squidilix
Member
I suppose Alex didn't see this...Saw these shots on reddit posted on era.
Last edited:
I suppose Alex didn't see this...Saw these shots on reddit posted on era.
You clearly don't know who Major Nelson and Aaron Greenberg are.Here's a hint - neither Sony or MS execs really care about the console "war" - it's not on their radar - they just want you to buy their shit...
Sorry misread your post for sure; but it's a common thing on this forum to claim MS are paying DF.
Can you link to a mods post confirming this?mods have already received documents of MS paying DF
Can you link to a mods post confirming this?
He don’t replied when it not fits his narrative.I suppose Alex didn't see this...
Ignorant take really... the fact scalpers price is higher for one product than for the rival product means people are willing to pay more for one than for the other. Higher demand raises the prices, which is exactly the thing you were trying to deny. And ebay is probably the world's biggest 2nd hand marketplace, so it is an indicator of demandI'm fully aware of how basic economics works. I'm also fairly confident that the last indicator that economists would look to for "demand" would be eBay. Hell - let's include Facebook Marketplace, OfferUp, or whatever other latest hip app is used to offload used stuff...
I honestly could care less about which console sold more than the other - they're both selling as fast as they're made. However, you clearly do care for some odd reason???
The fact is - ALL of the consoles are currently in active demand. Sony, MS, and Nintendo can't make them fast enough to meet the supply.
We won't know actual demand until there's an overabundance of supply.
I find it rather silly that someone posts a tweet about how Xbox sold more than PS for a period of time, and immediately everyone jumps in to defend Sony because of... eBay pricing???
My point is - prices on eBay fluctuate like farts in the wind. Prices also fluctuate daily, or week to week. Primarily because some people are too "ignorant" and pay more than necessary...
Grow up and stop championing a plastic box.
Here's a hint - neither Sony or MS execs really care about the console "war" - it's not on their radar - they just want you to buy their shit...
Saw these shots on reddit posted on era.
I suppose Alex didn't see this...
I usually get the whole "don't defend your favourite plastic box" but it's a useless accusation in this case. The demand for PS5 is far higher than Series X, it is what it is.I'm fully aware of how basic economics works. I'm also fairly confident that the last indicator that economists would look to for "demand" would be eBay. Hell - let's include Facebook Marketplace, OfferUp, or whatever other latest hip app is used to offload used stuff...
I honestly could care less about which console sold more than the other - they're both selling as fast as they're made. However, you clearly do care for some odd reason???
The fact is - ALL of the consoles are currently in active demand. Sony, MS, and Nintendo can't make them fast enough to meet the supply.
We won't know actual demand until there's an overabundance of supply.
I find it rather silly that someone posts a tweet about how Xbox sold more than PS for a period of time, and immediately everyone jumps in to defend Sony because of... eBay pricing???
My point is - prices on eBay fluctuate like farts in the wind. Prices also fluctuate daily, or week to week. Primarily because some people are too "ignorant" and pay more than necessary...
Grow up and stop championing a plastic box.
Here's a hint - neither Sony or MS execs really care about the console "war" - it's not on their radar - they just want you to buy their shit...
I’m starting to suspect that this might be real after all.
Both IO and CPU (eventhough CPU is basically the same) because CPU is also busy on IO stuff unlike PS5's.its a valid comparison of the two GPUs. If anything this helps us identify where the bottleneck might be on the Xbox Series X since it seems to be doing fine with nothing happening on screen.
Maybe the CPU is the bottleneck here or the I/O?
Would be cool if it expands to “South America” and the cartels and smuggling. Escobar/narcos and some cocaine cowboys mixed in.Its set in Vice City in the 80s
This leaker claims you go to "Cuba" for a bit, which is basically same place in RDR2 when Arthur goes to "Guarma."Would be cool if it expands to “South America” and the cartels and smuggling. Escobar/narcos and some cocaine cowboys mixed in.
Problem is the mods have already received documents of MS paying DF, so it was a lie the guy sent the documents would've gotten banned. None other our beloved baseball star, the meth head HeisenbergFX4 .
Problem is the mods have already received documents of MS paying DF, so it was a lie the guy sent the documents would've gotten banned. None other our beloved baseball star, the meth head HeisenbergFX4 .
They would have to expand a little because there wasn’t too much of anything coming out of Cuba back then I don’t think. Unless someone goes after “the beard” in the gameThis leaker claims you go to "Cuba" for a bit, which is basically same place in RDR2 when Arthur goes to "Guarma."
Could be true.
well GTA is fiction they can do whatever they wantThey would have to expand a little because there wasn’t too much of anything coming out of Cuba back then I don’t think. Unless someone goes after “the beard” in the game
Both IO and CPU (eventhough CPU is basically the same) because CPU is also busy on IO stuff unlike PS5's.
