• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NFL 2015 Week 3 |OT| - A Fraud Finds His League

E

eznark

Banned
No defensive player got between Rodgers and the line of scrimmage, which I think is the technical definition of "unabated to the quarterback"

I was surprised that play wasn't blown dead though.
 
F

FrenchMovieTheme

Member
Pagusas said:
It means the defensive player has a clear unblocked path to the qb, if that happens the play is called dead to prevent a hard hit on the qb. The poster was wrong though as the defensive player did not have a clear path to Rodgers .
Click to expand...

if the defensive player enters the neutral zone causing an offensive lineman to move before the ball has snapped, it is offsides and the play is over.

if the defensive player enters the neutral zone and no offensive lineman moves, then the ball is snapped, it would be a free play

what i have continuously seen with erron/packers is that the rule isn't applied properly. does it ultimately matter? no, but neither do a lot of the rule applications in the league and they are still applied properly
 
T

TheLegendary

Member
FrenchMovieTheme said:
if the defensive player enters the neutral zone causing an offensive lineman to move before the ball has snapped, it is offsides and the play is over.

if the defensive player enters the neutral zone and no offensive lineman moves, then the ball is snapped, it would be a free play

what i have continuously seen with erron/packers is that the rule isn't applied properly. does it ultimately matter? no, but neither do a lot of the rule applications in the league and they are still applied properly
Click to expand...
You don't understand the NFL.
 
S

squicken

Member
Why not go with Daniel? Alex tried that somewhat downfield throw; it floated badly and should have been picked off. He's not physically capable of making deep throws, and doesn't have Peyton's anticipation or WRs to get by with that
 
E

eznark

Banned
FrenchMovieTheme said:
if the defensive player enters the neutral zone causing an offensive lineman to move before the ball has snapped, it is offsides and the play is over.

if the defensive player enters the neutral zone and no offensive lineman moves, then the ball is snapped, it would be a free play

what i have continuously seen with erron/packers is that the rule isn't applied properly. does it ultimately matter? no, but neither do a lot of the rule applications in the league and they are still applied properly
Click to expand...

The ball was snapped though.
 
T

this_guy

Member
Kansas city wide receivers: 0 receiving yards. Forget touchdowns.

The reason the play wasn't stopped on the offsides call is because the Chiefs player stopped and didn't have a clear path to the qb. They stop the play to protect the qb. If the defensive line jumps offsides against Rodgers they should keep running at him to force the refs to stop the play.
 
C

captive

Joe Six-Pack: posting for the common man
man how awesome would it be to be Bostic today. What? you mean I got traded from the Bears to the Pats?
 
S

ShaneB

Member
Gouty said:
Dont do this. I want to hate you in the MLB thread
Click to expand...

I only hate assholes. You seem alright. Jays/Royals series would be fun.

squicken said:
Why not go with Daniel? Alex tried that somewhat downfield throw; it floated badly and should have been picked off. He's not physically capable of making deep throws, and doesn't have Peyton's anticipation or WRs to get by with that
Click to expand...

I'd be all for it. Chase was fun as hell in the preseason.
 
C

captive

Joe Six-Pack: posting for the common man
the organization paid to represent officials, is defending an official. I for one, am shocked at this revelation.
 
C

Crisco

Banned
captive said:
the organization paid to represent officials, is defending an official. I for one, am shocked at this revelation.
Click to expand...

I dunno, you can pretty clearly see the last thing Hochuli said was "running". Who knows what he said before that, but Cam didn't react until the end. Really no motive for either party here but who knows, maybe Cam just heard wrong.
 
S

Sweeney Tom

Banned
:jnc at people comparing Smith's performance to Kaep's





Kaep and Tomsula take risks. They're still dumb as shit, but Andy Reid and Alex Smith levels? Don't be mean
 
C

captive

Joe Six-Pack: posting for the common man
Crisco said:
I dunno, you can pretty clearly see the last thing Hochuli said was "running". Who knows what he said before that, but Cam didn't react until the end. Really no motive for either party here but who knows, maybe Cam just heard wrong.
Click to expand...

I don't really care, I just like how they reported the NFLRA's statement, as if anyone would expect them to do anything different.


Jesus tap dancing Christ, Alex Smith 2/7.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

NFL 2015 Week 14 |OT| - A Fraud Probably Injures Himself
160 161 162 163 164
8K
268K
Mackenzie 92 replied
NFL 2015 Week 13 |OT| - A Fraud Gorged on Thanksgiving
185 186 187 188 189
9K
315K
The Albatross replied
NFL 2015 Week 10 |OT| - A Fraud is Not Clearly Better Than Blaine Gabbert
192 193 194 195 196
10K
333K
Striker replied
NFL 2015 Week 9 |OT| - A Fraud Had Some Nice Shoes
189 190 191 192 193
10K
318K
MetalFearSolid replied
NFL 2015 Week 8 |OT| - A Fraud Knows What He Likes
221 222 223 224 225
11K
377K
cdyhybrid replied
Top Bottom