tmdorsey said:*clears throat*
5-1
WTF did we do to you? Are you a Saints fan or something?
HalfPastNoon said:wtf? did the giants get another bye?
guess they need all the help they can get. rofl. anyway, redskins brought out their C game and still held the chicago offense to 160 yards of total offense.
two straight weeks defense hasn't allowed a TD... however, special teams and offense sure likes to give them away.
if the redskins ever get the offense clicking, the NFC east race is over.
... or InjuriesHalfPastNoon said:wtf??? so i'm looking at the NFL standings, and i see carolina's 1-4? how'd that happen; did the cinderella potion all run out or what??
last place for a super bowl team. what's the word i'm looking for....
...
..
.
fluke?
:lol
Shoryuken said:I'm an Eagles fan. I have nothing personal against the Falcons, but if teams that can beat them don't, it makes the race for the best record in the NFC that much tighter. With their schedule right now, it's very possible for them to lose only a couple more games the rest of the season. People say that the Falcons keep getting lucky and that's what worries me. Nobody wants to fuck with a "destiny team".
Sactown said:... or Injuries
God Damn, you're dumb.
Fans show Quinn no mercy
By Adam Caldarelli
ChicagoSports.com
October 17, 2004, 5:15 PM CDT
If you thought the Washington Redskins' defense harassed Jonathan Quinn on
Sunday afternoon, you should've been there when he jogged off the field
after the Bears' 13-10 loss. The fans let him have it with more profanity
than should be allowed in public.
"You suck!" was the nicest thing hurled at Quinn as he left he field. As
the media followed, a fan yelled, "Hey, first question for Quinn: Ask him
why he sucks."
But to answer the question about whether the Bears will change
quarterbacks, the man who will make the call, coach Lovie Smith, wouldn't
say. He did, however, have a tough time defending his quarterback.
"We have to play better at the quarterback position," Smith said. "There's
no way to sugarcoat it. We have to get a profit from that position and we
didn't get that today.
"We all saw the game out there. It was a bad performance. Technical things
need to be worked out; decision-making things need to be worked out. What
do you say when we didn't play well at that position? We can continue to
beat him up. He didn't play well. We all realize he didn't play well. He
has to play better."
That's if he ever plays again for the Bears. In his short time as head
coach, Smith hasn't been afraid to make a change. And he sounded like a
man who had seen enough after watching Quinn complete 10 of 22 passes for
65 yards. In the first half, the offense had two first downs and one was
on a meaningless 23-yard run by Quinn with no time on the clock when he
should've been throwing it up for grabs. The problem is, neither backup
quarterback may be ready.
Welcome and i promptly inserted him into my Fantasy Football Lineup todayMyllz said:You can all officially welcome Willis McGahee into the NFL now.
Start #1 -
26 Carries, 111 Yards.
3 Catches, 31 Yards.
EAJAPAN said:So I wonder how the Colts/Vikings game will turn out in a few weeks....
EAJAPAN said:So I wonder how the Colts/Vikings game will turn out in a few weeks....
As
the media followed, a fan yelled, "Hey, first question for Quinn: Ask him
why he sucks."
Panthers Radio Announcers Drive of the day
I quote
"The bus ride out of this city"
Mrbob said:Are you kidding me? Your team squeked by against a team with a QB who couldn't play for division 3 college school. If Grossman were running the show we would have creamed your team. Thomas Jones ran for 95 yards and the Redskins could stack the line because Quinn couldn't complete a pass. Oh wait I'm sorry he completed 7/17 for 67 yards.
Willco said:They really didn't squeak by and that game wasn't as close as the score. The only touchdown on the Bears side a Jerry Azumah pick returned for a TD.
Thomas Jones only started picking up yardage in the fourth quarter because they did not stack the line. They started dropping safeties back. If you notice, in the fourth quarter, it was the corners who blitzed, if they blitzed at all. That was usually reserved for third down.
I'm sorry the Bears suck against a DEFENSE OF NO-NAMES. Seriously. Our starting DE, DT, OLB, MLB and SS are all out with injuries! The backup SS was out too, so they were forced to start a THIRD-STRING safety! I don't want to hear about any injuries.
Mrbob said:Even the Green Bay Packers or Kansas City Chiefs would look like a team of pro bowlers with Jonathan Quinn at the helm.
It was my mistake in thinking that Quinn could even be just a plain, average, competent QB with two weeks to prepare.
Cloudy said:bettis with another cheap td lol
Willco said:The point is, the Redskins had THIRD-STRINGERS starting on defense. They're without their starting linebackers, half their front line and their secondary is hurt. Fred Smoot even played injured. That was ridiculous.
If that's the best the Bears can do QB-wise, against a banged up defense of no-names, they are in big trouble.
soulja224466 said:well when you only have to go 42 yards, what do you expect?
soulja224466 said:yeah when they're playing against a defense. we have no defense!
soulja224466 said:Tim Brown returns punts? :lol
soulja224466 said:Tim Brown returns punts? :lol