AngmarsKing701
Member
My parents showed me Titanic. The sex scene was awkward.
Dat Kate Winslet titty.
My parents showed me Titanic. The sex scene was awkward.
Per player source,clarification is needed on HRR definition in league proposal,appears in new offer player share is lowered.Also 'salary guarantee/protection',to allow to go from 57% to 50%,means players would likely be paid back by themselves,out of their share in the future.Possibility a guy could retire,and players still playing, would be bearing burden to pay him back
Clarification between NHL and NHLPA will come by phone Wednesday and they will meet in person in Toronto on Thursday
Aaron Ward ‏@aaronward_nhl
Even IF the NHL clarified everything, I can't imagine most of the players being smart enough to even understand any of it. Their job is to skate and shoot pucks into nets, not to crunch numbers and make business deals.Aaron Ward ‏@aaronward_nhl
Hey look, the players are complaining again.
You guys are lucky you had parents who taught you in the ways of hockey.
I had to raise and teach myself on hockey since my parents don't give a damn about hockey.
Had to teach my little brother too.
Dark days.
$30 is a lot of money when you only make a minimum of $550k per year.Hey guys
Hey guys
If the NHL goes over by 3% this year
That means over 6 years the players cover .5% per year
if someone retires they may have to cover it!!!
That's about $22,000 share per player per year
Or about $30 per player per year for every player that retires
Yep. They're bitching about $30.
whoops
They're basically the same at this point. Posters impotently arguing about two wealthy men deciding what's best for millions of people with a good chance that things will still be just as depressing come November.I'm not sure what's more insulting.
Zedge confusing Furry-GAF for NHL-GAF.
or Soc confusing NHL-GAF for Poli-GAF.
Guns are badDang it Soc, this is a political free zone!
More on NHL offer: calls for 2012-13 salary cap of $59.9 million but teams can go over up to $70.2 million in Year 1 as part of transition
More on NHL Rev Sharing. Pool will be determined yearly by a Revenue Sharing Committee. The NHLPA will have representation and input.
NHL proposal includes changes to supplemental discipline appeal process. A “neutral” third-party arbitrator is being offered.
Sounds great.Guns are bad
Evolution is real
Gay marriage everywhere
Abortions for everyone
Miniature flag pins for no one
Are current contracts going to be grandfathered in or rollbacked caphit wise? Because the Wild are going to be fucked in 2013-2014 with half of their cap ($30m) devoted to 4 players...Pierre LeBrun ‏@Real_ESPNLeBrun
More on NHL offer: calls for 2012-13 salary cap of $59.9 million but teams can go over up to $70.2 million in Year 1 as part of transition
Darren Dreger ‏@DarrenDreger
More on NHL Rev Sharing. Pool will be determined yearly by a Revenue Sharing Committee. The NHLPA will have representation and input.
Sounds like a pretty solid offer, can't wait to see what Krys Barch thinks about it.
Guns are bad
Evolution is real
Gay marriage everywhere
Abortions for everyone
Miniature flag pins for no one
Are current contracts going to be grandfathered in or rollbacked caphit wise? Because the Wild are going to be fucked in 2013-2014 with half of their cap ($30m) devoted to 4 players...
I wonder what Kessel thinks about all this.
I wonder what Kessel thinks about all this.
I wonder what Kessel thinks about all this.
"huh huh....I don't know...whatever...don't worry about it"
"huh huh....I don't know...whatever...don't worry about it"
No more re-entry waivers
$5 mil max cap trade per team per year $3 mil per contract (or 50% AAV... Whichever is lower)
... 'hey are you gonna finish that donut ?"
Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie
One of most interesting aspects of NHL proposal is aimed at punishing clubs more than players, with regard to existing back-diving deals.
Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie
Any existing deal in excess of 5 yrs would carry cap hit in every year of contract, even if player were to retire with year(s) left.
Sounds like it's not grandfathered, teams with long contracts are going to have to bend over.
......Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie
One of most interesting aspects of NHL proposal is aimed at punishing clubs more than players, with regard to existing back-diving deals.
Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie
Any existing deal in excess of 5 yrs would carry cap hit in every year of contract, even if player were to retire with year(s) left.
Sounds like it's not grandfathered, teams with long contracts are going to have to bend over.
By the time these contracts are up, those cap hits will be nothing.Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie
One of most interesting aspects of NHL proposal is aimed at punishing clubs more than players, with regard to existing back-diving deals.
Bob McKenzie ‏@TSNBobMcKenzie
Any existing deal in excess of 5 yrs would carry cap hit in every year of contract, even if player were to retire with year(s) left.
Sounds like it's not grandfathered, teams with long contracts are going to have to bend over.
Sorry I lied. Important note on back-diving contracts (BDC). If player traded, then later in deal retires, original club on hook for cap hit
Pierre LeBrun ?@Real_ESPNLeBrun
Darren Dreger ?@DarrenDreger
Sounds like a pretty solid offer, can't wait to see what Krys Barch thinks about it.
No more Shanabans ?
I said they'd fight a 50/50 split, which they are, but the salary protections should put this one over the top. And honestly if we get 82 games I'm claiming a "pretty much correct" stance on that second one.
Wait.... you seriously believe accepting a salary cap wasn't a major concession? They were the first major league to adopt one if I remember correctly... That's HUGE. Right now I think they get like 57% of revenues. Profits are still rising rapidly. I see no reason they shouldn't be able to extract .5% or something.
I actually appreciate it. I knew bruce was full of shit, but all I could muster was an lol.Fei said:Hate to go all Socreges here but
He's on a 35+ contract already so his cap hit isn't going away no matter what.For perspective, some contracts that could potentially fuck their teams if that detail goes through:
Luongo will be 42 in his last year
Bryz will be 39
Kovalchuk will be 41
Lecavalier will be 39
Ehrhoff will be 38 (most likely to reach the end of the contract)
Hossa will be 42
Zetterberg will be 40
Pronger will be 42 (might retire soon, too)
Richards will be 39
I actually appreciate it. I knew bruce was full of shit, but all I could muster was an lol.
The lockout takes its toll on all of us.
....so this is why Burke hasn't done anything
....so this is why Burke hasn't done anything
Tyler Myers and Ehrhoff could combine for a $20M cap hit next year. Ville Leino's cap hit could go up to $6M last year. That's almost half the proposed cap for the year. Hahahaha fuck this cancel the season. My god.
Burke must have seen this coming for years if that's your measure!