There is no car game with better graphics today than DriveClub.
At this point we could create a kickstarter, put one dollar each of us and the first to drop real leaks get the prize
30fps, almost no physics calculation due to a super arcady physics model and less cars on the track than in most racing games.
that's why it looks as good as it does. it saves resources that are necessary in simulations because it is an arcade racer that is way less demanding.
basically, people tend to compare driveclub to actual 60fps simulations with physics simulations running at more than 300hz or even open world racing games that constantly need to dynamically stream in new data.
so of course it looks better than those.
30fps, almost no physics calculation due to a super arcady physics model and less cars on the track than in most racing games.
that's why it looks as good as it does. it saves resources that are necessary in simulations because it is an arcade racer that is way less demanding.
basically, people tend to compare driveclub to actual 60fps simulations with physics simulations running at more than 300hz or even open world racing games that constantly need to dynamically stream in new data.
so of course it looks better than those.
It's irrelevant to be honest. Mod of war has already said Tommy has info but wasn't willing to divulge the source or whatever else was asked of him. Much likeHeisenbergFX4 who is allowed to post his guesses at his lesuire.
Seems to me like all these neo member xbots are butt hurt and are reporting the posts willy nilly.
Even if Tommy refuses to give all the information again, I would not be at all surprised if his information is spot on.
He may just say ban me if the reveal is close just so they can unban him and apologise after lol.
There is no car game with better graphics today than DriveClub.
As one of the most insider, of insiders on this thread full of real insiders, and fake insiders, with my inside information, I can warranty that the information provided by my insiders are real insiders information, which has told me the PS5 will be revealed someday.
Gee, I wonder why it took you all this time to mention this? As opposed to weeks ago? (rhetorical question btw)
Everything else you mentioned have been speculated endlessly, particularily aquisitions of Housemarque & Remedy. This has been talked about to death over in the Reee Playstation first party thread.
These pseudo 'insiders' are just becoming boring at this point.
The only thing i can say right now is over twice as fast as Anaconda's SSD.
But I like it when you're ... guessing stuff.Sorry but I am not a neo member and my thoughts haven't changed on the subject.
But have seem to have gotten under a few people's skin because of my thoughts so I will just wait for reveals before posting anything else in regards to power or performance.
Lets just hope we get a full spec reveal before sometime closer to E3.
Your /s ruined the joke.This is big if true. Get vetted please.
/s
It's irrelevant to be honest. Mod of war has already said Tommy has info but wasn't willing to divulge the source or whatever else was asked of him. Much likeHeisenbergFX4 who is allowed to post his guesses at his lesuire.
Seems to me like all these neo member xbots are butt hurt and are reporting the posts willy nilly.
Even if Tommy refuses to give all the information again, I would not be at all surprised if his information is spot on.
He may just say ban me if the reveal is close just so they can unban him and apologise after lol.
Your /s ruined the joke.
This is big if true. Get vetted please.
This is the internet so you never know.
This is unreal.
Don't let a vocal few stop you posting your guesses! Appreciate your input. I really don't want to see people's reactions if no Feb spec reveals.Sorry but I am not a neo member and my thoughts haven't changed on the subject.
But have seem to have gotten under a few people's skin because of my thoughts so I will just wait for reveals before posting anything else in regards to power or performance.
Lets just hope we get a full spec reveal before sometime closer to E3.
so the RX5700 non-XT with 36 active CUs / 18 WGPs and 4 Shader Arrays does not exist?
![]()
So they are using an unbalanced config... interesting.... if the workload is scheduled to the SA with more WGP it will run with better performance than the SA with less WGP.Yes it is, if some of the CUs are disabled/fused off to maximize yields. 56CU (28wgp) with 4CU (2wgp) disabled is feasible. 60(30) with 8(4) disabled, etc. All very possible.
5700 non-xt is proof with 40(20) with 4(2) disabled.
I know he has no worries there just using it as an example of someone not giving all the info to get vetted. He trusts you guys as he's been here for a long time, if Tommy is legit, and that's a big if, he's a new member so wouldn't be willing to show as much asHeisenbergFX4 has a really, really solid source.
But we are not in the source burning business, and that doesn't mean what the source has will not change +/- with clock tweaks, etc..
There also have been more than one solid source on the SSD differences/tech, which we will not divulge details due to how easy it would be to burn them.
unreal(engine)
actually, is unreal engine or in house?
HelpSome spicy info if you can read between the lines
Sorry but I am not a neo member and my thoughts haven't changed on the subject.
But have seem to have gotten under a few people's skin because of my thoughts so I will just wait for reveals before posting anything else in regards to power or performance.
Lets just hope we get a full spec reveal before sometime closer to E3.
This is the internet so you never know.
This is unreal.
Not at all, just using you as an example of having info, but not getting vettedSorry but I am not a neo member and my thoughts haven't changed on the subject.
But have seem to have gotten under a few people's skin because of my thoughts so I will just wait for reveals before posting anything else in regards to power or performance.