Of course. But they try to base things on actual history sometimes. They’d have to go post prohibition to show the gangster side of Cuba.well GTA is fiction they can do whatever they want
yeah who knows could be false info. Or they could just want the player to run into castro or some shit idkOf course. But they try to base things on actual history sometimes. They’d have to go post prohibition to show the gangster side of Cuba.
And this is why we need NXGamer on the case.
Not related to RT this time, just (slight) graphical detail.
The settings are the same, but maybe how they are applied by the different APIs is causing the difference here. We all know PS5 won't be using DXR for example, so even though the games are like for like settings wise, this may not translate to producing the same result.Well unless my eyes are lying something is certainly... different between the two versions.
I haven't had time to go back through the DF video to look for any of these differences in motion, but these screens posted lead me to believe it could be a matter of camera distance affecting LODs and reflection cutoffs.
I'm still giving Remedy the benefit of the doubt when they said the settings are identical, but surely you can see with your own eyes that something is off?
Yep I mentioned that one. It's images 2 and 4 I'm not noticing much, if any difference in, but regardless there is clearly something funky going on.
Well previously in pc gpu competitions I heard one of the vendors cut corners on their implementations to get higher benchmark scores. Same might be happening here.The settings are the same, but maybe how they are applied by the different APIs is causing the difference here. We all know PS5 won't be using DXR for example, so even though the games are like for like settings wise, this may not translate to producing the same result.
IIRC in the XsX hotchips reveal the documents showed the XsX GPU having to choose between BVH for RT or texture mapping - unlike the RDNA2 info for AMD's new cards - so maybe these are scenes where they have to prioritize an additional texture layer or RT, but not both - because they are hitting their rendering limit with the current tools in the allocated frame-time, and the trade off is either drop frames, but with difficulty recovering quickly, or skipping a feature and avoid a prolonged section of dropped frames.Could be either VRS, or more likely SFS (Sampler Feedback Streaming) that is gimping the image quality.
I honestly don’t want there to be Pro consoles, just let the devs focus on a single spec when it comes to consoles. You get better optimization if more time’s allocated to a single machine.Why don’t we let the supply chains get sorted out first before we start flapping the gums about Pro consoles.
Ignorant take really... the fact scalpers price is higher for one product than for the rival product means people are willing to pay more for one than for the other. Higher demand raises the prices, which is exactly the thing you were trying to deny. And ebay is probably the world's biggest 2nd hand marketplace, so it is an indicator of demand
But good thing you could care less, I didn't doubt it for a second
I usually get the whole "don't defend your favourite plastic box" but it's a useless accusation in this case. The demand for PS5 is far higher than Series X, it is what it is.
The eBay listings although a small indicator for demand are still an indicator, especially here in the U.K where eBay is extremely popular (I think around 25 million monthly users which is insane considering the population). The fact that people are willing to pay upwards of £900 and even more for the PS5 says a lot. A lot of the people reselling are also scalpers who bulk buy in the hundreds and even thousands and only target high demanding products. If the price is higher for the PS5 than it's likely the demand is higher too. It's not rocket science and stating it doesn't mean I'm necessarily defending or attacking a certain corporation, let's at least have some nuance here.
Oh boy
Oh boy
Oh boy
About god damn time they brought back the real Lara Croft.Guys i'm so in love with this newly made wallpaper (made by CD Art Director)
Ultra excited about Nexgen Lara Croft Tomb Raider, CANNOT Wait!!!
Wait a second..... Control is another BC title, isn't it, Slimy? Man man...you KNOW what I'm going to say. I don't see how we can take those type of games as evidence of much at all. AT BEST, it shows one console running BC code and/or features better than the other. Without even having RDNA2 features enabled, how is that indicative of the power of either GPU? If this were native code, I'd expect BOTH consoles to be running at a minimum of 60fps at a higher resolution. Isn't that reasonable? Or am I way off base here?Again, the analogy doesn't apply here because the games engine or the gpu isn't idle. You can see gpu usage in games when standing still and it still operates at 80-90%. The car engine doesn't do that when you are idle.
Regardless, this is just a cool little experiment that gives us a direct comparison between the two gpus. No one is claiming that this is in game performance. It's no different than the cutscene comparisons Alex did with cod and ac.
Right. The Xbox one actually outsold the ps4 in December 2013 a month after launch.
Nah, my RTX 2080 has 46 CUs worth of shader processors, is over 11 tflops at peak clocks, has dedicated RT cores and was giving around 43-53 fps in combat scenarios using PS5 settings and resolution. 60 fps minimum is really hard in this game. I had to play at 960p and DLSS up to 1400p in order to hit a locked 60 fps experience with all RT settings enabled last year. Or was it a year before. played it at launch.If this were native code, I'd expect BOTH consoles to be running at a minimum of 60fps at a higher resolution. Isn't that reasonable? Or am I way off base here?
I see PS5 needs to activate their Windows.Anyone sees a difference in the carpets reflection?
I see one of the carpets seems blurrier.I see PS5 needs to activate their Windows.
Might be down to different gamma.
I see one of the carpets seems blurrier.