ShaiKhulud1989
Gold Member
I own 4 OLED displays, one of them for 4 years as a PC display and TV. Burn-in is hardly a problem.When I saw 'OLED killer' I always think this is gonna solve the burning issues once for all.
I own 4 OLED displays, one of them for 4 years as a PC display and TV. Burn-in is hardly a problem.When I saw 'OLED killer' I always think this is gonna solve the burning issues once for all.
Especially with monitors. They don't have nearly the same amount of protections as televisions do but they're charging up the ass for them. Hardware Unboxed has a great series on this I recommend. Just just a FALD led monitor for a few hundred vs an OLED.
We're already at limits of film and productions with 4k and can't even render games at 4k without ML Upscaling, I think the move to 8K is still a long way off.Now, but I hold my TVs for a decade. I'm still rolling with an original KS8000 from Samsung which was like 2016 with one of the first HDR sets
I think 8K will be viable options on ps6 and ps6 pro
I mean that's fine and all. But it's just weird to me that my KS8000 still looks amazing and I bought it Christmas 2016 and my OLED tv I bought early 2020 has started getting some image retention.Many of them now do. I just picked up an MSI QD-OLED monitor and it has a whole suite of OLED care settings you'd find on a TV, like pixel refreshing, pixel shifting, and it detects static screens, logos and taskbars to automatically dim them.
People should get comfortable with the temporary nature of electronics anyway. This won't be the last monitor you buy so some faint signs of burn-in by the end of its natural life shouldn't kill you.
I still am stuck with the damn thing as I couldn't get Amazon to refund me on it. For just doing tv things such as sports, movies and Netflix its still a wonderful picture but when it comes to gaming I am pissed. I also have the 65" and at the time it was the exact same price as the LG 55" and I remember going back and forth over whether I should get the extra size or get the LG for the extra performance. Sonys lies about the tvs performance swayed me their way and I regret it every day that I game on it. I bought Sony TVs exclusively for 20 years and like I said, I'll never buy one again.Jesus Christ man, I still remember that Reddit mega thread with mods banning users left and right and the whole furore Sony created with its false promises, in fact, this would have been a prime example of a class action lawsuit since it was basically false advertising ffs and to this day I'm still wondering how Sony managed to exit the whole fiasco unscathed.
It was mid COVID (can't remember if it was the first or second year) and I, like many others, decided it was time for a new TV with all the next-gen, HDMI 2.1 goodies due to being imprisoned at home and sure enough, I went for the 65" version.
Now, I remember courier services being crippled by the heavy workload at that time which meant that I'd have my new TV 2 weeks from my order - and that was when the info on the internet started dropping about the halved vertical resolution at 120Hz amongst other things, needless to say, after 1 week+ of reading/combing the internet I decided that it wasn't worth the risk since everything thus far had showed that it was a hardware limitation and not a software one and sure enough, that proved to be the case since the TV is still gimped to this day.
Anyway, called the shop, cancelled my order and I must have had a 2 months long back and forth with them as to have my fucking money back...
What a stressful ball ache that was, i still remember it to this day although I don't know if that has to do more with the TV or the whole hellish COVID period, fuck man
It's a shame since the TV was (and still is) pretty good otherwise picture-quality wise but man, the fact that they tried to pass a (literally) gimped product as one of the "next gen ready" TVs still angers me, fucking Sony man...
And oh, as for the "experts"...SHILLS the lot of them, especially that Caleb guy from digital trends since he (obviously) purposefully forgot to mention its shortcomings in his "review" and he'd never comment on the hundreds of comments on YT regarding this very specific problem.
Never-ever trust "professionals", they're basically shills/used car salesmen that don't care about you or i , they're gonna get paid for their "reviews" and just like that they're gonna go for their next review of the latest and shiniest thing/product, fuck the lot of them.
I don't think those issues even exist anymore man, I mean you gotta leave it on for like months maybe but from what I have been seeing thats a thing of the pastWhen I saw 'OLED killer' I always think this is gonna solve the burning issues once for all.
No thanks. Better implement raytracing or higher framerates than wasting it on 8k resolution.I do hope 8k starts becoming more common with TVs because in 3 years the PS6 will support it in some titles and in 7 years the PS6 pro even more. It has to start somewhere.
