer gamers. Ps5 is good for single player
Like cyberpunk how itll run on that"
Me: "Cyberpunk isn't getting a next gen upgrade until next year so that comparison won't be made anytime soon. And sure multiplayer gaming is the best for pc but I think it's dumb to invest in a huge ass rig to play games that look like valorant but that's just me"
Him:
"Reason for rig is streaming
Discord easy access
Games that are only on steam
and it's parts can be upgraded any time. Customization is endless"
Hello there Mr. Comcast employee.I've actually had several recent calls to Comcast and they all went great. I have minimal complaints. And the speed is lovely.
A console can easily has a life of 6 years if you want your PC have a decent performance in that time life you"
...
Customization is endless"
I've actually had several recent calls to Comcast and they all went great. I have minimal complaints. And the speed is lovely.
Hello there Mr. Comcast employee.
I bet he used a 5950X 16 core Zen3 CPU at like 4.5 GHz lolI almost sure Alex is using a Zen 3 if this is true he "forget" to mention because now that is not important, a CPU of that
gen can have easily 10% more performance using the same GPU of course always that your GPU can deliver more.
Isn't this the one area they agreed performed worse due to the recent patch? Weird place for a benchmarkPS5 = Bang for buck.
Yes but remember DF is perfect.I bet he used a 5950X 16 core Zen3 CPU at like 4.5 GHz lol
Yes it is.Isn't this the one area they agreed performed worse due to the recent patch? Weird place for a benchmark
Not for the goal Alex set out to achieveIsn't this the one area they agreed performed worse due to the recent patch? Weird place for a benchmark
Damn the X is barely over 1080p. wat
Yeah it was almost locked before I think.Isn't this the one area they agreed performed worse due to the recent patch? Weird place for a benchmark
"The differences this time around are really minimal on PS5 and X Series. They both run at the same resolution (2160p) at 60fps. I've only found hugely slight differences in grass draw distance and antialiasing in favor of PS5, but for all practical purposes there are no differences. In the case of Series S, the game runs at a maximum resolution of 1080p. It also appears to have less hair density in NextGen physiques. "
Another win? Well, it's humiliating already.
"The differences this time around are really minimal on PS5 and X Series. They both run at the same resolution (2160p) at 60fps. I've only found hugely slight differences in grass draw distance and antialiasing in favor of PS5, but for all practical purposes there are no differences. In the case of Series S, the game runs at a maximum resolution of 1080p. It also appears to have less hair density in NextGen physiques. "
Are we sure it's not dynamic res?
Are we sure it's not dynamic res?
Are we sure it's not dynamic res?
So NXGs video was about DiRT 5 afterall?
So NXGs video was about DiRT 5 afterall?
Yo wasn't Xbox Live supposed to be free by now?
What happened to that?
Oh are those back?They rereleased the 1 year subs at a higher price in the regions they pulled them from.
So that makes his tests invalid as this will boost the results compared to a 2700x or 3700x
He has a reputation to uphold after all, he is the Great Dictator the master of all PC elitists.
So that makes his tests invalid as this will boost the results compared to a 2700x or 3700x
How this test is invalid? He wanted to compare PS5 GPU with PC counterparts, so he make sure that he is not going to be bottlenecked by CPU.
Is there a garantee that a more powerful CPU won't affect the results by a adding a couple of FPS even if the scene is GPU bound? Why not use a PS5/XSX equivalent CPU then?How this test is invalid? He wanted to compare PS5 GPU with PC counterparts, so he make sure that he is not going to be bottlenecked by CPU.
Oh are those back?
Not in the US.. so not sure what you mean (MS directly doesn't sell them, it's unclear whether 3rd parties are on some existing amount of codes that eventually won't be replenished)
Fucking hell lol.
Yes a 3700XWouldn't a Zen 2 CPU be a better choice?
Sure but not every leaker knows EVERYTHING that will be shown. They could still have some legit info, but who knows.Calling fake news on the 4chan leak. All of its low hanging fruit and we know MS will be there in some capacity. Another glaring omission is elden ring not being mentioned when Bandai Namco has made tweets about the game awards as well. That doesn’t necessarily mean elden ring is guaranteed but, come on.
They pulled the $5/month option to make Xbox Live cost $10/month and keep Game Pass at $10/month, so that Game Pass Ultimate at $15/month LOOKS like a better value.They pulled them in select regions including the US at the same time, they’re slowly re-introducing them to regions like Latin America and Brazil at a higher price point not too long ago.
We shall see what they do with the US. But I feel they want to bundle up more with their streaming and game pass.
One of the many reasons why I'm put off by PC gaming.
They pulled the $5/month option to make Xbox Live cost $10/month and keep Game Pass at $10/month, so that Game Pass Ultimate at $15/month LOOKS like a better value.
"Spend more but you save money (cause we raised prices.)"
Current gen games do not tax the cpus. Neither the ps5 or the pc cpus are being used to their fullest. If you turn on cpu usage monitors on pc, you will see all the games top out at 20-50% even at 120 fps.
When doing a GPU benchmark, which Alex is doing here, you always try to eleminate all other bottlenecks beside the GPU. So you run your benchmark with the fastest CPU, RAM, SSD, etc. This way you can measure the GPUs at their peak performance. If you don't do this, you will compare the PS5's GPU to a 2060 Super running below it's potential performance, gimping the result. If you make your CPU slow enough, the PS5 would even beat the RX 3090, which would be incorrect. As you can see, the 10900K is not stressed and so should be the PS5's CPU. Thus the PS5's GPU should also not be constraint by it's CPU in this case, making this a rahter fair comparison.
My theory is it was less thought out than this. (although I like your theory too)They pulled the $5/month option to make Xbox Live cost $10/month and keep Game Pass at $10/month, so that Game Pass Ultimate at $15/month LOOKS like a better value.
"Spend more but you save money (cause we raised prices.)"