onesvenus
Member
Yup, credit goes to Dubs from beyond3d forums as beforeCould you post me this too? Thanks a lot.
Playstation 5 [PS5] [Release November 12 2020]
Three more days until embargo is over. Ugh!forum.beyond3d.com
- Status
HeisenbergFX4
Member
Not mind blowing by any means but for a free update that includes a 120 fps option in multiplayer?
Yes please
ethomaz
Banned
Because their making are based in spins... just see the RDNA 2 new last week lol
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
maybe this should prove that 4 tflops simply isnt enough for a next gen console? I mean i have been saying this for well over a year now. And this is a current gen game. Imagine whats going to happen when people try to run the 1440p 30 fps UE5 engine on there.
Going as low as 720P on a next gen console? What the hell??
IntentionalPun
Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
ethomaz
Banned
They are slowing reaching my own measurement near 300mm2 (303 to be exactly).Yup, credit goes to Dubs from beyond3d forums as before
FrankWza
Member
It will be discontinued inside 2 years.
geordiemp
Member
It was also interesting the amount of the visible screen that was a lower actual shader resolution using VRS extensively for that saving 5-12 % saving . Below, the green is half shader resolution
Benefit vs cost and added artefact discussion will be interesting.
Last edited:
kyliethicc
Member
Gonna push the PS5 soon tho
Going as low as 720P on a next gen console? What the hell??
Lysandros
Member
Furthermore PS5 is 'more' than 2.5 times as powerful, XSS has only around 30% of the triangle/rasterization throughput and pixel fill rate of PS5.
You can't be serious?
It's a 4TF console, with less RAM, slower memory, etc. and yet you believe it will start pushing the PS5???
I thought TF was the measurement that counted and now you're saying it does not and it's in all the marvelous features the GPU has that can make up the difference with a GPU that's 2.5 times more powerful?
I, I don't have words for this...
kyliethicc
Member
4K @ 120 FPS tho ? Phil promised. 12 TFlops... fixed frequency.. full powa of game pass cloud x?
so their 4K console can't even average 1800p and their 1440p console is a 720p console. LOL
Just the shaders are half resolution, not the scene.It was also interesting the amount of the visible screen that was a lower actual resolution using VRS extensively for that saving 5-12 % saving . Below, the green is half resolution
Benefit vs cost and added artefact discussion will be interesting.
yewles1
Member
Larger jump than from Morrowind to Oblivion? Shouldn't that be a given considering Oblivion will have been 2 gens ago by the time this arrives?
saintjules
Member
It can still be a removable M.2 NVMe PCI 4.0 SSD with a custom software stack for increased I/O efficiency (think of something like Mantle).
They can always set some minimum requirements for replacing the SSD, just like Sony did for the PS4:
PS4: The Ultimate FAQ – North America
With all eyes on PlayStation 4’s North American launch on November 15th, we wanted to provide definitive answers to your questions, both big and small. This list of Frequently Asked Questions is only a start, as certain details are still being finalized in preparation for launch. We will...blog.us.playstation.com
Getting ready for the PS5 Ultimate FAQ!
Yes
Last edited:
Dodkrake
Banned
Going as low as 720P on a next gen console? What the hell??
Since Xbox Series S > PS5, this is PS5 540p confirmed.
Insane Metal
Member
I agree.
onesvenus
Member
For me the biggest point was when he said: "impressingly it's not something you'll notice during normal play". It seems Tier 2 VRS is really worth it.It was also interesting the amount of the visible screen that was a lower actual shader resolution using VRS extensively for that saving 5-12 % saving . Below, the green is half shader resolution
Benefit vs cost and added artefact discussion will be interesting.
Last edited:
ZywyPL
Banned
Ultra setting are already a waste on PC, let alone on consoles with their limited power budgets, so this is so dumb to even try to "outperform" the PC settings. This game could've easily be 4K60 with a few options tonned down to Medium-High, without any noticeable differences in the visuals.
IntentionalPun
Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
I mean sure.. but what upscaling technique is being used?
Like we are just dismissing games with sub 4k rendering and then throwing around discussion of DLSS but there's no indication any such technique is being used lol
(not that I have an issue with regular dynamic resolution, I'm sure the game looks great at 1800p, but why again is this guy bringing up DLSS?)
yewles1
Member
DF: Gears 5 Upgrades For Xbox Series X Tested - Enhanced Graphics, 120Hz, Lower Latency + More!
SP: dynamic res, 1080p to 2160p, with an average of 1720p MP: 1080p at 120FPS Small dips in FPS but mostly due to bugs which will be fixed with an update Series S will run at dynamic res 720p to 1440p SSGI, several upgrades to shadows, lighting, textures and shaders VRS Tier 2 gives 5 to 12%...www.neogaf.com
geordiemp
Member
Most stuff > 1440p is not noticed during normal gameplay on a 4K screen for a console with modern temporal if your moving and playing. If you stop and analyse details, then whats the difference between 1600p and 1700p is my point or VRS and allot of screen at half shader resolution.
At the end of the day, with my eyes
anything over 1440p with 60 FPS is fine for either console lol, just asking a valid question.
Last edited:
HeisenbergFX4
Member
Whats coming down the pipe with DLSS is amazing.
jose4gg
Member
Damage control, As far as I can tell ( I haven't watched the DF video yet), they aren't claiming to be using any "temporal injection" or ML rescaling, nor have a checkerboarding chip integrated into the console...
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
GreyHand23
Member
PS5 DMC 5
Last edited:
Andodalf
Banned
What?
He's saying Fallout76 -> Starfield is a bigger jump in terms of their tech. Morrowind to Oblivion was one gen, 76 to Starfield is one gen. Not sure what the confusion is?
HeisenbergFX4
Member
In case this wasnt posted earlier
I got the right link added, thanks for those who pointed it out to me
I got the right link added, thanks for those who pointed it out to me
Last edited:
danielJackson
Banned
I wonder if you are serious, because you dont understand what you are talking about or are you just trolling. Because anybody whom understand these things would not think that "rdna2 features magically make 4Tflop machine push 10.2 Tflops machine that is also based on RDNA2, but have more custom silicon so it is not technically full rdna2"
Going as low as 720P on a next gen console? What the hell??
I (and many others) said it months ago:
if game doesnt run(forced native 4k) 4k on series x, it is possible that it runs sub 1080p or even 720p on series s
Feels good to be right, especially after all fucking "full rdna2" and shit that people whom should not have the right to even write about tech because of lack of basic understanding spammed months.
But this is good for xsex owners, at least some devs dont use native 4k to have mercy on series s. Dynamic res is much better option with limited power
duhmetree
Member
It is the future, for at least this generation. I dont know what Sony or Xbox have for super sampling this generation, but lets hope its good.
IMO Dynamic 4K 60 >>>>>> a dulled Native 4k 30
ThaMonkeyClaw
Member
100% agree, after seeing nVidia's DLSS 2.0 in action I am severely impressed how far that tech has come and I can imagine that both the PS5 and XSX will be sporting a similar type of technique for their consoles, which I am totally fine with, in motion you would have to have the vision of an eagle to see the difference.
sircaw
Banned
What do you think its going to be then?
onesvenus
Member
DarkParadise
Member
Imagine you have a PS5 and need Sony to confirm you that the cable is indeed HDMI 2.1. Nice try, guys!
Ramz87
Member
They made a mistake -
HeisenbergFX4
Member
That post aged well.
I added the correct tweet, again thank you guys for pointing it out.
I added the correct tweet, again thank you guys for pointing it out.
Last edited:
ethomaz
Banned
Translate?
BTW Sony already confirmed the bundled cable is HDMI 2.1.
The FUD did not last longer this time.
Last edited:
HeisenbergFX4
Member
Their second post is what I actually meant to include
but it says:
At this point we want to correct the spread of misinformation regarding the HDMI 2.1 cable of the PS5. As Sony confirmed to us, it is an HDMI 2.1 cable. We apologise for the ambiguities. Complete correction
Edit - I wasnt trying to add any FUD btw, I had already told several people here via PMs who asked that it was 2.1
Last edited:
IntentionalPun
Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
For sure.. and for now it's on PC only.
These console games aren't using the technique and we don't know when/if they will. Feel like if I was a twatter personality I'd frame these posts way differently... if you are going to bring up DLSS in relation to a system that currently has no games using the technique perhaps that should be noted, or it should be framed as a when/if scenario.
MistBreeze
Member
is not AMD is working on like DLSS feature it can be used in xbox series x and ps5?
Im sure I read it somewhere....
If this is the case it will help these consoles immensely down the road
BlueHawk357
Member
Think it's going to be 0p on the PS5.
Rea
Member
"There's another phenomenon here, which is called 'race to idle'. Let's imagine we are running at 30Hz, and we're using 28 milliseconds out of our 33 millisecond budget, so the GPU is idle for five milliseconds. The power control logic will detect that low power is being consumed - after all, the GPU is not doing much for that five milliseconds - and conclude that the frequency should be increased. But that's a pointless bump in frequency," explains Mark Cerny.
At this point, the clocks may be faster, but the GPU has no work to do. Any frequency bump is totally pointless. "The net result is that the GPU doesn't do any more work, instead it processes its assigned work more quickly and then is idle for longer, just waiting for v-sync or the like. We use 'race to idle' to describe this pointless increase in a GPU's frequency," explains Cerny.
Read again, nothing i said is wrong. Why would he literally said it's pointless to boost clock then continue to boost his ps5 when "race to idle"? LoL. That's a waste of power and resources.
Edit to spelling:
Last edited:
sircaw
Banned
Come on, it was a genuine question, you called out some other people saying they did not know what they were talking about, give us a proper answer.
Zheph
Member
There will be alternative, checkerboard rendering is one used on PS4 Pro and Sony patented not long ago some solution much closer to DLSS
Sony patents technology similar to DLSS - KitGuru
Nvidia’s DLSS 2.0 has recently overtaken the conversation across the PC gaming sphere thanks to its
www.kitguru.net
MS will have their own separate one via DirectML in my opinion.
IntentionalPun
Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
You need to keep reading that article as he never says this doesn't happen on PS5 dude."There's another phenomenon here, which is called 'race to idle'. Let's imagine we are running at 30Hz, and we're using 28 milliseconds out of our 33 millisecond budget, so the GPU is idle for five milliseconds. The power control logic will detect that low power is being consumed - after all, the GPU is not doing much for that five milliseconds - and conclude that the frequency should be increased. But that's a pointless bump in frequency," explains Mark Cerny.
At this point, the clocks may be faster, but the GPU has no work to do. Any frequency bump is totally pointless. "The net result is that the GPU doesn't do any more work, instead it processes its assigned work more quickly and then is idle for longer, just waiting for v-sync or the like. We use 'race to idle' to describe this pointless increase in a GPU's frequency," explains Cerny.
Read again, nothing i said is wrong. Why would he literally said it's pointless to boost clock then continue to boost his ps5 when "race to idle"? LoL. That's a waste of power and resources.
Edit to spelling:
He's not saying the PS5 doesn't race to idle.. he's saying "when I made my statements about how often the GPU / CPU are at or near max, I was not talking about situations where it was meaningless to have them maxed."
There's literally also no reason NOT to give the CPU or GPU full power during these scenarios.. like at all.. even if you were running on a battery, because you save more power with race to idle than with not racing to idle (hence why it's a power saving technique). He's calling it meaningless from a performance standpoint, he's not declaring the PS5 as not having that power saving technique.
Last edited:
MastaKiiLA
Member
That's fair, and I didn't mean to imply that it was a negative opinion. It's just I've seen so much of that stated in the Dualsense-related threads, that I think it's beating a dead horse at this point.
Bojanglez
The Amiga Brotherhood
Going as low as 720P on a next gen console? What the hell??
Still got that same energy T Tchu-Espresso ?
Last edited:
Epic Sax CEO
Banned
I'm not following the threads, so I have no idea if this was already discussed here.
More than a year ago Microsoft discussed their solution for Image Reconstruction Upscaling using DirectML.
Starts at minute 24.
It's interesting that while doing their research Microsoft working with Nvidia, not with AMD.
Nvidia gave them their "secret sauce", but it's not relevant anymore because by the time it was the original version of DLSS, that gargabe. Since than Nvidia learned with AMD's RIS and changed everything to release DLSS 2.0.
Anyway, you can see that it's just a question of software. Just like you don't need dedicated hardware to do raytracing the additional hardware for ML just speeds the work. Work that can be done with low precision math. There Microsoft explains that their solution uses FP16, and I guess it can be done with INT8 and INT4. Guess what, RDNA1 supports double rate FP16 and quad INT8 and octa INT4. Microsoft talked about customization to improve this and we suppose this means this work can be done across all the CUs, and not limited like it is on RDNA1.
So, Microsoft is working on this for a long time, and because they had to work together with AMD it's safe to assume that AMD's solution will be very similar and use the same hardware optimizations as the SeX.
We can also expect this coming to RDNA1, and because it'll be open source Sony will also probably take advantage of this work if they didn't do their own work to offer the same on the PS5.
All consoles must receive this feature via firmware update next year.
As expected this isn't and Nvidia advantage anymore, it's a new industry standard.
More than a year ago Microsoft discussed their solution for Image Reconstruction Upscaling using DirectML.
Starts at minute 24.
It's interesting that while doing their research Microsoft working with Nvidia, not with AMD.
Nvidia gave them their "secret sauce", but it's not relevant anymore because by the time it was the original version of DLSS, that gargabe. Since than Nvidia learned with AMD's RIS and changed everything to release DLSS 2.0.
Anyway, you can see that it's just a question of software. Just like you don't need dedicated hardware to do raytracing the additional hardware for ML just speeds the work. Work that can be done with low precision math. There Microsoft explains that their solution uses FP16, and I guess it can be done with INT8 and INT4. Guess what, RDNA1 supports double rate FP16 and quad INT8 and octa INT4. Microsoft talked about customization to improve this and we suppose this means this work can be done across all the CUs, and not limited like it is on RDNA1.
So, Microsoft is working on this for a long time, and because they had to work together with AMD it's safe to assume that AMD's solution will be very similar and use the same hardware optimizations as the SeX.
We can also expect this coming to RDNA1, and because it'll be open source Sony will also probably take advantage of this work if they didn't do their own work to offer the same on the PS5.
All consoles must receive this feature via firmware update next year.
As expected this isn't and Nvidia advantage anymore, it's a new industry standard.
Last edited:
Sethbacca
Member
You can't be serious?
It's a 4TF console, with less RAM, slower memory, etc. and yet you believe it will start pushing the PS5???
I thought TF was the measurement that counted and now you're saying it does not and it's in all the marvelous features the GPU has that can make up the difference with a GPU that's 2.5 times more powerful?
I, I don't have words for this...
Their main argument seems to be that frames > every other consideration. A game could be running 300fps@480p on the S and 4k30 on the PS5 and they would consider it an S victory. Dumbestshit ever.
- Status