Rorschach said:It's "blame Kubiak" year every year. And you guys were being chicken littles just last week.
It might be time to fire up the
not so
Rorschach said:It's "blame Kubiak" year every year. And you guys were being chicken littles just last week.
Texans fans are year round chicken littles. This isn't news.Rorschach said:It's "blame Kubiak" year every year. And you guys were being chicken littles just last week.
co sign, im hyped for thatbionic77 said:I don't think I have played my Wii since Galaxy (which was one of the few games this gen that I loved). Occasionally my nephew plays Brawl and some GC games on it but it has been years since I touched it.
Used to play soccer games on the PS3 (soccer is the best videogame sport), but lately it is just a Netflix box.
Skyward Sword is the first game in a long time that I am hyped over. Hopefully it is not a disappointment (like this past season of football).
Miguel said:Texans fans are year round chicken littles. This isn't news.
I do if they are fun to play.Buckethead said:I don't play video games made for little girls.
Your serve.
Spectral Glider said:Yep, I've seen it:
![]()
Spectral Glider said:Yep, I've seen it:
![]()
Alligatorjandro said:That looks like the place Ben assaulted his victims.
overcast said:It can't be said enough how impressive Cam Newton has been this year. I was mocking the pick the whole summer, glad to see him prove me wrong. He's a stud.
Don't have it, what's going on?MWS Natural said:Is anyone watching the NFL network right now??? lol
ExcellentSpectral Glider said:Yep, I've seen it:
![]()
Milchjon said:Any Giants fan up for an avatar bet?
DeaconKnowledge said:I think the most impressive thing about the Patriots' winning is that they haven't lost back to back games since something like 2009.
Sorry Giants fans
NYG @ NE
DeaconKnowledge said:I think the most impressive thing about the Patriots' winning is that they haven't lost back to back games since something like 2009.
Sorry Giants fans
NYG @ NE
bionic77 said:I don't think I have played my Wii since Galaxy (which was one of the few games this gen that I loved). Occasionally my nephew plays Brawl and some GC games on it but it has been years since I touched it.
Used to play soccer games on the PS3 (soccer is the best videogame sport), but lately it is just a Netflix box.
Skyward Sword is the first game in a long time that I am hyped over. Hopefully it is not a disappointment (like this past season of football).
tmdorsey said:Yep, sounds like me. The last time I really played my Wii consistently was when I played through NSMB Wii with my daughter. Since then I've played some Donkey Country Returns here and there.
When Skyward Sword hits though, I'm hitting it hard. 5 years since the last console Zelda game and it's felt like it.
DeaconKnowledge said:I think the most impressive thing about the Patriots' winning is that they haven't lost back to back games since something like 2009.
Sorry Giants fans
NYG @ NE
Xeke said:I'm going to be playing Skyward Sword non-stop.
TheLegendary said:
It's going to be interesting to see how Fewell does this chess match with the NE WR/TE. They like using the combo of Boley-Williams as the nickel backers and as a base against these pass heavy teams. New England should opt to run more, and to their advantage behind Matt Light and at Osi. There's some question marks as to what else happens - having JPP in the ball game, or even Prince (rather than Michael Coe) can pay a big difference.AngmarsKing701 said:My friends are NYG fans. They claim the G-men "match up well" with NE. We'll see, I guess. I think the Pats are gonna be pissed after losing last week.
Didn't realize Jordy was so tall. Damn.eznark said:So many #1 receivers. Remember when yankeehater tried to claim the Eagles receivers were far and away better than the Packers?
lololzorzloloorzsesjojso!!!
I think they are spiraling down too, however I still can't shake the feeling tomorrow's game will be over early. The Giants have been shook by horrible teams this year more than once.Spectral Glider said:My head, and my picks, say NE. But my gut tells me the Pats could be on a downward trend. It's interesting for them with back to back NY teams this week and next. I'm just ticked that I'm going to miss all the afternoon action tomorrow. But I'll be back in time for the all important 8:20 kickoff.
And don't forget Michael Clayton. His impact on the game will be invaluable.Striker said:It's going to be interesting to see how Fewell does this chess match with the NE WR/TE. They like using the combo of Boley-Williams as the nickel backers and as a base against these pass heavy teams. New England should opt to run more, and to their advantage behind Matt Light and at Osi. There's some question marks as to what else happens - having JPP in the ball game, or even Prince (rather than Michael Coe) can pay a big difference.