Guy from Digital Trends always struck me as a shill, he never mentions anything openly negative about a product no matter how shit it is. My go-to portals are Choose.tv, Flatpanels.hd, and sometimes HDTVTest on YT.And oh, as for the "experts"...SHILLS the lot of them, especially that Caleb guy from digital trends since he (obviously) purposefully forgot to mention its shortcomings in his "review" and he'd never comment on the hundreds of comments on YT regarding this very specific problem.
I have one of these bad boys too and other than the power button not working on the remote it's still trucking along looking good. Part of me wants to replace it, a larger part of me says why?Now, but I hold my TVs for a decade. I'm still rolling with an original KS8000 from Samsung which was like 2016 with one of the first HDR sets
I think 8K will be viable options on ps6 and ps6 pro
Higher refresh rates is where it needs to get to, to get clarity beyond a crt you need a refresh rate of 960Hz+ with the content to match that.I do hope 8k starts becoming more common with TVs because in 3 years the PS6 will support it in some titles and in 7 years the PS6 pro even more. It has to start somewhere.
Unless you have a huge screen and/or sit really close its not really worth it. There's barely any content available in 8K. Games can barely run on at 8K at a decent standard and you'd be looking at something along the lines of a 5090 to be an acceptable experience. Something you shouldn't expect next generation consoles to complete with.Now, but I hold my TVs for a decade. I'm still rolling with an original KS8000 from Samsung which was like 2016 with one of the first HDR sets
I think 8K will be viable options on ps6 and ps6 pro
Part of me wants to replace it, a larger part of me says why?
Guy from Digital Trends always struck me as a shill, he never mentions anything openly negative about a product no matter how shit it is. My go-to portals are Choose.tv, Flatpanels.hd, and sometimes HDTVTest on YT.
I thought micro led was the next thing not mink?
C9 here l, I too have burn in.The burn in on my E9 is real though.. and I kinda babysat this tv.
It's always the same. It was the same with 4k and 1080p before it. Now, we can get solid 4k >60fps with upscaling tech.8k is a waste of time and money. No content outside of few PS5 Pro games and PC, worse panels, higher prices etc.
It's always the same. It was the same with 4k and 1080p before it. Now, we can get solid 4k >60fps with upscaling tech.
People will claim it won't do much, but higher res means a clearer image and text, especially in the desk space. I'm sitting in front of a $600, 50" TLC miniLED TV. That shit smokes all the garbage PC monitors I had, from 32" Asus ArtPro to 49" Ultrawide.
This only made me realize that I need more vertical space. The recent 45" displays look interesting again, but not at $1500.
Shrink that down into VR helmets please.
Look at rtings website.I'm in the market for a new TV but all these panels have me damn confused. Any suggestions other than OLEDs? The reason I don't want an OLED is because of the burn in. It will drive me crazy. I'm a bit OCD when it comes to stuff like that.
So far I know there is:
Mini LED
QLED
Full Array LED
I'm looking at Sony and Samsung for my next TV purchase.
I'm in the market for a new TV but all these panels have me damn confused. Any suggestions other than OLEDs? The reason I don't want an OLED is because of the burn in. It will drive me crazy. I'm a bit OCD when it comes to stuff like that.
So far I know there is:
Mini LED
QLED
Full Array LED
I'm looking at Sony and Samsung for my next TV purchase.
If we need upscaling tech to hit 4k then clearly we aren't ready for 8k yet. Not until the upscaling solutions at least get betterIt's always the same. It was the same with 4k and 1080p before it. Now, we can get solid 4k >60fps with upscaling tech.
Burn in isn't really an issue. I've been using a LG C2 as a monitor for 2 years. Including work from home.
Propaganda by the LCD lobby. Been using a C1 as a pc monitor for 4 years, no burn in.
The biggest ghost tale that for someone GAF just loves repeating. Zero "burn" on my 6 year old C8, and certainly none on my Bravia 8I own 4 OLED displays, one of them for 4 years as a PC display and TV. Burn-in is hardly a problem.
