brap
Banned
Big dick badasses who like to have fun and fuck grown adults instead of kids? Sounds about right.Ah, well that explains this thread in a nutshell. NeoGAF continues to be ResetERA's polar opposite.
Big dick badasses who like to have fun and fuck grown adults instead of kids? Sounds about right.Ah, well that explains this thread in a nutshell. NeoGAF continues to be ResetERA's polar opposite.
Ah, well that explains this thread in a nutshell. NeoGAF continues to be ResetERA's polar opposite.
Fuck off with this retarded shit. I guess nobody can complain about censorship since we can't read the creators mind.
That isn't true at all. If that were the case the original JPN version would have never existed.Regardless Nintendo's hands are tied. The game features material owned by Atlus and Intelligent Systems.
Even if they wanted to release the game uncensored, they can't just do it.
That isn't true at all. If that were the case the original JPN version would have never existed.
Like many people said, it’s probably cost saving and all. It will be easier for them to just work on one version over the other. They could’ve done it though if they wanted. There have been quite a few games in the switch era that have not had a universal release. Xenoblade 2 comes to mind where the Japanese version doesn’t have English for example.Why Nintendo just launch the game in 2 versions like Resident evil 2 remake.
A censored and uncensored version.. or at least put like N64 resident evil 2... you choose the option to put censored or not.
How so? The original version is the Japanese version. Intelligent Systems and Atlus have never been the type to censor things themselves. So did makes no sense to me.The original JPN version had to be approved through all parties involved..
The game isn't Nintendo's property alone.
Weird I thought it did.Like many people said, it’s probably cost saving and all. It will be easier for them to just work on one version over the other. They could’ve done it though if they wanted. There have been quite a few games in the switch era that have not had a universal release. Xenoblade 2 comes to mind where the Japanese version doesn’t have English for example.
it’s still incredibly silly that the game has to have these changes made to it in the first place. probably the tamest game I’ve seen get so much unnecessary censorship.
Like many people said, it’s probably cost saving and all. It will be easier for them to just work on one version over the other. They could’ve done it though if they wanted. There have been quite a few games in the switch era that have not had a universal release. Xenoblade 2 comes to mind where the Japanese version doesn’t have English for example.
it’s still incredibly silly that the game has to have these changes made to it in the first place. probably the tamest game I’ve seen get so much unnecessary censorship.
Translation: “Just listen and believe because I have no evidence to back my outrageous claims”
How so? The original version is the Japanese version. Intelligent Systems and Atlus have never been the type to censor things themselves. So did makes no sense to me.
Weird I thought it did.
XC2 gives you the optional JPN audio as free dlc.
That poorly added on smog effect.
I think it’s probably a lot of things. Absolutely ESRB fears probably played a factor, as even monster boobs were censored. I’m sure the YouTube and the extremely vocal minority crowd were something they were worried about too. So they went out of their way to change things.You think this censored thing is because Youtubers or old man of ESRB? Or why this generation in a short time give this all crap of censored things?
Did you actually play the game before calling it “garbage”? Also I’m sure you yourself don’t like see your favourite game get censored, people have right get upset about seeing their games get censored.What does that say about the game if the fanbase isn't buying this because of a bit less fan service? I don't know how you take awesome properties like smt and fire emblem and end up with garbage like this. Hope we never see this game again after this
Translation: “I’m full of shit and have absolutely no sound arguments, so all I can do is continue to poison the well”.Just give it a shot. What do you have to lose? Worst case scenario you stop being a weeb and actually get a chance to reproduce.
So tell me, o’omnipotent one, what was the purpose of removing the hip bones or outright, butchering story content?Artistic freedom is an important point that too often goes neglected in these debates.
Changes that APPEAR to be censorship, may or may not have been actually intended for the purpose of censorship.
The bizarre thing is, when you start the actual boss fight, they remove the fog effect, and the edit to her attire is actually pretty decent!
Yes the censorship in TMS#FE is very bizarre. Even the bikini cloth they censored still exists in NA version, you just see it when you use Tsubasa’s Ad-lib Performance.This damned game is so bloody confusing at this point.
So tell me, o’omnipotent one, what was the purpose of removing the hip bones or outright, butchering story content?
Or perhaps, it is censorship by virtue of what artistic freedom is and Occam’s Razor.
OK. I'd say the original development team making a questionable decision is the simplest explanation.
No outside party has claimed responsibility for meddling with the game.
I think this game is cleary passion project by Atlus Dev studio 1 and been developed for Japanese market first which it's ok considering the theme of the game but they fail to consider this game will be buchered by western localization staff because there are some element potentially can spark some outrage in the west.OK. I'd say the original development team making a questionable decision is the simplest explanation.
No outside party has claimed responsibility for meddling with the game.
I don't understand what you're trying to say here.
Are you expecting an "outside party" to make a public post someday claiming that they somehow directly altered the game?
That's not how this works. Japanese companies, when bringing over games to North America will sometimes remove or change elements of the game because they want to reduce the backlash they are going to get from certain groups, which for a long time was outraged Christians/Catholics until recently when the source of the outrage changed position.
There's a long history of this spanning decades. No single party or person can individually claim responsibility here. I imagine that they make a judgement over whether or not keeping the game intact will potentially lead to some bad PR and go from there.
Like I mentioned before, you can generally tell why a company changed something based on the changes themselves. If the changes are focused on covering the skin of female characters for example, then it's obvious who exactly their trying to avoid the ire of. Especially when they make statements alluding to.
The last Switch first party game which have different version is XB2 AFAIK after that all is one global version: 3H, AC, SMO, LA, SMM2, MUA3, LM3 etc so no this is not because Nintendo just simply cheapen out but there are some changes in how they develop their first party games lately.Like many people said, it’s probably cost saving and all. It will be easier for them to just work on one version over the other. They could’ve done it though if they wanted. There have been quite a few games in the switch era that have not had a universal release. Xenoblade 2 comes to mind where the Japanese version doesn’t have English for example.
it’s still incredibly silly that the game has to have these changes made to it in the first place. probably the tamest game I’ve seen get so much unnecessary censorship.
The last Switch first party game which have different version is XB2 AFAIK after that all is one global version: 3H, AC, SMO, LA, SMM2, MUA3, LM3 etc so no this is not because Nintendo just simply cheapen out but there are some changes in how they develop their first party games lately.
Why Nintendo just launch the game in 2 versions like Resident evil 2 remake.
A censored and uncensored version.. or at least put like N64 resident evil 2... you choose the option to put censored or not.
I think it's xenophobia.
They do not censor Mortal Kombat, but they do censor Final Fantasy VIII.
They don't censor The last of Us Part II ... but Devil May cry 5.
Hypocrisy in Western culture
But meddling did occur regardless and by a certain party. Therefore, the original artistic intent was altered in a way that was (1) condescending to the target audience and (2) butchered story content.OK. I'd say the original development team making a questionable decision is the simplest explanation.
No outside party has claimed responsibility for meddling with the game.
But meddling did occur regardless and by a certain party. Therefore, the original artistic intent was altered in a way that was (1) condescending to the target audience and (2) butchered story content.
You can make whatever semantic argument you like, but if the original vision is altered and bastardized, that is censorship.
But then you need to prove that the alterations were done by choice, not to mention that the choice was done with independent autonomy and not because someone else told the creators to do so.Altering one's own work by choice isn't meddling, but it is censorship when censorship is the goal.
But then you need to prove that the alterations were done by choice, not to mention that the choice was done with independent autonomy and not because someone else told the creators to do so.
Fact of the matter is, the original vision was heavily butchered. By virtue of Occam’s Razor, there was meddling as Nintendo has not made any viable arguments justifying those changes.
But the claim that is censorship makes more sense due to Occam’s Razor. In addition, your argument that the changes are not censorship because the intent behind the changes were not for censorship falls flat in two ways.But that can be argued from either point of view. There is no proof to substantiate that Nintendo asked, or didn't ask, for the changes.
But the claim that is censorship makes more sense due to Occam’s Razor. In addition, your argument that the changes are not censorship because the intent behind the changes were not for censorship falls flat in two ways.
For one thing, it’s a Denying the Antecedent fallacy. Secondly, censorship does not necessarily need intent by definition. People who censor usually do not admit they did the censorship. They tend to justify it with dubious reasons like “Think of the children” to make the censorship look less bullshitty.
And yet Endless Fluff says that the designer was disappointed about the changes he had to make, so your claims that Nintendo gets “undue blame” is unsound. If it was Atlus’s doing, then similar cases would’ve been documented from their other games.If you want me to call it censorship, so be it.
I will not, however, stoop to casting undue blame on Nintendo.
Obviously they did see and permit the changes. Whether they requested them was left deliberately ambiguous (as Endless Fluff says).
Funny news, Japanese gamers are now buying a lot of the uncensored Wii U version of the game instead of the Switch version
Amazon.co.jp 売れ筋ランキング: Wii Uゲームソフト の中で最も人気のある商品です
Amazon.co.jp 売れ筋ランキング: Wii Uゲームソフト の中で最も人気のある商品ですwww.amazon.co.jp
Funny news, Japanese gamers are now buying a lot of the uncensored Wii U version of the game instead of the Switch version
Amazon.co.jp 売れ筋ランキング: Wii Uゲームソフト の中で最も人気のある商品です
Amazon.co.jp 売れ筋ランキング: Wii Uゲームソフト の中で最も人気のある商品ですwww.amazon.co.jp
If you want me to call it censorship, so be it.
I will not, however, stoop to casting undue blame on Nintendo.
Obviously they did see and permit the changes. Whether they requested them was left deliberately ambiguous (as Endless Fluff says).
Also AFAIK the sales ratio of the Wii U ver is like 1:8 with heavily favor the overseas (english) one so unfortunately when only can choose one, they just simply decided: "ah, lets port the most sold one"It's great to make raunchy games. They have as much place as any.
Alas, games produced for a global market don't enjoy that luxury. Studios who set out to sell their game to the masses worldwide must accept that standards vary and integrate it into the creation process.
The train of thought makes Tokyo Mirage Sessions all the more baffling. It's rarely particularly objectionable viewed in context of the material.
A niche game to boot.