Offensively I think they will be OK. Brandon can't have those same lapses he had last week. Dropping a pass, almost fumbling an easy handoff, and just looking disinterested. Want the ball? You're going to get it.
Ramses Barden is getting activated off the PUP and will play. Wellington and I were feeling he was coming on last year before getting injured. If the trio is going to be Manningham, Cruz, and Barden it won't be too bad. None of those guys are Nicks, but they'll have to manage. They will need Nicks for the S.F. game, a game that is more important.
Striker said:It's going to be interesting to see how Fewell does this chess match with the NE WR/TE. They like using the combo of Boley-Williams as the nickel backers and as a base against these pass heavy teams. New England should opt to run more, and to their advantage behind Matt Light and at Osi. There's some question marks as to what else happens - having JPP in the ball game, or even Prince (rather than Michael Coe) can pay a big difference.
Offensively I think they will be OK. Brandon can't have those same lapses he had last week. Dropping a pass, almost fumbling an easy handoff, and just looking disinterested. Want the ball? You're going to get it.
Ramses Barden is getting activated off the PUP and will play. Wellington and I were feeling he was coming on last year before getting injured. If the trio is going to be Manningham, Cruz, and Barden it won't be too bad. None of those guys are Nicks, but they'll have to manage. They will need Nicks for the S.F. game, a game that is more important.
And while listening to the radio yesterday while lying down, Jon Ritchie is the biggest moron in ESPN. Guy is such a tool.
Afrikan said:ok anyway....not trying to jinx anything, but Green Bay has a tough schedule...f'n a FUCKIN tough schedule the rest of the season......and the 9ers have a...um an easier schedule? Although anything can happen on any given Sunday.
but yeah, um there is a pretty good chance the 9ers could get home field through out the playoffs. We would just have to win our first playoff game. >_<
seriously though, I'd hate to face Rodgers at home if that were ever the case. Hopefully Green Bay is eliminated before then. (mind you Rodgers is my favorite QB in the league)
You really think home/away matters at this point? You got curb stomped by the Ravens in the playoffs at home, and lost to the Jets last year in the same instance.Tom Penny said:Doesn't matter. A) regular season home game B) NE coming off a loss. Odds are HIGHLY in NE favor. I will say bringing pressure without blitzing is very helpful for the Giants. Barring multi turnovers I don't see NE losing at home coming off a loss.
Striker said:You really think home/away matters at this point? You got curb stomped by the Ravens in the playoffs at home, and lost to the Jets last year in the same instance.
Not saying Giants are going to win, neither. Who the fuck knows at this point. If the game was in Foxboro last week, it wasn't making the Patriots beat the Steelers.Tom Penny said:No I think 31 straight regular season home games for Brady, 18-1 against NFC teams at Gillette and 2 back to back losses for the Patriots in 8 years is a total fluke. To think they aren't highly favored is laughable. Of course they can lose. It just isn't very likely. Period.
Afrikan said:Green Bay
Played; New Orleans, Carolina, Chicago, Denver, Atlanta, St.Louis, Minnesota
Left; San Diego, Minnesota, Tampa Bay, Detroit, New York Giants, Oakland, Kansas City, Chicago, Detroit
Opponent Played Records: 20 - 32 ------ -12
Opponents Left Records: 37 - 27 --------- + 10
Total Records: 57 - 59 ------------------------ +2
:jakncokeTom Penny said:No I think 31 straight regular season home games for Brady, 18-1 against NFC teams at Gillette and 2 back to back losses for the Patriots in 8 years is a total fluke. To think they aren't highly favored is laughable. Of course they can lose. It just isn't very likely. Period.
Wellington said:I was super confident heading into this Patriots game, but with the injuries to our top two skill position players along with our top DLineman, not sure anymore. We'll probably only win by 4.
I want all of our guys back so that we can stomp out the Niners and Niner-GAF forever.
cajunator said::jakncoke
Afrikan said:ok anyway....not trying to jinx anything, but Green Bay has a tough schedule...f'n a FUCKIN tough schedule the rest of the season......and the 9ers have a...um an easier schedule? Although anything can happen on any given Sunday.
but yeah, um there is a pretty good chance the 9ers could get home field through out the playoffs. We would just have to win our first playoff game. >_<
seriously though, I'd hate to face Rodgers at home if that were ever the case. Hopefully Green Bay is eliminated before then. (mind you Rodgers is my favorite QB in the league)
Eh, my Saints lost to the winless Rams TWICE. I'm used to it.Alligatorjandro said:He who loses to the Rams cannot laugh.