Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.
At this point we could create a kickstarter, put one dollar each of us and the first to drop real leaks get the prize
 


There is no car game with better graphics today than DriveClub.




We can go on all day if you like loll ...

And by the way, I don't agree on the #1 personally. I just clicked the first link on youtube lolll I'm sorry but Drive club is certainly not the best looking car game out there. :messenger_smiling:
 
30fps, almost no physics calculation due to a super arcady physics model and less cars on the track than in most racing games.

that's why it looks as good as it does. it saves resources that are necessary in simulations because it is an arcade racer that is way less demanding.

basically, people tend to compare driveclub to actual 60fps simulations with physics simulations running at more than 300hz or even open world racing games that constantly need to dynamically stream in new data.
so of course it looks better than those.

Maybe. But I play Driveclub in VR in 60fps with all assists off. The physics are not only there
,they are well established. The feedback you receive from the weight shifting around the car body, the grip levels of each individual tyre, etc.

Death of Driveclub is the biggest shame of this Generation as far as I'm concerned.

Edit: seconded by no Project Gotham throughout the entire gen
 
Last edited:
30fps, almost no physics calculation due to a super arcady physics model and less cars on the track than in most racing games.

that's why it looks as good as it does. it saves resources that are necessary in simulations because it is an arcade racer that is way less demanding.

basically, people tend to compare driveclub to actual 60fps simulations with physics simulations running at more than 300hz or even open world racing games that constantly need to dynamically stream in new data.
so of course it looks better than those.

On a pure visual level DriveClub will always lose out to PC games in terms of final image quality. So I agree with you. However you are doing DriveClub something of a disservice in dismissing it. The driving model, whilst not full simulation, is at the very least simcade. It's based on real world physics, uses manufacturer data and physically modelled aerodynamics. The cloud and weather systems are also modelled and simulated. Clouds are 3D and diffuse light from the sun accurately. The skies are generated each time and are also affected by wind - as are the waves and rippling of water on the lakes.

There is a lot more simulation to the game than you might think - https://blog.eu.playstation.com/2014/06/05/51-driveclub-details-might-just-blow-mind/

Bit OT here, sorry :)
 
As one of the most insider, of insiders on this thread full of real insiders, and fake insiders, with my inside information, I can warranty that the information provided by my insiders are real insiders information, which has told me the PS5 will be revealed someday.
 
It's irrelevant to be honest. Mod of war has already said Tommy has info but wasn't willing to divulge the source or whatever else was asked of him. Much like HeisenbergFX4 HeisenbergFX4 who is allowed to post his guesses at his lesuire.

Seems to me like all these neo member xbots are butt hurt and are reporting the posts willy nilly.

Even if Tommy refuses to give all the information again, I would not be at all surprised if his information is spot on.

He may just say ban me if the reveal is close just so they can unban him and apologise after lol.

Sorry but I am not a neo member and my thoughts haven't changed on the subject.

But have seem to have gotten under a few people's skin because of my thoughts so I will just wait for reveals before posting anything else in regards to power or performance.

Lets just hope we get a full spec reveal before sometime closer to E3.
 


There is no car game with better graphics today than DriveClub.

If Racing games look anything like 0:58 for next-gen, I'd be happy to dive back in. I think that's what's exciting for me. Genres of games I used to play in earlier generations coming more to life for next-gen. I haven't played a serious racing game since Ridge Racer R: Type 4. The soundtracks give much hype.
 
As one of the most insider, of insiders on this thread full of real insiders, and fake insiders, with my inside information, I can warranty that the information provided by my insiders are real insiders information, which has told me the PS5 will be revealed someday.

This is big if true. Get vetted please.

/s
 
Last edited:
Gee, I wonder why it took you all this time to mention this? As opposed to weeks ago? (rhetorical question btw)


Everything else you mentioned have been speculated endlessly, particularily aquisitions of Housemarque & Remedy. This has been talked about to death over in the Reee Playstation first party thread.

These pseudo 'insiders' are just becoming boring at this point.

The only thing i can say right now is over twice as fast as Anaconda's SSD.
 
Sorry but I am not a neo member and my thoughts haven't changed on the subject.

But have seem to have gotten under a few people's skin because of my thoughts so I will just wait for reveals before posting anything else in regards to power or performance.

