Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.
I do not have the document unfortunately, I do not work in the game industry so I can only go on what my friend told me, but he has no reason to lie to me. But if you were writing such a document you wouldnt write ' we are targeting 13 RDNA TFs' would you?

Don't take it personally it's just we get a lot of people claiming to be in the know so proof helps.
 
Is this true? Hmm, I would guess they've given a ballpark of the specs with PCs since their OS will be Windows 10(?)/DX12 so they don't need to send out too many kits, maybe.
I think it was Tom Warren or Windws Central that said MS sent devkits later than Sony. Also the fact that no XSX devkits have been leaked whereas we have seen multiple PS5 devkits
 
Guys come on that's just a bad idea. As much as I want to see or know more if he does something like that, chances are someone is getting screwed.

So I'm against that.
 
The reason Techland delayed Dying Light 2 is because it ran so poorly on the base Xbox One but yeah Techland is Microsoft now. Remedy and Housemargue are in the final stages of being required by Sony, it's not a done deal just yet.
How would someone working at a third party studio know what studios MS and Sony have acquired...?
 
Guys come on that's just a bad idea. As much as I want to see or know more if he does something like that, chances are someone is getting screwed.

So I'm against that.

giphy.gif
 
so he knows the date of the reaveal because the company he works for will present their game?
that would fit for ubisoft and their relationship to sony.
AC = Assasins Creed ?
 
1.8GCN vs 9.2RDNA you cant make that 5x comparison. For one the ps4 used the much older GCN 1.0 architecture which is less efficient than the GCN used in the much more recent vega cards. The 5700XT(9.7TF~) despite having 33% less stream processors than VEGA7 (13.4TF~) produces similar gaming performance as per digital foundry. Comparing it to GCN 1.0 which first arrived in 2011 in the form of Tahiti and the ps4 was derived from pitcairn which is GCN 1.0. Clock for clock RDNA is around 60% more efficient than GCN 1.0. You would only need around 1TF under RDNA to match the 1.8 of GCN 1.0. A 5x increase you would only need a 5.4TF navi card to match the same performance as a 9TF GCN 1.0 counterpart. To get a 8x increase over GCN1.0 compared to RDNA you would only need a 8.4tf GPU vs a 14.4TF GCN 1.0 GPU.

Someone make sure I've got the numbers right I'm suffering from a migraine.
by that logic, the ps4 was far far more than the 8x increase since the gcn architecture was far more advanced than the rsx architecture in the ps3 gpu and the terascale architecture in the xbox 360 gpu.

those architecture improvements are taken for granted. they were taken for granted when we got mid gen consoles on the polaris architecture which was 25% better than tahiti flops. no one said the ps4 gpu was actually a 5.1 tflops gpu now did they? 25% of 6 tflops is 1.5 tflops. did you hear anyone say the xbox one x was 7.5 tflops? even guys in charge of MS PR like phil spencer didnt do that. hes not doing that for the xbox series x either. a 12 tflops gpu would actually be 18 tahiti tflops. or 20 if we apply your 60% figure. and yet even phil spencer takes those improvements for granted.

so why in the world are doing that? 9.2 tflops would be a 5x increase just like the xbox one was over the 360. no one was out there bigging up GCN efficiencies because those are always taken for granted with every refresh.
 
As long as there isn't any dev's that work in the same company as me then I'll happily share a photo of it 🙂

We're all basement dwelling nerds.. None of us have real jobs or work with you..

Promise.

Don't forget to black out you name and IDs in MS Paint before you upload
 
Holy smokes. There's another new leaker as well as him 3 pages back I saw briefly also saying 'targetting 13'

yes, but at the moment it is very easy to present yourself as a credible insider.

Just build a nice story out of the numbers in the room and act convincingly.

For me its fake unless someone is vetted or can provide a unique proof.
 
Holy smokes. There's another new leaker as well as him 3 pages back I saw briefly also saying 'targetting 13'

Key word there is "new". Like, fresh off the boat new. No longevity rapport, no vetting process clearing and no prior guesses hitting somewhere to being accurate.

...and no avatar? Well we can't trust them yet dude.
 
Last edited:
by that logic, the ps4 was far far more than the 8x increase since the gcn architecture was far more advanced than the rsx architecture in the ps3 gpu and the terascale architecture in the xbox 360 gpu.

those architecture improvements are taken for granted. they were taken for granted when we got mid gen consoles on the polaris architecture which was 25% better than tahiti flops. no one said the ps4 gpu was actually a 5.1 tflops gpu now did they? 25% of 6 tflops is 1.5 tflops. did you hear anyone say the xbox one x was 7.5 tflops? even guys in charge of MS PR like phil spencer didnt do that. hes not doing that for the xbox series x either. a 12 tflops gpu would actually be 18 tahiti tflops. or 20 if we apply your 60% figure. and yet even phil spencer takes those improvements for granted.

so why in the world are doing that? 9.2 tflops would be a 5x increase just like the xbox one was over the 360. no one was out there bigging up GCN efficiencies because those are always taken for granted with every refresh.

best case we are looking at a 7x increase in flops (13 vs 1.84)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom