• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NFL 2016 Week 10 |OT| - The Dream is Dead.

mreddie

Member
SEE PHILLY, YOU NEEDED TO WIN THE DIVISION GAMES BUT NOOOO

Now you're Homer chasing down everyone else.

giphy.gif
 
I got nothing on how Collins has gotten as good as he has. Eating mountains of crow for hating the pick and doubting the player. I can't remember seeing a player on the Giants jump to such a level after a relatively forgettable first year. It's what you want, but still blown away by it.
 

Draxal

Member
Don't think it's an issue. It's just the fanbase. MetLife has hosted a myriad of concerts with no issues, etc.

It's um.

1. Lack of people, stadium was kinda not filled tonight.

I'm not getting home till 1 am and work is still there. Monday night games sucks for that reason.

2. Stadium is twice the siz of the meadowlands but holds the same amount.
 
Watching that game was painful in another way, I got the Flu everytime i sneeze my entire body hurts, also sleep deprived can't sleep with this flu..
 

Striker

Member
The Giants need to take out the Seahwaks and Patriots. Do that and Eli is a Hall of Famer
Seattle's defense would murder Eli worse than the 2011 Niners did. Hart and Flowerd had solid games but they really need Pugh back. Cruz, too, because Lewis isn't ready.
 

chuckddd

Fear of a GAF Planet
Ron Cook Verified account
‏@RonCookPG

Hearing Cam Heyward's pec injury is not good. Don't be surprised if Mike Tomlin delivers bad news today.

W7zRuVW.gif
 

effzee

Member

Savage.

Love Cris - best commentator/analyst in the biz.

Anyway, Eagles have no shot at the division or wildcard. Even when they have impressive wins, the rest of the division also wins out.

The those terrible losses to Detroit , Dallas, and NY Giants are going to cost them the season. And those losses are all on Doug Pederson.
 

BigAT

Member
Savage.

Love Cris - best commentator/analyst in the biz.

Anyway, Eagles have no shot at the division or wildcard. Even when they have impressive wins, the rest of the division also wins out.

The those terrible losses to Detroit , Dallas, and NY Giants are going to cost them the season. And those losses are all on Doug Pederson.

Doug Pederson threw two terrible passes to gift the Giants a 14-0 lead to start the game?
 

Hindl

Member
Savage.

Love Cris - best commentator/analyst in the biz.

Anyway, Eagles have no shot at the division or wildcard. Even when they have impressive wins, the rest of the division also wins out.

The those terrible losses to Detroit , Dallas, and NY Giants are going to cost them the season. And those losses are all on Doug Pederson.

Wildcard is easily in the plans since the entirety of the NFC North is a dumpster fire, and the NFC South should be right around the Eagles. And he only blew the Dallas game, Wentz spotted the Giants 14 points early and Mathews fumbled the game away in Detroit. Plus, considering we were thinking this was maybe a 6 win team before the season started, I'll gladly take the wildcard
 
Good effort from Newhouse considering he was shifted a lot between LG and jumbo TE.

This is what Eli saw on the decisive third-and-6. Saw LB and S leaving the box, checked to a run. Good blocks by Newhouse and Richburg

CxT9CGOUoAE7TCZ.jpg


DRC only played 14 snaps last night. Wow.
 

gutshot

Member
Wildcard is easily in the plans since the entirety of the NFC North is a dumpster fire, and the NFC South should be right around the Eagles. And he only blew the Dallas game, Wentz spotted the Giants 14 points early and Mathews fumbled the game away in Detroit. Plus, considering we were thinking this was maybe a 6 win team before the season started, I'll gladly take the wildcard

They will likely have to go 10-6 to have a shot at a Wild Card spot since they will probably lose a tiebreaker. Can they go 5-2 the rest of the way? Doubtful. Their offense isn't good enough.

Which is fine, because as you say, this was supposed to be a rebuilding year. So I'll gladly take 8-8 and then look to improve the talent level on offense this offseason and go into next year with much better skill position players and a QB and head coach with one solid season already under their belt.
 
Wildcard is easily in the plans since the entirety of the NFC North is a dumpster fire, and the NFC South should be right around the Eagles. And he only blew the Dallas game, Wentz spotted the Giants 14 points early and Mathews fumbled the game away in Detroit. Plus, considering we were thinking this was maybe a 6 win team before the season started, I'll gladly take the wildcard

Redskins will probably end your playoff hopes for the third straight year.
 