Lets just hope we get a full spec reveal before sometime closer to E3.
But I like it when you're ... guessing stuff.
 
I am sorry to read that those who might know things are now less willing to share because of those who wish to throw stones. This is why we can't have nice things.
 
It's irrelevant to be honest. Mod of war has already said Tommy has info but wasn't willing to divulge the source or whatever else was asked of him. Much like HeisenbergFX4 HeisenbergFX4 who is allowed to post his guesses at his lesuire.

Seems to me like all these neo member xbots are butt hurt and are reporting the posts willy nilly.

Even if Tommy refuses to give all the information again, I would not be at all surprised if his information is spot on.

He may just say ban me if the reveal is close just so they can unban him and apologise after lol.

HeisenbergFX4 HeisenbergFX4 has a really, really solid source.

But we are not in the source burning business, and that doesn't mean what the source has will not change +/- with clock tweaks, etc..

There also have been more than one solid source on the SSD differences/tech, which we will not divulge details due to how easy it would be to burn them.
 
Sorry but I am not a neo member and my thoughts haven't changed on the subject.

But have seem to have gotten under a few people's skin because of my thoughts so I will just wait for reveals before posting anything else in regards to power or performance.

Lets just hope we get a full spec reveal before sometime closer to E3.
Don't let a vocal few stop you posting your guesses! Appreciate your input. I really don't want to see people's reactions if no Feb spec reveals.
 
so the RX5700 non-XT with 36 active CUs / 18 WGPs and 4 Shader Arrays does not exist?

:messenger_winking:
Yes it is, if some of the CUs are disabled/fused off to maximize yields. 56CU (28wgp) with 4CU (2wgp) disabled is feasible. 60(30) with 8(4) disabled, etc. All very possible.

5700 non-xt is proof with 40(20) with 4(2) disabled.
So they are using an unbalanced config... interesting.... if the workload is scheduled to the SA with more WGP it will run with better performance than the SA with less WGP.

I wanted to see some tests because that card probably runs only a bit better than a 32CUs card.
 
Last edited:
HeisenbergFX4 HeisenbergFX4 has a really, really solid source.

But we are not in the source burning business, and that doesn't mean what the source has will not change +/- with clock tweaks, etc..

There also have been more than one solid source on the SSD differences/tech, which we will not divulge details due to how easy it would be to burn them.
I know he has no worries there just using it as an example of someone not giving all the info to get vetted. He trusts you guys as he's been here for a long time, if Tommy is legit, and that's a big if, he's a new member so wouldn't be willing to show as much as HeisenbergFX4 HeisenbergFX4 in my opinion, that's why I asked in another thread if the process could be detailed but I guess you do this in your PM's?
 
This back and forth with supposed insiders with the disclaimer "I could be wrong or things are liable to change" isn't helpful and anyone can do it. It's like casting a broad net and knowing some fish will get caught in it.

Latest insiders are just regurgitating what a few ppl on here have already stated months back.

Cant wait for some concrete infoooo
 
Sorry but I am not a neo member and my thoughts haven't changed on the subject.

But have seem to have gotten under a few people's skin because of my thoughts so I will just wait for reveals before posting anything else in regards to power or performance.

Lets just hope we get a full spec reveal before sometime closer to E3.

TBF dude the issue has only really been with Tommy (at least for me), not necessarily anyone else. He just has a "peculiar" posting history that sets off alarm bells for me.

As for yourself and others like OsirisBlack and Klee? I always take any insider claims with a grain of salt if there's no hard data with it, but you're okay in my book.

This is the internet so you never know.



This is unreal.


Yeah, that trailer was really impressive with the background shots. Probably best-looking backgrounds for a next-gen game I've seen yet, thanks to the lighting and reflections in particular.

If that's in-game (seems to be, given the scope of the game isn't some open-world or sprawling epic), we should be in for some really gorgeous games next-gen on both platforms.
 
Last edited:
Sorry but I am not a neo member and my thoughts haven't changed on the subject.