This back and forth with supposed insiders with the disclaimer "I could be wrong or things are liable to change" isn't helpful and anyone can do it. It's like casting a broad net and knowing some fish will get caught in it.
Latest insiders are just regurgitating what a few ppl on here have already stated months back.
Cant wait for some concrete infoooo
... é uma constante da vidaEles não sabem que o sonho...
![]()
And don't forget prototype #2 Verona... What if it really exists and is only in the hands of 1st party studios? Who knows if it is the one that people have the specs!?This back and forth with supposed insiders with the disclaimer "I could be wrong or things are liable to change" isn't helpful and anyone can do it. It's like casting a broad net and knowing some fish will get caught in it.
Latest insiders are just regurgitating what a few ppl on here have already stated months back.
Cant wait for some concrete infoooo
Really hard to figure that one out. Cerny said back in April SSD implementation from Sony is faster then fastest available on the market at that time (~3.5GB/s). A week before your post, Windows Central posted Anaconda specs and this about SSD :![]()
Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD
I guess Timdoggydog is the only one to be verified of the @OsirisBlack @CameFromNearFuture @Tommy Fisher @XcloudTimdog bunch? Can't say I'm surprised, though. Timdoggydog is a verified fanboy, that much is truewww.neogaf.com
Storage
NVMe SSD (we've heard read speeds of anywhere up to 2GB/s)
How do you square away the fact theTBF dude the issue has only really been with Tommy (at least for me), not necessarily anyone else. He just has a "peculiar" posting history that sets off alarm bells for me.
As for yourself and others like OsirisBlack and Klee? I always take any insider claims with a grain of salt if there's no hard data with it, but you're okay in my book.
Xbox One X is smaller than PS4 Pro iirc and still more powerful and quieter.![]()
![]()
![]()
And absolutely not even comparable.
P.s. One was completely quiet, the other is a vacuum cleaner
Xbox One X is smaller than PS4 Pro iirc and still more powerful and quieter.
C'mon guys the specs will be official soon so we will know which "insider" are the true one.
Just relax.
I know he has no worries there just using it as an example of someone not giving all the info to get vetted. He trusts you guys as he's been here for a long time, if Tommy is legit, and that's a big if, he's a new member so wouldn't be willing to show as much asHeisenbergFX4 in my opinion, that's why I asked in another thread if the process could be detailed but I guess you do this in your PM's?
Xbox One X is smaller than PS4 Pro iirc and still more powerful and quieter.
The shareholders vote on the sale. There is no "question" about it.
some of you all are really stretching reality trying to justify the fact that this person knows nothing.
I have literally taken companies private (what Sony would do here) and taken them public. Disclosure and approval laws are in place for a reason to protect the public.
We will never detail the vetting process. Ever. That is all done privately between only 2 parties. Not even all the mods know each individual's vetting process for each person. Only directly between two people (the mod and the person). This is to protect the sources, and not burn anyone ever.
S SCFC_ just responded and supposedly wants to go through it. Please stand by...
Things are coming, and it is very exciting. There is no "doom and gloom" from either camp. Both are going to be GREAT. So ignore the clickbait "warfare" articles from select sites and their "contributors", if you know what I mean.
Announcement by the end of next week with the PS Meeting 3rd week of February
Dealer sources told him XSX SDD loads Sea Of Thieves level at around 3-5s, while 3.5GB/s SDD on PC loads the same level at around 15-16s.Windows Central posted Anaconda specs and this about SSD :
So, its really complex math to figure this one out.
How do you square away the fact theOsirisBlack says the info
Tommy Fisher dropped that seems to be causing you concern is the information he's been getting also then?
OsirisBlack basically verified the information as correct., so do you no longer value his information too?
To be fair to Tommy, he's literally said the same thing since he started posting here just before xmas or whenever it was. You have probably been brought in by all these Neo Members saying he's copied a post on twitter from a few days ago about the SSD speed, but if you check he actually posted that ages ago. December 19th actually.
![]()
Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD
The one thing that keeps me from fully buying into Klee was when he said people will probably be disappointment by the numbers (I can’t find where he said it now but I know I read it.) Then he says the 12tf number isn’t a surprise to him. Who in their right mind was going to be disappointed by...www.neogaf.com
You on about dealer gaming guy from twitter? If you are he makes stuff up for clicks fyiDealer sources told him XSX SDD loads Sea Of Thieves level at around 3-5s, while 3.5GB/s SDD on PC loads the same level at around 15-16s.
3.5GB/s on PC is already faat, and yet XSX SDD loads games even faster. How is that? Only HW decompression can explain it and I believe it's secret source in both XSX and PS5.
So in summary
PS5 about 9.5 RDNA tflops with better RT hardware and much faster SSD
XbsX about 10 RDNA tflops
Things may change with an upclock or additional ram
Interesting. Did Mark Sony did it again? Undercutting his rivals with a smarter solution.