From Bob's article on the Kadri-Sedin/rule controversy:
http://www.tsn.ca/problem-isn-t-with-nhl-dops-it-s-the-rulebook-1.602168
Interesting tidbit:
"But the Kadri hit on Sedin may be the catalyst to bring about some converts to the anti-blindside bandwagon.
I know now of
at least 10 NHL GMs who think Rule 48 should be re-worded to make Kadri on Sedin and/or Malone on Foligno an illegal hit."
and on the other end
"One GM said he'd rather do away with Rule 48 entirely -- basically, keep your head up, fellas -- than modify it in any way."
I wonder who that one GM was...... MIKE IS THAT YOU
I wish Bob had brought up the Torres on Stoll hit though, which was also a "glancing the shoulder, principal point of impact the head" hit, same as Kadri-on-Daniel. This way the argument is just about what the first touch was, not what the MAIN impact was, which unquestionably was the head.