4 years. 12k hours. My c1 looks brand new.When I saw 'OLED killer' I always think this is gonna solve the burning issues once for all.
I have an A9G, bought in 2020, not sure on hours, but we only roll with the one TV in the house so I'd say it would be well north of 5K hours by now and in an off white full screen scenario there is minor evidence of burn in. Ran the once a year compensation cycle the other day but my expectation is this TV is not going to be a forever TV. Unlike the prior edgelit LED that got handed to the inlaws, thats as good as the day it was bought. Suffice to say I'm watching mini-LED with great interest as I'd prefer to head in that direction. Clearly Sony thinks its their path forward, expect features to filter down their range a bit next year. Once they have RGB the original version will be the midrange.4 years. 12k hours. My c1 looks brand new.
This is what I'm looking at from SamsungOLED is the best but if it's out of the question then:
LCD with old ass lamps -> LED LCD (usually edge lit) -> full array LED LCD - full array LED LCD with local dimming (FALD) - mini LED FALD LCD (current top) - > RGB LED FALD LCD (future)
Quantum dot was introduced many years ago and you want it in general, it expands color gamut. So QLED with mini LED FALD LCD is what you want. Oh, and there is panel type: IPS, VA...
LCD tech is quite something... Generally latest mini leds are very good, you want as many dimming zones as possible for the best HDR experience, 120hz/4k/VRR as well.
Yep. Its just LCD at the end of the day which comes with all its drawbacks.Is this not an LED killer rather then an OLED killer?
Tbh I'm glad LED is continuing to advance because it's a good technology.Yep. Its just LCD at the end of the day which comes with all its drawbacks.
You'd still have blooming, even with a more accurate backlight and pixel response and input lag will be way behind OLED's.
Unless you must have eye-searing brightness, OLED's are the way to go. Unless you have money to burn on a MicroLED display.
Burn in is definitely an issue if you use subtitles all the time. I learned this the hard way.Burn in isn't really an issue. I've been using a LG C2 as a monitor for 2 years. Including work from home.
In theory it will in the long run win on price. A lot of R&D costs to be offset before that happens, but panel for panel manufacturing costs are lower for MiniLED, at least thats the theory.Is this not an LED killer rather then an OLED killer?
All OLEDs die eventually because of the nature of their design. The new LG panels are so good that by the time it is an issue there will be a new model so much better that you'll want to upgrade anyway.You both have pixel degradation though, and your whole panels are dimmer as a result.
Pretty much burn-in, but they did it equally to the whole panel so it takes longer to notice.
So how cube I use my c1 as desktop monitor and ps5 monitor for 12k hours without any issue?I have an A9G, bought in 2020, not sure on hours, but we only roll with the one TV in the house so I'd say it would be well north of 5K hours by now and in an off white full screen scenario there is minor evidence of burn in. Ran the once a year compensation cycle the other day but my expectation is this TV is not going to be a forever TV. Unlike the prior edgelit LED that got handed to the inlaws, thats as good as the day it was bought. Suffice to say I'm watching mini-LED with great interest as I'd prefer to head in that direction. Clearly Sony thinks its their path forward, expect features to filter down their range a bit next year. Once they have RGB the original version will be the midrange.
Why? I use woled which got the fourth white pixel.RGB will be a game changer. Can wait too see this technology in the market.
So just because it didn't happen to you after 4 years, it's propaganda? How dumb can some people be, man...Propaganda by the LCD lobby. Been using a C1 as a pc monitor for 4 years, no burn in.
No idea, seems unlikely with that use case you have no burn in. (I find the term annoying as its the opposite, burn out).So how cube I use my c1 as desktop monitor and ps5 monitor for 12k hours without any issue?
I did the tests with and without hdr. Nothing.No idea, seems unlikely with that use case you have no burn in. (I find the term annoying as its the opposite, burn out).
There are plenty of longevity tests out there that leave no doubt, it'll appear eventually, and I'd be surprised if you run various grey tests and don't see it. Its typical that you won't see light burn in on regular content and only on test screens.
If it doesn't have burn in then it's worth almost any priceAnd it will cost twice as much as the competition, for slightly better, barely noticeable results.