Hindl

Member
They will likely have to go 10-6 to have a shot at a Wild Card spot since they will probably lose a tiebreaker. Can they go 5-2 the rest of the way? Doubtful. Their offense isn't good enough.

Which is fine, because as you say, this was supposed to be a rebuilding year. So I'll gladly take 8-8 and then look to improve the talent level on offense this offseason and go into next year with much better skill position players and a QB and head coach with one solid season already under their belt.

Yeah, but I think we can win out at home. This team is playing differently at home vs the road, and 3 of them are divisional games. We should've pulled out Dallas and Giants, and against Washington that was Big V's first game ever, he's really settled in. The Packers look very beatable too, so I'm going to assume they can sweep at home. Then they would just need 1 road win. Seattle isn't going to happen, especially since it's that time of the year where Russell goes god mode, but I think they could take off a win from either the Ravens or Bengals and sneak in. Though considering how they've played on the road, it'll probably be a 1st round bounce.

But I'm really encouraged but what I've seen this year. An offense devoid of talent outside of Sproles is doing just enough to win when the defense plays well. Bradham, McLeod and Brandon Brooks were all fantastic offseason signings, and even putting Wentz aside the draft class looks pretty good, with potentially 4 starters aside from him. If they can grab a WR in FA and have another draft class like 2016 we'll be in really good shape.

Redskins will probably end your playoff hopes for the third straight year.

Maybe but we'll see. This team just plays differently at home, and our RT isn't the massive liability he was in that game.
 
Yeah, but I think we can win out at home. This team is playing differently at home vs the road, and 3 of them are divisional games. We should've pulled out Dallas and Giants, and against Washington that was Big V's first game ever, he's really settled in. The Packers look very beatable too, so I'm going to assume they can sweep at home. Then they would just need 1 road win. Seattle isn't going to happen, especially since it's that time of the year where Russell goes god mode, but I think they could take off a win from either the Ravens or Bengals and sneak in. Though considering how they've played on the road, it'll probably be a 1st round bounce.

But I'm really encouraged but what I've seen this year. An offense devoid of talent outside of Sproles is doing just enough to win when the defense plays well. Bradham, McLeod and Brandon Brooks were all fantastic offseason signings, and even putting Wentz aside the draft class looks pretty good, with potentially 4 starters aside from him. If they can grab a WR in FA and have another draft class like 2016 we'll be in really good shape.



Maybe but we'll see. This team just plays differently at home, and our RT isn't the massive liability he was in that game.

There's a pretty decent chance that Week 17 could be meaningless for the Cowboys. That being said, you could be facing Tony Romo lmao
 

effzee

Member
Doug Pederson threw two terrible passes to gift the Giants a 14-0 lead to start the game?

Yeah I'll excuse the rookie QB who the dumbass coach keeps pushing to pass all the time.

This past game they actually stuck to running the ball and all 3 backs were heavily involved and they were able to dominate the line of scrimmage. When Pederson goes full Reid with a rookie QB and so so WRs, it doesn't lead to the best results.

Also Wentz threw those picks but the rest of the game was dominated by horrible coaching decisions like going for three 4th downs with some of the most bizarre play calls I have ever seen.
 
Yeah I'll excuse the rookie QB who the dumbass coach keeps pushing to pass all the time.

This past game they actually stuck to running the ball and all 3 backs were heavily involved and they were able to dominate the line of scrimmage. When Pederson goes full Reid with a rookie QB and so so WRs, it doesn't lead to the best results.

Also Wentz threw those picks but the rest of the game was dominated by horrible coaching decisions like going for three 4th downs with some of the most bizarre play calls I have ever seen.

Yeah I cant believe someone actually watched that game and then tried to sick up for dougie. He was terrible and absolutely cost them that game. Giving up points twice on the road against a divisional opponent is fucking crazy. Doug being afraid to kick the Fg against Dallas cost them that game, and him being to aggressive against the Giants cost that game.
 

dionysus

Yaldog
Despite the record, the Saints are now a good team. The offense has always been top 3, but the defense has come a long way in the last few weeks. The main difference has been the return of Dannell Ellerbe to WLB and Breaux and our other 1 and 2nd string corners. It really opens up the defensive play book when you have a linebacker who is good in coverage combined with more reliable corners. I am not saying the Saints defense is even in the top of the league, just that now they are average and have been getting key stops and giving up fewer points per game. There is a huge difference between being the 29th ranked defense and being an average defense.