But have seem to have gotten under a few people's skin because of my thoughts so I will just wait for reveals before posting anything else in regards to power or performance.
Not at all, just using you as an example of having info, but not getting vetted :messenger_ok:

You carry on guessing ;)
 
This back and forth with supposed insiders with the disclaimer "I could be wrong or things are liable to change" isn't helpful and anyone can do it. It's like casting a broad net and knowing some fish will get caught in it.

Latest insiders are just regurgitating what a few ppl on here have already stated months back.

Cant wait for some concrete infoooo

It's so convenient isn't it?! They can always blame it on change of plans/schedule because it'll not be disclosed by the company seeing how the game industry operates. It's a great loophole for insiders.

Case in point:
OsirisBlack OsirisBlack
S SCFC_
Tommy Fisher Tommy Fisher
M Mazeyna
 
Last edited:
Eles não sabem que o sonho...

;)
... é uma constante da vida 😅

This back and forth with supposed insiders with the disclaimer "I could be wrong or things are liable to change" isn't helpful and anyone can do it. It's like casting a broad net and knowing some fish will get caught in it.

Latest insiders are just regurgitating what a few ppl on here have already stated months back.

Cant wait for some concrete infoooo
And don't forget prototype #2 Verona... What if it really exists and is only in the hands of 1st party studios? Who knows if it is the one that people have the specs!? HeisenbergFX4 HeisenbergFX4 ! OsirisBlack OsirisBlack ! Tommy Fisher Tommy Fisher @Henry Clark!... Help!
 
Really hard to figure that one out. Cerny said back in April SSD implementation from Sony is faster then fastest available on the market at that time (~3.5GB/s). A week before your post, Windows Central posted Anaconda specs and this about SSD :

Storage
NVMe SSD (we've heard read speeds of anywhere up to 2GB/s)

So, its really complex math to figure this one out.

Btw, in your post from dec 18 you said VRS implementation is the same, but that part was specifically used as MS to point they are using their own "patented VRS".

Its a shame what has happened to this forum
 
TBF dude the issue has only really been with Tommy (at least for me), not necessarily anyone else. He just has a "peculiar" posting history that sets off alarm bells for me.

As for yourself and others like OsirisBlack and Klee? I always take any insider claims with a grain of salt if there's no hard data with it, but you're okay in my book.
How do you square away the fact the OsirisBlack OsirisBlack says the info Tommy Fisher Tommy Fisher dropped that seems to be causing you concern is the information he's been getting also then?

OsirisBlack OsirisBlack basically verified the information as correct., so do you no longer value his information too?

To be fair to Tommy, he's literally said the same thing since he started posting here just before xmas or whenever it was. You have probably been brought in by all these Neo Members saying he's copied a post on twitter from a few days ago about the SSD speed, but if you check he actually posted that ages ago. December 19th actually.

 
C'mon guys the specs will be official soon so we will know which "insider" are the true one.
Just relax.

For the love of god

tenor.gif
 
I know he has no worries there just using it as an example of someone not giving all the info to get vetted. He trusts you guys as he's been here for a long time, if Tommy is legit, and that's a big if, he's a new member so wouldn't be willing to show as much as HeisenbergFX4 HeisenbergFX4 in my opinion, that's why I asked in another thread if the process could be detailed but I guess you do this in your PM's?

We will never detail the vetting process. Ever. That is all done privately between only 2 parties. Not even all the mods know each individual's vetting process for each person. Only directly between two people (the mod and the person). This is to protect the sources, and not burn anyone ever.

HeisenbergFX4 HeisenbergFX4 has a very solid source, but like I said, that does not mean it can't change with tweaks and revisions to kit. Even the source admits this. Very solid source.

Tommy Fisher Tommy Fisher I asked to scale it back a bit. I personally am letting him be. I didn't do his vetting process so I do not know the details, I was just told by another that "his information cannot be fully verified but there may be something there" in so many words. He will either hang himself, or get paraded in the streets. Same goes for OsirisBlack OsirisBlack .

S SCFC_ just responded and supposedly wants to go through it. Please stand by...

Things are coming, and it is very exciting. There is no "doom and gloom" from either camp. Both are going to be GREAT. So ignore the clickbait "warfare" articles from select sites and their "contributors", if you know what I mean.
 
Last edited:
Xbox One X is smaller than PS4 Pro iirc and still more powerful and quieter.

