I don't think that makes sense since the TF's are calculated based on the clock. Therefore per clock and per TF performance comparisons are the same thing. Performance is about 25% better per TF/clock and 50% better per watt, based on AMDs original slides, which what you may be thinking of (and it was something like 120% higher per die area).
I think it's zero. Because the consoles have already a project involving heat, consumption, so I don't see this as possible
wccftech.com
Unless everyone is wrong it has a ~400mm2 APU. Unless they used to die space to make pictures of Felix the Cat it's going to be way above a 9TF chip.
MY theroy was That MS is Using the same chip for Anaconda and Lockhart or XSX can be upgradable by the user
We don't know anything about AMD solution for RT
Probably around 20-30%
That chip very likely includes CPU, GPU and RT cores.
Because back then they came from the Xbox 360 RROD issue, they didn't want to take that risk again and decided to first built it a bit bigger, before going smaller where they did a lot more of internal testing to be sure that it isn't an issue to get a smaller form factor.
More likely 10%.
PS3 super slim was ugly
wccftech.com
Even the Wccftech?
Nintendo did do the expansion pack on N64, so it wouldn't be unprecedented technically. IF they did it, and I highly doubt they will, likely the upgrade options would be very limited, like maybe just 1 option. But it seems like there will be a series of SKUs next gen instead of expandability, at least on the Xbox side.
It's starting to look like a 2021 launch for Sony...
Lol I highly doubt. They reconfirmed at ces few weeks ago
The decision to improve should have come in 2018 (2 years before launch) . But they had seen amd roadmap for RT and gpu and made decision based on that
Fixed