Coulda woulda shoulda and all that, but the Saints gave up 4 turnovers and still almost won that game. And if you look at that blocked extra point, that was clearly a designed play to cheat and hope you get away with it. The guy lined up opposite the right guard, holds the long snappers head down so the other guy can hurdle him unrestricted. According to NFL rules, that is an illegal by my reading of rule 12 section 1 article 6 or 7. You are not allowed to intentionally contact above the neck area (article 7) or pull a offensive player out of the way so another player can shoot the gap (article 6.)

Too many things have to go right for the Saints to make the playoffs for that to be a likely outcome, but we are a great spoiler team going forward.
 

squicken

Member
At the end of the 2Q, MIN scored TDs on 3 straight drives, throwing for 10-12 for 156 yards. In the 3Q they threw just one pass, a 9 yard completion. Coaching has been doing some bed shitting.

Pretty clear that Zimmer is exerting a lot of influence on his coaches. He wants to run the ball, whether it works or not
 

effzee

Member
Yeah I cant believe someone actually watched that game and then tried to sick up for dougie. He was terrible and absolutely cost them that game. Giving up points twice on the road against a divisional opponent is fucking crazy. Doug being afraid to kick the Fg against Dallas cost them that game, and him being to aggressive against the Giants cost that game.

I don't mind the aggressive calls. I actually prefer going for it and admire that about Doug.

But the calls for those situations were horrendous. 4th and 2 and you run a QB option play? Then run it again later in the game on another 4th down? 4th and 1 and you run a sweep play with Sproles?

That game prior against Dallas, he was afraid to let Sturgis kick a 52 yd fg after he already made a 55 yd kick. Also called like a million bubble screens which Wentz either always throws at the WR feet or over their head. The rare times they connected, the WRs would either lose yards or have no gain. That game reminded me of Todd Pinkston so much :(
 

Farooq

Banned
If Romo is looking better than Dak in practice and the coaches/Jerruh still decide to go with Dak, they are putting a unnecessary ceiling on the season. The better player should play, Romo deserves the opportunity to demonstrate if he is the better QB. Dak is what he is in terms of mechanics. You need an off-season to improve, it is not going to happen mid-season. He is going to still miss with his ball placement, and he is definitely not going to see the field as well as Romo this year, (who knows if he will ever get to Romo's level).

If you are subscribing with the hot hand philosophy, what happens when Dak struggles? You pull him for Romo? Can't play QB looking over your shoulder, bad games happen, and you want to fuck with a young QBs confidence? Pull the kid, tell him "Hey, this team is yours in the future, but right now Romo is the guy. Good job, sit back and learn."
 
If Romo is looking better than Dak in practice and the coaches/Jerruh still decide to go with Dak, they are putting a unnecessary ceiling on the season. The better player should play, Romo deserves the opportunity to demonstrate if he is the better QB. Dak is what he is in terms of mechanics. You need an off-season to improve, it is not going to happen mid-season. He is going to still miss with his ball placement, and he is definitely not going to see the field as well as Romo this year, (who knows if he will ever get to Romo's level).

If you are subscribing with the hot hand philosophy, what happens when Dak struggles? You pull him for Romo? Can't play QB looking over your shoulder, bad games happen, and you want to fuck with a young QBs confidence? Pull the kid, tell him "Hey, this team is yours in the future, but right now Romo is the guy. Good job, sit back and learn."

You have a chance to get Dak extremely valuable playoff experience this year. Cowboys are not a SB team with Romo anyways so it seem crazy to me to pull Dak for him. I really hope that they do it though.
 
If Romo is looking better than Dak in practice and the coaches/Jerruh still decide to go with Dak, they are putting a unnecessary ceiling on the season. The better player should play, Romo deserves the opportunity to demonstrate if he is the better QB. Dak is what he is in terms of mechanics. You need an off-season to improve, it is not going to happen mid-season. He is going to still miss with his ball placement, and he is definitely not going to see the field as well as Romo this year, (who knows if he will ever get to Romo's level).

If you are subscribing with the hot hand philosophy, what happens when Dak struggles? You pull him for Romo? Can't play QB looking over your shoulder, bad games happen, and you want to fuck with a young QBs confidence? Pull the kid, tell him "Hey, this team is yours in the future, but right now Romo is the guy. Good job, sit back and learn."

You spoke about ceilings, Romo is 36 years old and coming of yet another injury. Do you run the risk of taking Dak out, only to put him back in again if Romo gets re-injured? It happened last season..

I know Romo's your guy Farooq, but the reality is Romo may never start in Dallas again.
 

Hindl

Member
If Romo is looking better than Dak in practice and the coaches/Jerruh still decide to go with Dak, they are putting a unnecessary ceiling on the season. The better player should play, Romo deserves the opportunity to demonstrate if he is the better QB. Dak is what he is in terms of mechanics. You need an off-season to improve, it is not going to happen mid-season. He is going to still miss with his ball placement, and he is definitely not going to see the field as well as Romo this year, (who knows if he will ever get to Romo's level).

If you are subscribing with the hot hand philosophy, what happens when Dak struggles? You pull him for Romo? Can't play QB looking over your shoulder, bad games happen, and you want to fuck with a young QBs confidence? Pull the kid, tell him "Hey, this team is yours in the future, but right now Romo is the guy. Good job, sit back and learn."

Agreed. This criticism may be seen as homerish, but Dak has come down to earth in recent weeks. Had Pederson done the smart thing and kicked the FG, Cowboys would've lost the Eagles game, and Tomlin kicking a few of those PATs might've swung the Steelers game. Now, Dak is already better than about half the QBs in the league, but you can see his rookie struggles. They haven't really faced top tier defenses, except against the Eagles where he struggled for most of the game. They'll run into tough defenses in the playoffs. Dak is a great QB already and will only get better in the future, but unless Romo is literally crippled there's no denying Romo is better. Romo would've made several of the throws Dak has missed in recent weeks and they would've beaten the Steelers and Eagles much more comfortably. If they put Romo in I can see them going to the SB and winning. If they stay with Dak they'll eventually hit a wall. Their schedule is very favorable with weak defenses remaining (Vikings notwithstanding but they have no offense), but the playoffs are different.

You have a chance to get Dak extremely valuable playoff experience this year. Cowboys are not a SB team with Romo anyways so it seem crazy to me to pull Dak for him. I really hope that they do it though.

Romo is better than Dak, full stop. Put Romo in and they're going to the SB, however painful it is for me to admit it.
 

Tom Penny

Member
If Romo is looking better than Dak in practice and the coaches/Jerruh still decide to go with Dak, they are putting a unnecessary ceiling on the season. The better player should play, Romo deserves the opportunity to demonstrate if he is the better QB. Dak is what he is in terms of mechanics. You need an off-season to improve, it is not going to happen mid-season. He is going to still miss with his ball placement, and he is definitely not going to see the field as well as Romo this year, (who knows if he will ever get to Romo's level).

If you are subscribing with the hot hand philosophy, what happens when Dak struggles? You pull him for Romo? Can't play QB looking over your shoulder, bad games happen, and you want to fuck with a young QBs confidence? Pull the kid, tell him "Hey, this team is yours in the future, but right now Romo is the guy. Good job, sit back and learn."
You underestimate team chemistry and continuity. Inserting player x and the team gets better is a myth or every free agent and trade would work. Dallas should be looking at the bigger picture of how to sustain success and that picture doesn't have Romo in it.
 
I don't think that there is any doubt that Romo is the better QB, but the team is probably better with Dak. The chemistry and leadership is off the charts.
 
Hindl I just dont see it. Romo is not a playoff guy. He has had a bunch of chances to come up big in the playoffs and for whatever reason he hasnt. This year if you put him in he will have basically not played in almost 2 years. I would worry very much about him being rusty, on top of his age starting to slow him down. As much as I hate to say it i think Jerry is right to stick with Dak.





Hey bionic some good news for you:

The question, then, is what big first-party title will now spearhead the Switch's launch. We've heard the console's new Mario will be ready in time to fill this role.
 

Farooq

Banned
You have a chance to get Dak extremely valuable playoff experience this year. Cowboys are not a SB team with Romo anyways so it seem crazy to me to pull Dak for him. I really hope that they do it though.

They have a chance at having a the best offense Garrett will ever put together. Or they can sacrifice the season to give Dak experience? If we operate under the assumption that the draft is a crapshoot, then what they assembled is rare (hitting on three first round offensive lineman, are you kidding me?). Say they don't ever assemble an offense as talented, do they really want a QB that simply manages the game. Or a QB that can better utilize the talent they assembled.

It is a no brainer if Romo is looking better than Dak.
 

squicken

Member
e: Walsh gone

I don't think that there is any doubt that Romo is the better QB, but the team is probably better with Dak. The chemistry and leadership is off the charts.

I just don't think they can afford to pull him. By all accounts the team has rallied around him, so they have to ride that. I agree with Farooq that they have a higher ceiling with Romo, but esprit de corps and all that
 
Top Bottom