Xbox x basically copied and blueprinted their console off the inner workings of the ps4 pro they are very similar hmmmm tht wasnt a magical feat coming over a year later, higher price and ohhhhh using someone else's foundation

Sony overall most of these gens have been the better hardware producer, ps4 was more powerful than Xbox one and better, pro was made before x and oh ps3 was better then those massive massive rrod situations. Not to mention Sony also created the first true home console VR tht was very competent. I'll believe in Sony engineers creating the better hardware.
 
Last edited:
The shareholders vote on the sale. There is no "question" about it.

some of you all are really stretching reality trying to justify the fact that this person knows nothing.

I have literally taken companies private (what Sony would do here) and taken them public. Disclosure and approval laws are in place for a reason to protect the public.

depends on what kind of stock the public can hold. Some go public and the former owners retain all voting shares. Not all shares are equal. Just saying, shit is nuanced.
 
We will never detail the vetting process. Ever. That is all done privately between only 2 parties. Not even all the mods know each individual's vetting process for each person. Only directly between two people (the mod and the person). This is to protect the sources, and not burn anyone ever.

S SCFC_ just responded and supposedly wants to go through it. Please stand by...

Things are coming, and it is very exciting. There is no "doom and gloom" from either camp. Both are going to be GREAT. So ignore the clickbait "warfare" articles from select sites and their "contributors", if you know what I mean.

For the record, this is what S SCFC_ said:

Announcement by the end of next week with the PS Meeting 3rd week of February
 
So in summary

PS5 about 9.5 RDNA tflops with better RT hardware and much faster SSD
XbsX about 10 RDNA tflops
Things may change with an upclock or additional ram

Interesting. Did Mark Sony did it again? Undercutting his rivals with a smarter solution.
 
Last edited:
Windows Central posted Anaconda specs and this about SSD :

So, its really complex math to figure this one out.
Dealer sources told him XSX SDD loads Sea Of Thieves level at around 3-5s, while 3.5GB/s SDD on PC loads the same level at around 15-16s.

3.5GB/s on PC is already faat, and yet XSX SDD loads games even faster. How is that? Only HW decompression can explain it and I believe it's secret source in both XSX and PS5.
 
How do you square away the fact the OsirisBlack OsirisBlack says the info Tommy Fisher Tommy Fisher dropped that seems to be causing you concern is the information he's been getting also then?

OsirisBlack OsirisBlack basically verified the information as correct., so do you no longer value his information too?

To be fair to Tommy, he's literally said the same thing since he started posting here just before xmas or whenever it was. You have probably been brought in by all these Neo Members saying he's copied a post on twitter from a few days ago about the SSD speed, but if you check he actually posted that ages ago. December 19th actually.


Actually what he said was "the information lines up with what gaming journalists and some insiders have said" that does not sound like he confirmed it he basically just said it's what others are saying not what he has heard or seen.
 
Dealer sources told him XSX SDD loads Sea Of Thieves level at around 3-5s, while 3.5GB/s SDD on PC loads the same level at around 15-16s.

3.5GB/s on PC is already faat, and yet XSX SDD loads games even faster. How is that? Only HW decompression can explain it and I believe it's secret source in both XSX and PS5.
You on about dealer gaming guy from twitter? If you are he makes stuff up for clicks fyi
 
So in summary

PS5 about 9.5 RDNA tflops with better RT hardware and much faster SSD
XbsX about 10 RDNA tflops
Things may change with an upclock or additional ram

Interesting. Did Mark Sony did it again? Undercutting his rivals with a smarter solution.

yeah, i think with the tech amd had available, and the node they were working on, 10 is the upper limit in a consumer console.

If MS has 12+ and were confident that sony could not reach or exceed that, they would have used numbers and not vague power multipliers like they did with 1x...something like "12 TF sEx, which translates into 3x the performance of the 1x. sEx the most powerful console created by humankind in the 4 billion year history of the planet. We are gods now."
 
Wait, rdna is considered navi? Like old navi out today?
But rdna2 is just navi with RT and vrs...like what PS5 Xsx is going to have.

So the whole argument about 12tflops rdna2 > 12tflops navi is pointless?
Was it DF that pushed such narrative? And then Xsx stealthy hype ran with that. :lollipop_anguish:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom