Is it? All I see is the UPC symbol.
Another picture. I don't want to post it
Is it? All I see is the UPC symbol.
Well, I don't know where hihoptherobot lives, because this is mostly governed by state criminal law, but in my state, there are penal codes/statutes regarding the receipt/purchase of stolen property. There is an intent requirement (meaning that the person receiving/buying the property must know it was stolen) and it is somewhat difficult to prove, but you can infer it through circumstances, such as the fact that it was bought two weeks ahead of time, where it was bought from (i.e., not a licensed seller, etc.). It would probably be difficult to prove for a prosecutor to pursue criminal charges in court and win, but either way, a defendant's going to rack up bills fighting it.
In terms of civil litigation, I'm not sure what Nintendo's rights are, but it seems to me that the prudent thing to do is just give the console back to them, rather than incur legal expenses.
tldr; Both sides probably made the smart decision here to avoid the worst outcome.
Oh the horror. Someone saw a console UI two weeks before launch. Whatever will we all do?
Is this your first console launch? It happens every time and no one cares once the thing is out.
Ohhhhh, is this why he didnt want this thread made?
Man we are going down the rabbit hole.
He always mentioned he would sell it because of his financial situation currently. But that was before the possibility that it was a stolen unit. Hiphop was assuming he got an early shipment.
Thanks!
Ah okay, yeah that's a bad mistake. I was wondering earlier how Nintendo was able to identify the unit and if this is the case, it now makes sense.Another picture. I don't want to post it
So it seems hiphoptherobot is the actual thief. Wow, HHR, how low can you go, try to say"i boutght it off a retailer to I bought it from someone, to I bought it from someone shady to now you were the actual thief. You deserve jailtime for sure. Hope that 15 min fame was worth it being behind bars.
Yeah, Im honestly thinking of selling it. I am selling my house in a couple weeks and repairs that the buyer requested are draining my bank account quickly. But I will take some videos in a few minutes.
This. Stop being an angry mob pls and thank youHe always mentioned he would sell it because of his financial situation currently. But that was before the possibility that it was a stolen unit. Hiphop was assuming he got an early shipment.
So it seems hiphoptherobot is the actual thief. Wow, HHR, how low can you go, try to say"i boutght it off a retailer to I bought it from someone, to I bought it from someone shady to now you were the actual thief. You deserve jailtime for sure. Hope that 15 min fame was worth it being behind bars.
Why are people amazed that he tried to sell it? If I had a Switch this early, and didn't know it was stolen, I would consider selling it, because you could get quite a lot of money selling a physical Switch at this point. Admittedly, it would have been worth more before the videos were released of it.
He always mentioned he would sell it because of his financial situation currently. But that was before the possibility that it was a stolen unit. Hiphop was assuming he got an early shipment.
Ah okay, yeah that's a bad mistake. I was wondering earlier how Nintendo was able to identify the unit and if this is the case, it now makes sense.
That's not how this works.What the hell? How can Nintendo even do this? And not even paying the man back his money?
Mind you, we're working off incomplete information and there's a lot of filling in the blanks going on here.
So some people want to throw HHR in jail? Awkward.
Yeah, Im honestly thinking of selling it. I am selling my house in a couple weeks and repairs that the buyer requested are draining my bank account quickly. But I will take some videos in a few minutes.
So it seems hiphoptherobot is the actual thief. Wow, HHR, how low can you go, try to say"i boutght it off a retailer to I bought it from someone, to I bought it from someone shady to now you were the actual thief. You deserve jailtime for sure. Hope that 15 min fame was worth it being behind bars.
Apparently he tried to sell it on reddit
![]()
https://www.reddit.com/r/NintendoSw...ndo_has_taken_back_the_leaked_switch_console/
Apparently he tried to sell it on reddit
![]()
https://www.reddit.com/r/NintendoSw...ndo_has_taken_back_the_leaked_switch_console/
where did you read that?So some people want to throw HHR in jail? Awkward.
This. Stop being an angry mob pls and thank you
How does him wanting to sell it mean he stole it? lol WAT...you guys...
It's 2 weeks before launch, he'd get a lot more than he paid for it.
How does him wanting to sell it mean he stole it? lol WAT...you guys...
It's 2 weeks before launch, he'd get a lot more than he paid for it.
"What could go wrong?"Apparently he tried to sell it on reddit
![]()
https://www.reddit.com/r/NintendoSw...ndo_has_taken_back_the_leaked_switch_console/
What the fuck is this shit?
People on GAF were telling him to sell it when he first posted about it. So what if he did? IF he didn't know it was stolen, then how is he now the thief for selling it to pay for bills like he clearly said he was considering a
There's nothing particularly shady about him trying to sell it. Both here and in that interview article he said he might sell it since there was nothing he could do with it right now and needed the money for expenses.
Well, I don't know where hihoptherobot lives, because this is mostly governed by state criminal law, but in my state, there are penal codes/statutes regarding the receipt/purchase of stolen property. There is an intent requirement (meaning that the person receiving/buying the property must know it was stolen) and it is somewhat difficult to prove, but you can infer it through circumstances, such as the fact that it was bought two weeks ahead of time, where it was bought from (i.e., not a licensed seller, etc.). It would probably be difficult to prove for a prosecutor to pursue criminal charges in court and win, but either way, a defendant's going to rack up bills fighting it.
In terms of civil litigation, I'm not sure what Nintendo's rights are, but it seems to me that the prudent thing to do is just give the console back to them, rather than incur legal expenses.
tldr; Both sides probably made the smart decision here to avoid the worst outcome.
I barely post here. The ones out of touch with reality are the dudes worrying about Nintendo getting bad press.
There's nothing particularly shady about him trying to sell it. Both here and in that interview article he said he might sell it since there was nothing he could do with it right now and needed the money for expenses.